[00:00:00 - 00:00:04] To the Caribbean and the US Virgin Islands south into South America [00:00:04 - 00:00:11] North to the pole and worldwide on the internet. This is coast to coast a.m. Good morning, everybody [00:00:11 - 00:00:16] I'm art Bell and in the continuing adventure into the unknown [00:00:16 - 00:00:19] uncharted territories [00:00:19 - 00:00:21] of the human mind [00:00:21 - 00:00:29] We're going to be departing a little in a way this night and interviewing a very [00:00:29 - 00:00:33] very unusual individual on the Big Island of Hawaii [00:00:33 - 00:00:36] named Terrence McKenna [00:00:36 - 00:00:39] Who is Terrence McKenna? [00:00:39 - 00:00:46] Well among other things he's probably the successor to Timothy Leary [00:00:46 - 00:00:53] And that may not be the focus or it may turn into the focus of the interview I don't know [00:00:53 - 00:00:55] And I don't care. He also [00:00:57 - 00:00:59] Has a lot of very interesting views on time [00:00:59 - 00:01:03] And what we are approaching [00:01:03 - 00:01:08] We'll talk about all that with Terrence McKenna very interesting [00:01:08 - 00:01:15] Fellow in a moment as matter of fact he had to come down. Oh, we'll find out about that from a very obscure location [00:01:15 - 00:01:24] All right, this should be most interesting first, let us see if we can establish contact Terrence McKenna, are you there? [00:01:24 - 00:01:30] Hmm. I am art. Good evening. How are you? Well, I'm just fine and I hope you hear me. I hear you. Okay [00:01:30 - 00:01:34] Yes, I hear you fine. All right, you are [00:01:34 - 00:01:40] You're on the Big Island of Hawaii. Is that right? That's right. Now when I called you the other day [00:01:40 - 00:01:48] You were way up in an area where your only contact with the outside world was by cellular telephone [00:01:48 - 00:01:51] Where do you actually live on a mountain somewhere? [00:01:51 - 00:01:56] I live up on the slopes of the world's largest volcano [00:01:56 - 00:02:01] Which is Mauna Loa and when you called me the other day, we mutually agreed [00:02:01 - 00:02:04] My cell phone is not ready for prime time [00:02:04 - 00:02:13] So I came off the mountain I do have up there a 128k connect to the internet that [00:02:13 - 00:02:16] wireless 40 miles through the air [00:02:17 - 00:02:23] But my phones are not so good so I came down off the mountain to talk to you this evening [00:02:23 - 00:02:27] Well, if it were not for the delay, I would say an internet phone [00:02:27 - 00:02:31] We could have done the interview by internet phone, but you have that little delay there that makes it hard [00:02:31 - 00:02:35] So I think we've done the right thing. Anyway, so you're off your mountain project by the way [00:02:35 - 00:02:41] Terrence what's it like living on the side of an active volcano? [00:02:43 - 00:02:50] Well, it's it's very exciting actually, I don't know who's ever been out to the big island but no I have not [00:02:50 - 00:02:57] People think of Hawaii is swaying palms and endless beaches what we have out here are [00:02:57 - 00:03:03] Lava fields and fourteen thousand foot mountains on this island two of them [00:03:03 - 00:03:06] one the world's largest [00:03:06 - 00:03:11] volcano the world's largest mountain in terms of volume and the other one just [00:03:12 - 00:03:14] hundreds or so feet shorter, so [00:03:14 - 00:03:22] They are they we've got quite a dramatic landscape out here. Is there any possibility that that volcano? [00:03:22 - 00:03:25] Will actually blow [00:03:25 - 00:03:29] Well, it's been in continuous eruptions for the past 13 years [00:03:29 - 00:03:38] But over on the other side about 70 miles away on on the what's called the helo or the west side [00:03:38 - 00:03:41] So we sort of feel pretty safe out here [00:03:41 - 00:03:49] There is some talk they had a meeting of the International Geophysical Congress a couple of years out here [00:03:49 - 00:03:51] There is large-scale [00:03:51 - 00:03:59] Destabilization that goes on periodically in these islands big undersea landslides that produce local [00:03:59 - 00:04:04] Tsunami but in an effort to escape human created [00:04:04 - 00:04:06] catastrophe and confusion [00:04:06 - 00:04:13] I'm betting that I can eke out 50 years on this island and slide through in good shape [00:04:13 - 00:04:17] Well, it's probably a pretty good bet actually in the long [00:04:17 - 00:04:22] I think so I I think Hawaii if the world flies to pieces [00:04:22 - 00:04:26] It'll be a very good place to be and if the world doesn't fly to pieces [00:04:26 - 00:04:32] It's a pretty good place to be and if the volcano should totally blow up. It's a painless death [00:04:32 - 00:04:34] That's right [00:04:35 - 00:04:38] Dramatic one and a dramatic one as well. That's right [00:04:38 - 00:04:41] All right [00:04:41 - 00:04:47] You have a theory about time time actually parents is one of my favorite all-time [00:04:47 - 00:04:52] Topics so what before we launch into what you think about time? [00:04:52 - 00:04:56] Tell me what you think time is in other words is [00:04:56 - 00:04:58] time [00:04:58 - 00:05:01] our invention or is time a [00:05:01 - 00:05:08] Real thing that we I mean I realize we're measuring it but in the cosmic scheme of things [00:05:08 - 00:05:10] Is there really time? [00:05:10 - 00:05:17] Yeah, I mean you give me a perfect entree to launch into this thing [00:05:17 - 00:05:22] See in the West we have [00:05:22 - 00:05:25] inherited from Newton [00:05:25 - 00:05:28] What is called the idea of pure duration? [00:05:28 - 00:05:34] Which is simply the time is sort of a place where things are placed [00:05:34 - 00:05:42] So that they don't all happen at once in other words, it's viewed as quality list. It's a it's an abstraction [00:05:42 - 00:05:51] In fact, I think when we carry out a complete analysis of time what we're going to discover is that like? [00:05:51 - 00:05:53] matter [00:05:53 - 00:05:56] Time is composed of elemental [00:05:56 - 00:05:58] discrete [00:05:58 - 00:06:00] type [00:06:00 - 00:06:02] You know all matter [00:06:02 - 00:06:09] Organic and inorganic is composed of a hundred and four a hundred and eight elements. There's argument [00:06:09 - 00:06:13] Time on the other hand is thought to be this featureless [00:06:13 - 00:06:19] quality list medium, but in fact as we experience it as [00:06:19 - 00:06:22] living feeling creatures [00:06:22 - 00:06:30] Time has qualities there are times where everything seems to go right and everything seems to go wrong. That's true [00:06:30 - 00:06:34] Adurance that's absolutely true [00:06:34 - 00:06:40] I've wondered about that all my life. There are periods of time where in effect you can do no wrong [00:06:40 - 00:06:46] And and other periods of time where you can do no right no matter what you do [00:06:46 - 00:06:51] Well, so when looking at this I created a vocabulary [00:06:51 - 00:06:57] Actually, I borrowed it from Alfred North Whitehead, but I I think I'm on to something [00:06:57 - 00:07:00] which science has missed and [00:07:00 - 00:07:10] It's this it's that the the universe or a human life or an empire or an ecosystem [00:07:10 - 00:07:15] Any large scale or small scale process? [00:07:15 - 00:07:22] Can be looked upon as a kind of a dynamic struggle between two qualities, which I call [00:07:22 - 00:07:28] Habit and novelty and I think they're pretty self-explanatory [00:07:28 - 00:07:35] I'm sorry habit and what novelty novelty novelty and habit is simply [00:07:35 - 00:07:38] repetition of established pattern [00:07:38 - 00:07:40] conservation [00:07:41 - 00:07:48] Holding back what has already been achieved into a system and novelty is the chance-taking [00:07:48 - 00:07:52] exploratory the new the never before seen and [00:07:52 - 00:07:55] These two qualities [00:07:55 - 00:08:01] Habit and novelty are locked in all situations in a kind of struggle [00:08:01 - 00:08:08] But the good news is that if you look at large scales of time [00:08:09 - 00:08:17] Novelty is winning and this is the point that I have been so concerned to make that I think science has overlooked [00:08:17 - 00:08:25] that if you look back through the history of the human race or of life on this planet or of [00:08:25 - 00:08:30] The solar system and the galaxy as you go backward in time [00:08:30 - 00:08:32] things become more [00:08:32 - 00:08:34] simple more [00:08:35 - 00:08:42] Basic yes, and so turning that on its head we could say as we come toward the present [00:08:42 - 00:08:45] Things become more novel more complex [00:08:45 - 00:08:50] So I've taken this to be actually a universal law [00:08:50 - 00:08:53] affecting historical process [00:08:53 - 00:08:56] biological processes and [00:08:56 - 00:09:01] Astrophysical processes nature produces and [00:09:01 - 00:09:07] Conserve novelty and what I mean by that is as the universe cooled [00:09:07 - 00:09:09] the [00:09:09 - 00:09:12] original cloud of electron plasma [00:09:12 - 00:09:18] Eventually atomic systems formed as it further cooled molecular systems [00:09:18 - 00:09:22] then long chain polymers then [00:09:22 - 00:09:29] Non-nucleated primitive DNA containing life later complex life multicellular life [00:09:30 - 00:09:37] and this is the principle that reaches right up to our dear selves and and notice are it's [00:09:37 - 00:09:40] working across all [00:09:40 - 00:09:44] scales of being this is something that is this true of of [00:09:44 - 00:09:50] human societies as it is of termite populations or populations of [00:09:50 - 00:09:52] atoms in a in a chemical system [00:09:52 - 00:09:55] nature [00:09:55 - 00:09:57] conserves prefers [00:09:58 - 00:10:04] novelty and the interesting thing about an idea like this is it stands the [00:10:04 - 00:10:10] existentialism of modern philosophy on its head, you know what modern atheistic [00:10:10 - 00:10:14] existentialism says is [00:10:14 - 00:10:21] We're a cosmic accident and damn lucky to be here and any meaning you get out of the situation [00:10:21 - 00:10:23] You're simply conferring [00:10:24 - 00:10:29] I say no by looking deeply into the structure of nature [00:10:29 - 00:10:33] We can discover that novelty is what nature [00:10:33 - 00:10:38] produces and conserves and if that represents a [00:10:38 - 00:10:45] Universal value system then the human world as we find it today with our [00:10:45 - 00:10:47] technologies and our complex societies [00:10:47 - 00:10:53] represents the greatest novelty so far achieved [00:10:53 - 00:10:58] And so suddenly you have a basis for an ethic that which [00:10:58 - 00:11:03] Advances novelty is good that which retards it is [00:11:03 - 00:11:08] Is to be looked at very carefully. All right, let me stop you right there [00:11:08 - 00:11:14] One of the first things that you said when we got on the air this morning was that you had a hundred and twenty-eight [00:11:14 - 00:11:16] Baud connection from your mountaintop [00:11:16 - 00:11:19] Secret location, right? Okay [00:11:21 - 00:11:26] As we are discussing your theory, which is fascinating of novelty [00:11:26 - 00:11:34] I'm taken to ask you about a quote actually of several pages written by Michael Crichton [00:11:34 - 00:11:37] And I know you know who he is [00:11:37 - 00:11:43] With reference to the Internet it is Michael Crichton's contention [00:11:43 - 00:11:46] That the Internet which one might consider to be novelty [00:11:49 - 00:11:53] Exemplified in continent indeed is going to result [00:11:53 - 00:11:58] not in more novelty, but in fact in [00:11:58 - 00:12:01] a [00:12:01 - 00:12:05] Slowing of the the process of evolution or novelty as you you see it [00:12:05 - 00:12:11] Because there will be a commonality there will not be innovation. There will not be [00:12:11 - 00:12:19] Entrepreneurship there will be ten main ideas in America and Hong Kong and Moscow and [00:12:19 - 00:12:21] London and so forth [00:12:21 - 00:12:23] How would you address that? [00:12:23 - 00:12:31] Well, I'm astonished. I hardly know what he's talking about. I let me give you my take on okay [00:12:31 - 00:12:35] Let me rephrase it. He's saying the Internet will stifle [00:12:35 - 00:12:40] Diversity and the diversity is critical to advancement [00:12:40 - 00:12:48] Well what I see happening and I spend hours and hours a day on the internet is I believe it's the great force [00:12:48 - 00:12:50] empowering [00:12:50 - 00:12:53] marginal and minority points of view [00:12:53 - 00:13:00] To come along in centuries in other words before the Internet the great [00:13:00 - 00:13:07] establishment ideas already has the machinery of media to communicate their position [00:13:07 - 00:13:15] Sure, what has happened is that the common man has gotten into the game with technology that I really don't think [00:13:15 - 00:13:20] Was ever intended to fall into oh you bet you bet it wasn't [00:13:20 - 00:13:28] Yeah, so I don't know what Crichton is talking about. I believe what the internet is doing is [00:13:28 - 00:13:31] dissolving boundaries [00:13:31 - 00:13:37] Between people's idea systems classes and factions and we're getting a much richer [00:13:37 - 00:13:44] evolutionary interplay among ideas and this sort of thing so I see it as [00:13:45 - 00:13:51] a very fertile place with a lot of mutation going on in hardware in [00:13:51 - 00:13:55] How people view it ideologies this sort of thing? [00:13:55 - 00:13:58] I just don't know where he's coming from well [00:13:58 - 00:14:03] I might I might expand on it this way he suggests for example that if you were to take [00:14:03 - 00:14:11] An otherwise deserted or barren desert island and you were to put a species upon it that species [00:14:11 - 00:14:14] Because there are so few of them [00:14:15 - 00:14:22] Would by necessity be very innovative would change very quickly in trying to adapt and live and stay alive [00:14:22 - 00:14:29] On the other hand if you put many many creatures on that island that process would be far [00:14:29 - 00:14:34] Slower and he uses that as a parallel to the internet. I'm not sure that I agree with it either [00:14:34 - 00:14:37] I just found it an interesting take [00:14:37 - 00:14:39] on the [00:14:39 - 00:14:40] sociological [00:14:40 - 00:14:46] Implications of the internet well you see when people talk about the internet. They're usually talking about the internet [00:14:46 - 00:14:51] That was because it's moving so quickly for example [00:14:51 - 00:14:56] I just read this paper by a guy named Alexander Chislenko out at the Media Lab at MIT [00:14:56 - 00:15:04] And he's talking about plugins that will translate websites of one language into another [00:15:05 - 00:15:12] Well now imagine when people can put up websites in Telugu, Wetoto, Russian, French [00:15:12 - 00:15:19] You name it and you can automatically slide into those websites and see what's going on [00:15:19 - 00:15:22] You're describing Crichton's nightmare and your [00:15:22 - 00:15:26] Best dream I believe [00:15:26 - 00:15:31] This is the thing about technology it tends to polarize people [00:15:32 - 00:15:36] Let me make one point here before we leave this time thing [00:15:36 - 00:15:42] I said I'd identified an tendency in the universe which science had missed which was to conserve [00:15:42 - 00:15:49] Novelty and then you asked about the internet which sort of led me to the second half of the observation [00:15:49 - 00:15:55] Not only does the universe have this preference for novelty, but each [00:15:56 - 00:16:04] Polarization into novelty has proceeded more quickly than the ones which which preceded it [00:16:04 - 00:16:11] So for instance the flow cooling out of the universe led to the slightly more rapid [00:16:11 - 00:16:18] appearance of organic chemistry which led to the quite rapid evolution of higher plants and animals [00:16:18 - 00:16:21] led to the hysterical pace of [00:16:21 - 00:16:24] human history and I [00:16:25 - 00:16:30] See no reason to suppose that that process of acceleration will ever slow down [00:16:30 - 00:16:34] no, isn't it is it Terrence a linear process or a [00:16:34 - 00:16:38] an accelerating exponentially accelerating process [00:16:38 - 00:16:45] It's an exponentially accelerating process which leads to a kind of end of the world [00:16:45 - 00:16:51] Scenario that has made a lot of people place me out with the squirrels because [00:16:52 - 00:16:57] I'm saying that this process of novelty is now moving so quickly [00:16:57 - 00:17:00] That's within our own lifetime [00:17:00 - 00:17:03] It is going to accelerate [00:17:03 - 00:17:06] essentially [00:17:06 - 00:17:07] to such [00:17:07 - 00:17:14] An intensity that we will be experiencing more novelty in a few weeks or days than we've previously [00:17:14 - 00:17:19] Experienced in the whole life of the cosmos. Oh my god, you have described [00:17:20 - 00:17:25] Precisely what I have just written about called I wrote a book called the quickening and [00:17:25 - 00:17:30] Someone showed me your book and I said this is in Atlanta [00:17:30 - 00:17:34] I saw it and and I said yes, this guy is on to this [00:17:34 - 00:17:42] I'm on to it from I guess more of a pedestrian perspective than yourself after listening now [00:17:42 - 00:17:48] To your first half hour Terrence, but we're talking about I it suddenly dawned on me exactly [00:17:49 - 00:17:55] Precisely the same thing. I've been doing this talk radio program for about 13 years, you know, the all-night show right and I am a [00:17:55 - 00:17:59] trained observer of events and people and [00:17:59 - 00:18:03] every night I've had to watch the news and [00:18:03 - 00:18:10] Dissect what is going on in our world to prepare to do this program and in that 13 years [00:18:10 - 00:18:13] unmistakably socially economically [00:18:14 - 00:18:20] Politically environmentally you name it we can talk about it in every one of those areas of human endeavor [00:18:20 - 00:18:25] Things are beginning to accelerate. There is simply [00:18:25 - 00:18:29] No question about it and that sounds exactly [00:18:29 - 00:18:34] What to be the same thing you're proposing [00:18:34 - 00:18:43] Here. Yes where where I've gone further than most people is a lot of people have noticed this the time is speeding up [00:18:43 - 00:18:46] phenomenon but they tend to give credit to [00:18:46 - 00:18:49] science or media or [00:18:49 - 00:18:57] Something like that. That's that's right. Yes. Well what I'm saying is this is built into the laws of physics [00:18:57 - 00:19:03] Oh, I think I think you're right Terrence. We're at the bottom of the hour. I think you're exactly right Terrence. Stay right where you are [00:19:03 - 00:19:11] Interesting very interesting Terrence McKenna from the Big Island of Hawaii is my guest. I'm Art Bell and this is CBC [00:19:13 - 00:19:18] 1997 it's art and his guests the late Terrence McKenna and now [00:19:18 - 00:19:26] Enjoy this on gold hour on the best of coast to coast a.m. With art Bell from May of [00:19:26 - 00:19:32] 1997 it's art and his guests the late Terrence McKenna and now [00:19:32 - 00:19:38] Enjoy this encore presentation of coast to coast a.m. With art Bell [00:19:40 - 00:19:46] We have a very very interesting fellow on the line. His name is Terrence McKenna and [00:19:46 - 00:19:49] He's from the Big Island of Hawaii [00:19:49 - 00:19:53] And he has just described to me [00:19:53 - 00:19:55] in [00:19:55 - 00:19:57] language that you had to listen very carefully to [00:19:57 - 00:20:07] Exactly what I wrote about the quickening and it will pick up on that in a moment. It's fascinating my guns like hearing my own theory [00:20:08 - 00:20:12] Amplified coming back at me or an explanation of what I wrote about [00:20:12 - 00:20:14] Wow [00:20:14 - 00:20:16] Anyway in a moment back [00:20:16 - 00:20:22] Some cases [00:20:22 - 00:20:28] Back now to Hawaii and Terrence McKenna Terrence [00:20:28 - 00:20:34] I thought we lost you for a moment, but I think we have you back. Are you there? Oh, yeah, okay [00:20:35 - 00:20:41] There will be silences during the break. So do not interpret that as we have disconnected Terrence only if you get a dial tone [00:20:41 - 00:20:43] Are we in trouble? [00:20:43 - 00:20:47] Otherwise just hang in there. Okay. Alrighty. All right [00:20:47 - 00:20:54] Um, I mean I sat here as I listened to you the first half hour in shock because I realized [00:20:54 - 00:20:58] you were describing exactly what I wrote about and [00:20:58 - 00:21:05] What I did Terrence I realized that a lot of people say this quickening or whatever you want to call it [00:21:05 - 00:21:07] Whatever name you want to put to it [00:21:07 - 00:21:09] is a byproduct of [00:21:09 - 00:21:12] mass communication and I began to realize [00:21:12 - 00:21:18] Uh-uh. No, it is not a product of mass communication. Yes. We're hearing about it [00:21:18 - 00:21:19] more [00:21:19 - 00:21:21] And more volumes of it [00:21:21 - 00:21:28] But in fact in fact what you are describing is really going on and I documented that [00:21:28 - 00:21:34] much in my book in real everyday life in in each one of these areas and many more I [00:21:34 - 00:21:37] Documented the fact that it is not [00:21:37 - 00:21:39] mass communication [00:21:39 - 00:21:43] That is beginning to quicken things, but there is another process at work now [00:21:43 - 00:21:49] I don't know what that is and I don't know where it's leading. In other words people will say well [00:21:49 - 00:21:54] What when we finally get to this crunch point, whatever that is [00:21:56 - 00:22:00] What will happen and I don't have that answer I'm just a talk show host an observer [00:22:00 - 00:22:05] But maybe you do when we finally reach what you call [00:22:05 - 00:22:07] time wave zero [00:22:07 - 00:22:11] What is going to happen [00:22:11 - 00:22:17] Well, the only way to predict what's going to happen is to look at the quality of what has happened [00:22:17 - 00:22:21] As the quickening as you call it has begun to accelerate [00:22:21 - 00:22:25] what it's been characterized by is [00:22:26 - 00:22:29] dissolution of boundaries between [00:22:29 - 00:22:31] classes of people [00:22:31 - 00:22:39] bodies of knowledge pools of capital language groups so forth and so on and so it seems to me [00:22:39 - 00:22:42] ultimate novelty must be a [00:22:42 - 00:22:45] situation where all boundaries are [00:22:45 - 00:22:52] Dissolved and of course what that looks like. I don't know. I don't know whether it's a virtual reality [00:22:52 - 00:22:55] Where you become God? [00:22:55 - 00:22:57] through the public utilities or [00:22:57 - 00:22:59] exactly [00:22:59 - 00:23:02] what it is, but it's clear to me that the [00:23:02 - 00:23:05] human nervous system is [00:23:05 - 00:23:11] Globalizing itself building a model of conscious thought on a planetary scale [00:23:11 - 00:23:17] tens of thousands of people are participating in this none of them have a real [00:23:18 - 00:23:25] notion what it's all about but everyone is serving this sort of unfolding grand design and [00:23:25 - 00:23:30] You know, I think the emergence of alphabet was part of the quickening [00:23:30 - 00:23:36] I think the emergence of hominids out of more primitive primates was part of this quickening [00:23:36 - 00:23:42] I think this is the business that this planet has been about for a very very long time [00:23:42 - 00:23:46] Are you able to discern [00:23:47 - 00:23:49] any timelines [00:23:49 - 00:23:52] to [00:23:52 - 00:23:58] Timeline zero. Well, yes, I mean we've been talking about this as a metaphor what makes me [00:23:58 - 00:24:03] I hope a little different from some of the other process in the marketplace is [00:24:03 - 00:24:07] I've got a formal mathematical [00:24:07 - 00:24:13] Theory that you know, I mentioned habits and novelty this [00:24:14 - 00:24:19] Dualistic flow. Yes. Well because it is a dualistic flow. It can be portrayed like [00:24:19 - 00:24:27] The ebb and flow of the price of the stock or something like that. In other words, it can be portrayed as a line graph [00:24:27 - 00:24:35] So I've written computer programs which produce what I call novelty waves in other words [00:24:35 - 00:24:38] timescales [00:24:38 - 00:24:44] Waves that picture the ebb and flow of novelty and by getting known [00:24:44 - 00:24:47] historical and paleontological [00:24:47 - 00:24:56] And geological data against these waves at different scales. I was able to finally discern a best fit [00:24:56 - 00:25:03] But the conclusion that it led to was even well was very startling to me [00:25:03 - 00:25:09] Which is this ultimate novelty this transcendental object at the end of time isn't [00:25:09 - 00:25:13] millennia in the future it is in fact [00:25:13 - 00:25:21] Slated to collide with historical necessities sometime in late 2012 [00:25:21 - 00:25:28] 2012 2012 now, I know you have some interest in the Mayan calendar [00:25:28 - 00:25:36] I do I didn't know when I calculated this date that it was the same end date as the Mayan [00:25:36 - 00:25:41] Calendar to the day. Oh my let me ask you this Terrence. What did you? [00:25:41 - 00:25:46] Input to your database [00:25:46 - 00:25:53] To for this computer program in other words, what did I start with? Yeah. Yeah. Yes [00:25:53 - 00:25:59] Well, I started I had a very academic interest in the chain [00:25:59 - 00:26:03] which is the Chinese method of divination and [00:26:03 - 00:26:05] This is you know [00:26:05 - 00:26:11] everyone who's looked at this thing has been struck by the fact that it seems to work and [00:26:11 - 00:26:14] So I carried out a mathematical analysis [00:26:14 - 00:26:21] Wait, I don't know what Ching is and I bet a lot of other people don't either a Chinese method of divining [00:26:21 - 00:26:26] What what kind of method what is it? Well, it's existed for thousands of years in China [00:26:26 - 00:26:33] It's sometimes done by throwing it at 50 stocks or sometimes done with coins [00:26:33 - 00:26:37] but it's a method of producing a [00:26:37 - 00:26:43] Thing called a hexagram which is made up of either broken or unbroken lines [00:26:43 - 00:26:46] But six on top of each other [00:26:46 - 00:26:53] So if you're a mathematician you can figure if it's made up of broken and unbroken lines [00:26:53 - 00:26:59] and there's six of them on top of each other there must be a possibility of 64 of these things and [00:26:59 - 00:27:08] Thousands of years ago in China. There was a vast body of literary commentary built up around these [00:27:08 - 00:27:13] hexagrams and they have always been presented in a traditional [00:27:14 - 00:27:17] Order a certain way that they are always [00:27:17 - 00:27:23] Presented and I was studying a very academic question [00:27:23 - 00:27:29] Which is is this order of these hexagrams a true order in other words? [00:27:29 - 00:27:36] governed by rules or is it simply a random jumble sanctioned by tradition and [00:27:37 - 00:27:44] this very obscure academic question led ultimately to the discovery that the each thing was a [00:27:44 - 00:27:53] 384 days 13 lunar cycle calendar and then from there I realized that this [00:27:53 - 00:27:58] 384 day calendar was actually a nested [00:27:58 - 00:28:05] subset in a fractal time keeping scheme that was really more accurate and more [00:28:05 - 00:28:07] sophisticated than anything [00:28:07 - 00:28:13] In the West so what I'm really suggesting here is that in the same way that the West [00:28:13 - 00:28:17] conquered the nature of matter through the [00:28:17 - 00:28:20] elaboration of modern science [00:28:20 - 00:28:28] about 4,000 years ago in China a deeper analysis of time was carried out than [00:28:28 - 00:28:35] Then has ever been undertaken in the West plane. It's quite Oh Terrence [00:28:35 - 00:28:37] What is your website? [00:28:37 - 00:28:39] It's that levity. It's [00:28:39 - 00:28:40] triple w [00:28:40 - 00:28:47] Dot levity calm and then just click on parents McKenna there levity is le v [00:28:47 - 00:28:50] ITY so it's a it's [00:28:50 - 00:28:56] Www.levity.com correct. I will get a link up shortly [00:28:56 - 00:29:00] Well, I think you do I visited a web site today. You've got good people [00:29:00 - 00:29:07] You know Keith is he does a wonderful job. All right. Well, so then you you get there and then just click on Terrence McKenna and [00:29:07 - 00:29:10] Be sure you're buckled in from the sound of what I've heard so far [00:29:10 - 00:29:19] Well, the interesting thing you see art is with the wave like that you can do what's called [00:29:19 - 00:29:26] Retrofitting in other words if you have a wave of novelty that describes the past. Yes, you have to [00:29:27 - 00:29:31] correctly predict the Italian Renaissance the Greek Enlightenment [00:29:31 - 00:29:38] the modernity of the 20th century and so by predicting the past we've gained [00:29:38 - 00:29:43] Confidence that this wave predicts the future that sounds quite scientific [00:29:43 - 00:29:50] In other words science is repeatability and if you can repeatedly demonstrate that you can mathematically show the events of the past [00:29:50 - 00:29:55] Then yes, I would imagine you could project. Well, so I've been at this since [00:29:56 - 00:29:57] 1975 [00:29:57 - 00:30:04] But I the theory is in a sense very conservative. It never says what will happen [00:30:04 - 00:30:11] It says when when it was the same things are highly likely and when you're just wasting your time [00:30:11 - 00:30:13] Uh-huh [00:30:13 - 00:30:18] When you look out or project out toward 2012 [00:30:18 - 00:30:22] What is the [00:30:22 - 00:30:25] magnitude of the spike or the difference [00:30:25 - 00:30:28] There if you can give us an idea of magnitudes [00:30:28 - 00:30:36] Along the way there is only one point in the entire cycle where the level of habit [00:30:36 - 00:30:38] drops to zero [00:30:38 - 00:30:44] effectively then novelty becomes infinite and that point occurs on [00:30:44 - 00:30:51] This false this date in 2012 now. It's very interesting. There are some people on the net called [00:30:51 - 00:30:54] singularis and [00:30:54 - 00:30:56] They're hardheaded [00:30:56 - 00:31:02] Engineering types and they take things like rate of energy release rate of data storage [00:31:02 - 00:31:10] This sort of thing and draw all their curves out and they conclude that sometime between [00:31:10 - 00:31:12] 2008 and 2020 [00:31:12 - 00:31:17] Everything we produce infinite amounts of energy [00:31:17 - 00:31:24] We pack infinite amounts of data into infinitely small spaces in other words this same sort of thing where? [00:31:24 - 00:31:27] because of the acceleration [00:31:27 - 00:31:29] built in to the [00:31:29 - 00:31:35] Unfolding of this novelty process. We're gonna cross more territory between here in 2012 [00:31:35 - 00:31:39] Then we've crossed between the Big Bang and getting to here [00:31:39 - 00:31:42] That's an incredible thought [00:31:42 - 00:31:46] It kind of explains what's happening, you know [00:31:46 - 00:31:52] That it isn't the it isn't the old-style religion that it isn't the sterile [00:31:52 - 00:31:58] Steady state of science. It's that the universe is actually [00:31:58 - 00:32:01] involved in some kind of process of self [00:32:01 - 00:32:04] metamorphosis and [00:32:04 - 00:32:09] Human beings indicate that we have crossed some boundary into a new [00:32:11 - 00:32:18] Era a new epoch of ever greater acceleration into this process of self revelation [00:32:18 - 00:32:21] I mean, this is what religions are raving about [00:32:21 - 00:32:28] This is what every prophet on the street corner is trying to articulate and no question. I think it's real [00:32:28 - 00:32:35] I think we're getting a lot of static because people can only deal with it through images that they know [00:32:35 - 00:32:41] You know Marshall McLuhan once said we drive into the future using only our rearview mirror [00:32:41 - 00:32:49] and that's sort of what it is that I call this thing the transcendental object at the end of time and [00:32:49 - 00:32:55] I think you know in a sense religion and Christian revelation. It will all be [00:32:55 - 00:33:02] Fulfilled in a way none of us ever suspected because nature has this [00:33:03 - 00:33:07] appetite for novelty and acceleration into novelty and [00:33:07 - 00:33:13] So then again I asked at this moment that we speak of [00:33:13 - 00:33:19] 2012 right. What do you actually think will occur? [00:33:19 - 00:33:29] Well, I thought about this a good deal and they're hard and soft and very honest, but I've noticed that what the time wave seems most [00:33:31 - 00:33:38] Inherently able to track is technology somehow technology is very important [00:33:38 - 00:33:43] It's the transformation of the human relationship to the world through tools [00:33:43 - 00:33:49] And so what I'm thinking would fulfill this entire scenario without requiring [00:33:49 - 00:33:53] God Almighty to put in an appearance is [00:33:53 - 00:33:57] Time-travel I think that [00:33:57 - 00:34:00] We are moving towards [00:34:01 - 00:34:07] You know if you look at biology over huge scale time hundreds of millions of years [00:34:07 - 00:34:14] It is a kind of conquest of dimensionality. All right, let's let's consider that [00:34:14 - 00:34:22] Somebody recently said and I have been considering since I heard it a very simple question if time travel is [00:34:22 - 00:34:26] Possible then where are the time travelers? [00:34:27 - 00:34:35] Well when I asked that question to my sources, they said you you can only travel as far back into the past as [00:34:35 - 00:34:43] The moment of the invention of the first time machine because before that there were no time machine [00:34:43 - 00:34:53] That I but let me think about that does that make sense you could only travel back to the moment of the invention of the [00:34:53 - 00:34:55] time machine [00:34:56 - 00:34:57] Because prior to that [00:34:57 - 00:35:02] There was no capability. It's like trying to drive where there are no roads [00:35:02 - 00:35:06] Yeah, it also means when you invent the first time machine [00:35:06 - 00:35:15] Instantly time machines will appear by the tens of thousands having come back through time to see the first flight into time [00:35:15 - 00:35:25] That's incredible I never that's a whole new line of thought for me about about that question [00:35:25 - 00:35:28] And it might make sense [00:35:28 - 00:35:31] It might make sense [00:35:31 - 00:35:35] And your analogy is trying to that you cannot drive in essence [00:35:35 - 00:35:39] Where there are no where there are no roads [00:35:39 - 00:35:42] Well, of course you nearly do that when you go home from the broadcast here [00:35:42 - 00:35:46] But and you haven't even been up to see me you're okay [00:35:50 - 00:35:57] We're very proud of our bad roads I understand it keeps the riffraff away as it certainly does [00:35:57 - 00:36:01] It doesn't keep the riffraff away, but it keeps everybody else away [00:36:01 - 00:36:05] How long [00:36:05 - 00:36:08] Terrence have you been residing on the side of the volcano there? [00:36:08 - 00:36:15] Well continuously for about three and a half years. I've had land out here for about well since 77 [00:36:15 - 00:36:19] since 77 and before that I [00:36:20 - 00:36:23] lived I grew up in western Colorado and I [00:36:23 - 00:36:27] Had my children and my marriage and all that in [00:36:27 - 00:36:31] California lived 35 years in Northern, California [00:36:31 - 00:36:33] uh-huh um [00:36:33 - 00:36:36] You [00:36:36 - 00:36:38] You knew [00:36:38 - 00:36:44] Timothy Leary yes, I knew him we appeared in public mostly in Europe [00:36:44 - 00:36:52] Together a few times and he certainly was a huge influence on me. I only came to know him in the pet in the past [00:36:52 - 00:36:57] Seven or eight years, but as the kid growing up in the 60s [00:36:57 - 00:37:01] He was an enormous influence on me. You are now being called by many [00:37:01 - 00:37:06] His heir apparent his heir now, I guess well [00:37:06 - 00:37:11] I think not by many but I was called it by him everybody else kept their mouth shut [00:37:14 - 00:37:20] Well I have my method I'm very interested in the psychedelic experience I [00:37:20 - 00:37:28] was raised Catholic and what I kept of that was an enormous thirst for [00:37:28 - 00:37:30] the paranormal the miraculous [00:37:30 - 00:37:32] supernatural yes [00:37:32 - 00:37:39] And I went to India and I made the rounds of the gurus and the geishas [00:37:39 - 00:37:46] And I didn't find what I was looking for but when I went to South America to the jungles down there I [00:37:46 - 00:37:48] discovered that [00:37:48 - 00:37:54] LSD was only the tip of the psychedelic iceberg and what I had taken to be [00:37:54 - 00:38:00] modern science and modern chemistry was actually a tradition of [00:38:00 - 00:38:07] shamanism and religious use of psychedelic plants that was thousands and thousands of years old and [00:38:08 - 00:38:13] That fascinated me because I actually it worked for me [00:38:13 - 00:38:19] most people who see the mystery with [00:38:19 - 00:38:24] Listen let us pick this up after the top of the hour now listen to me carefully [00:38:24 - 00:38:28] You've got about a 10-minute break here at least and you're not going to hear anything [00:38:28 - 00:38:34] Don't let it bother you just put phone down grab a cup coffee or something or another and we'll be back to you [00:38:34 - 00:38:37] Okay, all right stay right there. This is CBC [00:38:37 - 00:38:42] This hour on the best of coast to coast am with art Bell [00:38:42 - 00:38:48] 97 it's art and his guests the late Terrence McKenna and now [00:38:48 - 00:38:55] Enjoy this encore presentation of coast to coast am with the lines are [00:38:55 - 00:38:57] absolutely alive and [00:38:57 - 00:39:02] Everybody out there just relax for a little while I have some advice for you [00:39:02 - 00:39:08] My guest is a very very unusual person whose name is Terrence McKenna [00:39:08 - 00:39:16] In order to properly appreciate what you're about to hear if you're just joining us in Los Angeles San Francisco and so forth [00:39:16 - 00:39:20] You're going to have to pretty much put down whatever you're doing [00:39:20 - 00:39:28] I'll turn the radio off a little bit and listen very carefully because it makes a lot of sense [00:39:28 - 00:39:30] But you've got to listen carefully [00:39:31 - 00:39:38] Terrence McKenna will find out more about him in a moment lives on the side of a an active volcano in Hawaii [00:39:38 - 00:39:44] An interesting place to choose to live by itself and an interesting man indeed [00:39:44 - 00:39:47] So Terrence more appearance McKenna coming up [00:39:47 - 00:39:49] Oh [00:39:49 - 00:40:10] Art have you heard about Terrence McKenna's theory called time wave zero? [00:40:10 - 00:40:17] He suggests that as we get closer to time wave zero we are experiencing tacking on radiation from it [00:40:17 - 00:40:22] Evidently the impending event is so colossal that it will emit such intense [00:40:22 - 00:40:29] Radiation that some of it takes the form of faster than light speed tacking on particles or waves which? [00:40:29 - 00:40:35] Can travel faster than light and that they're actually being hurdled backward in time [00:40:35 - 00:40:41] the closer we get to the event the greater the radiation density hence the more frequently and [00:40:41 - 00:40:47] Intensely we experience paranormal phenomena associated with it. We'll ask about that by the way [00:40:47 - 00:40:49] We haven't yet. This could be the mechanism behind [00:40:49 - 00:40:56] What you call the quickening the event we are approaching will probably be something ten amount to a [00:40:56 - 00:41:01] White hole or a mini Big Bang it will for all intents and purposes [00:41:02 - 00:41:09] Be the end of time for us Terrence believes it will occur consistent with the Mayan calendar in the year [00:41:09 - 00:41:12] 2012 now by the way he has derived this [00:41:12 - 00:41:16] Independently of the Mayan calendar [00:41:16 - 00:41:20] He simply has discovered that it coincides with it [00:41:20 - 00:41:26] He goes on it is not unreasonable to assume that et's possessing UFOs if they exist [00:41:26 - 00:41:29] We'll be flocking here to research or rather [00:41:29 - 00:41:37] Research the phenomenon it is also believed that tacking on bombardment would have bizarre effects on the human nervous system [00:41:37 - 00:41:43] Visions that sort of thing as well as physical manifestations in the environment like the clear water virgin [00:41:43 - 00:41:48] Bizarre mutations like the chupacabra and heaven knows what else all [00:41:48 - 00:41:55] The stuff you attribute to the quickening might be explained by this and after listening to the first hour [00:41:55 - 00:42:03] I must agree Terrence. I'm stealing one more bit of time to read you a fact that I think relates and challenges [00:42:03 - 00:42:06] You a little bit it is from Stephen in Wichita. It's well thought out [00:42:06 - 00:42:15] Here it is aren't I'm not sure that you can equate novelty with either acceleration or complexity a [00:42:15 - 00:42:18] nature has always been novel and [00:42:19 - 00:42:26] Surprisingly so considering earlier periods in Earth's history given that over 90% of all species [00:42:26 - 00:42:33] That have ever lived are now extinct and the exotic body designs. It would seem novelty is a given [00:42:33 - 00:42:40] But in order to be effective it must have a survival advantage and be passed on once the novelty becomes a hindrance [00:42:40 - 00:42:43] It disappears [00:42:43 - 00:42:46] Acceleration may be more a factor of population density [00:42:47 - 00:42:54] Virtually all of the social problems we face today have been duplicated years ago in rat population density studies [00:42:54 - 00:43:01] our novel inventions of this century have simply allowed us to artificially compress distance and time [00:43:01 - 00:43:04] by modes of travel and communications [00:43:04 - 00:43:12] profit motives have directed and limited the novelty of our civilization in this century as never before and we're becoming a [00:43:13 - 00:43:18] Hindrance the higher the population density the more the acceleration seems to be [00:43:18 - 00:43:27] Anecdotal but relative compare the pace of a small country town to a large city with its population density and resulting problems [00:43:27 - 00:43:30] accelerated by stress and [00:43:30 - 00:43:35] Profit motives that's from Steve in Wichita. What do you think Terrence? [00:43:35 - 00:43:38] Well, I don't disagree with all of that [00:43:38 - 00:43:44] I think there's certainly been the admin flow of novelty within the 20th century [00:43:44 - 00:43:47] Parts of it more novel than others [00:43:47 - 00:43:55] But I think to argue that it isn't among the most novel periods in time is the pretty uphill battle [00:43:55 - 00:43:58] the question is whether [00:43:58 - 00:44:02] Novelty is something which simply adheres to [00:44:02 - 00:44:07] Statistical dynamics or whether it's a real [00:44:08 - 00:44:13] Direction a real arrow that is directing process and that's what I maintain [00:44:13 - 00:44:16] I think it's not true to say that [00:44:16 - 00:44:24] The biota of the earth today is not more novel than it was in the past certainly there are [00:44:24 - 00:44:29] novel forms of life which have on undergone extinction, but the [00:44:29 - 00:44:32] proliferation of [00:44:32 - 00:44:40] Human life which is an advanced animal plus a culture creating creature indicates to me that we're at a level [00:44:40 - 00:44:44] Of novelty that this planet has never before experienced of course [00:44:44 - 00:44:52] It's it's an arguable thing because history which is what we're always comparing these waves to is not yet a quantified [00:44:52 - 00:44:56] Thing I mean how do you rate the war of the roses over? [00:44:56 - 00:44:59] Queen Anne's war or something like that [00:45:00 - 00:45:05] But nevertheless though we don't have an absolute quantification of history [00:45:05 - 00:45:13] There is general agreement among historians that events like the Renaissance the Greek Golden Age the 20th century are [00:45:13 - 00:45:19] periods where a great deal of novelty and social forms and technologies was [00:45:19 - 00:45:24] Concentrated all right you put together a computer program [00:45:24 - 00:45:26] which [00:45:26 - 00:45:33] Which was able to trace the ebb and the flow of this novelty and in effect chart major [00:45:33 - 00:45:35] events in history [00:45:35 - 00:45:38] How many if I might ask? [00:45:38 - 00:45:40] hits and misses [00:45:40 - 00:45:45] As you as you thought when you got this in final development, and then you look at each point in history [00:45:45 - 00:45:52] How many hits and misses were there any misses in the model or did you hit each? [00:45:52 - 00:45:55] major moment in history on the nose [00:45:56 - 00:46:01] Well by my understanding of this theory there can be no misses in other words [00:46:01 - 00:46:08] It's not a statistical theory. We're not okay if we're right two-thirds of the time here here [00:46:08 - 00:46:12] So we have to be right all the time, so you're telling me you are I? [00:46:12 - 00:46:19] Submit to you and to the world for your examination and critiquing the fact that yes the time wave [00:46:19 - 00:46:23] with its end point in December 21st 2012 [00:46:24 - 00:46:30] Described with as great an accuracy as I am able to discern the actual [00:46:30 - 00:46:36] Vastitudes of novelty and habit in history and natural history. That's the claim. That's right [00:46:36 - 00:46:41] Terrence have you submitted this I mean this is serious science that you're discussing [00:46:41 - 00:46:48] Have you submitted that because of its repeatability? That's science now. Have you submitted this to peer review? [00:46:49 - 00:46:56] Well among mathematicians yes, and there's a lively debate raging on the internet about that [00:46:56 - 00:46:59] Let me say something though here about [00:46:59 - 00:47:08] science and why the acceptance of the time wave can't really occur under the tent of ordinary science [00:47:08 - 00:47:11] You have mentioned repeatability [00:47:12 - 00:47:19] Repeatability is the idea at the very basis of the scientific method at the very basis of experiment [00:47:19 - 00:47:21] That's right. What's called? [00:47:21 - 00:47:23] restoration of initial condition [00:47:23 - 00:47:28] But now notice that what the time wave theory is saying is [00:47:28 - 00:47:35] That every moment in time is a unique moment is unique and not and will not a specific [00:47:36 - 00:47:43] Excuse me specifically repeat, but what you're suggesting is that you can plot the highs of novelty [00:47:43 - 00:47:48] Throughout history. Yes, you can but you cannot [00:47:48 - 00:47:52] You cannot assume [00:47:52 - 00:47:56] That you're doing it probabilistically in other words [00:47:56 - 00:48:01] Essentially when you really understand philosophically what the time wave is saying [00:48:01 - 00:48:07] It's an enormous attack on probability theory, you know the way science works [00:48:07 - 00:48:14] Now is if you want to know how much energy is flowing through a wire you take a thousand measurements [00:48:14 - 00:48:20] You add them together and you divide by a thousand and then you have the current flowing through the wire [00:48:20 - 00:48:22] but notice that that [00:48:22 - 00:48:27] assumes that it doesn't matter what time you make the measurement and [00:48:27 - 00:48:32] So much of science is like this to the point where I am redefining [00:48:32 - 00:48:36] Science and saying science is the study of those phenomena [00:48:36 - 00:48:43] so coarse grained that the time in which they occurred does not affect them and [00:48:43 - 00:48:48] That leaves out then history love affairs corporate takeovers [00:48:48 - 00:48:53] Empire building everything interesting in the human world is too [00:48:55 - 00:49:03] Tragile to finally embedded in the context of its time to be open to that kind of scientific modeling [00:49:03 - 00:49:06] so so so in other words [00:49:06 - 00:49:09] They're really relatively small [00:49:09 - 00:49:15] insignificant events that don't enter into the larger measurements you're making of this [00:49:15 - 00:49:22] Ed and flow well, for instance on a given day when the chart says [00:49:22 - 00:49:29] Novelty will be high certainly somewhere in the world. Someone is having a very un-novel day [00:49:29 - 00:49:33] It's a statistical thing of a bell curve [00:49:33 - 00:49:39] No reference to you are you but a bell curve where when the wave is predicting high novelty? [00:49:39 - 00:49:47] Most people most systems will experience that novelty, but of course some will not it's the idea that [00:49:49 - 00:49:56] Novelty is ebbing and flowing, you know when you study the first thing they teach you is when you flip a coin the odds are [00:49:56 - 00:50:03] 50/50 heads or tails if that were true the coin would land on its edge every single time [00:50:03 - 00:50:08] That's the rarest of all results in a coin toss indeed [00:50:08 - 00:50:11] So what's really happening is that what are called? [00:50:11 - 00:50:17] Secondary and tertiary factors are causing the coin to be heads or tails [00:50:17 - 00:50:25] I say no there are zones in time where heads are favored and zones in time where tails are favored [00:50:25 - 00:50:31] The idea that time can be described as a perfectly smooth surface and then dealt with [00:50:31 - 00:50:35] Statistically is just the first half with Greek [00:50:35 - 00:50:41] idealism and the careful examination of nature shows it to be inadequate in the same way that [00:50:42 - 00:50:48] Perfect circles were inadequate for describing planetary motion you are therefore saying that conventional science [00:50:48 - 00:50:56] Does not have and cannot have with its present course of investigation and a proper understanding of time [00:50:56 - 00:51:01] That's right because it assumes that it is to be analyzed with statistics and that [00:51:01 - 00:51:08] Flattened out and denies the difference among various times and types of time [00:51:08 - 00:51:11] Terrence how long have you been working on this? [00:51:12 - 00:51:14] since 1971 [00:51:14 - 00:51:17] 71 yeah [00:51:17 - 00:51:26] What is your you told me that you're originally from Colorado family and all that back in Colorado right then finally exile [00:51:26 - 00:51:30] Well essentially yes, and I got myself to the University of California [00:51:30 - 00:51:37] At Berkeley right at the time of the anti-war movement and all of that [00:51:37 - 00:51:41] it was like a kid in a cultural candy store and [00:51:41 - 00:51:43] studied [00:51:43 - 00:51:46] Philosophy our histories and then went off to Asia [00:51:46 - 00:51:51] basically to check out the hash dens and the gurus and [00:51:51 - 00:51:56] The hash was fine, but the gurus just wanted into my pocket [00:51:56 - 00:52:05] And so then I went to South America and as I mentioned that's where this shamanism thing just really grabbed me [00:52:05 - 00:52:07] I'm part of South America Terrence [00:52:07 - 00:52:10] Southern Columbia the Putumayo River Basin [00:52:10 - 00:52:12] and [00:52:12 - 00:52:17] You know the it's the psychedelic plants that are so [00:52:17 - 00:52:22] Fascinating to me because you mentioned repeatability [00:52:22 - 00:52:30] Here's the technology a technique that lets you repeatedly and with relative safety [00:52:30 - 00:52:38] journey into alien worlds filled with alien forms of intelligence and it's the only thing I found that [00:52:39 - 00:52:41] Does that in other words I've? [00:52:41 - 00:52:43] investigated [00:52:43 - 00:52:47] flying saucers crop circles this the map I it doesn't [00:52:47 - 00:52:49] Turn me on but no [00:52:49 - 00:52:56] Let me quickly stop you there and ask you about crop circles many many people feel [00:52:56 - 00:53:00] That they are fractal in nature and if you're on the internet. I know you've seen [00:53:00 - 00:53:07] Photographs of some of the more amazing ones don't end some of the rest of them. They do appear to be fractal [00:53:08 - 00:53:10] What is your thinking there? [00:53:10 - 00:53:14] Well, I was thinking you know, I don't think it's been published in this country [00:53:14 - 00:53:19] But this wonderful book called around in circles by Jim Schnabel [00:53:19 - 00:53:25] To my mind that blows the lid off the whole crop circle thing [00:53:25 - 00:53:28] You and I could spend the whole evening art [00:53:28 - 00:53:30] discussing [00:53:30 - 00:53:35] the relationship of the media to the human psyche to [00:53:35 - 00:53:38] how people handle evidence and [00:53:38 - 00:53:46] Because I really think the the psychedelic community has evidence to give on these [00:53:46 - 00:53:52] Paranormal questions that has never been properly heard and evaluated because the ordinary [00:53:52 - 00:53:58] Society's attitude towards people who use psychedelics is that they are automatically [00:53:59 - 00:54:07] reliable, yes, I know but I think we're not gonna crack stuff like UFO abductions and that sort of thing unless we [00:54:07 - 00:54:15] Admit the psychedelic evidence and if we do admit it suddenly the whole thing begins to look very very different [00:54:15 - 00:54:17] All right, Terrence. I don't reject it [00:54:17 - 00:54:19] And a lot of guests that I've had on [00:54:19 - 00:54:23] Who have been into the very same areas were in right now [00:54:23 - 00:54:27] very politically correctly [00:54:28 - 00:54:32] Rejected out of hand we don't you don't need it to accomplish this [00:54:32 - 00:54:38] They say that you can do it within yourself and I don't reject that thought either [00:54:38 - 00:54:41] But I would like to hear the case that you would present [00:54:41 - 00:54:47] For for psychedelic psychedelics opening the doors that you're talking about [00:54:47 - 00:54:50] That in fact they do [00:54:50 - 00:54:55] Well, how would you make that case? Well, I hear what you're saying is you're equating [00:54:56 - 00:55:03] Spiritual techniques like yoga and prayer and exactly and that sort of thing. I'm not sure there's the connection [00:55:03 - 00:55:09] I mean it does help to be an ethical person to take psychedelic, but [00:55:09 - 00:55:16] For instance the psychedelic that has fascinated me most over the years is DMT [00:55:16 - 00:55:21] Dimethyltryptamine now, this is not a well-known substance. No, it isn't. What is it? [00:55:21 - 00:55:28] Well, that's what it is dimethyltryptamine it occurs in a number of plant species throughout the world [00:55:28 - 00:55:30] it's utilized by native peoples and [00:55:30 - 00:55:37] In the pure form out of the laboratory when you smoke this stuff [00:55:37 - 00:55:43] You find yourself inside the flying saucer that all these dazzled people are [00:55:43 - 00:55:51] Raving about but you found yourself there by initiating an action on your own [00:55:51 - 00:55:57] In other words repeatability and after about three minutes of spending time with the self-transforming [00:55:57 - 00:56:00] machines and their [00:56:00 - 00:56:06] Technologies you're deposited back in your apartment pretty much none the worse for wear [00:56:06 - 00:56:15] Well now let's give this stuff to the leading lights of the UFO community or anyone else who has an interest in [00:56:15 - 00:56:17] unusual psychological [00:56:17 - 00:56:18] or [00:56:18 - 00:56:20] paranormal phenomena [00:56:20 - 00:56:26] Alright, alright hold tight Terrence. We're at another break point. Terrence McKenna is my guest [00:56:26 - 00:56:29] What a totally interesting individual he is [00:56:29 - 00:56:35] You're gonna sit by the radio turn the volume up a little bit put down your book or whatever else you're doing and listen [00:56:43 - 00:56:51] Back now to the Big Island of Hawaii and a very unusual individual named Terrence McKenna Terrence [00:56:51 - 00:56:59] I've got a question for you. Have you ever watched Star Trek? Oh, yes. Oh, yes good. You're familiar then with the Prime Directive [00:56:59 - 00:57:06] Thou shalt not interfere as I believe the Prime Directive. Yeah, that's right. Yeah now [00:57:06 - 00:57:12] What you are saying is so serious and is such a large revelation that [00:57:12 - 00:57:17] Is it not possible that you are in a sense doing what you're doing right now? [00:57:17 - 00:57:21] Violating the Prime Directive [00:57:21 - 00:57:24] well [00:57:24 - 00:57:26] You know [00:57:26 - 00:57:33] It's only been about a hundred years since the news began to arrive in the lap of Western civilization [00:57:33 - 00:57:35] that there were these [00:57:36 - 00:57:42] Interactive plants scattered around the world. The first one was the peyote cactus and in 1888 [00:57:42 - 00:57:47] Mescaline was extracted from that. I think it's not without implication [00:57:47 - 00:57:52] That right at our moment of greatest cultural crisis [00:57:52 - 00:58:00] When we're destroying the environment and uprooting the rainforests and so forth and so on that out of those same rainforests [00:58:01 - 00:58:08] Comes a phenomenon which if we will face it squarely offers a severe challenge to our notion of how [00:58:08 - 00:58:12] Reality works and how the world is put together and what if we miss it? [00:58:12 - 00:58:17] What if we burn down finally enough of the rainforest that that one plant that we could have used? [00:58:17 - 00:58:25] Is destroyed. No, this may have already happened in the sense that there are many known cases of people collecting [00:58:26 - 00:58:32] Promising plants from only one known source and then returning a few months or years later to find the whole thing [00:58:32 - 00:58:38] Paved over. That's right. All right, it tackled this one aren't very interesting [00:58:38 - 00:58:46] Adherence describes a workable scenario, but my question with it is this is this a universal process or only a localized? [00:58:46 - 00:58:49] Effect I believe that one of the theories of modern physics [00:58:50 - 00:58:56] describes that observations affect the process or thing being observed, isn't it possible that the [00:58:56 - 00:59:04] The data the random sticks in China is somewhat skewed by what is being determined as to time [00:59:04 - 00:59:11] Hasn't everybody noticed the phenomenon of time being perceived to slow down depending on how frequently you for example [00:59:11 - 00:59:15] Look at the clock cooks have noticed the same effect with boiling water [00:59:15 - 00:59:20] the quickening may be happening because we notice certain events and then notice [00:59:20 - 00:59:23] More of the same as time goes along in other words [00:59:23 - 00:59:29] We call cause the process to occur at least from our point of view at in Nashville [00:59:29 - 00:59:42] Is this a moment of deep thinking yes, well, I'm I am thinking I think it's a kind of self-fulfilling [00:59:43 - 00:59:48] Hypothesis, I think we are contributing to it as we uncover it within ourselves [00:59:48 - 00:59:55] Yes, something is calling us towards itself and as we approach it we become more like it [00:59:55 - 01:00:01] something is sculpting out of the primate body over a couple of million years an [01:00:01 - 01:00:06] Entirely different kind of creature and as we go to meet this thing [01:00:06 - 01:00:09] Which I call the transcendental mystery at the end of time [01:00:09 - 01:00:13] We are taking on more and more of its characteristics [01:00:13 - 01:00:17] It's godlike power its ability to span space and time [01:00:17 - 01:00:19] Yes, and when we finally do beach it [01:00:19 - 01:00:24] I imagine there will be a kind of effortless moment of merging and recognition [01:00:24 - 01:00:29] Signposts along the way life on Mars, maybe Europa cloning [01:00:29 - 01:00:33] These rise of the internet virtual reality [01:00:33 - 01:00:38] Nanotechnology possibly alien artifacts all that [01:00:38 - 01:00:40] and more [01:00:40 - 01:00:48] One image I carry of this thing are it is you know those mirrored balls they hang in dance clubs. Yes, and [01:00:48 - 01:00:51] scintillations racing around the walls [01:00:51 - 01:00:52] well [01:00:52 - 01:00:54] the scintillations are [01:00:54 - 01:00:57] distortions of the thing and so as we approach this [01:00:57 - 01:01:05] Transcendental object at the end of time there will be more and more breakdown of ordinary reality and more and more [01:01:05 - 01:01:07] distorted [01:01:07 - 01:01:11] Scenarios of what it is that color clearly is process underway now [01:01:11 - 01:01:18] Yes, and everyone is through their own fears religious training hope they're trying to project [01:01:18 - 01:01:25] What is it? What is it? And there's a lot of fear a lot of uncertainty. I am not afraid of it [01:01:25 - 01:01:32] I would really like one of the great things about the psychedelic aliens is they don't vibrate with this strange [01:01:32 - 01:01:39] Vibe that the fetal trading graze of popular media vibrate with it's a much more [01:01:39 - 01:01:44] upbeat and affirmative kind of alien contact that occurs through the plant [01:01:44 - 01:01:50] This one plant or this one drug that you described [01:01:50 - 01:01:54] Dimethyltryptamine DMT. I don't know what that is [01:01:54 - 01:02:02] Well, what makes it so attractive in a discussion like this art is it's one of the most powerful of all the [01:02:02 - 01:02:07] Psychedelic, but it only lasts five minutes five minutes five minutes [01:02:07 - 01:02:15] So someone who has spent a lifetime dissing psychedelics or denying the existence of the paranormal for that matter [01:02:15 - 01:02:19] Should at least be willing to invest five minutes [01:02:19 - 01:02:26] We've never lost anybody you pick yourself up and go on about your business five minutes five minutes [01:02:26 - 01:02:29] The effects could you describe them? [01:02:30 - 01:02:34] To much of my audience that I know can recall the effects of LSD or [01:02:34 - 01:02:41] Very much rooms. It's very different very different. Well LSD is a kind of psychological [01:02:41 - 01:02:43] self-examination and [01:02:43 - 01:02:49] Strange thought processes and insights what happens with DMT is there is the unmistakable [01:02:49 - 01:02:55] Feeling of having gone to a place in other words it comes on in about 15 seconds [01:02:57 - 01:03:02] Suddenly you're in a place and this place is full of what I call [01:03:02 - 01:03:06] Self-dribbling jeweled basketballs [01:03:06 - 01:03:12] That are intelligent in some sense. They're like badly trained rockwilers [01:03:12 - 01:03:20] They come bounding forward and they're what they're doing in there is they're conducting some kind of a language lesson [01:03:20 - 01:03:23] because they speak [01:03:24 - 01:03:29] They they have a language which you can see is the only way I can explain it [01:03:29 - 01:03:32] What is the source of DMT is it a manufactured drug? [01:03:32 - 01:03:37] Candy, but it's its source is really in nature in plants like [01:03:37 - 01:03:40] Socotria viridis desmanthus elleniansis [01:03:40 - 01:03:45] There's a whole bunch of this Latin salad most of these are South American plants [01:03:45 - 01:03:52] But every ecosystem on earth has DMT sources in it in fact the human brain naturally produces [01:03:52 - 01:04:00] Why we don't know but I'd say there is a strong clue here is the drug which causes people to see little creatures [01:04:00 - 01:04:05] And this same substance occurs naturally in the human brain now [01:04:05 - 01:04:08] I'm not saying that's the answer to the UFO phenomenon [01:04:08 - 01:04:13] But how many people have looked at this and pursued it well then let me ask this [01:04:13 - 01:04:16] There are many who claim [01:04:16 - 01:04:18] to have been abducted [01:04:18 - 01:04:23] Terence and if DMT is a natural occurring substance in the brain [01:04:23 - 01:04:30] Your theory could probably be verified by measuring those who have claimed to be abducted [01:04:30 - 01:04:35] Would such a measurement scientifically be possible well the problem is you recall? [01:04:35 - 01:04:43] I said it only lasts five minutes so unusual amounts of it in the body are very quickly brought down to baseline [01:04:44 - 01:04:49] One of the most transient drugs in the body ever ever observed [01:04:49 - 01:04:55] So and an interesting thing about it art is when they measure its presence [01:04:55 - 01:05:00] They look at human cerebrospinal fluid and they've discovered that it reaches its greatest [01:05:00 - 01:05:03] concentration there between three and four in the morning [01:05:03 - 01:05:09] Well, that's when people are doing the intense REM dreaming yes, and so I think [01:05:10 - 01:05:15] Well, you know the Australian aboriginals have this concept of the dream time yes [01:05:15 - 01:05:23] And I think when you put the dream time the chemistry of DMT the abduction stories together and the depth [01:05:23 - 01:05:32] With which modern media has programmed and messed with people you're very close to being able to begin to talk about the alien [01:05:32 - 01:05:39] Phenomenon I think there are aliens, but I think they can only reach us through our minds [01:05:39 - 01:05:43] They don't cross the universe in ships of titanium [01:05:43 - 01:05:47] They don't even project holograms of themselves into the desert air [01:05:47 - 01:05:54] They come through the human mind and if you look at the human mind in all cultures and in all times and places [01:05:54 - 01:05:59] Except Western Europe in a few intellectuals in the past few hundred years [01:05:59 - 01:06:05] The human mind has always been haunted by sprites gnomes mix these elves yes [01:06:06 - 01:06:13] So I don't see the UFO the modern wave as anything more than the latest wave of this [01:06:13 - 01:06:16] mysterious relationship we have with [01:06:16 - 01:06:20] disembodied minds through the [01:06:20 - 01:06:23] Imagination well then people say well, so this is the old [01:06:23 - 01:06:30] psychological reduction argument no because when I say the human imagination [01:06:30 - 01:06:36] I don't mean some paltry psychological function. I think the human imagination is [01:06:36 - 01:06:43] The largest part of us and where we're going to spend most of the rest of human history here here [01:06:43 - 01:06:48] All right [01:06:48 - 01:06:51] How is such a theory? [01:06:51 - 01:06:55] Greeted by the majority of people who listen to it I mean right now [01:06:55 - 01:06:59] I'm getting a lot of access and a lot of people are really hearing what you're saying [01:06:59 - 01:07:05] Even though you've got to listen very carefully. They're hearing what you're saying Terrence and a lot of them are agreeing with you [01:07:05 - 01:07:11] But there's going to be a big body of very violent disagreement too isn't there well [01:07:11 - 01:07:16] Yes, there are some very large eggs at stake in this game [01:07:16 - 01:07:21] I mentioned science and the need to revive probability theory [01:07:21 - 01:07:26] There is a lot of vested interest in certain versions of what the UFO [01:07:27 - 01:07:31] phenomenon is but you see what I bring to all of this and [01:07:31 - 01:07:38] speaking for the psychedelic community what we bring to all of this is not simply another wrap or [01:07:38 - 01:07:44] Another tall tale, but a method. Oh, no I hear that so then would you suggest that? [01:07:44 - 01:07:47] sightings of UFOs [01:07:47 - 01:07:50] abduction encounters [01:07:50 - 01:07:54] Are if if you could be there measuring a burst of DMT? [01:07:55 - 01:07:57] You'd certainly find it at that moment [01:07:57 - 01:08:03] I think you would find it and I think you would also another place where you would find it is that human death [01:08:03 - 01:08:08] I think this is very important and that's human death that human death [01:08:08 - 01:08:13] I think as we die we have if we haven't had this a DMT trip [01:08:13 - 01:08:18] I also think probably every night in these deep dream states [01:08:18 - 01:08:26] We penetrate into realms from which we can remember almost nothing well then that would be another moment at which you should be able [01:08:26 - 01:08:33] To measure a spike in DMT level in the brain. Are you talking about death? No no yes. Yes. Yes [01:08:33 - 01:08:35] Yes, I'm talking about both [01:08:35 - 01:08:36] instances you cited [01:08:36 - 01:08:40] REM sleep deep REM sleep and the moment of death well [01:08:40 - 01:08:46] It's been confirmed in deep REM doing this kind of research on dying people you don't have ethical questions [01:08:46 - 01:08:50] I understand, but you're saying it has been confirmed. You know where in deep sleep [01:08:50 - 01:08:56] I don't know in the in what institution there has been confirmation of this well at the University of [01:08:56 - 01:09:00] Mississippi a few years ago a team led by a guy named Christian [01:09:00 - 01:09:06] All those papers are in the literature and in fact anyone interested in this should just search [01:09:06 - 01:09:11] DMT on the internet and they may have never heard of it that they will be astonished [01:09:11 - 01:09:15] Well, I've never heard of it, but but your chain of logic is making sense to me now [01:09:16 - 01:09:21] Let us talk for a second about paranormal events as we approach time wave zero [01:09:21 - 01:09:27] It is your contention. I think that paranormal events ghosts poltergeists [01:09:27 - 01:09:34] Paranormal events of all manner and shape will begin to increase which would suggest [01:09:34 - 01:09:39] I think that DMT spikes will be increasing yes [01:09:39 - 01:09:45] I it's a way of putting and certainly DMT is becoming more known in [01:09:46 - 01:09:53] society and there's a almost a fad now of locating plants in one's environment and and [01:09:53 - 01:10:00] Extracting this stuff and getting enough out to actually hit the money. Yeah, do we have laws against it yet by the way? [01:10:00 - 01:10:04] I guess I'd ask huh well. It's an interesting situation here [01:10:04 - 01:10:09] It is an a human neurotransmitter every single one of us has it in our body and yes [01:10:09 - 01:10:12] This is among the most illegal substances [01:10:12 - 01:10:19] Figures figures doesn't it? Yeah, it does figures. It's the catch-22. We're all holding art [01:10:19 - 01:10:28] Well the way things are going will probably all be tossed in a pokey for it [01:10:28 - 01:10:35] We'll have little roadside stops and DMT measuring devices. Well. I think this was Adam's fall [01:10:37 - 01:10:43] You made a I'm gonna return to another subject for a second you met a fascinating statement [01:10:43 - 01:10:47] I said well if there's time travel where are the time travelers your answer was? [01:10:47 - 01:10:52] they will not be here until the first time machine is invented because [01:10:52 - 01:10:58] You could not go back to a time prior to the invention of a machine that would enable travel [01:10:58 - 01:11:05] Your parallel was you can't travel where there are not roads, and there were are not roads back that far in time [01:11:05 - 01:11:13] If time is to virtually end by 2012 Terrence where would you see the invention of time machine? [01:11:13 - 01:11:16] a time machine the first time machine [01:11:16 - 01:11:19] between now and then [01:11:19 - 01:11:24] Well, I don't think it's between now and then actually that I think it's then [01:11:24 - 01:11:27] It's then it's then in other words [01:11:27 - 01:11:35] If what the time wave zero thing is showing is that events can be portrayed in this linear way as a line on a graph? [01:11:36 - 01:11:42] Yes, that's suddenly in 2012 for some mysterious reason this can no longer be done [01:11:42 - 01:11:48] it must be because in 2012 time ceases to be linear and [01:11:48 - 01:11:53] That must mean that because a technology is created [01:11:53 - 01:12:00] Which causes time to lose its linear and serial quality and that could only be time travel? [01:12:00 - 01:12:02] And you believe that at that moment? [01:12:04 - 01:12:11] Tens of thousands or millions or who knows of time travelers will suddenly show up well actually that's my [01:12:11 - 01:12:13] conservative [01:12:13 - 01:12:15] Model of what would happen? [01:12:15 - 01:12:20] What's against that is I'm sure you've heard this the well-known? [01:12:20 - 01:12:23] grandfather paradox which is [01:12:23 - 01:12:29] Time travel is always said to be impossible because you travel back in time and you could kill your own grandfather [01:12:30 - 01:12:37] Well, how do we avoid this yes? I think we avoid it by actually what happens when the first time machine is [01:12:37 - 01:12:40] invented is [01:12:40 - 01:12:41] the rest of [01:12:41 - 01:12:43] Universal history happens instantly [01:12:43 - 01:12:49] This is the only way paradox can be kept out of the picture [01:12:49 - 01:12:55] So I call it the God whistle scenario so in other words linearity ends at that [01:12:56 - 01:13:02] Instance and the rest of the history of the universe occurs in a few milliseconds [01:13:02 - 01:13:07] It's sort of the reverse of the Big Bang where you get a lot of action in the first few [01:13:07 - 01:13:14] nanoseconds of the universe's life in this model the universe undergoes half of its [01:13:14 - 01:13:18] morphogenetic unfolding in the last few [01:13:18 - 01:13:24] milliseconds of its existence is that then the moment when the human race in effect [01:13:25 - 01:13:31] joins those that we can temporarily now visit only with something like DMT or [01:13:31 - 01:13:37] That the human race joins those who have passed over into the great beyond or both [01:13:37 - 01:13:45] That's what I think it is. I mean are they one in the same in your view or they may be I thought that you know these [01:13:45 - 01:13:50] DMT creatures, what are they and the conservative position? [01:13:50 - 01:13:58] Since we know there are human beings is they must be some kind of human being but what kind and the only answer [01:13:58 - 01:14:03] I can come up with is soul. I mean I [01:14:03 - 01:14:06] Resisted this but is it possible that? [01:14:06 - 01:14:15] Shamans have been using plants to peer into the great beyond and that there is the kind of ecology of souls out there [01:14:15 - 01:14:22] When you ask the shaman they say well you weren't listening. We told you we did it with ancestor magic [01:14:22 - 01:14:27] Say oh I get it an ancestor an ancestor is actually a dead person [01:14:27 - 01:14:31] Yeah, absolutely [01:14:31 - 01:14:34] Absolutely fascinating Terrence listen to me. We're at the top of the hour [01:14:34 - 01:14:38] Go take a 10 or 12 minute break and when we come back [01:14:38 - 01:14:45] We're gonna talk about souls because I've I've got some recent really incredible news about souls [01:14:45 - 01:14:50] And you're just the right guy to comment on that and don't worry folks. We will get the lines open Terrence rest [01:14:50 - 01:14:53] Okay. All right, Terrence McKenna [01:14:53 - 01:14:55] Terrence McKenna Wow [01:14:55 - 01:15:03] Is Mike if on the other hand you have the time to sit down and really listen to what's being said not reacting [01:15:03 - 01:15:06] like a Neanderthal with your [01:15:08 - 01:15:14] Your head hitting the table then you're gonna come away from this thinking some new thoughts [01:15:14 - 01:15:19] And there is value in that back to Terrence shortly [01:15:19 - 01:15:23] Kenna that should be an interesting adventure [01:15:23 - 01:15:28] Unto itself, but I want to ask you Terrence about a little bit about [01:15:28 - 01:15:32] Souls you mentioned souls and and so I have two questions [01:15:34 - 01:15:42] One is there was a recent not recent very old medical study in which a medical doctor [01:15:42 - 01:15:47] Actually endeavored to set out and prove in days when it was politically okay to do this kind of thing [01:15:47 - 01:15:50] that the soul [01:15:50 - 01:15:55] Could actually be measured that at the very instant of human death [01:15:55 - 01:16:00] And he went through a whole big trip. I put the medical report up on my website [01:16:00 - 01:16:03] the human body loses [01:16:04 - 01:16:06] about three quarters of an ounce [01:16:06 - 01:16:10] And not due to gases or anything else you might imagine in your mind [01:16:10 - 01:16:16] No physical cause all of that accounted for and he printed and published this medical study [01:16:16 - 01:16:21] Suggesting the human body actually instantly at the instant of death [01:16:21 - 01:16:24] loses three quarters of an ounce of weight [01:16:24 - 01:16:28] Do you have any reaction to that? [01:16:28 - 01:16:30] well [01:16:30 - 01:16:35] Looking at it through the eyes of novelty theory. I think nature is very reluctant [01:16:35 - 01:16:40] Give up a complex ordered form once it's been achieved [01:16:40 - 01:16:49] I've noticed that the difference between living organisms and things like chairs and tables if the chairs and tables [01:16:49 - 01:16:50] don't [01:16:50 - 01:16:51] metabolize [01:16:51 - 01:16:56] In a sense the the soul is something which is manifest in time [01:16:56 - 01:17:01] It's almost as though organisms have a hyperdimension [01:17:01 - 01:17:08] They're they're objects with time folded inside of them and at death [01:17:08 - 01:17:11] What seems to happen is this complex? [01:17:11 - 01:17:22] Morphogenetic field if you will simply withdraws back into whatever higher dimension that came from in the first place [01:17:22 - 01:17:24] It's not