her.stnewthe library is open ->
library / Terence McKenna / Original Tree Of Knowledge

Original Tree Of Knowledge

Terence McKenna / audio 9:59:12 ~614 MB opus 143 kb/s

A Sounds True weekend workshop recorded live in Boulder, Colorado, with ethnobotanist and philosopher Terence McKenna. McKenna examines the hypothesis that psilocybin mushrooms were central to human evolution and the emergence of language and consciousness, arguing that psychedelic experience is not fringe anthropology but fundamental to understanding what we are. He discusses techniques of ecstasy developed by non-Western societies, the relationship between diet and evolutionary pressure, and the ways that making a transformative experience illegal removes it from the realm of model-building and human knowledge. The workshop weaves together rigorous philosophical argument with personal testimony about consciousness and access to invisible worlds.

transcriptmachine-transcribed, unedited

Sounds True presents In Search of the Original Tree of Knowledge, a weekend workshop with Terence McKenna.

Researcher, author, and philosopher, Terence McKenna has spent 25 years studying the foundations of shamanism and the ethno-pharmacology of spiritual transformation.

His books include Food of the Gods and The Magic Mushroom Grower's Guide, and most recently, The Archaic Revival.

He is also the founder of Botanical Dimensions, a non-profit botanical research project.

In this weekend workshop, Terence McKenna examines time and its mysteries, the nature of language, and the techniques of ecstasy that have developed in non-Western societies to navigate to and from invisible worlds.

And now, recorded live in Boulder, Colorado, In Search of the Original Tree of Knowledge, a weekend workshop with Terence McKenna.

How to slice into this pie, I try to never do it the same way because I don't want to get bored, but that lays a sort of obligation on me that I'm not always able to meet.

And two things, I think, are going on inside this wrap as currently packaged.

First of all, I'm very interested in talking about the impact of psilocybin on human evolution and values and institutions.

And then, so that you don't think we've just fallen into fringe anthropology 101, I'm interested in taking the insights from that discussion and trying to apply it to the modern or postmodern, as the case may be, dilemma.

Trying to draw some implication from looking at human prehistory and the set of factors that were in place at the moment of human emergence.

And since I feel pretty much among friends and fringies here, it doesn't trouble me to confess that my book, Food of the Gods, I really conceived of as a kind of intellectual Trojan horse.

It's written as though it were a scientific study, footnotes, bibliography, citations of impossible to obtain books and so forth and so on.

But this is simply to assuage and calm the academic anthropologists.

The idea is to leave this thing on their doorstep, rather like an abandoned baby or a Trojan horse.

And they will open their doors to it and take it inside, only to discover that out of this very staid rational discourse, pour the self-transforming elf machines from hyperspace with their own agenda.

I feel like I should say this, it's more for my ease than yours, that I've reached the conclusions that I now espouse through skepticism, reason, rationalism and tough argument.

So it may sound ditzy, flaky and soft-headed, but that's just because you're hearing it wrong.

The guiding input was experience.

And in a way, what we're gathered here to talk about tonight is an experience, which is not only rare, transformative, challenging, but also for reasons which we'll probably get around to, illegal.

So, uh, it's, uh, it's, uh, it's a very peculiar situation.

Very few experiences are illegal and our, uh, models of the world are built up based on our experience.

So, if you make an experience illegal, you're essentially saying it is off limits for model building.

You can't include that in your model because it isn't really there in some sense.

And, and this is the situation in Western society vis-a-vis the psychedelic experience.

To my mind, the psychedelic experience is as much a part of being human as sexuality, in personal independence, uh, child rearing.

These are the things which are scripted into us as opportunities for exercising our peculiar situation vis-a-vis the phenomenon of being.

And a society which would deny that is a society whose secret, or maybe not so secret, agenda is the infantilization of its citizens.

I mean, if we are not capable of dealing with these things, then who is?

And are the people who made the rules, did they carefully, conscientiously, and at depth explore these dimensions?

And decide they were unfit for human consumption?

Or, uh, was it done more hastily, more mindlessly, and with more fear?

I would submit to you that, uh, it's the latter.

Well, first of all, I want to talk about the impact of psychedelics, especially in this case, psilocybin, on humanness.

And then, if there's time, maybe we can talk a little bit about what is so great about it.

I had a philosophy professor once, Paul Feyerabend, some of you may know his books.

And he opened his Epistemology 101 course by saying,

I'm going to teach you what truth is, and then I'm going to teach you what's so great about it.

Well, I won't claim to teach what the psychedelic experience is.

That you will have to find out on your own.

But I think it is legitimate to discuss what's so great about it.

You know, are we, by any measurable index, superior or inferior to people who do not have this experience?

Because if not, then really the psychedelic position is no more than a kind of cult

to be lined up along with Roman Catholicism and all the other cults out there.

Speaking as a former member, of course.

Well, my notion of the way to legitimate the importance of psychedelics is by showing,

and I think one can show in fairly short order,

that these things are not alien to the human experience,

or ancillary or the province of uneducated little brown people down in the rainforest or anything like that.

I submit to you that the psychedelic experience and the impact of psychedelic plants on human beings

is central to understanding who we are and how we got this way.

And if we can explore this issue and convince ourselves that there's some merit in this point of view,

then it will simply, it will do more than rewrite the annals of a staid science like anthropology.

It will actually change how we relate to each other and to the planet that we're in the process of grinding into pollution.

So that's the raison d'etre for the politics behind it.

Now, here's the spiel.

Sometime in the last three million years,

our remote ancestors, the proto-hominids,

were disrupted in their evolutionary climax

in the canopies of the great rainforests of Africa.

You see, most animal species evolve into a niche,

tighter and tighter and tighter.

We see this with termites and cockroaches and most life forms.

This is what happens to them.

Only if the niche is somehow disrupted or destroyed

does the game veer away from its tendency toward closure.

And this is what happened to us.

Our remote ancestors would have lived happily

in the climaxed rainforests of Africa

in the same way that primates to this day live happily

in the climaxed rainforests of Indonesia and South America.

But for the fact that the dynamics of the planet,

and this ultimately is, if we're looking for a cause,

or some people would say a villain,

then it's the climatological dynamics of the planet

which began to limit these rainforest habitats.

And a new kind of habitat began to form in Africa,

which was grassland.

It's very recent.

And under nutritional pressure and under a pressure

that was the result of this retreating environment,

our remote ancestors descended from the trees

and began to adapt themselves to the new world of the grassland.

And they did this over a period of probably a couple of million years.

Now, I maintain, and if any of you are evolutionary biologists or anthropologists,

this is the nub of my position.

Here's what's new scientifically.

What they teach you about evolution is that it's caused by mutation,

which is a random process,

which then meets another random process,

which is natural selection.

And out of these two random processes,

lo and behold, you get sea urchins,

birds of paradise, gray whales, and human beings.

Now, when you inquire as to what is the source of this mutation,

you will be told it's cosmic rays,

incident, incoming hard radiation,

which can disrupt chromosomes.

And then most of these mutations are lethal,

some huge percentage of them.

But a vanishingly small number of them

actually confer adaptive advantage,

and they are then preserved in the genome

and passed on.

Now, what I want to suggest,

and I've never seen it thoroughly treated

by evolutionary thinkers,

is that food is the unexamined source

of evolutionary pressure.

It can be.

If you know anything about animal species,

you know that most animals tend to specialize their diet.

Insects are famous for this.

If you find a caterpillar and you want to raise it in a jar,

you must give it the food plant you found it on

because they don't just eat leaves.

It doesn't work like that.

They have species-specific adaptations.

Now, why is this?

It's because it's a strategy

to limit exposure to toxic and mutagenic chemicals

that other life forms are sequestering in their tissue

to discourage predation, essentially.

Well, so then what happens when an animal population

such as our remote ancestors

comes under pressure from a dwindling habitat

or a limited availability of food?

Well, what happens, if you have any sense,

is you start experimenting.

You start digging up roots you never thought about before

and chewing on them.

You start eating leaves.

You start eating insect protein.

You experiment with the slaughter of small animals

and so forth and so on.

And this is precisely what our remote ancestors did.

This is the much-lamented transition

from fruititarian holiness

to predatory carnivorous messiness.

But had we not been willing to lower our gourmet standards,

we would have entered the fossil record at that point.

So, here we have these proto-hominids

foraging into this new grassland environment,

beginning to beat on prairie dogs

and stuff like that.

And, simultaneously, as we all know,

evolving in this African veld environment,

were great herds of ungulate animals,

proto-cattle, bison, wildebeest, antelopes,

many, many different kinds of animals.

And one of the curiosities of nature

is that many mushrooms prefer the dung of ungulate animals

to just going out and making a deal

with the raw, natural environment.

They like the leavening that goes on

with vegetable material

when it passes through the double stomach

of an ungulate animal.

As a headline, what this means is

mushrooms grow in manure.

And so, our remote ancestors,

testing for insects and eating small animals,

would certainly have encountered

the so-called coprophytic or coprophilic,

the dung-loving mushrooms.

And they would have tested them for food.

Years ago, when I was in Kenya,

I observed baboon troops

in this very environment we're discussing,

and their habit was

they were very interested in cow pies

because they had learned from experience

that if you rush over to a relatively old cow pie

and flip it over,

there's a high probability of beetles

or beetle grubs under there.

And so, these were vectors for food getting.

Well, in the M,

I did not observe mushrooms in Africa,

but I observed mushrooms in the Amazon,

and they can attain the size of a dinner plate.

I've never seen them in cultivation quite that large.

But, you know, you come out after a hard rain,

and these things are landed

like little flying saucers or frisbees

in the meadows.

They would certainly have been tested

for their nutritional potential.

And psilocybin,

different from all other chemicals in nature,

including, as far as I can tell,

all other hallucinogenic chemicals in nature,

psilocybin has a unique set of characteristics

which implicated, to my mind,

very strongly in the catalyzing

of the emergence of humanness

out of proto-hominid and hominid organization.

And it works like this.

It's very relatively easy to understand

as major scientific breakthroughs go.

At least you're not going to be asked

to do any partial differential equations this evening.

I mean, psilocybin, in very low doses,

doses so low that if you were to take a dose this low,

you could conceivably forget you had done it

and just go out and shop and fiddle around.

But at doses so low that they do not register

as a psychedelic experience,

psilocybin imparts measurable improvement

in visual acuity.

Roland Fisher did this work

in the late 50s and early 60s.

And they built an experimental device

where a person who could not be seen

by turning a crank,

there were two parallel bars.

And by turning a crank,

this person could rotate one of the parallel bars

so that it was no longer parallel.

And lacking talking rats,

they went to the next preferred experimental animal,

which is graduate students.

And they would sit a graduate student

down in front of this device,

give them a very low dose of psilocybin,

and then put a buzzer in their hand

and say,

when the two bars are no longer parallel,

push the buzzer.

And Fisher collected large amounts of data

which showed that the people

who had taken the psilocybin

and the other people were given placebo,

of course,

could detect this deformation

long before the unstoned subjects

were able to do so.

And Fisher,

who was a totally straight European scientist,

in fact,

a Vienniser,

when I talked to him about this stuff,

he was very cagey.

And he was funny,

in fact.

He said,

well, you see,

it's very interesting.

Apparently,

here we have data

which argues significantly

that we are perceiving reality

better with the drug

than without the drug.

Yes.

For him,

that was a joke.

I mean,

he never did anything with it.

It was just a throwaway line.

But it stuck with me.

And I don't think you have to be

a rocket scientist

to see

that if you are a hunting animal

in a situation

of nutritional pressure,

as our remote ancestors were,

and there is a food

in that environment

which will give you

better vision

than, by God,

the animals

which accept that item

into their diet

are going to

be more successful hunters

than the ones

that do not.

And consequently,

they will outbreed

those members

of the population

that have some aversion

to this exotic food.

Either they don't like

the look of it

or they don't like

that it grows in manure

or they don't like

the taste of it.

But those who accept it

as a dietary item

will be more successful

at getting food

and consequently

more successful

at raising their offspring

to sexual maturity.

And that's the name

of the game

in Darwinian evolution.

You must raise

your offspring

to sexual maturity.

then the genes

flow forward.

If you fail

in that

you get

an F

in the evolution

game.

Well, okay,

so visual acuity

that's all very fine

but psilocybin

has other properties

which build

on that initial

pharmacological

peculiarity.

If you take

slightly larger doses

of psilocybin

and this is typical

of many indoles

you get

with many of which

are hallucinogens

you get

what is called

CNS arousal

central nervous system

arousal.

You all know

this feeling.

It's the feeling

of two double cappuccinos

in short order.

It's that you

do not sleep.

You are very restless.

You are very alert.

Your attention

is scanning,

scanning,

scanning

and

in highly

sexed animals

like primates

arousal means

exactly what it

sounds like.

It means

erection

in the male

animal

and

now

isn't that

interesting?

That is

a second

factor

feeding back

into this

increased

success

with offspring

business.

not only are you

a better hunter

but you're a more

highly sexed creature

and you're having

more of what

straight anthropologists

refer to as

successful copulations.

An amazing phrase

actually.

Meaning of course

that impregnation

is a consequence

of this sexual activity.

Now the other thing

that psilocybin

does

at or slightly

above this

arousal level

and this is very

important for the

argument

is it creates

it causes

what I call

boundary

dissolution

or

and boundary

dissolution

in human beings

like you

and me

means

ego loss

and I believe

that this

would have

promoted

a social

and sexual

style

based

not on

monogamous

pairing

but on

orgy

the scenario

is fairly easy

to imagine

it's

that

these

remote

ancestors

of ours

would take

these mushrooms

and they

probably

at the new

and full moon

the thinking

is that

ritual

was originally

lunar

timed

and then

they would

and these

are

we're talking

about

nomadic

groups of

people

probably

no more

than 80

to 100

people

and then

there would

be

group

sexual

activity

now

an interesting

social

consequence

of

orgyastic

social

styles

besides

a whole

lot of fun

of course

is

it's impossible

to trace

lines of male

paternity

in that

kind of a

situation

you see

women know

whose children

are whose

because they

see the child

come out of their

body

and they nurse

the child

but men

do not

in that

situation

have

their children

my children

what they

have

are

our children

the tribal

group

and

this

boundary

dissolving

thing

let's dwell

on this

for a moment

because this

is central

to my

argument

and it

has

political

consequences

for our

own

lives

all

primates

clear back

down

into squirrel

monkeys

and lemurs

all primates

have

what are called

male

dominance

hierarchies

and what this

means is

that the

most

the males

with the

longest claws

the hardest

muscles

and the

meanest

dispositions

take control

of everybody

else

women

children

weaker

males

everybody

comes under

the thumb

of the alpha

males

of the pack

this is true

as I said

of squirrel

monkeys

howler monkeys

so forth

and so on

it is also

true of us

sitting here

in this room

this is a male

dominant society

I mean there's a lot

of complaining

and hair pulling

about it

and there's a

political alternative

in the form

of the women's

movement

and feminist

sensitivities

but for most people

male dominance

is the rule

well I

would like

to suggest

that our

peculiarly

discomfort

relationship

to reality

is a consequence

of the fact

that

for a

long period

of time

perhaps as short

as 20,000 years

perhaps as long

as a million years

as a species

and not

consciously

we accepted

into our

diet

a drug

that had

the consequences

of suppressing

male dominance

that this

was

the social

consequence

of accepting

psilocybin

into the diet

the ego

is

a

structure

that

forms

in the

psyche

like a

calcareous

tumor

or a

growth

if you

do not

have

regular

recourse

to the

cure

and the

cure

is

psilocybin

and the

boundary

dissolving

sexual

and social

style

which it

carried

in its

wake

so the

reason

that we

as a

people

are

haunted

by the

idea

of a

lost

paradise

a

perfect

world

sometime

in the

misty

past

is not

you know

Mercier

called it

the

nostalgia

for

paradise

and thought

it was

a kind

of a

longing

that had

no basis

but I

think

that it's

entirely

a memory

of a

period

when

male

dominance

was

chemically

suppressed

ego

was

chemically

suppressed

and by

male

dominance

and ego

I don't

mean to

lay this

entirely

on men

I mean

I would

wager

probably

everyone

in this

room

has more

ego

than they

need

certainly

starting

with me

and that's

part of the

paradox

that you're

supposed to

enjoy

in this

you know

the ambiguity

of me

preaching

the loss

of ego

so

essentially

you know

what happened

was

a chemically

driven

leap

in evolution

as a

consequence

of the

suppression

of these

behaviors

that favored

male

dominance

as a

species

we would

have continued

with male

dominance

forever

had it

not been

for

psilocybin

in the

diet

and it

established

a situation

in which

in less

than

two

million

years

the human

brain

size

doubled

this is

without

contest

the

greatest

mystery

in the

whole

of

evolutionary

theory

Lumsden

who is a

brilliant

evolutionary

biologist

called the

doubling of

the human

brain size

in two

million years

the most

spectacular

transformation

of a major

organ

of a higher

animal

in the

entire

fossil

record

well

now

it would

be

spectacular

enough

if it

were the

liver

of an

otter

or the

pancreas

of an

elephant

but

notice

that

it is

the

organ

which

created

the

theory

of

evolution

itself

and

all

other

theories

so that

we're

getting a

little

tautological

here

folks

there's

something

fishy

going on

what

was it

that

caused

this

explosive

doubling

in

human

brain

size

well

I

maintain

that

it

was

the

new

behaviors

that

emerged

with

the

suppression

of

ego

and

their

reinforcement

in

this

situation

of

nomadic

pastoralism

and

that

there

was

a

period

let's

call

it

from

the

melting

of

the

last

glaciers

in

BC

there

was

a

period

when

men

and

women

were

in

balance

with

each

other

children

and

adults

were

at

peace

with

each

other and then it was lost and we fell into history you know the long slog

toward Armageddon is what was initiated in its place well now if it was so

wonderful why would anybody ever let go of it why was it lost well we have to go

back to the very forces which created this situation remember I said it was

called the climatological dynamics of the planet created the grasslands in place

of the rainforest continuation of those processes turned those grasslands into

desert and where there once were water holes running rivers grasslands and vast

herds of animals and their human symbiotes suddenly there was encroaching

desert fewer water holes the mushrooms began to be seasonal began to be

located only in the rain shadows of mountains the great mushroom festivals

which had been at the new and full moon became solstice seal and then equinoctial

and then you know biennial or something anyway you get the picture it was fading

and I don't think people took this lying down no pun again I think that there was

great anxiety about the fading of the mushroom and the loss of the sacrament and

so these people searched for a strategy for preservation well in a world without

refrigeration there is only one well no there are two strategies for preservation of

a delicate food like that one is air drying which is not terribly satisfying because as soon as a

rain cloud comes along your dry stuff absorbs moisture out of the air and turns yuck and so

the real the only real option is preservation in honey and this was done I'm sure it's still done in

Mexico to this day in remote mushroom using villages people preserve it in honey now the problem here and this is a

a lot of my book goes into this kind of thing a lot because food of the gods because what food of the gods is

really about are the hidden factors that drugs lay upon us that we are not even aware of and if you are

attempting to preserve a hallucinogenic mushroom in honey what you have to be aware of is that honey itself is

potentially a psychoactive drug honey will turn into mead it will ferment into a crude kind of honeyed alcohol

well if the mushroom brings suppression of ego group sexual activity and the formation of group values what does alcohol bring

alcohol has two effects primarily it lowers sensitivity to social cuing at the same time that it confers an exaggerated sense of verbal

facility in other words people turn into jerks behind this I mean you only have to go to a busy singles bar somewhere here in Boulder and you will see the alcohol ambiance being acted out

right in front of you so and and you know it's perhaps not so true of our generation but I think probably for a thousand years nobody got laid in western civilization unless they were juiced

because Christianity was laying such a heavy trip on everybody and you know people barely took their clothes in other words you had to become blindly intoxicated to do what comes naturally

and I think up until very recently how many women have their first sexual imprinting in an atmosphere of alcohol abuse I mean I would some huge percentage I imagine

so that is the story basically of the fall into history the loss of this mushroom cult happened right at the time that we were inventing agriculture and

agriculture and the suppression of orgy have something in relationship to each other on two unrelated levels

first of all you suppress orgy because once you have agriculture it's no more about psyching yourself up for the great hunt it's all about getting up before dawn and going out and hoeing the weeds out of the crops

so it doesn't promote a party mentality

the other thing is that as human mental capacity was evolving remember that exploding brain size as human mental capacity was evolving women in these nomadic groups

began to notice a curious fact which was every year they would return roughly to the same place as they had been the year before and in the discourse

from last year's camp in the midden they would discover food plants growing

and some brilliant woman or group of women put it together and said aha we buried food here last year and now there is food here

must be something about putting food into the ground gets you food in other words they were able to cognize a cause and effect relationship

that were separated over many months of time at the same time that women were putting this together men were noticing that the act of sex had certain consequences nine months later

the same perception had different impacts on both sexes but it was an ability to coordinate a temporally separated cause and effect

well once men got onto the notion of male paternity

they realized that these aren't our children

some are mine

some are somebody else's

and from that notion

you go to

my child

to my woman

to my hunting area

to my weapons

to my

my

sib group

you get it all

you see

the ego is born

and it is born in an atmosphere of complete paranoia

the first consequence of agriculture

well it has a number of consequences

but one consequence

is

it's a tremendously efficient way of producing food

that's obviously why people got into it

what does efficiency mean?

surplus

what does surplus mean?

haves and have-nots

the most spectacular architectural edifice of 10,000 BC on this planet

was the grain tower at Jericho

it was

had thick walls to hold the grain

and it had high walls so you could climb up on top of it and drop rocks on the people who were trying to get into it

surplus makes nomadism impossible

because you can't drag this huge amount of grain with you

so you get sedentary populations

and then

since the people who want the grain are killing your people in fury when they can't get the grain

you decide to put a wall around the whole encampment

now you have a small town

now you have urbanism

now you have the division between nature and secular society

you have classes

you've got it all

and I maintain that this is the long march into hell

and

our particular

obsession with drugs

as a species

I maintain can be traced back

to this transition

that

you know

yes elephants love fermented papayas

and so do butterflies

and so forth and so on

but this kind of

intoxication

is not

what we're about

we

addict

severely

to several dozen substances

less severely to

probably a hundred more

and

we addict to everything

that

you know

what we call romantic love

shows a lot of similarities to hard drug addiction

when you separate the lovers

you know

sleeplessness

suicidal tendencies

burning into tears

hysteria

loss of weight

you can't tell whether this person is getting off heroin

or has separated from their partner

well if you take an individual

who is alcoholic

or

has some kind of serious drug problem

current thinking is

this can be traced to traumatic abuse in childhood

this is what happened to us

traumatic abuse in childhood

we were literally

torn out

of a symbiotic relationship

to the earth

by the forces of male dominance

agriculture

sedentary living

so forth and so on

and we've been trying to

scratch an itch

that we can't find

ever since

and it has

you know

money doesn't do it

power doesn't do it

nothing seems to do it

we cannot

we seem to be the unhappy monkey

and we take this unhappiness out on each other

with a vengeance

and

you see what happened was

when the mushroom faded

the million years of

pharmacologically interrupted

patterns of male dominance

reasserted themselves

but it was no more a foraging monkey

with this style

it was a creature with language

tools

music

social organization

and suddenly it got very ugly

and people weren't interested

people began fighting over the women

so we don't want to have orgies anymore

this woman

is my woman

touch her you die

and so forth and so on

and we are living out

the legacy

of this

well before I talk about the

the social consequences of it

for us

I want to go back to the question

what was so great

about it

I mean we've talked about orgy

but you can have orgy without psilocybin

what was so wonderful about that

proto-historical mode

well this is where it becomes slightly more woo-woo

because what we have to talk about is what is the psychedelic experience anyway

and I maintain

that if we're talking about psilocybin

and we're talking about taking it in nature

as these people did

that you know

yes

first come the dancing mice

the little candies

the colored grids

and so forth and so on

but what eventually happens

quickly

like ten minutes later

is

there is an entity

in the trance

in the vision

there is a mind

there

waiting

that speaks good English

and invites you up into its room

and once there

you

realize that this is what all the hoopla

about the Gaian mind

and the rebirth of the goddess

and all that

is about

it's not a metaphor folks

it's a headline

in biology

we are not

the only intelligent

minded species

occupying

this planet

we may be the only

bipedal hairless mammal

with intelligence

on this planet

but there is something

out there

spread through

the grasses

the forests

the rivers

and the oceans

our own emergence

emergence into intelligence

took less than two million years

life

has been on this planet

for a billion and a half years

and we don't know

how many strange pathways

beckon

but at some point

a kind of mind

came into existence

and it is real

it's what lies behind

the religious impulse

in our species

there really is

somebody else

sharing

the local

mind space

and I don't believe

we're talking

theology

here

in other words

this is not

you know

in Milton's wonderful

phrase

the God who hung the stars

like lamps

in heaven

it's not about that

for me

that's a big question mark

but it is

it is

the God

goddess

of this earth

it is the biological mind

it is

that all

boundaries

are illusions

and that life

is a thinking

feeling

entelechy

of some sort

and we are just like a little

droplet

that has somehow

escaped

from the river

of cognition

and now imagine

that we're the only water

in the cosmos

not so

it turns out

what

the reason the psychedelic experience

is so baffling

and transformative

even as we sit here

with your heads

full of Heidegger

and Husserl

and

I don't know

Wilson Phillips

and all this stuff

is because

in the faith

in contact with that

we have no more

sophistication

than our

orgiastic

mushroom

munching ancestors

civilization doesn't give you

a leg up

on this stuff

in fact

it makes it harder

to figure out

what's going on

because we have defined

nature

as dead

you know

atoms

screaming

through empty space

ruled by

tensor equations

of the third degree

that's our picture

of what nature is

that isn't what it is

it's

a mind

of some sort

okay

what is the implication

of all this

is this just some kind of

fringe

anthropological revisionism

no

it isn't

because

the fall into history

and its consequences

is

at this point

a loaded gun

held

to the head

of the entire planet

we are about

to

pull over

the soup cauldron

and if we do this

then

two and a half billion years

of evolutionary advance

will be shot

nobody else ever dropped

the ball

so you know

we appear to be

vying for

this peculiar

honor

if we do not

awaken

to the consequences

of ego

then

we are going to run

this system

right over the edge

the whole

thing

which characterizes

our dilemma

as a global society

is

our inability

to feel

feel

the consequences

of what we are doing

you know

we've got the data

the ozone hole is

disappearing

life in the sea

will die

if it does

that will disrupt

the food chain

the world food supply

will drop

by 60%

everybody who isn't

white as a sheet

will have to starve

in that case

and so forth

and so on

I mean

we actually toy

not only

with our own extinction

but with the extinction

of all life

on the planet

and with the extinction

of the idea

of dignity

and decency itself

well

I'm not in this

psychedelic game

because I think

it's not easy

or because

I think it's going

to be a cinch

I'm in it

because I think

it's the only game

in town

you know

if hortatory preaching

could have done

the trick

then the sermon

on the mount

would have turned

the corner

if

cautionary data

flowing back

to ruling institutions

could do the trick

then sometime

after Thomas Malthus

people would have begun

to hit the brakes

nothing

seems to work

we're sick

we need

pharmacological

intervention

the

ego

is

permitting us

to

slowly

not so slowly

commit suicide

and

you know

the fact that we

cannot act

collectively

that we are suspicious

of all forms of

collectivism

that we

really are

all for one

and one for all

is not

our style

instead

what we have going

is a cat fight

and

you know

no less

straight person

than Arthur Kessler

in a book called

The Ghost in the Machine

said

humans are so wired

for beating the brains

out of woolly mastodons

that's what evolution

has equipped us to do

not

negotiate

weapons

treaties

and destroy

bacteriological

factories

we

have to

force

our evolution

we

have to

chemically

restructure

the primate

brain

so that we

do not

commit suicide

and the only way

to do it

is for the psychedelic

community

to stand up on

its hind legs

and roar

and

you know

maybe they'll build

camps for us

but

the point being

I think

there's a moral

imperative

to try

what works

I mean

you know

in the 60's

psychedelics were called

consciousness expanding drugs

a good old

phenomenological

description

well

if

consciousness

does not

loom large

in the future

history of our species

then what the hell

kind of future

is it

going to be

no future at all

I maintain

so

if

there is even the

slightest

iota

of possibility

that these things

do

what I'm saying

they do

we need to get

johnny quick on it

and check it out

because

that we may be

beyond the point of

no return

right now

nobody knows how bad

this ozone hole

thing is

or what's locked up

at rocky flats

or behind the iron

curtain

or dumped in the arctic

ocean

we may be past

the fail safe point

right now

folks

there is no time

to lose

it is time to engage

the powers that be

in a little more

serious dialogue

than the

just say no

horseship

that's been peddled

recently

because we're talking

about the survival

of life

on the only planet

that we are

certain

has life

on it

this may be

the site

of a cosmic

experiment

with

universal

implications

and it rests

in our hands

everybody

here

tonight

is here

because

a whole

bunch of people

didn't drop

the ball

and

you know

you think you've got problems

nine times

in the last

million years

the ice

has moved south

from the poles

miles

thick

no antibiotics

no electronic

communication

nothing

and I'm sure

these people

were miserable

and they dragged

through it

and they lived

and they passed

it on

now we're

it

and we will be judged

the lamest

of the lame

if we cannot

come to terms

with this

and begin to talk

about what is going

on

this is not

obscure

as I said

I view

the psychedelic

experience

as central to

humanness

as our sexuality

we cannot

allow

dominator

institutions

to infantile

infantilize

us

and to tell you

where your mind

can and cannot

go

we even have a piece

of paper

locked up in a vault

in Washington DC

that guarantees

life

liberty

and the pursuit

of happiness

well now

what could

the pursuit

of happiness

possibly mean

if it doesn't mean

the freedom

to practice

your own

relationship

to nature

and its gifts

so I think

we have been

entirely

too casual

about the importance

of the psychedelic

experience

this is for one reason

because

we cannot

publicly get together

and discuss it

in detail

and one of the things

that I think

is very important

about get-togethers

like this

is if you will

look around

you'll notice

that we cannot

really be distinguished

from the rest

of society

some of us

live under bridges

some of us

clip coupons

you know

there's a wide

spectrum

of people here

but

this is your

affinity group

this is your

community

someone in this room

actually has

what you need

and

you know

I have

acted as a

filter

so out of

millions

living along

the front range

here we've

gotten it down to

I can't go any further

than that folks

the rest

is

up to you

well

I guess

the last thing

I want to say

and then we'll take

a little intermission

and

and then come back

and do questions

afterwards

which is my favorite

part

but I want to

just for a minute

invoke

the psychedelic

experience

without regard

to

the evolutionary forces

that created it

or the political

institutions

that suppress it

and so forth

and just say

in case there's

some soul

in this room

who's never had

experience

that

this is

extraordinary

news

we're not talking

about something

like a dream

it is not

like

meditation

no

you can't

get there

by yourself

and

Babaji is

equally useless

because you

and Babaji

are starting

from the same place

in this game

it requires

pharmacological

perturbation

of ordinary

neurochemistry

in order

to see

this mystery

and it is

a mystery

it is

not going to be

reduced

to the firing

of synapses

or repressed

sexual desires

or day

residues

or anything

like that

it is

the very thing

which all

these religions

are yammering

about

it's there

it's real

I mean if you think

that the world

is empty

of adventure

then you just

haven't been hanging

out with the right

crowd

I mean

on a Saturday

night

within the confines

of your own

apartment

on five grams

of psilocybin

mushrooms

in silent darkness

I guarantee

you

you will believe

that Ferdinand

Magellan

should take second

place to you

you will see

things

which no human being

has ever seen

before

and

that no human being

will ever see

again

that's how big

that universe

is

that can

the incredibly

constricted

space-time

locus

of the here and now

that evolution

has forced upon us

for survival purposes

is simply

one point

in an apparently

infinite hologram

of explorable

data

that is

the human world

I mean

the

you know

the entire world

of every science fiction

novel

and story

ever written

is

minuscule

compared

to the universes

of strangeness

and peculiarity

that are

accessible to

any one of us

if you will

but

apply the method

and if you're not

willing to apply the method

then you know

you're going to sweep up

around the ashram

till hell freezes over

and

not

understand

what

is going on

I mean

I think

you know

I'm sorry to be so hard

on religion

I think it has

its place

is

the inspiration

of ethical behavior

you know

religion should

teach

ethical behavior

but

it has

very very little

to say

about the mystery

of being

other than

that it's there

and that's not

practicing religion

is dancing

with the mystery

losing

and finding

yourself

in the mystery

and people often

say to me

you know

well

how does this relate

to other forms

of spiritual work

the answer is

maybe

not at all

I mean

I've certainly taken

a lot of psychedelics

and I think

I see no sign

of

spiritual attainment

or

ethical

perfection

or anything

so

la-di-da

as that

I don't know

what this is

all about

but I do know

it's ours

it belongs

to us

we are the creatures

of mind

and

95%

of what

mind is

lies

on the other

side

of the psychedelic

boundary

ordinary

consciousness

is just

like

keeping the

accounts

of life

but there's more

to life

than the account

books

I mean

everything else

is out there

the color

the affection

the humor

the terror

the mystery

the strangeness

of it all

this

is the domain

that we want to claim

and explore

and if we can find

the collective

institutional courage

to do it

I think this

current

planetary crisis

will be seen

for what it really is

and what it is

is

it's not a dying

these are not

the last rights

for intelligence

this is a birth

process

I mean

if you were to

come around

if you've never seen

somebody give birth

around the corner

and it was in progress

you would be

thoroughly

profoundly

alarmed

I mean

it looks like an

enormous tumor

is making its way

out of somebody

and they are being

split in two

and blood

is being shed

and there's

pleading

and screaming

and thrashing

it would be a real

leap of understanding

for you to say

oh how wonderful

new light

is emerging

this is the way

we do it

well

this is the way

we do it

I mean

we are in the birth

canal right now

of a planetary

civilization

literally

the amniotic oceans

of 500 years ago

that's all gone

there is no frontier

there is no going back

the piece of the fetal environment

is gone

and now

in transition

literally

the walls

are closing in

you can't breathe

you can't eat

you can't find your way

it appears to be the end

but there's light

at the end of the tunnel

the problem is

that tunnel

is in the back of your mind

and if you don't go

to the back side of your mind

you will never see

the light at the end of the tunnel

and once you see it

then the task becomes

to empower it

in yourself

and other people

spread it as a reality

God did not retire

to the seventh heaven

God is some kind of lost continent

in the human mind

and if we will but explore the human mind

we can reclaim these relationships

with our own authenticity

and shed the childishness of his mind

of historical existence

and gender politics

and all the rest of it

and move on to the real business

of establishing a real civilization

thank you very much

Does anyone want to ask a question or is it all just perfectly clear utterly convincing and

Yeah, of psilocybin bad effects

Somebody once said what's wrong with DMT and I said well nothing unless you fear death by astonishment

But but your question is a good one first of all

You know, I talked a lot about how what we have to do is destroy and ablate ego

However, there is a very small percentage of us who have a hard time creating any ego

whatsoever and the for these people boundary dissolution is no problem their boundaries are dissolving all the time on them

I would say that they are at the

Contraindicated end of the spectrum that if you're

fearful already and

Fighting to keep from being overwhelmed by confusion at what's going on in your life at the paper box factory or something

then probably

Tossing in mega doses of how the sentence is not the way

for you to do it or if you do if you're just bent on doing that then I would say

Do it in the presence of some kind of professional and

How you find a professional in this legal climate you'll have to discuss with me privately?

I don't want to make it sound though. I mean it's a tricky thing

I don't want to make it sound like it's absolutely riskless

Physically, I think it's pretty safe

Unless you have are odd in some way, but you need to know you know

You don't want to find out you're odd an hour and a half into it, but that

the the problem comes

with the mind

You know if if you are delicately balanced

If your whole life has been about not looking at that or that or that

Then this is not your game, you know you should go back to

watching Jeopardy and

But the kind of person

The kind of person who is called to this is a person who has an exploring

soul I mean my I am not a

Courageous person in the sense that you won't find me shooting white water you would do don't see me

You know rappelling down the faces of cliffs, but from the time I was at the tiniest little kid

I was into the weird

What's weird weird is the compass heading and if you keep your compass always

Pointed toward the peculiar the ultra the bizarre the unspeakably alien then you know you'll find these places

The people the people who think life is all cut and dried and are perfectly happy to have Carl Sagan and George Bush explain all of reality

Have never left the broad swift stream of mundane

thinking but you know off in the byways and tributaries

There's a wonderful alchemical saying

Which I generally mangle, but I think it goes something like this the tallest mountains the oldest books the widest deserts

There you will find the stone and what it is is it's a prescription for exploring weirdness

That's all it's not going to be on mtv. It's not going to be in God forbid Esquire

It's going to come

From you know doing your homework visiting strange people in strange lands

and checking it out the

What I can't give you to return to your question is I can't give you a guarantee that it will be fun

You know the rolling stones have that wonderful line you don't get what you want you get what you need

This stuff is ruthless and if there's something that you're trying not to look at it's going to get you for sure

But ask the veterans most people will tell you you learn more from the bad trips

Than you do from the good ones the good ones are ecstatic and connect you up to nature and other people the bad ones show you

Your your kinks and your limitations and your thought

Errors and that sort of thing. It's not an easy row to hoe. That's why I think

There's a little bit of social confusion about it one of the things I should make clear is I really advocate

high doses

Rarely I think the worst thing you can do is get into a style of psychedelic diddling

Where you know you take half a gram every day

all this is doing is

Giving you a tolerance to psilocybin

You're not having the psilocybin experience. You're having the tolerance to psilocybin

experience the really the way to do these things is to

Do them rarely so that your whole system can reassert itself and come to equilibrium and then just slam it

and

This is amazing. I mean, I think I think that this works for all these psychedelics

I'm

I'm an inveterate cannabis user and I wish in a way that I could get a slightly

Better grip on my cannabis use because the I think the real way to do cannabis is like

once a week

by yourself in

Silent darkness with the strongest stuff you can get and then immense amounts of it

And you know people call it a recreational drug and of this and of that hate done that way it will

catapult you into places where it's the it's I love it the great place to get to on cannabis and some people never in their whole life

Touch it is the place where you say my god. I've done too much

It's not easy folks, but it's worth shooting for

Basically what what you should do is is you know do some homework read some books

Talk to your friends and then hang on Hannah. It's like

You know, it's very much like riding an enormous roller coaster

You know once that baby rolls out of the station

Do not stand up do not try to climb out of your car

Shut up and hang on with the faith that most people have lived through this

Somebody else yeah the purple

Well having just heard that I'm a pothead please ask them one at a time

What is your first literary question?

Well, I don't mean to imply that people first used it in low doses and then middle and then higher over time

What I mean what I meant to imply I think they were using low middle and high doses from the very get-go

But they were using low doses to hunt middle range doses for orgy and ceremony and truly high doses for this boundary dissolving

tremendum

literary question uh-huh

Well, I'm I'm not wedded to that first of all chatal hyaluk for those of you haven't read the book

Or know about chatal was this immensely sophisticated

civilization that existed in the seventh millennium

B.C.

We're talking three thousand we're talking six thousand years before

Zero this civilization existed and was destroyed and the

The characteristic of it is shrines dedicated to cattle and in my book

I argue that this was probably the last outpost of this partnership

Society

But it was still I think the real golden age of mushroom use was probably from about

30,000 years ago to about

15,000 years ago and by the time chatal hyaluk comes along it's it's a fading or yearly or seasonal thing

The important one. The assertions that you made earlier

The assertions that you made earlier was that these endo-based plant solution agents actually change people that use them. And the unfortunate thing that I observed is, I can't agree with that assertion. It seems that as many people, it seems like only a really few people are changed by it. Only those who are predisposed to change. And I'd like, in one of the questions you asked, that's one of the important ones that you made earlier.

Does it make us better...does it make us different. And I'm just not convinced at all. When I see people taking mushrooms and going around, no. And I mean, it's, it's an amazing show, I mean, my friends are you all through me too.

And that's because I tell my brothers, you know, it's one of the things, right? And I'm very interested in sharing that there's what you're going to do. This is so hard to learn.

So you're a real person that you're doing. That's why you're going to be the ones that are worthy of the most.

I think one of the questions you ask that doesn't make it better, doesn't make it different.

different. And I'm just not convinced

at all. But when I see people

taking mushrooms and going around

doing chinkish-minkish things,

and just being as jerky

as they ever were, I mean,

you know, I'm going to

and you know, I don't see it happening.

Well, I...

My argument

would be that people

don't take it enough and they don't take

it frequently enough.

That there are a lot of people

who really would rather

not get loaded

but who feel they must

take some psychedelic

drug in order to keep membership

in their peer group. So what they

do, you know, you can always spot these people

because their first question

at the get-go is, will I be able

to drive? I love this

question.

Because, you know, it indicates

you've got a real tough nut

on your hand. In every

sense of the word, no.

No, you will not be able to drive.

So, you know, I...

One of the things that inspires

me to do this is

I want to get to the people

who've taken

three grams of mushrooms

and the people who've taken

150 mikes of LSD.

And I want to convince those people

that they never got close

to what I'm talking about. Even though

they had a life-transforming experience

and saw things totally differently,

they never got close to what I'm

talking about. And so

what you have to do is convince people to take

high doses

and then that's to

break them through and then

frequently enough that they don't

forget what the deal

is. So I think if you take a

psychedelic population and divide

it into those who have done

five grams and above,

then you will see

an exceptional

slice.

But not the dabblers.

The dabblers don't count.

And we all can

be, or at times,

guilty of this, I think.

And then...

Is that your last question?

Does that do it for you?

Or do you want to be thought psychotic?

You choose.

Well, I'd love competition.

I mean, I...

The competition is terrible.

That's the entire basis

of my success.

Yeah.

You, because you were

before.

If you still wish.

I don't know if it's preferable.

But here's the thing.

People are going to think

you're a nut

if you come down

and say

that Johan Sebastian Bach

or Jerry Garcia

is God.

And this is what

you will have to say

if you listen to the dead

or the B minor math.

So,

what I'm interested in

is

I want to know

the thing in itself.

Not what it does

to Bach.

not what it does

to a river

flowing through

a forested valley.

I want to see

what it can do

with darkness

and silence.

And I think

most people think

it'll be boring.

Probably because

they've been hanging out

with these BDI gurus

meditating

and God knows

there's nothing

more boring on earth

than most meditations.

However,

psychedelic,

sitting in a darkened room

on five dry grams

of psilocybin mushrooms

is nothing

like meditating.

And that's where

it can get at you.

My relationship

to it

is always one

of

I want to know

what it is.

And so,

I think this

sensory deprivation method

is the only way

to get at that.

Other people might not like that.

People say,

well, you mean

you put down

the whole thing

of going into nature?

Isn't nature

the great affirmation

in all this?

And the answer is,

yeah,

but it works for me

sort of

without the drugs.

Plus,

and this is just

maybe my own weirdness,

but I'll share it with you.

I have noticed

that these things

are incredibly disruptive

of the ordinary flow

of Kazuistry.

Do you all know

the concept of synchronicity?

Well,

if you don't stay

in your room

with the lights out

and the phone unplugged,

the damnedest things

will happen to you.

I mean,

you couldn't pay me

to go into

an American city

even mildly loaded

because

adventures beckon.

Now,

some people like that.

You know,

some people say,

you know,

let's take 500 mics

and go meet

weird people.

Uh-uh.

Not this cookie.

Uh-uh.

Yeah.

According to your statement,

what I find happens there

is that you

create an experience

where you are

taking in other people's dogma.

You know,

you're bringing in

something that's already done.

And I feel like

the people experience

can create something new

and something new

expresses itself

from the death.

Which is why

I also say

the darkness sometimes.

But one thing

that I did learn

is that

the high doses

are very,

very interesting.

It would take me

way far

beyond

the small doses.

And I've experimented

with both

homeopathy

and

now from the

mineral extracts

in terms of

making my own medicine.

But in turn,

it's psychedelic.

But if you take that

into

and my question

is coming back,

of course,

that if you take that

into a situation

where you remove

the whole

elective habit

that you do

in a homeopathy,

do you think

that there could be

a more potent experience

through that solution?

Are you asking me

do I think

a homeopathic

preparation

of a psychedelic

would be effective?

It would be

homeopathically

effective.

I wouldn't expect

it to be

experientially effective.

See,

I would say

that

there's

what we view

out here

is a direct

creation

of what we are

inside

that's the current

present.

That if you do

change it

in the same manner

that you change

your homeopathy,

which is changing

the asterisk

so that you then

create the world

of a certain time,

that it would be

even more potent

and even more

immediate

effective

really

just in our reality.

But don't you

think that

if that were true

and since

in a high dilution

like that

no molecular trace

of the original

compound remains

that you have

then just

found the solution

to the

legalization

conundrum.

because in a

materialist world

it's assumed

to be bogus.

right

yeah

well

this seems

to me

not an abstract

proposition

at all

let the best

homeopaths

succuss

the strongest

hallucinogens

and set them

out

and

let's give

it a whirl

over on

this side

yeah

oh I can

hardly

wait

why are you

in jail

ah

why am I

not in jail

hmm

well that's

an interesting

question

and I

number one

I don't know

here's what

I've come up

with

notice

that I

use

big words

I don't

boil

I don't try

to boil it

down to

a shoutable

slogan

like

turn on

tune in

drop out

uh uh

that

then they

come

they come

so that's

one possibility

that simply

if you are

defined in

their eyes

as an

intellectual

then they

automatically

put you

in the

harmless

category

and send

resources

elsewhere

that's one

possibility

now the other

possibility is

slightly more

disturbing

but in the

interest of

thoroughness

let me

raise it

perhaps I'm

sanctioned

perhaps

they decided

we don't

really understand

what this

stuff is

and we

can't have

a mass

movement

but let

one guy

just kind

of keep

the pilot

light

on

in case

we ever

change

our minds

about

this

he will

have kept

the pilot

light on

and the

other possibility

which is

probably

too naive

but in the

interest

again of

exhaustive

thoroughness

maybe they

just haven't

noticed

yet

you know

Tim

Leary

who's

a friend

of mine

would

address

25,000

people

at a

throw

my

crowds

are

you know

a couple

of times

a year

they creep

over a

thousand

and I

think the

key is

to keep

it

low-key

and we

don't want

to

you know

dodge

your

stadium

filled

or anything

like that

it's

very good

to

atomize

it

and spread

it through

now the

other thing

is

you know

I advocate

plant

hallucinogens

and people

always say

well

what about

LSD

I mean

didn't LSD

change your

life

didn't it

change all

our lives

why aren't

you into LSD

and the

answer is

certainly

yes

and yes

the reason

I'm not

into LSD

is a

a

not having

to do with

the effects

of LSD

which I think

are marvelous

but with the

fact that

a

couple of

enterprising

second year

biochemistry

students

can produce

six or seven

million hits

in a long

weekend

six or seven

million hits

of an illegal

drug

suddenly

this is the

realm of

governments

and criminal

syndicates

and revolutionary

disruption

of populations

my brother

and I wrote

psilocybin

the magic

mushroom

growers guide

if you work

like a

dog

for six

months

maybe you

can produce

two or

three thousand

hits

so

that's the

thing

medical qualities

that made it

terrifying

to the government

I mean

anybody

with

fifty thousand

dollars worth

of backing

and

two years

of biochemistry

could turn

themselves

into a major

threat

to

political

stability

in this country

so they

slammed that

they're not going

to put up

with that

the thing

I love

about the

mushrooms

is

you know

if you're

a dedicated

mushroom grower

you produce

this piddling

amount

and if they

come and drag

you away

because it is

illegal

all they get

is you

no

syndicate

collapses

no pyramid

disappears

so

it's invasive

and

low-key

and slowly

spreading

the other

thing is

mushrooms

are

this is a

cultural

thing

mushrooms

are

inherently

non-threatening

they're

absurd

you know

they're

they're what

we

they're what

we put

decals

of on

serving trays

and

bath

towels

bear

mushrooms

on them

it's a

kind of

silly

thing

and

and so

I think

that they

don't really

understand

what a

powerful

hallucinogen

this is

well that's

enough on

why I'm not

in the can

this woman

yeah

more creative

and beneficial

process

if we work

on evolving

our minds

without using

an external

drug

what happens

if the government

does come in

and decide

to completely

wipe it out

or

we can't

access

that thing

of consciousness

anymore

and then

things

you know

they just

step backwards

again

when they do

so much more productive

to teach people

how to get

themselves out

the road

absolutely

if we could

do it

I mean

I'm not yet

convinced

see

I mean

you've got

your gurus

but if

you ever get

close to

any of these

people

in these

guru scenes

close enough

where you can

just say to them

look level

with me

is this stuff

as good

as five grams

in silent darkness

and they say

are you serious

the other possibility

is technology

on two fronts

mind machines

the problem

with mind machines

is you know

you have to smoke

a bomber

to put up with it

more than ten minutes

I mean

you quickly

satisfy yourself

that

this can't

possibly be it

because it's

it is lights

but it is

contentless

while the

psychedelic

experience

is all

content

the other

possibility

and I've

put in

some time

in this

beat

is

virtual reality

and I have

more hope

for virtual reality

because virtual reality

is a technology

for showing

for

that would allow us

to show each other

the inside of our heads

our dreams

our visions

and I think

that

sufficiently perfected

it might have

the consequences

of

these psychedelics

the problem is

it carries a huge

amount of negative

freight

you know

that it's not going to be

a tool for us

to show each other

the inside of our minds

it's going to be a tool

to sell us crap

that we don't want

it's going to be a tool

for yet more realistic

vicarious and gratuitous

violence

it's going to be a tool

for more

pornographic

degradation

of women

so it seems to me

while it holds out

the possibility

of a technically

driven psychedelic

it has a lot

of negative freight

I agree

with your premise

but I

I'm driven

by a tremendous

sense of urgency

I mean

why try to create

a technical alternative

to psilocybin

when you've got

psilocybin

like

I think

that people

should use mushrooms

as a step

and once

you get there

you try

and you keep going

without

without that tool

I mean

because what we

what we want

I mean

we want to

transcend

this plane

we want to be

on a higher plane

a higher

state of awareness

that you're not

you're not going to

get to that plane

ultimately

if you have to

keep coming back

into the plane

to get the stuff

to get out

of the plane

again

well how about

how about this

maybe there's

something wrong

with that metaphor

because notice

it has to do

with planes

and transitions

it's an inherently

dualist metaphor

this concludes

tape 1

our program

continues

with tape 2

our program

continues

with tape 2

how about this

maybe there's

something wrong

with that metaphor

because notice

it has to do

with planes

and transitions

it's an inherently

dualist metaphor

how about if we say

there is no inside

and outside

there is no with

or without

you just use

what you've got

whatever works

should be used

I spent time

in India

and visited

all these people

and so forth

and so on

I just became

convinced

that unless

you were

predisposed

to believe

in this stuff

that it would

never carry you

where you wanted

it to

and one thing

about psychedelics

you don't have

to be predisposed

it doesn't work

for those who

believe it works

it works

for those who

think it doesn't work

then one last

point

and then we'll

go on

there's a story

maybe some of you

know this story

of a man

who lived

by the side

of a river

and he wanted

to cross

the river

so he

practiced

a city

of levitation

so that he could

walk across

the water

and it took

him 40 years

to perfect

this city

and finally

he could cross

the river

and

Buddha

was preaching

in the neighborhood

and the guy

came to him

and he said

Master

look what I've

achieved

I can walk

on the water

to cross

the river

and Buddha

said

yeah but the ferry

costs a nickel

and that's

the thing

I think

we're not going

to be able

to replace

this tool

without wasting

so much

time in the

act of

reporting

It that Armageddon will catch up with us. I think we have to humble ourselves

So thoroughly that you have to admit that you can't get where you want to go unless you form a partnership

with somebody whose idea of a good time is growing in a cow pie and

If you're willing to partner up with this humble humble

Member of the ecosystem then you and it can fly to glory

Have at it

Yeah, I wouldn't recommend especially in the late stages of pregnancy doing anything that is going to wildly

Perturb you and you know LSD was discovered in the act of trying to produce better drugs to induce labor

So that's excellent advice honor the fetus. Yeah

Yeah

Well the true and honest answer is how the hell can you find out when they won't let you do research?

It's totally insidious. We don't know

We don't know because they will not allow

The the research to be done. This is one of the reasons why I say that you should stick with

shamanically

Sanctioned plants because we know for instance that people have been taking psilocybin in the Sierra Mazateca of Central Mexico

Mexico for millennia they don't show blindness

tumors

miscarriage

Madness cataracts whatever that's your human data for that

But you go to let's talk for a minute about something like ketamine

Nobody knows nobody has any data

MDMA seems to be tremendously effective in facilitating

Interpersonal stuff that's a psychological issue chemically

What kind of data do we have you know six years worth of data gathered under duress so?

To be safe stick with the things that are sanctioned by human use and then

In some more enlightened future

We will explore these synthetics and find out just what the parameters are. Yeah finish up

No, I'm not saying that I'm saying take things which have been sanctioned by human usage

I mean, how about a plant like Strychnos Nox Vamica? I mean, you're dead in a minute and a half

And it's a beautiful wonderful plant. Why did it kill you? Well, because it's jammed with strychnine

No, it's nothing about it's being a plant

It's about having a repeated history of human usage. That's what sanctifies it

Yeah, the lady in magenta

First of all, I'd like to point to the woman who's sitting right here

I deeply respect your position there because many times in my own search of consciousness

I've wanted to not have to depend on the external catalyst to catalyze my broken consciousness

But I propose that you think about one thing

And that is, I've studied plants for the last 23 years

Plants and medicine

And what I've noticed is that there is a particular co-evolution that happens between the plant and the human

And so what I've studied here for granted at one point that the mushrooms are going to catalyze the same kind of consciousness that they always have

But not only do the biological climatic situations determine what is going to happen to that mushroom

But I think that all species are changing consciousness at the same time

So what the generations of mushrooms might have taken me years ago when I was 18 years old

That whole species and the whole might be prepared to teach an entirely different, more evolved lesson at this point

And so I'm just trying to talk a little bit

That's really an interesting point

I mean, it never occurred to me, but somebody brought it up to me

They said, have you noticed that the trips are changing?

And once you do ask yourself this question, it does seem to be so

And I don't know whether that what, I mean, that's a deep assertion

I'm not sure exactly what's going on there

For instance, this goddess thing

I don't think people gave the goddess a thought in the early 1970s, late 1960s

Now people have, you know, some of the least likely people report intense encounters with the goddess

So is it amplifying the general mindset of the society?

And so there's more goddess stuff there?

Or I don't really know

It's a very interesting question

There are more questions than answers

I mean, this is definitely wide open stuff

Yeah

You discussed our sense into health

Which certainly makes sense

You suggest the use of psychedelics of suicide as an antidote to sex

But I have trouble seeing a cause and sex relationship

As far as what our youth or moral-wise threat youth might lead to in terms of bearing the path

We're trying to restore the relationship of ego to the other components of the psyche that existed as recently as 12,000 years ago

The ego has become a deadly growth in the historical societies

Exacerbated by the phonetic alphabet, monotheism, modern science

This is like you're getting sicker and sicker and sicker as you lay these things on

And so the idea is that if we could restore the original diminished role of the ego that it had for that period

However long it was, that we could begin to solve our problems

Because the problems which face us, put very simply, are going to demand sacrifice

And sacrifice is what the ego doesn't want to hear about

I mean when you go to somebody and say look to save this planet

We're going to have to redistribute income radically

That means everybody in this room is going to have less

We're going to have to honor a whole bunch of cultural positions

That we previously just were going to bulldoze over and so forth and so on

So it's the diminishing of ego by any means necessary that lies to getting any grip on our problems

I mean if we continue as we are

I think we have probably less than 30 years before life is irreconcilably screwed up

You know nobody believes

That the future is rosy and wonderful

I mean if you go to the people at the World Bank and the IMF

And these people who are straight, you know suits all of them

They have a set of curves which would stand your hair on end

When they propagate the curve of population

The curve of toxification of the environment

The curve related to the ozone hole disappearing

You see, you know, it's finished sometime in the next 50 years

They don't talk about this because they don't want to panic

The vast numbers of people who just go to work and raise their kids

And pray somebody smarter is doing something about all this

But they don't believe there is any kind of normal future

And I don't either

I think we're going to that it's business as usual is not on the menu folks

We're either going to go into a era of immense resource scarcity

Regimentation, governmental interference in our lives

Tremendous propagandistic efforts to make us do one thing or another

Or we're going to pull the plug on scientism

And its stooges and the institutions which feed us feed it

Capitalism is an interesting problem

More easily discussed now that communism is out of the picture

Capitalism is as anti-human a philosophy as you can possibly conceive

Because at this very moment

We should be consuming less

Manufacturing less

Selling less

Transporting less

And what's the battle cry?

Free trade everywhere!

What does free trade mean?

It means my right to come to your country and sell the most outlandish junk you've ever seen

And you will have no right to turn it away

Because in the name of free trade

Crapola has to go everywhere

It's really

See they try to tell you that capitalism and democracy are not at variance

Actually the whole Marxist Leninist Socialist thing was a side dish

The real life and death struggle is between capitalism and democracy

Democracy says everybody has an innate worth that must be honored

Capitalism says those who die with the most toys win

You cannot reconcile these two things

And nobody wants to talk about this

We're still having the party over the fall of communism

But you know

You go to the Soviet Union or the former areas of the Soviet Union

And you see that what it was was it was a deep freeze for traditional culture

In Kyrgyzia and Turkmenistan

People are basically camel husbandry is what's going on

Now with communism on the rocks

McDonald's will be there in five years

And Kmart will be following close behind

So I think we're coming to a great crisis

Of fundamental

Our relation to our own fundamental institutions

I'm not anti-capitalist

I think capitalism needs to sever

Its connection to materialism

This is again why virtual reality is interesting

You sell things made of light

Not made of beryllium, metal, brass, steel and wood

But light

We've got all the light we need

But we have to stop making things out of stuff

Or we're not going to be around to tell the tale

In order to get anywhere we have a major shift of values

Yeah

You're suggesting that a way to shift our values

Is to take a lot of psilocybin

Which I don't disagree with

But your model has been that everybody in the culture

Participated in this

And were able to shift their values simultaneously

So to cooperate

Are you suggesting

Is that the necessary outcome in this case?

No, I think that you know

Revolutions are made by percentages

If fifteen or twenty percent changed

Then the example would spread

You see, we are not

Psilocybin is the easy way to awaken

Take a psychedelic plant

And have an experience

And get your act together

But the future is full of sledgehammers

It's not going to end with a whimper

It's going to end with a series of thuds and bangs

It could begin almost any time

I mean we could get a hot muggy day in Mexico City this summer

And a million people would die

This thing in Los Angeles is a wake up call

It is going to get uglier

And more chaotic

And more crazy

There is going to be more starvation

More fascism

More dictatorship

It's unless

We do something

Until we do something

And it can

How bad is it going to have to get

Before people say

You know

We're doing something wrong

You know

People dance on the Russians

But you've got to admire people

Who have the guts to say

We did it entirely wrong

100%

I mean

Can you imagine in this country

To being able to do

Say

You know

I mean

It may be coming

This character from Austin

Is a peculiar item in the mix

You know

I mean

I for years

Had a fantasy speech

Which I always imagined

That I would somehow end up giving

But

It's

The speech where you say

My fellow Americans

You have been lied to

Screwed

And abused

By these two criminal parties

For

A hundred years

And your only hope

Is to

Overthrow

The republicrats

And create a decent world

To live in

Well no republican

Can make that speech

Speech

No democrat

Can make that speech

And be credible

It has to be

Somebody who wasn't

In bed

With either of those forces

So I'm not at all pleased

By who

Apparently will bear the mantle

But on the other hand

If change is what we need

Then it's

It's probably not going to be

A candidate

That you and I can embrace

It's going to be

Some oddball

So you know

We have to recognize it

When we see it coming

Yeah

A couple of things

First of all

It seems to me

In an attempt to place the

Spatial and temporal context

Which you put in

Experience

You have to realize

What the functions are

That go into that

We don't even know

What it is

No we don't know

What it is

We try to place it

Into a temporal

Spatial mode

And it seems to me

That it's

It serves us better

To leave the flesh open

And have the experience

To let the experience

To tell us

What it's about

And what we need to build

Yeah

The great thing about it

Is it can talk

Secondly

I'd like to ask a question

About time away to zero

Good for you

When I first saw it

You talk about that

It was not a thing

That was

Made in Sansei

I believe

And

I was fascinated by it

And I watched it closely

But as it got

To the end of the tape

When I started

Getting interested

In what the significance

Of a zero crossing

Was

The tape stopped

So I'd like to

I mean it seems to be

A decreasing function

Of time

Which meant that

A zero crossing

Had some singular significance

But I

I really wonder

What

In real terms

A zero crossing

Is time away zero

Well

Probably half

At least

In the room

Haven't the faintest idea

What this question

Is about

I've stayed away

From this

Because this is

The personalistic

Stuff

Where I've created

A certain model

Of reality

Based on

A new way

Of looking at time

And I don't want

To go into it

Too much tonight

But I want to

Suggest something

To you tonight

Which is

That

You know

At the very beginning

Of this talk

We talked about

Mutation

And natural selection

And that's

The Darwin's

Insight

Was vast

And deep

And what he

Offered was

An explanation

For how

Rainbow trout

Come to be

Monarch butterflies

Redwood trees

Herds of elephants

So forth

And so on

What it doesn't

Address

Is us

We are

The weird

Bird

On the block

I mean

Yes

We're some kind

Of monkey

But when you

Stand us next

To our nearest relative

It's very very clear

That it is not

A very near relative

It doesn't

Look like us

Much

Certainly

Doesn't act

Like us

What's the deal

With human beings

And I think

That

You know

How all

These religions

These western religions

Have built in

This idea

Of the end of the world

And they're always

Running around

Expecting the Messiah

Or something

And this

To the scientific

To the scientific mind

Is just the final proof

Of the pudding

That these people

Have water

Between the ears

Because science

Just says

You know

That's just ridiculous

I mean

But I wonder

I wonder

I mentioned

Just a minute ago

These curves

That when you

Propagate them

Into the future

Everything leads

To the unimaginable

And it's all

Within the next

50 years

So

I sort of

Think

As human beings

As analogous

To iron filings

On a piece of paper

And you shake

These iron filings

Out of a salt shaker

Or something

And there they lie

Randomly arranged

In heaps

Well then

You come underneath

The paper

With a very powerful magnet

And lo and behold

These little iron filings

Coherently arrange themselves

Into this beautiful

Double mustache pattern

Which I'm sure

You've all seen

Well I think

That

There is

A

An enormous

Punchline

To the historical

Process

That

Very very few

People

Suspect

And that

What history

Is

It's

It's what happens

To an animal

Who falls

Under the influence

Of a kind

Of strange

Attractor

And that

We are being

Pulled

Into a well

Of transformative

Intentionality

History

Is not

Pushed

By the

Causuistry

Of war

Migration

Imperial

Dynastic families

And stuff like that

History

Is pulled

Toward

An unimaginable

Something

Which is

Continuously

Trying to

Mirror

Itself

In us

This is why

These Egyptians

Said

You know

I don't know

What it is

But I just think

We should really

Build a big

Simple building

And say

I don't know why

But I'm gonna

Enslave 50,000 people

And do it

And don't ask me

And this is

And you know

This is the same force

That reared

Chartres Cathedral

This is the same force

That created

The space shuttle

We are

In a relationship

To an unseen

Something

Which we keep trying

To image

With our mythology

Our religions

Our technologies

Our epiphanies

And I think

That

It's not so far away

That it

It isn't

10,000 years

In the future

It is

Sometime

In the next

50 years

And that

This is what

History was for

You see

History is an

Incredibly

Peculiar

And brief

Phenomenon

I mean viewed

From the point of view

Of biology

It's less time

Than it takes

For a new species

To emerge

Let's call history

25,000 years

You know

In frame

One

You're chipping flint

In frame

Two

You're hurling

An instrument

toward Alpha Centura

Like that

This happened

Well

What's happening

It's that

Mind itself

Is being

Pulled out

Of this creature

And it's being

Given hands

And languages

And

Post symbolic

Systems

In order to image

The unspeakable

I call it

The transcendental object

At the end of time

It casts

And it's in another dimension

It's in a kind of

Superspace

And what it casts

Into history

Is the enormous

Shadow

Of its eminence

This is what

Straight people

Call God

This is what

All these visionaries

Are raving

It's about

It's that

When you sink

Belief

The surface

Of ordinary causality

And mundane

Hohumism

What you discover

Is

This enormous

Transcendental

Object

Which you could call it

You know

The sacred heart

Of Jesus

Or the

Flying saucer

Or the

Philosopher's stone

It's all of

Those things

And much

Much more

It's not only

Stranger than you

Suppose

It's stranger

Than you can

Suppose

And it has

Called us

Out of animal

Organization

Over a 25,000 year

Period

We hang in the balance

And then we meet it

And we're going

To meet it

That's the light

At the end

Of that birth canal

Of transcendence

That I referred to

And now I see

That our

Song is sung

Our time is done

Thank you

Very very much

For turning in

Thank you

To show up at 10 AM

To play

Saturday or

Sunday

And then

We'll dig into this

Deep and deep

In the interim

I think

That

It's

Worth

Taking the

Time for

Everybody

To

Just make a

Very

Brief

Very, very

Brief

Statement

You don't have to say

Who you are

If you don't want to

But you can say

What you're hoping for

Or why you're here

Or what your

Agenda is

Just so that

If it turns out

We're 80%

Shrinks

Or you know

80%

Ceramicists

Or something

Then we turn it

That way

And

Those of you

Who are

Undercover

Please stay

Undercover

So you don't

Alarm

Anybody

Especially

Me

Right

So why don't we

Just start

And

Go

Across

In some

Reasonably

Logical fashion

Which

Yeah

Well

That

Tells you

What you're

Worth

Doesn't

Oh

True

No

Let's not record it

So people

And

Also I had

At one point

Thought I would be

An art historian

That was one of my

Real

Obsessions

So I had

Had enough art history

To be trained

In

You know

Recognizing the evolution

Of motifs

How one artist

Passes on

Techniques

And conceits

To his

Students

Or his

And all this

Art historical stuff

And I also

Had been

Very interested

In Jung

And

And none of this

Seemed to explain

The content of the

Psychedelic experience

I would get in there

And say

Well

How come

I'm not

Seeing

A archetypes

And B

Things

Which

Somebody

Else

You know

And so

Caravaggio

Bosch

Somebody

Should have seen

This stuff

And gotten it down

And there didn't seem

To be

A trail

Through the history

Of western art

Of the presence

Of this

Dimension

So then I thought

Wow

Is it that nobody

Knew

About all this

I mean Bosch

Would have given

His right arm

For a sheet

Of blotter

I would think

So

So it became

For me

Like a mystery

What

Where is this stuff

Coming from

And what does it say

About our humanness

Yeah

I've read

Bosch

Is somewhat

Of an ink pig

By the optimist

Of his time

They were experimenting

With him

Well there's a lot

Of ink

Spilled over Bosch

Because he is such

A startlingly

Radical painter

In the context

Of his time

Many of his conceits

Were picked up

After his life

Peter Bruegel

The elder

Being the foremost

Exponent of it

He may have been

An alchemical

Guinea pig

Who

Let's see

Frasier

I think

Wrote a book

Called The Millennium

Of Hieronymus Bosch

In which he wanted

To suggest

That maybe

Detura use

That there was

A cult

Called

The Brotherhood

Of the

Free Spirit

Which practiced

Ritual

Nudity

Which

Begins to sound

Something like

As we talked about

Last night

It was a cult

Of printers

And

It may be

That the garden

Of earthly delights

Was actually painted

As an altarpiece

For a congregation

Of the Brotherhood

Of the free spirit

But this is all

Pretty murky stuff

It's hard to get back

To Bosch

He didn't leave

Any written records

We have his birth

Is recorded

In the parish church

Where

Of the village

Where he was born

We know he was born

Sometime around 1450

Died in 1516

But the details

Are pretty murky

Well

Not to belabor Bosch

So what I thought

Would be a reasonable way

To do this

This morning

Is to take

The most extreme

Psychedelic

Case

And experience

And describe it

And talk about it

A little

And then see

What issues

That raises

Because my

Experience

With this stuff

Has led me

To the conclusion

That

In a way

It's

To be thought

Of

This other dimension

Is to be thought

Of

Like a mandala

And different

Psychedelic compounds

And generously

Different kinds

Of yoga

And different kinds

Of techniques

Of all sorts

Land you

In different parts

Of this mandala

But that

What you're always

Trying to do

Is get to the center

Of the mandala

And it's

Simply my bias

My opinion

But I think

The center

Of the mandala

Is probably

The DMT

Experience

For a number

Of reasons

And so I thought

It would be interesting

To talk about it

This morning

First

Let me talk

About it

Physically

DMT

Is

An

Indole

Halucinogen

A beta

No, no

A tryptamine

And

It's

Produced

Endogenously

In the human

Brain

This is

Very interesting

Very few

Psychedelic

Compounds

Are produced

In the human

Brain

We don't know

What DMT

Is doing

There

But

It means

Essentially

That we all

Are subject

To a rest

On a technicality

Because we all

Are holding

A Schedule

One drug

It's sort

Of the ultimate

Catch-22

Where if all

Else fails

They just say

Well you were holding

Anyway

The interesting thing

About DMT

Another interesting

Thing about it

Is that

It's incredibly

Rapid

In it's

Onset

And

In it's

Disappearance

The whole

trip lasts about 15 minutes

This makes it a tremendous tool with which to challenge the critics of our position

Because if somebody wants to rise up in righteous wrath and condemn

psychedelics

Then you say well you have tried them haven't you and of course they never have it's like scientific

denunciations of astrology I mean scientists love to denounce astrology

But find one who can cast a natal horoscope, and I'll give you a hen's tooth

You know so

the

DMT overcomes this objection the entire experience lasts 15 minutes, so you say to the critic

You know you're not going to experience it and yet you're going to carry on a pogrom against it

You won't invest 15 minutes to checking out what this is about. You know, what kind of scientist are you?

So it has that social efficacy

Now the fact that it is the strongest of all

Hallucinogens at least if there are ones stronger, please keep them away from me

I mean, I don't think anybody needs to get higher than that. I certainly don't

I mean, I've at times come out of those places and said this stuff is illegal

You know it breaks cosmic law

Of course then Tim Leary told me that cosmic laws are only local ordinances anyway, so it didn't really matter

Uh, okay. Oh, good question. Yes, it's the commonest of all hallucinogens in nature

It occurs in many grasses

Phalaris tuberosa, Phalaris arundinaceae. It occurs in a number of leguminous plants

Probably the most spectacular being Anadonanthra peregrina this huge

Tropical locust-like tree from which the snuff called neopa or epina is made

That's a tough way to get your DMT. Let me tell you

Because there's so much cellulose and other crap and corruption in the mix that you have to do like a tablespoon

Up each nostril and the technique

The technique the technique is you get a bamboo tube or a hollow tube about this long and you

Pour in this tablespoon of this stuff and then you squat down on your haunches

And you get a friend and you put the tube up your nostril

And then the friend blows with the full force of his breath blows this stuff into your head

Well, you fall. It's like being hit in the face with a two-by-four. I mean you that it's like you think he kicked you and

You fall over backwards. You scream you salivate

You get back up on your haunches and by this time he has refilled the tube for the other nostril

So and then after

Mm-hmm

Yopo, epina, nipa, it depends on the language group and the waika, yanomami

It's also called vilka in the carib language and then after

For ten minutes or so it slowly begins to form up in your head

But you know God your sinuses are in stat for sure and

It's not very pleasant and the other thing is it never reaches the blinding

transformative intensity that you can achieve with the the chemically pure

compound

No, no that good point if you orally ingest it

It will be destroyed in your guts. It won't work

the Amazon Indians have

Encountered this problem and created a very sophisticated

Pharmacological strategy for dealing with this you've all heard of ayahuasca

Ayahuasca is DMT from one plant

Combined with another plant which contains a chemical which is called an MAO inhibitor

MAO is mono amine oxidase and your gut is full of MAO and

Its job is to take mono amines

small molecules and

Oxidize them into a harmless byproduct usually indolecetic acid which can be shunted to the bladder

Well, when you take DMT orally these mono amines just I mean these mono amine oxidase compounds

Just grab on to it and destroy it

But if you take an MAO inhibitor with it and harming which occurs in banisteriopsis copy is an MAO inhibitor

Then lo and behold it isn't destroyed in your gut instead

It passes into the bloodstream it passes through the blood-brain barrier

Which is a very tight chemical filter that keeps the brain from being exposed to toxic materials?

But these drugs can cross that barrier and then what the ayahuasca

experience really is is a slow-release DMT trip that instead of taking five minutes

Takes about two and a half hours and if you really know your

Psychedelics and your breath control techniques on

Ayahuasca over an hour or so you can work yourself to a place where you say

Lordy me it looks just like a DMT flash and it does

But you've had to do some hard climbing to get there with DMT itself

Once you push the start button, there's no stopping it and

I

Think it's worth describing it. How many people have had this experience?

Uh-huh. Well, so they can somewhat anchor it

Uh-huh. It's very subjective

Obviously, but I will describe what happens to me and then we can work out from there

One point that I want to make about these things is that the the great strength of the psychedelic possibility is

It's democratic

You know, it isn't that people of great spiritual advancement attain these states or

People who have studied under some lineage. It's truly available to everyone and when I had my DMT

Experiences I realized you know either I am

Incredibly special

Which doesn't there's no other evidence to support that or

This is something which can happen to anyone and that's the more interesting possibility

After all if it can only happen to very very special people then that lets most people out

But if it's generally available, then it's big big news about the human condition. Yeah

Yeah

How did they find DMT in the human brain?

Hmm interesting question

No, I think he means how did they find that it was endogenously produced?

Well, I think they were studying the group that did this was at the University of Louisiana

Christian and his group and I they were studying fast reactions in the brain and

For fast reactions you have to look at chemicals that can go through some kind of cycle of

Structural change and return to their zero point very very quickly

Their original thought was that DMT mediated attention. I mean I'm talking to you right now

Suppose there were a loud noise over here. We would all

Immediately project our mind onto the source of the sound

They thought that that was a

neurological function mediated by DMT

Could be I'm not sure I suspect it has more to do with the chemistry of dreaming

Once they discovered DMT and began to track it they discovered that there was a circadian rhythm

It means that daily rhythm in its production in the human organism and that it reaches its greatest

concentration in the brain around

3 30 a.m. in most people well, this is when the deep dreaming and the high REM states are really chugging and I

suspect I

Mean lucid dreamers may want to argue with this, but I suspect that every night

We go deeper places than we can ever speak of

That ordinary dreams are right on the surface of consciousness

Big lucid dreams are an inch deeper, but I think we go a hundred feet down

Every night into places where you cannot say anything about it. Yeah

I wanted to ask you about

Let's make that perspiration

Well, it's

It's hard as hell to find DMT and this is a puzzle

Because if you look it up in a standard work on organic chemistry, it presents it as a trivial

synthesis

much

More simple than LSD which it always presents as quite a difficult synthesis

But when you actually talk to workbench chemists, it's tricky to make DMT

It's especially tricky to carry out the final crystallization

So what you're usually offered in the underground is some kind of muck which looks sort of like

maple

Syrup half gone to sugar

I wouldn't get near that

Actually, it means they they botched their synthesis what you're hoping for is a white

powder

However in 30 years of chasing this all over the world

I've only seen it as a white powder a couple of times usually the synthesis has fallen slightly below that

Standard and what you get is a pale yellow powder

Sometimes a pale rose or pink powder and then the real rough trade is

orange and this is what you if you've seen it this is probably what you've seen it looks like orange mothballs and

It has the smell of indole

This very sharp smell which if you're not a chemist and you've never smelled indole

When you reach in your mind for what is this like you'll say well, it's sort of like mothballs

Not quite but it has that same sharp chemical

You know, and this is what you're gonna smoke see so a lot of people beef about that and say well, you know

It's like smoking burning plastic

Musso may not but it is a little bit like that

The other objection to DMT that has been around since the 60s is people say it destroys brain cells

There's no evidence for or against

this but I would submit to you as

spend the people who are neurophysiologists can

Argue with this if they disagree, but I think an excellent index

For the low toxicity of a drug is how fast it clears your system and DMT clears your system in about 15 minutes

If you take some compound drug or whatever and 48 hours later

You're still taking hot baths and you know wishing you could have a massage and sitting staring at the wall

Then this drug is really sticking to your ribs

It means that your metabolic pathways have no way of dealing with it

They can't grab it here. They can't grab it there, and it takes a long time to leave your system an example of this in the pseudo

psychedelic domain would be ketamine you know ketamine the experience lasts about 45 minutes, but

48 hours later you can feel your knees suddenly go rubbery or you can have

What are technically called fugue states strange states of?

Disconnectedness from what's going on around you. This is not a very good

Advertisement for a drug here this woman and then

Well less because if you smoke DMT the dose is approximately 50 milligrams

Which is like the size of a kitchen match head

the

If you combine it with an MAO inhibitor and take it orally, you can probably get away with about 35 milligrams of DMT and

Oh, I don't know a hundred and a hundred milligrams of harmaline

Now harmaline itself is sometimes described as a psychedelic drug. I really think this is sort of misleading

You will have hallucinations if you take pure harmin

But only at doses approaching the toxic dose

Many compounds will give you hallucinations

Approaching the toxic dose

Bee venom

Rattlesnake venom

Stuff like this that doesn't mean it's a hallucinogenic drug. It means you're dying

And you should take steps to correct the situation

Now yes

You said that there was a short transit time

But how long does the memory of that experience last because that would indicate to me that there is still a presence and perhaps a homeopathic dose at that point in the in the mind in the brain

Well at DMT and one of the things that has caused me to think that it must that it might have a role in the chemistry of dreaming

is that one of the frustrating things about it is you have this experience without doubt the most bizarre appalling peculiar experience you could possibly have

that's at minute 2 at minute 5 you're raving about it at minute 5 you're raving about it at minute 7 you can't remember it and so if you're raving about it

One of the things that has caused me to think that it might have a role in the chemistry of dreaming is that one of the frustrating things about it is you have this experience without doubt the most bizarre appalling peculiar experience you could possibly have

That's at minute 2 at minute 5 you're raving about it at minute 7 you can't remember it and so it's literally like gold running through your fingers you say you know this is the most amazing thing this is the most amazing thing this is the most amazing thing this is what am I talking about

and you know how you can have a very engaging complex dream and the alarm goes off and by the time your feet hit the floor you're grasping for it and it's just it's literally melting before your eyes that's a very DMT like presentation the way a dream melts away is the way a DMT trip melts away at the same speed

Well over time and using tricks you can drag a certain amount of data out of it and what I'll do is

I'll describe a DMT trip and it's a composite of maybe 40 of these trips and then you can see what you make of it

So this is I'll just describe it I'll be the the graduate student you be the guy with the clipboard

You're saying to me so what happened?

Okay, here's what happened

You I took you one takes

Most people can get off in about three to four hits

Now there's a trick to it

Hash smokers are greatly favored in this endeavor because you really need leather lungs

For this

The great problem is that people will cough or not be able to hold it in

You take two hits

In a situation where your clothes have been loosened and you can just flop backward

When you need to you take two hits now many people miss the point

Because after two hits you feel completely peculiar you feel as though your body is undergoing some strange kind of anesthesia

All the air has been pumped out of the room this is the visual acuity thing I talked about last night

The colors jump up the edges sharpen

It's and at that point people say whoa wow it's really coming on strong

And then what you have to do is you have to take one more enormous hit

And this separates the intrepid from the casual believe me

Because most people and and the facilitator doesn't want to lean on the person you say you know dammit take the third hit

And saying no I feel completely weird say I know you feel weird but take the third hit

Well if you can coax somebody into that then what happens is you close your eyes

And you see the ordinary warm brown

Back you know closed eyelid scenario

And then these colors begin racing together

And it forms this mandalic

mandalic

Floral slowly rotating

thing

Which I call the chrysanthemum

This is a place in the trip that you want to see as you go by it

The chrysanthemum forms and you watch it for like

15 seconds

If it doesn't give way

Then you didn't do enough

You have to do more

One more hit usually will do it

Well then what happens is it like physically propels you through

This chrysanthemum like thing

And you there's a sound like a

Saran wrap bread wrapper

Being crumpled up and thrown away you know that crackle

A friend of mine says this is your radio interlecky leaving through the anterior fontanelle at the top of your head

I don't know what it is

But it's something is being

Yeah, right, that's what it is

And then there's this very

Very defined sense of bursting through something

A membrane

And on the other side

And this is now remember my experience

On the other side

As you break through

There's a cheer

There's a

Whole bunch of entities

Waiting on the other side

And they you know that Pink Floyd song

The gnomes have learned a new way to say

Hooray

Well, it's that place

It's those gnomes

And you burst into this space

And

And they're saying

How wonderful that you're here

You come so rarely

We're so delighted to see you

And

One of the things about DMT that's really puzzling

Is in a sense

It doesn't affect your mind

In other words

You don't change

For instance if you take ketamine

The first thing you notice

The very first thing you notice

Before the trip hits

Is you notice that you no longer are anxious

About having taken ketamine

You just sort of anxiety leaves you

That means it's affecting your mind

It's doing something to the judgmental machinery

DMT doesn't lay a hand on the judgmental machinery

You break through into that space

Exactly who you were before breaking through

And the usual reaction of most people

Is something like

You know when you think

You think

God

Heartbeat

Normal

Pulse

Normal

Everything's normal

Yeah everything's normal

Oh God

Because these things are there

And they're hammering at you

And they come forward

They're like jewel self-dribbling basketballs

And there are many of them

And they come pounding toward you

And they will stop in front of you

And vibrate

But then they do a very disconcerting thing

Which is they jump into your body

They jump into your body

And then they jump back out again

And the whole thing is going on

In this very high speed mode

Where you're being presented with thousands of details

Per second

And you can't get a hold

You say you know my God

What's happening

And these things are saying

Don't abandon yourself to amazement

Which is exactly what you want to do

You just want to go nuts with how crazy this is

They say don't do that

Don't do that

Pay attention

To what we're doing

Well what are they doing

Well what they're doing

Is they're making objects

With their voices

They're singing

Structures into existence

These things are

And what they will do is

They'll come toward you

And then

And you have to understand

They don't have arms

So we're kind of downloading this

Into a lower dimension

To describe it

But what they do is

They offer things to you

Say look at this

Look at this

And as your attention

Goes toward these objects

You realize

That what you're being shown

Is impossible

It's impossible

It's not simply intricate

Beautiful

And hard to manufacture

It's impossible to make these things

The nearest analogy would be to

The Fabergé eggs

Or something like that

But these things are like the toys

That are scattered around the nursery

Inside a UFO

Or something

Celestial toys

They are

The toys themselves

Appeared to be somehow alive

The toys themselves

Can sing other objects

into existence

So what's happening is

There's just this proliferation of elf gifts

And the elf gifts are moving around

Singing

The whole thing

Is directed toward

They're saying

Do what we are doing

And they're very insistent

They say

Do it

And you feel

Like a bubble

And now this is subjective

I mean only

You know 5% report this

But it happens to me

You feel like some kind of bubble

Inside your body

That's beginning to move up

Toward your mouth

And when it comes out

It isn't sound

It's vision

You discover that you can

Pump

Stuff

By singing

And they're urging you to do this

They say

That's it

Keep doing it

And the whole thing

Is like

You know we're now at

Minute 4.5

With this stuff

And you speak in a kind of glossolalia

There's a spontaneous outpouring of syntax

Unaccompanied by what is normally called meaning

It's sort of

You know

And this is accompanied by a modality

Something seen

And they're saying

Yes, do it

Do it

And then after a minute or so of this

The whole thing begins to collapse in on itself

And they literally begin to physically move away from you

And usually their final shot is

They actually wave goodbye

And they say

Deja vu

Which makes no sense at all

If you analyze it

So then you come down

And you're now at minute 6 to 7

And you come down

And it's like being more loaded than you've ever been

It's like about a 700 mic acid trip

But you embrace it as

Totally down

You say

I'm totally down

I mean

You look

You look like a termite from Arturis

And the room is decorated in Amish quilts

But I'm completely back

And then over a minute or a minute and a half or so

The room just comes right back together

And four minutes after that

Some people can give no account of it whatsoever

They just say

You know

I don't know

It was the weirdest thing that ever happened to me

And I can't remember it now

And

So

That's the basic run through

Now

A lot of stuff is going on in there

First of all

You know

What are these things?

And

Why do they want you to do this strange activity?

And what's so great about it?

Well

Hmm

Well first of all

Who are these things?

We can like

You know

Be good scientists

And make a list of the possibilities

And then see which seems more likely

They could be

A

Disincarnate race

Of

Hyperdimensional dwellers

Who live in some kind of parallel continuum

Just over some kind of energy barrier

And they're there all the time

You do have the feeling that they're there all the time

That it's ongoing

That you have just cut into their scene

So that's one possibility

Another possibility is that behind all these psychedelics

And especially DMT

That this is not a drug at all

That it is

Essentially

A pay telephone

Of some sort

To aliens

Good old National Enquirer type aliens

Of

Who

Have

Are using this as a

As a

Communication domain

Say you know

We can't land on the white house lawn

That would create panic and hysteria

So let's create a drug

Which inside the drug

We will be able to deal with people

And

I was hoping that John Mack

Who's an expert on

UFO abductions

Would be here this weekend

I expected him

Because I think this whole abduction thing

Is not going to be illuminated

Until they start giving abductees DMT

And saying so is this what happened to you?

Was it like this?

Or was it completely different?

Well, so then there

Those are the two possibilities

That I sort of dealt with

Over the first 10 or 15 years

Of thinking about this

And then recently

Just one second

So

That people are interpreting

As an abduction

Is just a high production

Of endogenous DMT

Within the brain

It could be

What puzzles me

Is that the

Abduction thing

Is so non-psychedelic

It's so cut and dried

And all this anal

Examination stuff

With strange

Machinery, there's nothing comparable to that. I'm happy to report to you

Going on in the DMT thing, but it may be you see it

Well, I'd be interested in looking at the possibility that DMT under normal or abnormal conditions

could be sequestered in the human brain and then some

unusual stimulus or stress could cause it to suddenly be dumped and

Yeah

Yeah, that's an interesting possibility. I also

have migraines or the kind called cluster headaches and

Yes, a lot of the simply the nice thing about DMT is that it's painless

But the sense of being split open and of the traveling scatomata as they call these

Hallucinations that migraine people see it's related in some way. Yeah, yeah

Sure

It involves this principle that is characterizing called phasing

But it's basis

This is sort of what happens on the subatomic level between matter and energy

Turns out there's no fundamental particle at that level. You have this dance between matter and energy, you know energy

Coalesces into a bit of matter which then becomes energy

And you can look at this matter and energy relationship as having a wavelength of frequency associated with it

Now granted this happens on a subatomic level, but if there's something

comparable going on on a level at which we

We seem to exist in the physical form and it seems to me that there has to be something akin to it

That it may be that we as beings are sort of tuned to a frequency range, you know in this particular form and that

Somehow it's possible to shift that or expand it to so that what we're actually experiencing is a broader range of frequencies

So a sort of shift in wavelength and I think some of these experience can be at least explored you know in that context

You know there's so much that we don't know ain't that the trail of

this cosmos that

But but we can take and we can extrapolate some degree at least we can we can use this to

To take journeys and explore possibilities from what we do know in science for example

subatomic around it fundamentally

uh, I mean for god's sake the language of these people is something more like sorcerers

these days than than science

and

And we do seem to at least believe from the evidence that we see that there is this matter energy interchange on a very fundamental level

Now if something akin to that is going on in macro level there may be this this

principle of phasing of which we either shift

Uh our tuning or we expand it to include a

larger spectrum

Yeah, I think no I think that that's a very interesting avenue to pursue this thing about frequency

Somebody told me one of the great things about this job is you hear a lot of weird stories and somebody told me a story recently

About it didn't involve DMT it involved LSD

But this guy and a friend of his took a quite large dose of LSD larger than they intended and they went to a party

And they were so loaded by the time they got to the party that they realized they could not function as party goers

So they just moved into a corner and sat with their backs to the wall and watched this party rage in front of them

And after about 20 minutes of sitting there

They both simultaneously

Noticed it was a dance party

Noticed that the music was sounding really strange

And everybody was moving very slowly

And as they watched

The thing came to an absolute

Halt and people were just frozen and there was absolute silence and at that point

the door at the other end of the room swung open and

an elf

entered the room and

moved among all these frozen people and

And then left by the door he came in and they both saw this and they said that they could tell that it was

that

The people in the room didn't know it happened because for them it occupied a microsecond

But this thing that was you know in Carlos Castaneda who God knows is not the world's most reliable

Reporter on these things nevertheless there is this thing about stopping the world

So maybe it's something like that that there is as you suggest a frequency phase

Yeah, this sort of leads into the third possibility having to do with the origin of these things and

In a sense this is the hardest one to swallow

But in another sense this is the most conservative

In some crazy notion of conservative the most conservative explanation

Because

We have no evidence other than the tabloids that this world is being visited by friendly visitors from Zenebul

Ganubi or Zeta Reticuli or the Pleiades or anywhere else

I mean to my mind the evidence that this is happening is vanishingly small and totally underwhelming

The other possibility

That there's some kind of parallel dimension

In which these things exist is also somewhat poorly supported

If we're talking about something which thinks

Something which can communicate

Something which is intelligent

Then we should look to ourselves

As the source of it because we are the only intelligent

Communicating things we know within a certain narrow definition of these things

So that it's occurred to me with greater and greater force and largely prompted by giving DMT

Occasionally to Tibetans and Amazonian shamans

And when you say to them you know to the shamans in the Amazon when you say to them

What is happening with this stuff and what are those little things in there?

They say oh well those are ancestor spirits didn't you know haven't you heard?

Shamanism is about doing healing through the intercession of ancestor spirits

Say hmm ancestor spirits let's get this straight

Dead people is what you're talking about right?

These are dead people

And you know maybe because I was raised Catholic I resisted this like grim death

But I'm beginning to think that what you actually break into in that place

Is something that we might call an ecology of souls

That is it possible to entertain the notion that at death you actually don't just become worm food

But that something survives in some other dimension

And that it has this bizarre character to it

And that this explains their peculiar affection for humanity

And their involvement

Somehow in our fate

Well this is to me fairly mind bending as a possibility

If what is awaiting us at the end of the 20th century

Is the erasure of the boundary between the living and the dead

Then we've all been too conservative in our projections of what is going on

Yeah

Yes that there will be some kind of erasure of the boundary between the two

Well once I had this idea you know

I mentioned my Jungian and art historical proclivities

And so that means you always look back through tradition and folklore to try and find something analogous to this

Well there ain't much but there is one

One area that seems suggestive to me and that is as you all know the Irish are a a fairy haunted race

They're also an intoxication obsessed race at least in stereotype

Well it turns out that

You probably all are familiar with the notion of purgatory

Purgatory is the place where you have to spend a lot of time before you get to heaven

If you're not bad enough to go to hell

So you put in a few

Calculio chasms of eternity in

Purgatory and then you get led into heaven

Well, I had always assumed that this dogma

I don't know I hadn't really thought about it

I just sort of assumed it arose with early Christianity

But when I began looking into this I discovered that the idea of purgatory

Was invented by Saint Patrick

And it was invented specifically to convert the pagan Irish

Because the pagan Irish believed in the in the land of fae

They believed there was this nearby dimension full of the souls of the dead surrounding us all the time

And the certain people with the gift of second sight could see this

So Patrick just said to them no no that isn't it

It's purgatory and was able to push that on them so successfully that a later church council

Adopted it as general dogma for the church to use in converting the pagan slavs as well

So it's an idea of a nearby dimension

inhabited by disincarnate souls that is apparently very old but very alien to our tradition

Yeah

There's another notion

It's going to be a gross over simplification but it's kind of related

And it has to do with the quantum wave function which is really kind of a dual wave

has two parts to it uh one part and they both have a temporal or time related aspect to them

one part which is called the ordinary part of the wave can be seen as a wave

propagating forward in time and the other half of the wave which is called a complex conjugate

can be seen as propagating backwards from some future state

some past state some future state emitting waves which at some point

interact and produce what is perceived or experienced as as the present state which is really a dynamic

process in itself there is no absolute present because as soon as you get out of your mouth it's past

but the interesting thing is that what that implies is that what we experience in the present

whatever they may be is somehow related to some future state and some past state

but it also means that neither future or past are fixed and that we could sort of align ourselves with different tracks or vectors

you know and and a slightly

different vector

slightly askew may produce something totally

different than what our ordinary perception is

this is speeding well yeah this could be i mean i've always felt that what biology is

is some weird kind of chemical strategy for amplifying quantum mechanical indeterminacy

that you know macro physical objects are not subject to quantum mechanical indeterminacy but organisms

apparently are especially thinking organisms we don't know that's our perception our perception is that

that objects on a macro scale large scale are not subject to quantum

fluctuations fluctuations but that's only because

of this probability with in some sense and that it there's a most probable state and if we happen to

exist in that that our perception is that it's more fixed that there is no indeterminacy it obeys certain laws that

are rather linear in nature

but we really don't know

what you're sort of saying is that natural laws only apply some of the time

which gives them a curious status as laws in that case

well that's sort of broadening the notion of relativity

i mean

what happens in a black hole for example what is a singularity it simply means that the laws that

normally apply in everyday experience no longer are relevant well one of the problems cosmology is

meeting is that there are so many large black holes in the universe that you come up with you know 10 high six singularities

that's a few more singularities than a good theory would tolerate i would think i mean

what kind of theory is it that hands you back 10 to the 9th singularities which are exceptions to the theory

that's true but we you know a lot of that's based on uh assumptions that uh are stretches

ain't that the truth again it gets back to a psyche with a psychedelic experience you know

it's this whole lower dimensional language slice thing that we seem to have to operate in in order

to describe an experience that just does not fit into that slice you know we do our best to do it you

know and sometimes it comes across being very crude and and nice sometimes we kind of get close to the

mark but it's it's difficult to know uh i mean the whole notion of black hole singularities is just

that's the present uh attempt at explaining some experience that uh is is beyond ordinary experience

none that we've encountered a black hole directly that we know of that's true

it seems to me one of the embarrassments of science is that the big bang begins with a singularity

and so then you have this whole vast interlocking schema of rational explanation except that it begins

with a hard swallow you're asked to believe that the entire cosmos of space and time sprang from a point

no larger than a cross section of a gnat's eyelash whatever whatever else one could say about

that theory i think you'd agree it's the limit case for credulity absolutely i mean if you believe

that try to think of something that you would throw up your hands and say well i'm not buying that

it it it absolutely it's sort of like when you join the catholic church you make a declaration of faith

well when you join science you sort of make this declaration of faith that i do believe that the

universe sprang in a single instant from an incredibly tiny hot dense dot unlikely but who knows

there's something else as you two were dialoguing a bit i was getting this visualization of you have to

look at the pond of reality so to speak as not only being the um the visual of someone throwing a pebble

from the top of the pond and creating the ripple effect of the wave effect but also from the bubbles

coming from below and to me the deep space that you were talking about is the air inside the bubble coming

from below and so the dimensional reality of that picture is not a linear time perspective it's

something coming from all directions it is again the center of a mandala effect well this is why i say the

the psychedelic experience is a boundary dissolving experience because it takes away past present

cause effect all of these things disappear now remember i said ayahuasca is a kind of slow release

dmt trip and one of the really interesting things going on with ayahuasca to my mind perhaps the most

interesting thing is that the style in the amazon of taking ayahuasca is people get together in a darkened hut

at night and they take it and they sing but the songs they're selling them at the table back there

the songs when there's a break in the singing and you hear the people discussing the songs

they don't discuss them like music they discuss them like sculpture and painting and they say to the

shaman i like the part with the gray bars and the blue speckling but when you brought in the pink in

combination with the beige and white i thought it was too much say what kind of a discussion is this about

a song you realize then when you take ayahuasca they see the songs uh and now this is really interesting

to me because you remember in the dmt flash they wanted you to use your voice to make objects well then

in the ayahuasca trance you use your voice to control these colored modalities and uh the whole thing

is done that way well so then what it must mean is that the neurophysiology of ayahuasca somehow allows

for the ordinary signal processing which is being shunted into the audio pathway in the brain is instead

being shunted into the optical pathway this is what's called a synesthesia these things have been

fascinating for hundreds of years to people but the synesthesia means that you know color sounds are seen

well now what was this anything other than a neurophysiological curiosity well i maintain it is

because i think that a language which could be seen would be a kind of telepathic language if you've thought

much about telepathy you might have naively assumed that telepathy is you hearing me think that isn't what it

is i think telepathy is you seeing what i mean and it's not something which happens dramatically

it is a function of eloquence you know first you have the speaker who is boring you to death then you have

the speaker who at least holds your attention then you have the speaker of whom it is said she paints a picture

it means we're moving toward poetry well it's possible to imagine a transformation of the neural

processing of language it may be a behavioral possibility it may not even require a gene shift

where then we would see what we each mean you know there's this persistent idea

promulgated by robert graves in the white goddess among other people

that there was once what he calls an ursprach a primal language so emotionally intense

that to be in the presence of poetry declaimed in this language is to see the poetry and that this is

what the lost poetics of the high paleolithic were about and probably it was pharmacologically assisted

that you could gather people in the presence of a great bard or singer and that person

could then create telepathic modalities and that telepathic modality that richer more unifying language

was the thing which was suppressing the formation of ego

the ego speaks and hears through sound the super ego projects images and is perceived as images now it's very interesting

at least to me that in the pineal gland of ordinary human beings there is a compound called a deneroglomerotropine

which when analyzed in inorganic or just in the normal nomenclature of organic chemistry turns out to be

a beta-carbolene closely related to harmoline well is it possible that we are as close as a one gene

mutation away from a shift that would switch our processing of audio input into the visual field and that then we would cross over into a realm of

beheld

understanding and that this is the evolutionary leap that we're trying to make that it's in the body

not in the technology in the body there is actually going to be a minor a one gene

click to another channel and then we will be able to see what we mean and i maintain that if you can see what

somebody means

you are that person

contrast it contrast it to ordinary

communication

ordinary communication is achieved through small mouth noises

as primates

we have a throat and voice

arrange a voice box arrangement that allows us to produce small mouth noises

for hours if necessary i'm the living proof of it

but it's not a very efficient mode of communication because what happens is i

have a thought

i look in a culturally sanctioned dictionary which i have copied into my head

i translate the thought into an acoustical signal

using my mouth which moves across space

which enters your ears

you rush to your interior dictionary

and you construct my meaning out of your dictionary

now notice that this process rests on a very shaky assumption

it rests on the assumption that your dictionary and my dictionary were published by the same folks in the same year

if your dictionary is different from mine

you will not correctly reconstruct my meaning

and we will have what we call misunderstanding

notice how among us as a species one of the

most bring down things you can say to somebody

is would you please explain to me what i just said

because it means oh boy here comes trouble

now you're going to find out that you know

people didn't understand you they horribly misunderstood

and and the communication is very provisional

the amount of noise in the circuit is huge

well then contrast this to i utter something

and it condenses as a sculpture in the air

and you and i then become its observers

and we rotate this syntactical object

and we look at it we regard it from many points of view

this is not ambiguous

or it's certainly considerably less ambiguous than this reconstruction from interiorized dictionaries

so perhaps what all this is about is evolutionary pressure on our languages

to become visual and therefore to become more

unified and less riddled with noise

which creates misunderstanding which creates horrible social realities

yeah

i'm not just in the middle of reading a book called

oh michael talbot's book uh-huh

he was talking about uh visual experiences being about 50 percent based on meaning

and additions internally to you know what's coming through originally

so it sounds like you still have a transmission problem translation

yes although what you could do with a visible language would be very challenging i mean we could do

many things with it it's not an outlandish it's not a completely outlandish idea

in nature it occurs there's a there's a wonderful phenomenon in nature which is worth talking about to

sort of legitimate such a far out notion which is as you all probably know um octopi

can change color this is one of those things you learn on those science specials on tv

this concludes tape two our program continues with tape three our program continues with tape three

octopi can change color well most people i think assume that they do this

for camouflage that would be a reasonable assumption they don't do it for camouflage

let's talk about octopi for just a moment first of all they're mollusks they divided from our

evolutionary lines 700 million years ago they're related to escargot they have no backbone for crying out

loud they're not even vertebrates but what is always said in biology classes about octopi is that

they're a wonderful example of parallel evolution because their optical system is very much

like a mammalian optical system well why is this well it's because they evolved in a in an environment

the reef environment that is an environment all as dense with signals as a rainforest is

and um an octopus is soft bodied it can not only change color but it can also change its surface

from smooth and rubbery to bumpy pimply rugos ribbed so forth and so on and also because it is soft

bodied and in an aqueous environment it can fold and unfold and reveal and conceal parts of its body very very quickly

well all of these behaviors and physiological characteristics go together to make the octopus

an excellent visual communicator and the color changes the blushes traveling dots and bars that

these creatures manifest and the squids do it too uh our language and if you're interested in this there's a

wonderful book by a guy named monahan called communication and non-communication among the cephalopoidea

and he goes as far as creating a grammar for this stuff well so then in a way you know if you pull back from the

mundane assumptions about this what's happening is the octopus wears its mind on its skin

it is dressed in its mental state

one octopus encountering another can tell its mood how recently it's eaten how recently it's had sex

whether it's ovulating all by looking and so they the only way an octopus can have a private thought

is by squirting ink into the water and then hiding inside it this is essentially its correction fluid for

misspoken octopi you see so in a sense this is what i think we are are being beckoned toward that we want to

clothe ourselves in language we do it in a to a degree in a funny way i mean if you want to think about

virtual reality this is a virtual reality all this stuff these fixtures the architecture the

infrastructure the road these are ideas it was an idea and it has then been summoned into matter by the

the allotment of funds the spending of money

you

the hiring of craftsmen, so forth and so on.

Our whole civilization is an excreted set of interlocking ideas, agreements.

We're like coral animals.

And we, somewhere, you know, there's this naked, pulpy creature,

but, you know, clothed in denim, clothed in a harder shell produced by Mercedes or Chevrolet,

moving around inside a larger environment produced by the state of Colorado, and so forth and so on.

So I think octopi offer an excellent metaphoric example of what naked-mindedness would be.

And some of these octopi, as I said, they evolved in the coastal reef domain,

but that's a very competitive domain.

Everybody in the ocean wants to be there, because that's where the sunlight and the food is.

So if you're smart, you'll try and evolve into a more hostile niche.

And some of these octopi have become what are called benthic, or abyssal.

It means they exist in the parts of the ocean where light never reaches.

Yes, and they have retained this communication ability by switching over to interiorly generated phosphorescence.

So there are species of octopi which actually are studded with organs that have the equivalent of eyelids over them,

but they're flasher lights.

So when you descend into the benthic depths of the ocean,

you enter a domain where all one octopus ever sees of another octopus is its linguistic productivity,

because that's interior-generated light that can be seen.

And I think, you know, if you want to set the compass of virtual reality towards something worth writing home about,

then producing an octopus environment so that we could experience this kind of thing

would be a kind of proto-telepathic playpen of some sort.

Yeah?

I guess I'm skeptical enough, but octopi, I don't want to introduce colors that are not really

because of what they're thinking of, but it's still worth a lot of it, as we need it.

Aha, so you think that subterfuge enters here, too.

Yeah, that was my real question.

My real question is, last night when you were discussing the role of psychedelics in human evolution,

and you were going by a strictly Darwinian theory.

Right.

I assume since your researcher that you were sheltered in various endeavors,

that you entertained other theories.

And if so, have you considered a possibility that psychedelics may influence evolution,

the evolution of human kind in very direct light?

In other words, have a direct effect upon DNA, so that the selection of...

Well, you want me to...

It's a central dogma of biology, that information we can get out of DNA,

but can't get back in directly.

In other words, it can only be selected for over a period of generations.

Have you ever played around this period of...

Yeah, well...

Well, you raise a lot of issues.

First of all, since the discovery of retroviruses, of which the HIV virus is one,

we now know that it is not always information transcripted from DNA to RNA to protein.

The retroviruses transcript from RNA to DNA.

So, the central dogma, which is that the genome is not being altered by the environment,

is sort of shaky at this point.

You bring up a very interesting point, which has never, to my mind, been really thrashed out in orthodox science,

which is, if you had a bunch of these psychedelic molecules,

and we could raise them up to the size of loaves of bread, or something like that,

what you would notice about them is they're all what are called, by chemists, planar,

meaning they tend to be flat.

They're not lumpy.

They're flat.

Well, if you look at DMT or harmine,

harmine is built off a pentexel group,

and with two benzene rings off of it.

It is the perfect size to slip in between two nucleotides in DNA.

It can actually bond into the DNA there.

Now, many drugs do this.

These drugs are called dimers.

The usual problem with a dimer that will intercalate,

this is the other term, intercalate,

means slide between the rungs of the DNA,

is it usually deforms the DNA.

It, like, passes a bulge along it,

and then transcription is difficult.

But these indole hallucinogens can dimer with DNA

without disrupting its structural integrity.

This is why I believe that this is the source of the vision.

That, and, you know, orthodox biologists just roll their eyes at this idea

and say, well, now you've made a very common error here.

You've confused genetic information with information.

Don't you understand that genetic information is just a sequence of codons

coding for protein?

And, you know, that has no relationship to your memory of Aunt Minnie's face.

However, by being so unwielding on that point,

they create a huge problem for their brothers and sisters across the hall

who are trying to understand memory

because the molecular theory of memory is a nightmare.

Here's the problem.

Every molecule in your body is changed every five to seven years

depending on who you talk to,

except neurons.

The nerves are generally the nerves you're born with

or the nerves you die with.

But it's an absolute no-no to suggest that memory is lodged in the neurons.

Well, but if Aunt Minnie died 45 years ago

and you can still remember the dear woman's face

when she used to walk you in the park,

then every molecule of your body has been swapped out five times

since she quit the plane.

How can you have this memory of Aunt Minnie?

And then they say,

well, they don't say, actually.

They just throw up their hands.

Now, to the people who say

DNA can't store any kind of information

other than codon sequences for proteins,

they have to explain why then 90% of the genome

seems devoted to junk sequencing

that does not produce protein,

that does, in fact, not do anything that anybody knows about.

It seems to me that we might as well

just take the path of least resistance

and say if the neurons are the only part of the body

that persists throughout life,

if the memories persist throughout life,

then you've got two choices.

Either the memories are in the neurons

or the memories were never stored in the body in the first place.

And if you believe that,

well, then the obligation to explain

just where they were stored is hard upon you

and the mechanism for retrieving them.

So, I think molecular biology,

by being so reductionist,

has made certain problems in neurophysiology

and higher cortical functioning

almost insoluble.

You know, for years and years,

it was held that the...

this was another one of these central dogmas of biology.

It was held that information could move

from the nucleus of the neuron to the synapse,

but that there was no transport mechanism

for moving any molecular species

from the synapse back to the nucleus.

So, consequently, they said learning cannot take place

in the nucleus of the neuron

because the materials for learning,

which would be present in the synapse,

modifications through experience,

there's no transport system.

And this was dogma until 10 years ago.

Well, then, they discovered

what's called axioplasmic transport,

and they, by putting labeled compounds in the synapse,

they were able to locate

these labeled compounds later,

complexed with nuclear material in the neuron,

proving to the most diehard materialist

that synaptic material

was, in fact, moving backward to the neuron.

So, I think that, you know,

there's much that isn't understood

about how all this works.

Something worth pointing out,

you know, science seeks closure

and explanation, explanatory closure.

My brother one time made a little aphorism,

which I think says it all on this subject.

He said to me once, actually on a mushroom trip,

he said, have you ever noticed

how, as the sphere of understanding

grows ever larger,

necessarily the surface area of ignorance

gets ever bigger?

Seems perfectly clear.

You know, a simple-minded way of saying that is

the bigger you build the bonfire,

the more darkness you will reveal.

Yeah.

And also, any progress

really comes from outside the context

of the paradigm that's having the experience.

I mean, it really, to my knowledge,

almost everything that's really been advanced

in any, you know, in science or philosophy,

it's really something that's come from

outside the context of the paradigm.

Yes, well, some of you have probably read

Thomas Kuhn's book,

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,

where he shows, you know,

that it's never the way they tell it

afterwards.

The aftertelling is always about

the primary insight,

the careful experiment,

the gathering of data,

the correlation.

Actually, it doesn't work like that at all.

It's entirely

psychic, piecemeal,

ruled by synchronicity.

One of the most interesting things,

I'll tell this story

and then we can go to lunch

because I think, you know,

science has great pretensions

about itself.

I mean, it basically regards itself

as a meta-theory.

It regards itself

as capable of passing judgment

on all other theories.

They are supposed to submit themselves

to science

to be told

whether they're real or not.

Yeah, like a religion.

Well, how many people know

that, you know,

modern science was founded

by René Descartes

in the early 17th century.

What were the circumstances

under which Descartes

founded modern science?

René Descartes

was a 19-year-old

basically ne'er-do-well

and he decided

that he would go wenching

and soldiering

across Europe

which was a thing

that young men

of certain class

did at that time.

And so he joined

a Habsburg army

that was laying siege

to Prague

in the summer of 1619

and after they had taken care

of the problem

there in Prague

this Habsburg army

began to retreat

across southern Germany

and on the evening of

now there's a lot of arm wrestling

about this

but let's just say

the 17th of August

this army made camp

near the little town

of Ulm

in southern Germany

which

synchronicity freaks

pay attention.

Ulm will later be

the birthplace

of Albert Einstein.

worth noting

but that night

Descartes

in the barracks

had a dream

and an angel

appeared to him

and the angel said

the conquest of nature

is to be achieved

through number

and measurement

and he was

thunderstruck.

he took that

angelic revelation

and turned it

into modern science.

Modern science

was founded

by an angel.

You know

they don't tell you

this at MIT.

You know

it's astonishing

how

things which claim

roots in rationalism

are actually

among some of the

most irrational

productions

in the

historical

continuum.

It appears

that

our development

our history

our histories

have always been

created

at the promptings

of invisible

voices.

I mean

Socrates

who is at the

very center

of what's called

thinking

by western

civilization

Socrates

had a demon

D-E-A

M-O-N

it was a little

voice

it told

it was his

crap detector

it told him

the difference

between profound

philosophical

thinking

and

bullpucky

and

so

you know

the edifice

of western

thinking

built on

Platonism

owes its debt

to an invisible

agency

speaking from

hyperspace

so does

modern science

a la Descartes

how much more

of this

I mean

we don't care

if artists

talk to angels

because we've

our definition

of them

is that

they're screwballs

but to

believe that

an enterprise

like modern

science

has to trace

its way

back to the

same ecstatic

roots

is I think

very suggestive

that the world

is stranger

than we can

suppose

and that

we need to

open

these channels

of communication

to these

invisible worlds

probably the

next great

paradigm shift

will be

enunciated

by a mushroom

an angel

an elf

an alien

what have you

yeah

repetition

yeah

the first few

times I did it

I couldn't get

any grip

at all on it

and by talking

a lot

and trying to

describe it

you slowly

slowly build up

a map

so about the

logos

the logos

is this

phenomenon

that was sort of

the centerpiece

of greco

hellenic

spirituality

what it is

is it's a voice

in the head

that people

strove

to attain

for a thousand

years

this was the

sine qua non

of intellectual

accomplishment

in the greco

roman world

and the logos

told you

the right way

to live

and this is

sort of what

you get

with psilocybin

you get a voice

that can

confound you

with the depth

and brilliance

of its answers

and one of the

great

you know

one of the

puzzles

of trying to

understand

greco

hellenic

spirituality

is

what were they

talking about

and if this

ever was

a general

phenomenon

then what

happened to it

why do we

not

experience

this

this is

not well

understood

I mean

the rational

scholars

who have

created our

vision of

Greece

basically

just don't

even want

to talk

about this

they would

rather

gloss

over it

you know

one of the

things that

sort of relates

to all this

is

I think

human beings

are a lot

more malleable

than we tend

to imagine

in other words

we imagine

that people

in the distant

past

or in

Greece

or somewhere

were just

like us

except they

were living

in a different

time and

place

there's no

way to

find out

of course

because they're

all dead

but there are

certain

episodes

in the

evolution

of western

culture

that suggest

that people

may be

much more

plastic

than we

ordinarily

suppose

first example

would be

how can

it be

that in

the middle

1500s

perspective

was

discovered

I mean

how do

you discover

perspective

this is

very hard

I think

for modern

people to

understand

because

it's a

given

for us

I mean

we see

in perspective

we accept

it as

a quality

of the

world

rather than

a cultural

artifact

put in

place

at a

certain

moment

but in

fact

during

the

renaissance

only the

most

inspired

people

could

paint

in

perspective

on the

natch

most

people

they had

complex

devices

called

perspectographs

that would

project

over the

scene

a receding

grid

and then

people would

essentially

fill in

the lines

now another

example of

this kind

of thing

that's not

so well

known

but that

is an

example

that

Marshall

McLuhan

makes a

lot of

is

St.

Augustine

the great

father of

the Christian

church

he had

a reputation

for being

a very

holy

man

and the

accounts

of his

contemporaries

say that

the way

people would

satisfy

themselves

that

St.

Augustine

had a

pipeline

to

God

is

they

would

bring

him

scripture

the Bible

essentially

and

open it

in front

of him

and let

him look

at it

and then

they would

close the

book

and question

him about

what was

there

and he

could always

tell them

and they

were

amazed

as far

as we

can tell

St.

Augustine

was the

only man

in Europe

who could

read

silently

nobody

else

could

do

it

was

regarded

as

a

miracle

now

we

all

read

silently

and there

may be

a few

unfortunate

individuals

among us

who move

their lips

while they

read

but that's

the only

vestigial

trace

we have

of this

previous

cultural

mode

where

everyone

to read

meant

to read

aloud

no one

could conceive

of any

other way

of doing

it

the

logo

seems

to me

a kind

of

similar

thing

it

was a

mental

behavior

function

which

for reasons

which are

probably

complex

and unknowable

slipped out

of reach

that's why

it seems

to me

these

psychedelics

are very

close

to

being able

to modify

our behaviors

along these

kinds of

lines

because

there are

a number

of behavioral

and experiential

possibilities

that we

suppress

I mean

I think

it's

just

as an

example

of how

little

we know

about

what's

going

on

look

at the

Gaffin

don't look

at it

but conceive

of

the Gaffinburg

spot

the G spot

now we all

know what

this is

clearly

people were

looking for

it for a

long

time

how come

they only

discovered

it 12

years

ago

I mean

if

something

that

major

can be

overlooked

then it's

hard to

imagine

what might

have been

overlooked

I mean

that's

pretty

central

into

the

project

of being

a

human

being

and

apparently

it was

unknown

until

very

recently

so

yes

the

logos

was

probably

what I

call

the

Gaian

mind

and

that

at a

certain

point

in

cultural

development

people

just

became

so

chuckle

headed

that

the

Gaian

mind

just

said

the

hell

with

how it

works

with

psilocybin

yeah

well

I mean

I take

when I

take

psilocybin

I take

it on

an empty

stomach

I don't

fast

or anything

like that

I just

don't

eat

for

six

hours

I

don't

call

that

fasting

and

then

I

take

it

in

silent

darkness

that's

number

one

very

important

the

next

thing

is

weigh

the

dose

you

must

weigh

the

dose

because

five

grams

is what

you want

and

I've

had

over

and

over

the

experience

of

showing

somebody

what

five

grams

is

much

a

fourth

that

much

yeah

well

that's

the

problem

that's

why

you

don't

have

elves

in

the

attic

and

bats

in

the

belfry

like

I

do

you know

and so

then you

take it

and I

take it

on an

empty

stomach

and a

lot

of

people

don't

like

the

taste

I

don't

really

understand

that

I

just

chew

them

up

I

sit

with

them

and

I

chew

them

up

and

then

huh

dried

none

of

this

mixing

in

applesauce

or

any

of

that

malarkey

I

mean

what's

that

about

oh

well

fresh

grams

because

there's

more

than

a

you

know

there's

a

huge

water

loss

there

and

then

it

takes

people

sometimes

say

it

came

on

within

five

minutes

or

it

came

dynamics

to

imagine

that

it

could

come

on

that

fast

for

me

it

comes

on

almost

always

at

the

one

hour

and

twenty

minute

mark

I

think

it

can

come

on

sooner

than

that

I

think

I'm

fairly

resistant

to

these

things

in

the

hour

after

I

the

bummers

that

you're

afraid

are

going

to

jump

out

at

you

as

soon

as

you

get

loaded

if

you

will

carry

out

the

examination

of

conscience

you'll

be

so

bored

with

that

by

the

time

the

compound

actually

hits

that

you

usually

don't

have

to

pay

any

dues

because

you

face

the

fact

that

you're

a

jerk

fifty

times

in

and

I

should

say

in

the

time

preceding

that

you

may

have

to

go

to

the

bathroom

once

you

may

it

makes

your

nose

run

which

is

a

funny

thing

it

also

makes

you

yawn

these

are

definitely

qualities

of

psilocybin

not

related

to

its

psychoactivity

and

I

in

other

words

you

decide

ahead

of

time

I

am

going

to

sit

here

and

do

this

because

at

about

the

hour

and

fifteen

minute

mark

it

will

begin

hitting

you

with

stuff

like

you

would

really

be

more

comfortable

downstairs

or

you

know

it

is

awfully

hot

in

here

why

don't

you

get

up

and

adjust

the

thermostat

all

this

stuff

you

say

no

we

holding

the

space

and

sit

there

and

then

it

begins

to

come

on

and

it

comes

the

image

I

have

is

like

a

jellyfish

or

a

silk

scarf

or

something

like

that

it

just

kind

of

drifts

down

and

surrounds

you

and

at

that

point

I

guess

I

pray

I

say

to

it

you

know

I'm

completely

in

your

hands

please

don't

hurt

me

you

know

I'm

yours

I'm

completely

committed

I've

held

nothing

back

so

don't

burn

me

please

and

then

there

is

a

kind

of

it's

hard

to

describe

a

kind

of

potential

begins

to

build

up

and

you

say

hmm

the

rush

hasn't

begun

but

it's

you

can

almost

close

your

eyes

and

see

millions

of

little

psilocybin

molecules

elbowing

serotonin

molecules

out of

the way

and

fitting

themselves

into

the

receptor

site

and

the

electron

spin

resonance

dynamics

is beginning

to shift

and the

whole thing

is

about

to

take

off

at that

point

I

smoke

furiously

and

that

usually

is

all

it

takes

and

it

comes

on

and

it

the

first

rush

is

really

astonishing

sometimes

it's

more

mind

boggling

than

others

but

I

can

remember

situations

where

we

just

see

it

coming

and

say

oh

my

god

you

know

it's

miles

wide

and

miles

high

where

are you

going

to

run

to

you

know

it's

just

good

grief

you

know

I guess

I'm not

going to

execute

that

decision

then

it

just

hits

and

it's

like

a

tidal

wave

I

mean

I

have

the

feeling

when

I'm

doing

it

in

California

that

everybody

from

Vancouver

to

Tijuana

has

just

crawled

under

their

desk

because

you

can't

imagine

this

is

happening

between

my

ears

you

know

it's

more

like

an

asteroid

must

have

fallen

in the

Pacific

Ocean

and

raised

some

enormous

incoming

wave

it's

what

it's

sort

of

like

it's

like

watching

a

thermonuclear

explosion

through

50 feet

of

crystal

clear

glass

so

you

know

you're

perfectly

calm

it's

not

getting

at

you

but

the

energy

that

is

being

released

in

your

presence

is

awesome

and

then

it

and

sometimes

in that

first

pass

you

actually

the

linguistic

machinery

is

burned

out

that

you've

probably

seen

these

scenes

where

they

will

test

a

hydrogen

bomb

and

they

set

up

cameras

a

quarter

mile

from

ground

zero

a

half

mile

a

mile

two

miles

and

then

when

they

actually

detonate

the

bomb

they

get

the

view

from

the

first

camera

and

then

they

switch

to

the

second

camera

as

the

first

camera

is

have

as

this

thing

spreads

out

toward

you

and

then

it

does

what

it

wants

to

do

it

tells

you

what

it

wants

to

tell

you

and

it's

highly

unpredictable

I

mean

you

cannot

people

always

say

you

should

ask

it

a

question

this

seems

absurd

to

me

I

my life was in turmoil, I did ask a question. I wrote it down ahead of time

and the question was, am I doing the right thing with my life? And then when I

got in there and I posed the question and the answer came back instantly. It

was a ripoff from Lyndon Johnson. It said, what kind of a chicken shit question

is that to ask me? I said, oh sorry, didn't mean to presume, you know. I said, get your

act together and then we'll have a conversation, but if that's what you want

to talk about, you should have taken MDMA. And then, you know, paralleling

what we talked about this morning, and again I'm just giving you my subjective

take on it. It's like I come into a place, it's hard to describe, it's a

feeling, and the content of the feeling is, now the elves are near, but they

won't appear unless I invoke them. And, you know, I wish I could tell you that I

chant in Mundayan or something like that, but I don't. Well, I stole a line from an

old, old I Love Lucy program, where Ethel is talking to Lucy about UFOs, and

Lucy says she talks to the UFOs, and Ethel says, well, how can you talk to UFOs? And

Lucy said, well, it's simple. I just say, come in little green men, come in little green

men, and that's what I do. I say, come in little green men, and then there is a, and

women if there are any out there, and then there is a, it's like a, it's like, it's like a

marching band, it's like a Nepalese marching band is what it's like, and it

comes from a distance, like there's a place in my vision that's small, a little

dancing light, and a, and a little faint sound, and the light comes closer, and the

sound gets louder, until finally, you know, they pick me up on their shoulders, and

with tubas blaring, and sackbut, and rebeck, and all of this stuff, and then they carry

me around, and talk to me, and it's, the whole thing is shot through with such a

weird sense of zaniness, Irishness, Joyce-ishness, I mean, it's almost unbearable, it's so,

I don't know, not exactly Disney-esque, because their humor tends to be a little more savage

than that, and then that is part of the first wave, and then the rest of the trip unfolds

pretty much as you, there's a kind of a pushing and pulling that goes on, you can direct it, each

one of these plants does have a character of its own, and, sure, one of the most puzzling

things about these, these plants, is that they have characters that seem irreducible, for

instance, psilocybin, it is the science fiction drug, in other words, it says, you know, we

have been denizens of this planet for 400 million years, our original home planet is

in the M5-83C system, we are connected via hyperspace to all intelligent life forms in

the galaxy, it shows you enormous machines in orbit around alien planets, it talks about

the end of history, and the collectivizing of humanity, and it's this enormous

hortatory, salvational, dramatic, science fiction type scenario, well, then you take

ayahuasca, which in molecular terms is just a few nitrogens are moved around, I mean, it's

basically the same thing, and you get a completely different message, you, you, you, you feel

the energy of the rainforest, and the rivers, and you, it's very feminine, you think

about childbirth, you think about the continuity of generations, you think about the, the, uh,

mystery of the meat, you think about tantric sexuality, it's all redirected back into the human and natural world in some way, and then, of course,

DMT, which I described this morning, which the DMT elves are not from outer space, or they

don't present themselves that way, in fact, one of the odd things about the DMT thing is that you have

the feeling that this space that you break into, even though it's large, some people even refer

to the dome of DMT, that tells you they really were there, but wherever this huge vaulted space

is, you have the feeling, although it's hard to explain how you know this, but you have the feeling

that you're way, way, way underground, which fits with the elf motif, you're in the hall of the mountain king, you're

under the hills, with the, you know, the little people who retreated under the hills, uh, the character

of these things is, uh, one of the most puzzling things, uh, about them.

And how do you relate all these different species of, uh, gremlins to the, uh, the logos that shows the part of this one?

Well, that's a real question. The logos seems more, it, first of all, it isn't, it doesn't crack jokes,

and, and do quadruple entendre puns, and stuff like that. It's more like a wise and loving teacher.

Uh, these DMT things are, you know, it's a troop of maddened elves, and they are just doing their own thing.

And then, with ayahuasca, though some people claim they contact an entity, it hasn't been like that for me.

It seems to me that on ayahuasca, you, you become like a, a camera. You just fly through a visual world.

I mean, after a good ayahuasca trip, you just feel like your eyes are bugging out of your head.

I mean, it's like buying prints on Madison Avenue, you know, and, and you've just been looking, and looking, and looking, and looking,

and you, you literally have to give your eyes a rest after an ayahuasca trip.

And the ayahuasca visions are more, they seem to cover a broader spectrum.

The psilocybin hallucinations tend toward this highly polished, machine-like, insect-like, outer space bit.

And the ayahuasca hallucinations are wonderful pastels, laces, layering of colors.

And then, one of the most interesting things to me about ayahuasca, and I just cannot understand how this works.

If I could, I'd, I'd be Erte or somebody.

And that is that you, in the middle of the ayahuasca trip, you can suggest motifs.

You can lead it, so that, for instance, you can say to it, uh, Art Deco.

And suddenly there will be thousands of candy dishes, cigarette lighters, champagne buckets, automobiles, stained glass windows, doorknobs, silverware,

all rolling in black space in front of you, all the perfect exemplification of this aesthetic, the Art Deco aesthetic.

And then you can say to it, okay, uh, Italian Baroque.

And it just, like that, suddenly, altar pieces, Madonnas, uh, martyred saints, uh, and fantastic scroll work, and fleur-de-lis.

And you can say, well, surprise me.

And then you will get a coherent style, like Art Deco, like Italian Baroque, except that it's, nobody's ever bothered to realize it on this planet.

But it's as coherent.

Uh, it's like, you know, 20 years ago, there was no such thing as Southwest, as a style.

You know, this weird thing coming out of Santa Fe that I notice has planted its roots deep here as well.

The turquoise and beige endlessness of feathers and hammered titanium and all that.

Well, that's an aesthetic that has cohered in the last 20 years and come into being.

There seem to be an infinite number of these things.

As different as the bronzes of the Han Dynasty are to a Dali or a Pollock or a Bosch.

And, uh, and then you can say to it, going beyond the surprise me challenges, what I always say to it is, uh,

I want to see more of what you are for yourself.

And then it's like there's this low organ tone and it begins to lift the veils and the temperature in the room drops about 20 degrees.

And after about 20 seconds of that, you just say, enough of how you are for yourself.

Because you can tell what's happening is, it's starting to reveal something so peculiar and so untailored for the human mind or eye that you become afraid.

You say, you know, can we go back to dancing mice, Art Deco cigarette lighters and Baroque altarpieces, please?

This is turning into deep water as far as I'm concerned.

So, uh, yes?

What happens on, uh, higher than, uh, if anything, higher than five grams per hour?

Oh, that's a good question. Good question.

It requires a small detour into pharmacology.

The concept, which all pharmacologists are familiar with and which you should be too if you're going to deal in this realm,

called LD50.

This is not a pretty notion, but a necessary one.

It stands for lethal dose 50.

What does this mean?

It means if we have a hundred mice,

how much psilocybin do we have to give each mouse to kill half of them?

Do you see?

LD50.

Half the sample dies at the LD50 dose level, whether it's graduate students or rats.

Now, when you're designing a drug or when you're thinking about a drug,

what you want is a drug with an extremely high LD50 opposed to its effective dose.

So, say the effective dose of psilocybin is probably about .5 milligrams per kilogram.

And the LD50 is probably, uh, 200 milligrams per kilogram.

The LD50 of psilocybin is 400 times the effective dose.

This is a pharmacologist's way of saying this is very, very safe.

A pound wouldn't kill you.

I don't think.

It might be getting close, but you'd have to eat in that range to die.

Now, some drugs have horrendous LD50 to effective dose profiles.

Unfortunately, and I hope I don't rain on anybody's parade here,

MDMA has a terrible LD50 profile.

The effective dose is 125 milligrams.

You can kill yourself with a thousand milligrams.

So, that's not good at all.

Because, sure as hell, some street person or some depressed person or some maniac

is going to take a thousand milligrams.

And then you've got a stiff on your hands.

So, yeah.

I recently read some info on MDMA indicating that

uh, uh, uh, serotonin, depressed serotonin levels on MDMA, uh,

uh, uh, uh, well, the serotonin stays low in your body for biology at the kidney.

Where it's going to related substance called E.

Uh, the serotonin levels are depressed for only two hours

and the researcher indicated that his conclusion was

that MDMA had some physiological toxicity

that he did not have

and therefore it might be wise to avoid it for that reason.

So, in fact, I've read an article that

it's destroying the serotonin receptor sites.

I've heard about a liver test before and after,

about 3,500 milligrams.

Was there a difference?

There was a difference.

Well, I think MDMA is,

I don't want to trash MDMA.

It's changed a lot of people's lives

and saved relationships and so forth and so on.

But to me, it's a perfect example

of why you're better off taking plants.

Because here was this drug.

Somebody invented it.

They gave it to a few friends.

It seemed to be wonderful for solving personal problems.

So, without any collection of human data,

this thing becomes an item in the underground.

Well, and so then thousands of people take it.

The psychological effects seem completely benign.

It's a wonderful thing.

The physiological effects,

it's a very disturbing profile.

It isn't exactly as you said.

It's not that it destroys the serotonin receptor site.

It's that nerves, neurons,

are covered by these very delicate structures called dendritic spines.

Now, nobody knows what dendritic spines do,

but every neuron in your body has them.

And when you take MDMA,

it mows them down.

They just, they go away.

Now, so then you get two schools of thought.

One says,

well, my God, anything impacting the physical brain that dramatically

should be stayed away from.

And the other camp says,

well, do you see any behavioral changes

in people who take MDMA a lot?

Do you see any physical destruction,

seizures, blindness, anything?

And the answer is no.

So they say,

well, here we have histological evidence

that this thing is making major physiological changes

in the dendrites,

and no behavioral sequela to back up that this is of any consequence.

Well, my position being basically a very conservative person

is in that case, wait.

You know, they're doing work on this

in a dozen labs around the country.

They'll figure it out.

In the meantime,

take psilocybin or mescaline

or something else that has been sanctioned

because you just do not want to insult the physical brain.

You know, that's the whole name of the game.

You have to keep the brain in good shape.

Yeah.

Could we go back to his question?

Once you're past the Traeger dose,

is it worthwhile to start to step up?

Oh, yeah.

That's where we were talking.

That's why we started talking about LD50

because I wanted to explain to you

that taking a drug like a compound like psilocybin,

if the effective dose is 20 milligrams,

20 milligrams for somebody who weighs 135 pounds,

well, then looking at the pharmacological data,

they should be able to take 2,000 milligrams

without any trouble at all.

That's a thousand times,

that's a hundred times more.

But in fact,

what happens is as you raise the dose

is that the psychological presentation becomes unbearable.

It becomes so strange

that you fear for your sanity

in a good old Edgar Allan Poe-ish phrase, you know.

It gets stranger and stranger.

And you know,

I've talked to pretty naive people

who have overdosed.

Usually the way these overdose situations occur

is people are gathering mushrooms in the wild

and they start eating them

and then they just keep eating them

and then they realize

they've eaten 4 times more than the effective dose.

And this is where you get into places

where you don't know what to say

because if you tell people,

they'll throw a net over you.

But you want to say

because you're so personally disturbed.

This is where the flying saucers land

and the rectal examinations begin

and you're told that you're the Messiah

and they, you know,

it becomes quirkier and quirkier.

So I think you have to,

you know,

I'm very admiring of people

who can take very high doses

but I find it quite challenging enough

in the 5 to 7 gram range.

A friend of mine says of psilocybin

that every time he takes it

he tries to stand more,

meaning more of the vision

because it is filtering itself.

It's definitely filtering itself.

This is why beginners

almost never have bad trips

because somebody in there

looks at your clipboard

and says,

oh, this guy has never done this before

so lay off the rough stuff.

Just, you know,

bring them through the standard number.

It's the people who consider themselves experienced,

you know,

who've done it 20, 30, 40 times.

He says, you know,

we can take the gloves off with this guy

and, you know,

it always amazes me.

I sometimes meet people who say,

you know,

I've taken mushrooms 50 times

and I've never had a bad trip

and I think, you know,

lucky soul

because when it goes left,

it's hard, you know,

it's hard.

You have to really then,

you know,

do not your mantras bungle

is the best advice I can give you

because you need to steer back

towards the mainstream.

Now, maybe at this point

this is a good point

at which to talk about

what do you do

when the going gets rough?

There are two things, at least,

that you can do

that are very effective.

The first is,

and it's a very simple thing,

but people in our culture

seem to be resistant to this,

is you sing,

you force air into your lungs

and body

and you chant,

you sing,

anything you want

and it will radically alter the parameters.

There's a certain place in psilocybin

that is my

uh,

which I call the meat locker

and then I don't like this place,

you know,

and meat locker is a mild term for it.

It's more like,

uh, you know,

the morgue for the homicide unit

or something.

Whenever I start drifting that way,

I sing.

And then you can navigate through it.

The other thing you can do,

although this is sometimes trickier,

is, uh,

smoke cannabis.

This is what those bombers are for

that you rolled in the first hour

while you were waiting for it to come on

is as soon as it begins to press in

in some really invasive or alarming way,

just take a couple of hits of the good

and chant

and then you can bring it back on track.

And also talk to it.

Don't be afraid to say,

you know,

I don't like this.

Take it off me.

It's too peculiar.

I'm not ready for this.

It says,

oh, sorry,

uh, you know,

back to dancing mice.

Uh, yeah.

Do, uh,

different batches of mushrooms have

wildly during concentrations of psilocybin?

Well,

there hasn't been a lot of work on this.

Uh,

Michael Buickley at Evergreen College

years ago,

grew stropharia cubensis

by the method that's described in my book,

the book I wrote with my brother.

And what they discovered,

see,

psilocybin is 4-phosphoroxy-NN-dimethyltryptamine.

That phosphorus group

is removed as soon as it crosses,

uh,

the blood-brain barrier.

So really,

uh,

what's active is,

uh,

a,

organism

Something worth mentioning. I suppose. It's worth mentioning is

when I was into my

Extraterrestrial phase when I was assuming that the mushroom was an extraterrestrial

Either the extraterrestrial itself or something designed by some kind of an extraterrestrial

It was very interesting to me that psilocybin is as I said for

Phosphoroxy NN dimethyltryptamine. It is the only force substituted indole in nature

the only one

Well, if you were to search for evidence of extraterrestrial

Tampering with the biome of this planet what you would look for is a unique compound occurring in one life form and no other

Here it is folks this phosphorus group is unique

And I've never read any description or discussion of what the evolutionary history of that why it would appear in an organism like that

And not in any other

That's just an aside because I'm always searching for the thumbprint of the alien

It there may not be an alien thumbprint

But the phosphorus group attached to psilocybin is a good candidate for it. Yeah

Um

Switching the subject only slightly the

Descriptions that you've given of all of these experiences

Although you uh have said that it varies widely

There is a remarkable internal consistency

Of your description that you're entering a world that seems to have

Boundaries and entities that you've consistently encountered

Again and again

I've um spoken to

Many other people over the years

Some of whom

I've known you a long time

And nobody I've ever spoken to

People who've taken high doses or

Low doses have ever had

Similar experiences

Now clearly you've talked to people who have

Maybe they were just being polite

I'm wondering if you've ever experimented

With your own experiences

Like what Lily describes in programming and metaprogramming

And to see

You describe ways of evoking

the energy

Which certainly could be put into the context of

Introducing programs into your experience

True

Have you worked with

Different presuppositions going into this

To see what the limits are

Well my original presupposition was to try to have no presupposition at all

And then out of that came all of these assumptions

You're right that nobody has trips exactly like mine

Although

If you question people carefully

You can begin to see what how it works

For example

You know I described this thing this morning the elves the presentational thing

The high speed motion the gifts all that

Well sometimes people will take dmt and they will come back and you'll realize that

It's as though there is an archetype there

Which has different levels in it

And if I had to say what the archetype of dmt is

It's the archetype of the circus

And one time I saw a woman come out of dmt

She was an anthropologist

She had fairly high body weight

And I could tell that she had not gotten a complete hit

Came down we said okay, what was it?

She said it was the saddest carnival in the world

She said the carnival was closed

All the tents had their flaps rolled down

And there were just paper cups and candy wrappers blowing in the aisles in between them

And the the ferris wheel was stopped

Well, she was just at the edge of this thing

And if you think about the archetype of the circus

It is an interesting one

First of all

You have the three center rings

Where wild and zany activity is continuously being presented

Tiny cars keep arriving with 14 clowns in each one

And they keep climbing out falling all over each other

But it isn't all fun and games

It has a strange erotic content

And as a child I think my first awareness of what I would really call eros

Was watching this beautiful long-haired woman in a tiny spangled costume

Hanged by her teeth 120 feet above the center ring doing acrobatics

So you've got so you've got the clown

And you've got the lady in the tiny spangled costume

And then off from the center ring

You have these dark alleyways where the side shows are

The Siamese twins and the goat boy and all the rest of it

You know, and it has a very weird vibe about it

So it can land you in any of these places

But if you if you try and correlate people's experiences

It seems to me that it's pretty clear that through

Through their own life history and their own programming

Nevertheless something is trying to poke through

Now my dmt experience seems pretty radically different from other people's

Although other people don't give any account at all

I mean it's amazing how inarticulate people are

You they come down you say how was it and they say was far out

You say you know you don't get out of here with that rap

You know how was it and you say well

Well

They can't give a good account on psilocybin

I think most people experience something very much like what I describe

Huge machines a sense of danger to the earth

Apocalyptic visions

The idea that someone will come and help

I'm pretty resistant to all the flotsam and jetsam of the new age

I mean, I don't spend a moment worrying about the exact physical location of Atlantis or

Stuff like that and I think people it inflates their personal

Mythologies and intellectual misconceptions, but there there is something trying to get through that's why this exercise

Show me what you are for yourself is

Is really a good one and maybe my trips are so weird because I have always worshipped weirdness

So I can go further down that road without being alarmed while somebody else

You know would pull back

One of the problems is that we haven't we don't have complete maps of these places at this stage in exploring that new world

What we have essentially are the scribbled diaries of frightened explorers

And we don't know if Explorer A is talking about the same river system as Explorer B

Or whether they were on opposite sides of the planet or the universe

Building a coherent picture of the psychedelic dimension would be the first challenge to us to a rational approach to understanding

Is that the first book? No, I read that I read the first book

Well, it actually is a map. Talk about weird. This is one of the weirdest things you would ever read

But it has an amazing ring of truth in it and in it he presents a map of all of the realms of beings that exist that he's visited

Visited is just normal consciousness. It's almost an anti-psychedelic description

But it's pretty consistent with some of the things you were discussing this morning

Because this is where you go when you die

And it's also where you go when you sleep

In fact, he talks about classes you attend in your sleep

And he describes these levels upon levels of entities coexistence

Well, I read the first book and I was puzzled by how much of it didn't seem familiar to me

Like I remember in the first book he talks about a world that's just like this world except the cars are nine feet wide

That would be a very puzzling psychedelic experience to go to that world

I knew someone who was very close to him and I don't want to set off any lawsuits here

But I once cornered this person and said so what about it?

And he said don't worry. You don't have to worry. This is not getting close to your bailiwick at all

Buddhism of the Mahayanas

has you know a tremendously complex system of levels and entities

wrathful Buddhas and Dharmapalas and peaceful entities

And I think that that's pretty interesting as a phenomenological description of mind

I reject the philosophical premise of Buddhism because I think it's

You know an unbelievably uncompromising kind of nihilism

But Buddhism as it's pitched in America soft pedals that a lot

You know they don't they don't present it as a form of nihilism

But I think ultimately it is in the most positive sense

But still I'm of the school that follows Alfred North Whitehead who said say what you may

There are certain stubborn facts

And you know that's not a very Buddhist point of view

Yeah

If I can control myself and not do it too often

The problem is cannabis does so many other wonderful things

And I tend to use it for those other wonderful things

But if I were totally dedicated to vision

Then I would only smoke once a week

Because then you completely come to equilibrium

And then you know I again I think people do it

Not wrong but not the way you should do it if you want visions

You should do it the way you do all these other things

Alone in silent darkness and at high doses

Bursts of hallucination on cannabis are hard to control and predict

But sometimes they're as intense as anything can be

If you read 19th century descriptions of cannabis use by people like Fitzhugh Ludlow

And the Club de Hashashin and that crowd

Where they were eating the hashish

It's very clear that it was the LSD of the 19th century

I mean nobody can read those descriptions without realizing

These people were loaded for sure

They were thoroughly and completely smashed

To be able to write those kinds of accounts

Yeah, go ahead

So I was interested you said you spoke a lot at the start of the mushroom trip

And when I spoke a lot at the start of the trip

Which tends to really confuse Henry

And then just like realize

It has an effect which

And I'm not sure that's a good effect

In terms of getting the learning

Shall we say

From both our accounts

Well you didn't exactly make clear to me what the effect was

It fuzzes you out going into

Well it depends on the scope

I suppose if you have a very top grade sense of me

It will be one thing

It will be something totally different

What it does to me is it just slightly cuts my anxiety

You know

I'm able to let the thing unfold of its own

I'm not I don't know

I mean I have a very

A lifelong

Intense relationship to cannabis

And I basically make my living

Out of being able to do feats of memory

And you know cannabis is supposed to trash your memory

So I don't you know maybe I'm different

But I resist any maybe I'm different argument

Because it's malarkey

Nobody's different enough

That they can

You know

In terms of your articulateness

And memory recall

When you're at the peak of a time of experience

Is it that you still

You know

Speak as clearly then

I mean I'll give it a little tongue-tap

No more so

My great dream is

That as my powers of locution fade with old age

That cannabis will be legalized

Then I can sit in front of you and smoke

And my career can be pushed 20 years further into the future

The way I use cannabis is to think

And I do a lot of thinking

I do a lot

And I

At night before I go to bed

I smoke

And then I play the tapes of the day

And then I understand what happened

If I didn't have cannabis

I don't think I would be

Sort of

At sea

Or a kind of a space case

Because I never get what somebody really meant

Really intended

Really had in mind

Till I play the tapes stoned

And then I see

Aha!

That's what the agenda was

That's what was going on

You didn't go to sleep afterwards?

Oh yeah

Yeah

And if I don't smoke

Then I'm insomniac

Yeah

I don't know how far you want to go about this

But I'm really interested in how you can hear it

And that's one

And all of the experiences together

What we talked about

Kind of complete that

Okay

Well

LSD

Again

You remember

I'm only speaking for myself

Because there is no other way to approach it

I found LSD very interesting

But ultimately kind of frustrating

Because I wanted visions

And to me what LSD by itself does

It does a lot of slippery and hard to name stuff

It accelerates and changes the quality of thought

It

Hmm

Well basically that's it

It does something to the quality of thought

But I had been reading Aldous Huxley

And Havelock Ellis

And those people

And I kept saying

Where are the ruins of alien civilizations?

Where are the jeweled tapestries?

And then fiddling around with LSD

I discovered that if I would

Take it with mescaline

Then it became the psychedelic experience

That I was seeking

But in and of itself

It's kind of psychoanalytic

It's sort of like cleaning up your act

It often focuses you on your own personal stuff

And you know I have to confess to you

I'm I don't I'm not that interested in my own personal stuff

Probably because it's so horrendous

But I I don't like personalized trips

I like cosmic vision information trips

And and then mescaline

Mescaline is you have to take a lot to get it to really do what you want it to do

And it being an amphetamine has a not a very good LD50 profile

It's not like MDMA

Where 10 times the effective dose you're in real trouble

But probably 40 times the effective dose

And you'd be sweating bullets

So and then just the nature of my life

I've not had as much to do with mescaline as these other things

I'm really a vision freak

And people say you know well there's feeling

And there's insight

And there's this and that

But the reason I'm so fixated on vision

Or the excuse I give

Somebody said it's because you're a double Scorpio

But to me it's the

To me it's the proof

That it's not coming from me

I can come up with insights

I can come up with funny ideas

But I can't come up with objects

Never before seen by the human eye or mind

And so when the vision start

Then I feel this is the transpersonal part of the trip

This isn't my unconscious

My memories my fears my hopes

This is something else

Yeah

Last night you were talking about

Boundary dissolution and ego reduction

In what you described this morning

How do they relate?

How do boundary dissolution and

How do your descriptions of the trip this morning

Relate particularly to ego

Well I think in very practical terms

They show you that everything you know is wrong

You know?

I mean how can the ego survive that piece of information

It just puts in your lap

Incontrovertible evidence

That everything you ever thought or believed is hokum

And that's extraordinarily humbling

And that word humbling

Means the feeling you have when your ego is reduced

You know?

Humble yourself enough and you'll begin to feel humiliated

And you know that's a deeper ego reduction

I think they

Aside from any magical chemical effect

They might have on ego

They're just simply showing you

The true size of the universe

And your place in it

And you know in our down personal lives

Every man, every woman, a king or a queen

I mean we build castles in the air

Our career, our children, our whatever

Well then you get into those places

You just say you know

How preposterous

This is a dangerous kind of question

Is there any gender difference in these things?

For men and women?

Male and ego being?

Well that's an interesting question

I'm interested in that also in terms of the history

Yeah

You mean what we talked about last night

Yeah

You live in the, perhaps a male created

Well I think women by virtue of the fact that they

Menstruate and give birth

Are just inherently

More, more chemically driven creatures than men

Men are Apollonian in intent

The idea is always some kind of abstract

Purity, clarity kind of thing

And women know from the get-go

That that's an illusion

That the reality is the floor of the rainforest

The interconnected tissue

The levels, the trade-offs

And so forth and so on

This is why I think

Generally men tend to be more interested

In these things than women

And to also be more impacted by them

For women it seems to sort of fit in

And affirm what they knew

For men it seems to come as a tremendous surprise

That this is the way things are put together

I think that if we, if everybody gave birth

And experienced menstruation

Probably we never would have launched ourselves into history

In a way, you know, without going too far with it

Men are the ancillary sex

I mean the the original

Blastula in the embryonic development

Is female

And I was listening to somebody the other night

Talk about this

Saying no wonder men have the problems they have

What a man is, is a woman

Who has been under incredible chemical assault

For nine months in the womb

And you just have been hammered

Sculpted, shaped

And recast

Again and again

And then you're born male

A female fetus

Doesn't experience anything like that

It starts out with a smooth shot

And phylogenetic expression

And then achieves it

I don't think of the ego

As particularly male

Because I think we all have it

To excessive degrees

But men are able to express it

A woman with an ego

Is frustrated

A man with an ego

Is a menace to all concerned

You know

Yeah

How do you feel about taking a trip

With another

Or other people

Do you think

Reflection of energy

And personalities

Changes your trip?

I think it's very

It's a very major decision

To do that

That if you're going to take a

High dose of psychedelics

With somebody else

Then you better be prepared

To get all entangled

With them

Which can be great

It can also be

Fairly confusing

I don't like taking psychedelics

This is not an issue

Of entanglement

That's sort of what goes on

Between lovers

Or close friends

But I get a lot of requests

To sit for people

And I don't do it

Because I

I don't know whether it's my

Personality

Or what it is

But I am unable

To contain my anxiety

In the presence of

Another stoned person

Especially if I'm stoned

If I'm stoned

And they're stoned

And we're in a dark room

I cannot get off

I listen to them breathe

I worry

I wonder if I should ask them

If they're alright

Then I go off on long trips

About not interrupting them

And then that loops back into

But I haven't heard them breathe

For 20 minutes

And I'm always afraid

I don't know

So really people say

Doesn't it take courage

To do it alone?

For me it takes more courage

To do it with people

Because inevitably

Then you get tangled up

Into some kind of craziness

And you know

You can think

You're having a telepathic experience

And they've decided

That they want to have sex

Or something

And meanwhile

I've just had a revelation

About that entry

Moliere made

In his diary

When he was talking

To his niece Agnes

About the nature

Of the French comic theatre

And so you say

Boy you know

We've got too much

On the menu here

But I'm weird

Remember that

Yeah

Okay

Now

And we

Have heard about

The common vision

Shared by people

In Ayahuasca

So

Can you comment

On this kind of thing

In contrast

To what you're talking

About

You mean the group mind

On Ayahuasca?

Yes

Is that possible?

Oh yeah

No

It's very possible

I mean you can sit

With someone

And play a little game

Where you will

Describe the hallucinations

For 30 seconds

Then they get to

Describe the hallucinations

For 30 seconds

And you can absolutely

Convince yourself

That people are

Seeing the same

You know

That you're seeing

The same thing

And you know

When you toss

Sex

Into the mix

It just goes

Over the top

I mean I've had

The impression

I don't want

To trot it out

As a position

Of mine

Or something

That I assert

As true

But I have had

The impression

Stoned on mushrooms

Making love

That

It's like

Perspiration forms

On the surface

Of the skin

And there's

Some kind of

Electrolytic

Thing

That goes on

And the boundaries

Dissolve

Between the people

I don't mean

Metaphorically

I mean

That you

Become

One

Organism

And that's

That's

Pretty

Amazing

Yeah

Now

After I just said

I don't like

Taking

Psychedelics

With people

I guess

What I should have said

Is I hate

Being responsible

Because I don't mind

Taking ayahuasca

With 30 people

None of whom

Speak English

In a hut

Up some river

But that's

Because I know

That the old

Shamans

Are in charge

That I'm just

A face in the crowd

Nobody's going to

Turn to me

For explanation

Or help

I'll tell you

An ayahuasca story

Just to give you

An idea of the

Kind of stuff

That goes on

In these sessions

Years ago

In 76

Cat and I

It was before

We were married

Were in Peru

And we

Had found

This shaman

Who was very good

And he had a following

And we were

You know

Apprenticing ourselves

To him

And he

The style

Of these

Peruvian mestizo

People

Is that

I mean

Cultures handle

This differently

But they are

Never straight

With each other

It's

An incredibly

Masked

Culture

Almost like the

Japanese

But without the formality

In other words

If you think

Somebody's a jerk

You would never

Say that

That's the last thing

You would say

Because that's your

True opinion

So we got into

A situation

With these people

Where this

Elder shaman

Who was very respected

Beloved

Even

By these people

He had a nephew

A sobrino

Who

Who was an absolute

Jerk

I mean this guy

Was into

Pimping a little

On the side

And he was very

Ambitious to perfect

His ayahuasca

So he could

Go to Lima

And charge yuppies

A bunch of money

For taking it

And so forth

And he had this

Really awful

Habit

And I don't know

What was really

Had gone on

Before we got there

But they would all

Get together

To take ayahuasca

And these old

Old guys

You know

85 years old

The totally

Authentic dudes

Would sing

These beautiful

Ayahuasca songs

And he would sing

Against them

I mean can you imagine

A scene like this

Where everybody

Singing row row row

Your boat

Except one guy

Wants to sing

Five foot two

Eyes of blue

Does

And and the level

Of social tension

In these meetings

Would just rise

And rise

But nobody

Would ever

Say anything

To this guy

And tell him

To bug out

And can that crap

So one night

This had happened

Two meetings

In a row

It was the third

Meeting like this

Everybody hoped

This guy wouldn't come

So then he showed up

So then we all

Dose

Then we get loaded

And the singing

Begins

And he begins

And in the wave

Of hallucinations

And cat was

Sitting next to me

He was sitting up

On his haunches

Kind of rocking

Back and forth

On his heels

And I would look at him

And I could see

He was going through

These weird

Animal transformations

First he would become

Like a jackal

Then he would become

Like a monkey

And it was really intense

And I mentioned it

To cat

And she could see it too

Well

So then he kept

And we were also

Trying to tape

These ayahuasca songs

So it was a double

Irritation to us

That this guy

Was so out of control

So after a

Particularly long song

By the old guys

With him

Just hammering

Against them

I could feel cat

Who has a real

Irish temper

Getting more

And more

Pissed off

At this guy

And finally

At the end

Of this song

When the silence

Fell

She had been

Just staring

At the floor

And she looked

Across the room

At Don Jose

And gave him

A look

Of pure

Loathing

And I saw

These red things

These red

Triangular shaped things

Come out of her eyes

And go across the room

Like

And when it got to him

It knocked him

Off his feet

He was thrown

Backwards

From the impact

Of these things

Literally

And the

Everything going on

In the room

Stopped dead

And the elder shaman

Said to the guy

Sitting next to him

He said

Oh

The gringa

Sends

The ba da da da da

And

You know

Then you realize

Wow

We're in over our heads

Here

You can't tell shit

From Shinola

In this scene

This concludes

Tape 3

Our program continues

With tape 4

Our program continues

With tape 4

So that's an example

Of you know

Magical power

Condensed onto

The material plane

Yeah

There's a film

About two nights ago

Of dolphins

Swimming

And there were

Purple triangles

Coming from their heads

As Capuletans

Wow

Clearly

The same

The same phenomenon

Yeah

First of all

I have to ask

Inesitable question

Due to the counter singing

After that

He actually

Didn't come back

After that evening

Then the other question

Or actually

A perspective

Is

I've done extensive work

With iridology

To the point

That I could understand

Where the limitations

In that science

Were blatantly obvious

Because it's not so much

The physical characteristics

Of the iris of the eye

It is what is transmitted

From the mind

Through the pupil

Or the sensor

Of that filter

That is really being accessed

By someone

Who is discerning

And that's what will give you

The blueprint

That you're looking for

And so

I feel that

That power

And that transmission

Of mind

So many times

Is carried

From that energy

That goes back and forth

Through the eye

And I wondered

If you had any more thoughts

On that

Well it seems to imply

That we are all

Potentially linked together

In many ways

That civilization

Has suppressed

We are no longer telepathic

We are no longer able

To reach out

And tap somebody

With a glance

Like that

And

But somehow

Our perception

Of what's been going on

Is skewed

We don't

You know

Rupert and I talked a lot

About this

He had the idea

That

He said

You know

The search for a psychic

The search for proof

Of psychic power

Has not been a very happy story

With card flipping

And this sort of thing

And Rupert

Had the genius

To realize

That

What is the commonest

Psychic power

That we all

Believe exists

And have experienced

And so forth

But which science

Is utterly unable

To explain

That could be

Statistically studied

Well what it is

Is

The sense

That someone

Is looking at you

You know

And you could

Test this

And in fact

We did tests

Where you would

Choose one person

And put them

At the front

Of a room full of people

And then you would

Tell people

Either look at your lap

Or look at the back

Of this person's head

And they would be asked

Are people looking at you?

Or are people looking

At the back

Of looking at their lap

And certain people

You could quickly

Satisfy yourself

Were able to detect

This a phenomenal amount

Of the time

Well beyond statistical

You know

The rules of probability

So I think

We're surrounded

By subliminal abilities

That we can't

Really understand

I mean

I from years

Of traveling

In Asia

I have an amazing

Psychic power

Which is

I can tell

When food

Shouldn't be eaten

You know

And it will

It will happen

To me

You know

In very good restaurants

And if I go

Against it

You know

I'll spend the evening

Over the toilet

Because I

Couldn't believe

That

Shea

So-and-so

Would serve

Poisoned food

Because it was costing me

So much money

But then when I get back

To the hotel room

Sure enough

By overriding

My own instincts

I get into trouble

I think

Psychic ability

Well this is worth

Talking about

That we cannot be

Or

How can I put it

We cannot

Evolve

Beyond the confines

Of our language

And

If you have a language

That makes telepathy

Impossible

Then telepathy

Will be

Impossible

Inside

That culture

You see

We all pay lip service

To the idea

That

That language

And culture

Create each other

But we actually act

As though

Culture

Is real

And it isn't

I learned this

You know

In Peru

Very dramatically

Because in the

Peruvian Amazon

There's a

Disease

Which people

Are very

Very

Concerned

About

Susto

Have all of you heard of this

Susto

Only affects

Peruvians

This is the first clue

That something weird

Is going on

And it's major

Manifestation

Is bad luck

And

But if you get it

And you're a Peruvian

You prepare to cash in your chips

You know

It's as horrible as melanoma

You know

You're doomed

If you have this stuff

And you have to go to a shaman

And get it taken care of

Or you're dead

Within six months

But I can't get Susto

It's not

It's a linguistic disease

Of some sort

It travels around

Inside the confines

Of mestizo

Spanish

And nowhere else

Well

Yeah

People have these ideas

Yeah

And you know

Like people say

Well magic is accomplished

Because the person

The magic

Is being done to

Knows

That it's happening

And therefore

They unconsciously

Participate

In their own demise

But I've observed

These shamans

In the Amazon

And they will go

If a shaman

Has decided to

Actually get

Somebody

Then he will go

To incredible

Lengths to conceal what he's doing so that the person never knows and never knows how to blame

So it isn't some kind of psychological

Co-option that's happening. It's something a good deal more complex than that

Yeah

For example we have all these myths about fairies and elves and magic and perhaps at one time the world was like that but it is not like that now

Here you're talking about a social context that does not include telepathy

Generates a culture without people experiencing telepathy

And yet we have all these myths, we have all the fairy tales

Now you're talking about self-transplanting the machine elves

Do you have any question about this?

Well, I'm not sure that you got it into a question that I can respond to try again

Okay, so our culture then is very like science oriented

And the whole idea of the magic

Things like the existence of elves, thin corn

People laugh at that unless they're on supposed trenches

Do you think that this kind of thing could come back?

Do you think that we will have

You know, like with our eyes for example, experiences with these kind of things

Yes, sure, because what you have to do is you have to shift the locus

I mean it's kind of hard to explain but every civilization has a locus

And and we have disempowered ourselves by shifting the locus to an imagined class of experts

We have an incredibly peculiar version of how the universe is put together

First of all, we rely a lot of the time on the notion of the eensy-beensy

Genes, viruses, atoms, elementary particles

These are the things which shape our world

We tell each other

And yet who has ever seen any of these things?

I mean a virus maybe a few people have seen

A hydrogen atom?

It's a pretty airy-fairy concept

And when you start talking about the anti-mu-maison and stuff like that

Where you can only approach it through an arcane mathematical language

The reality, whatever that means, of these things becomes pretty questionable

See, one of the things I think that psychedelics could do

Is give back to us what I call the immediacy of felt experience

Since the rise of Cartesian analysis in the 17th century

Everything that we experience has been defined as what are called secondary characteristics

Color, a secondary characteristic

Feeling, and what's real is

Mass, momentum, charge, spin

Stuff like this

Which, you know, these are the primary qualities of the universe

Whoever encounters or deals with them

We need to model reality so that it is understandable to us

I mean that that statement should even have to be made

Shows how far off track we are

Our current model of reality is excellent for describing

The behavior of hydrogen at the center of stars

Or something like that

Terrible for explaining to you how you're supposed to stay tuned to your girlfriend

So, somehow we have sold out to abstraction

And this is something about science, you know

And the demonic power of numerical analysis and stuff like this

I think that part of what the psychedelic revolution is

And why it is so politically threatening

Is because a psychedelic person does not believe anything they cannot confirm for themselves

Through thought, intuition, or feeling

And a non-psychedelic person

Joins up

With the quantum physicists

Or the

Hasidic Jews

Or some group of people

Who've already got it packaged and figured out

I mean the UFO thing is a good example

Everybody's interested in UFOs

And, you know, are there space people

Are there not?

And I think most people think that the news will come

That the way you encounter a UFO

The way most of us will encounter a UFO

Is that the president will call a press conference

And say, you know, that the time has come to speak frankly

About certain declassified material

And that yes, in fact, it has been going

I mean, that's not how it's going to happen

The way it's going to happen is on 5 grams

In silent darkness in your living room

And that's real

You know, if flying saucers were to land

On the south lawn of the White House tomorrow

It would be minor news

Compared to what can happen to you

A minute and a half after smoking DMT

We don't realize that we are not real

Unless we are the center of our own private mandala

And so we look to media

To experts

You know, maybe the Dalai Lama can clarify it

Or Mother Teresa

Or Stephen Hawking

We'll forget all that

Those are just linguistic concepts

As far as you're concerned

The only thing that's real to you

Is yourself and your immediate surroundings

And if we could empower that

You know, our political problems

Would disappear overnight

We are infantile

And we do love it

We don't really try to claim

Our existential validity

And those who do

Are called mad

Because they depart

From the sanctioned paradigm

Over here somebody

Yeah

It just struck me

That one of the things

That you seem real good at

Is bringing that personal experience

Into language

And being able to communicate it

Which creates the same kind of reality

That you appear to be

Declined

Of a shared

Linguistic reality

Where we can discuss

The experience that we've had

It's value

It becomes elevated

When we talk about it

Yes, well it becomes real

When we talk about it

I mean, one of the most satisfying experiences

That I have

As a public speaker

Is sometimes

After speaking to groups

Like last night

Somebody will come up afterward

And say

I thought I was crazy

Until I heard you speak

Now I know there are at least two of us

And the truth is

You know, there are more than two of us

There are thousands

If you

You know

It's a delusion

If it happens

To one person

It's a cult

If it happens

To twenty people

And it's true

If it happens

To ten thousand people

Well this is a strange way

To have

Epistemological authenticity

Conferred upon something

We vote on it

You know

So I

I

Would like

Competition

I mean

I feel pretty lonely

Out here

I'm surprised

Nobody has followed me

Into this

There must be other people

Who can articulate

These things

As well

Or better

Than I can

But boy

They don't seem

To come forth

And I really don't know

Why that is

Because what I say

Is not all that

Exceptional

It's just

The sum total

Of it

Is kind of eerie

But if we don't

That's why

I was saying

You know

We cannot evolve

Faster

Than we evolve

Our language

Is like the

Collective skin

Of our culture

So you know

Until you say

The words

Self transforming

Elf machines

From hyperspace

Then there aren't

Such things

Once you say it

It has gained

A certain kind

Of ontological currency

So why aren't you arguing

The opposite point

You know

When you talk about

A quantum physicist

Or

A spiritual

Or

You know

That

Learning a language

System

See people are buying

Other people's experience

I mean

If you're not

A quantum physicist

Why in the world

Should you take

Those people seriously

They're talking

Gibberish

What power does it have over you

Except that it comes

Presented on the platter of science

Say you must believe this

If you don't believe this

You're not

A well educated

Trendy

With it person

We can just say

Well malarkey

Didn't you people believe

Something completely different

Fifteen years ago

You say

Yes

But now we've got it

Say well

Am I supposed to take

That assertion seriously

You change your mind

Every six months

But our experience

During the psychedelic experience

Before we bring it to language

Is

You know

Ungraspable

Very frustrating

Once

We lose it

And

You know

We can't settle down

Until we bring it to language

That's what they've done

With

Their experience

They brought it to language

And they can kind of

Settle down

And play with it

So

We

We seem to be caught

In the thing

If we're having a

True experience

It's pre-linguistic

It's

You know

Beyond concept

It

Once

Once we conceptualize

It

It becomes

Not quite an experience

But the experience

Really changes

And

It

It becomes something

That we can then

tokenize

To each other

And have a good social time

With

But

You know

We're missing it

Well

Every entity

Has

A value dark

Dimension

I mean

Surely

Only the most naive

Of quantum physicists

Believe

That

The

You know

The quantum electrodynamic

Description

Is

All

There is

To say

About

The electron

Because

Biology

Is made

Out of electrons

And you can't reason

From

Quantum electrodynamics

To

The rainforest

You know

Obviously

Other factors

Are present

Which are

Escaping

This particular

Linguistic model

So

Being able

To talk

About

A mystery

It merely is

A sectioning

Through it

That

Gives you a kind

Of a lower dimensional

Map

Of it

But the mystery

Remains intact

You know

Wittgenstein

Talks about

What he called

The unspeakable

And

You know

The unspeakable

Is the true domain

Of being

And then

Within that

There is a very

Small subset

Of those things

Which can actually

Be captured

In language

But

There are

Vanishingly

Small

Set

Of the whole

Thing

Mostly

It's all

Mystery

I don't know

Why this is so surprising

To people

I mean

Where is it writ large

That bipedal primates

With binocular vision

Are supposed to be

Carrying around

In their heads

True models

Of the cosmos

I mean

Would you expect

An apple tree

Or a monarch butterfly

To have

A true map

Of the cosmos

Inside them

No more

Than that we

Should have

So I think

All

All knowledge

Is provisional

And I think

The new science

Will

Honor this

This is why

The rise

In the use

Of the word

Model

They no longer

Believe

They're giving

A complete explanation

Of phenomenon

They just say

Well here's a model

A better model

And we'll keep

Modeling

And our models

Will get better

And better

But they will never

Be more than crude

Approximations

To an unspeakable

Mystery

No I find it exhilarating

I think

Part of the male

Or part of the ego

Dominator

Pathology

Is to demand closure

Out of everything

There is no closure

You have to learn

To sit

With the messiness

Of the mystery

You know

It's this thing

We said this morning

The bigger you build

The bonfire

Of understanding

The more darkness

Is revealed

To your startled eye

So

No I think

It's open-ended

And exhilarating

And tremendously

Exciting

That that's the kind

Of universe

That's the kind

Of universe

We're living in

Terence I think

The thing about mystery

Is

I find it fascinating

I think

Up until

Just a few months ago

When May thing

Was trying to understand

Trying to understand

I read something

Somewhere

Some little sentence

That said

I'm not trying to understand

The mystery anymore

I'm just trying to have

A relationship

That's right

Because it clicked me

Into a whole

Different place

Well you know

This is not merely

The stoned ravings

Of the psilocybin brigade

Do you all know

Or have you ever heard

Of Gödel's

Incommensurability theorem

This sounds daunting

And disturbing

Have you ever heard of this?

Does anybody have a clue

What I'm talking about?

Okay, well that

In itself

Is a measure

Of the kind of society

We're living in

Because to my mind

More important

Than Einstein

Or Schrodinger

Or any of those people

Was Kurt Gödel

German mathematician

And he began

By studying

The calculus

And he had a very

Funny method

What he did

Was he would

Number

Every operation

In a partial differential equation

And these numbers

Are called

Gödel numbers

G-O-U-M-L-A-T-D-E-L

Kurt Gödel

And what he showed

And I think this is

Maybe the

Most important

Intellectual step

Taken

In the 20th century

He showed

That

Any formal system

Will produce

True

Statements

Which are not

Provable

Within the confines

Of the formal system

Itself

Now what this actually means

Is that

Mathematics

Can fail

It means

That

There is no closure

Closure

You can

He proved this

Logically

Showed

That closure

Is

Impossible

That everything

He showed it

For arithmetic

The most secure

Of all

Intellectual edifices

Essentially

What he showed

Was that

2 plus 2 equals

Is a very

Strong tendency

Not a law

And

This

Incommensurability

Theorem

Means that

No program

Of

Formal

Analysis

Will ever

Completely exhaust

Its subject

There will always be

A residuum

Of mystery

And

We need to come to terms

With this

I mean it's taken us

80 years

To get Einstein

Under our belts

And that's a simple notion

Compared to what

Gödel is saying

Because what he's saying

Is not about

You know the distortion

Of space-time

Near massive objects

But something

Which actually

Affects our own lives

On a day-to-day basis

And you know

If you live

For closure

You're beating your head

Against a stone wall

And your head

Will wear out

Long before

The stone wall

Will

There's a kind

Of an appreciation

For the mystery

Needs to replace

The attitude

That the mystery

Is an unsolved problem

Mysteries have no relationship

Whatsoever

To unsolved problems

Yeah

I'm just wondering

About the motivation

Of the explorer

Going into the dark continent

Wanting to

Draw a map

Of the river

So that you can eventually

Go the railroad

Et cetera

That

You go through

A lot of pain

A lot of difficulty

To pioneer

To get the map back

If your primary assumption

Is that this map

Will never be

Drawn

Where's the motivation

What

You don't need

A complete map

I mean

I'm not such a fan

Of Wittgenstein

But he seems to have

Raised his ugly head

Here

Wittgenstein

Used to say

We do not

Seek statements

Which are true

We seek statements

Which are true enough

That's this genuflection

To the incommensurability theorem

That's as good as it gets

Folks

True enough

Beyond that

There's just

You know

The airy realm

Of metaphysics

Which will never be plumbed

So what we're trying to do

Is refine our model

Make it more responsive

To what we want

The model to tell us

But you don't want to confuse

The model

With the phenomenon

Being modeled

Because it will always have

Dimensions

Which

Exceed

The grasp

Of the theory

That's what the probability

Says that there's a tendency

For

A particular state to exist

That's as good as it can

Yes

Although I have

Real problems

With probability theory

Which we'll probably

Get into

Tomorrow

I think

That in a sense

Probability theory

Has made it almost impossible

For us

To think clearly

About anything

Because it

It contains certain

Insidious

Built-in

Assumptions

That are

Purely

Assumptions

For instance

Probability theory

Tells you

That when you flip a coin

The odds of it being

Heads or tails

Are 50-50

If in fact

That were true

The coin

Would land on its edge

Every single time

So

What we need

You see

Is

Not a theory

Of

What is possible

That's science

If you want to know

If something is possible

You find a scientist

And they're always perfectly happy

To fulfill this function

And tell you

Whether this is possible

Or not

What we

Completely lack

As a civilization

Is

A theory

That explains to us

How it is

Out of the

Vast

Class

Of

Possible

Things

Certain things

Undergo

What Alfred North Whitehead

Called

The formality

Of

Actually

Occurring

We have no theory

I mean

Science can say

Well it's probable

That it'll be this

But it's also

40% probable

That it'll be that

Say well which will it be

Say well

I just told you

The probabilities

Say I'm not

That's not good enough

I want to know

Say we have no theory

Of selecting

Among the probabilities

The other

Problem that haunts

Probability theory

Is that it assumes

That time

Is an absolute

Flat plane

It assumes

That

No physicist

Tells you

In his lab notes

Please perform

My experiment

On Tuesdays

Wednesdays

And Saturdays

Because it won't

Work

Any other time

In other words

The assumption

Is made

That the experiment

Will produce

The data

Predicted by theory

No matter when

The experiment

Is performed

In other words

It's assumed

That the phenomena

Is time independent

But that's just

An assumption

That Newton

Got into

Proving

That phenomena

Are time independent

Is absolutely

Beyond

Our intellectual

Reach

It can't be done

A curious thing

About probability theory

Probability theory

Is say

You want to know

How much current

Is flowing through

A wire

Here's how probability

Theory

Finds out

It measures

The current flowing

Through the wire

With a meter

It measures it

A thousand times

It takes those values

And adds them

Together

Then it divides

By one thousand

Then it tells you

This is how much current

Is flowing through

The wire

You look at the value

They've given you

And you say

But we took a thousand

Measurements

And we never got

This number

Say well

That's because

You know

You didn't average

The probability

And

Well

If we took a thousand

Measurements

And not one

Is that value

You're offering

Why should we believe

That this is the amount

Of current flowing

Through the wire

Well then there's a bunch

Of hand waving

And epistemic

Foot stamping

And so forth

Science is an

Incredibly

Fragile

Edifice

Which if it weren't

For its ability

To hand its findings

On to

Technologists

Who make pretty

Things

Would have to take

Its place

Somewhere to the left

Of

I don't know

Homeopathy

Acupressure

Something like that

In other words

It is not a meta-theory

It has not got

Truth by the jugular

It has a bunch of

Fishy mathematical formula

Which it's

Flailing you with

But I don't think

I think that

Serious revision

Of probability theory

Is going to

Have to take place

I think you've given

Probability theory

Much more than it's

Really there

Inherently what it's

All about is simply

Acknowledging the fact

That there are variables

In anything that we

Can't know

And we don't know

It's really nothing

More than that

Which brings you back

It has a moment

Well

But for instance

If the odds

That the coin

Comes up heads or tails

Are 50-50

Why doesn't it land

On it's edge

Every single time

I don't see how it's

Related to the

Lanning insight

Just simply

What happens

With a coin

Where it ends up lying

Basically

Whether it's face

Up or down

Right

Well

You know

Another thing

Probability theory

Says

Is the chance

Has no memory

And so

They always

In first year

Statistics

They say

If you flip a coin

And it comes up heads

49 times

What are the odds

That will come up heads

The 50th time

The answer is

50-50

But any gambler

Would tell you

That

You know

If it comes up heads

Five times in a row

Bet on heads

For crying out loud

So

There's

Something

I'm not an acolyte

Of probability

Or statistics

Because I think a lot

Is done

Or inferred from them

That just doesn't exist

I agree

At the same time

Really

Is the notion

That there are

Things going on here

That we can't know

Even though

That's not acknowledged

By most people

Who are practicing it

That's the reality

Probably

But don't you think

The other assumption

Is that

Time

Is a

Non

Inputting

It's not variable

You know

That

You don't say

The odds of the coin

Coming up heads or tails

Are 50-50

In Canada

But

48-52

In Bolivia

The variables

That sort of

Smear it out

Simply because

It can't be characterized

The way

People

People who are doing that

Like to tend to characterize

them

Well

But underlying the whole thing

Is still the notion

That you're dealing with

Unknowable

And

And I'm not saying

That those who are

Deeply immersed

In practicing

Probability and statistics

Hold this view

But

The reality is

Underlying

Sort of

Underpinning the whole thing

Is the notion

That

There are things going on here

That we can't know

Oh well I don't have any trouble

With that

I understand

Why science

Latched on to probability

With such a vengeance

It's because

You know

Thanks to

William of Ockham

There is this notion

Called

Ockham's Razor

Which is this idea

That is most simply

Stated as

Hypotheses

Should not be

Multiplied

Without necessity

So

Since the idea

That time

Is a flat

Invariant

Is the simplest

Assumption

Try it first

And

See if it works

But

I maintain

That you know

Science has

In certain areas

Been

Very slow

To make progress

In

The social

Domain

In

Econometrics

In

The

You know

Multiple body

Problems

And stuff like that

Well I think

This is because

This simple assumption

That time is an invariant

Has to be

Reexamined

I would almost

Read

I would offer

A new definition

Science

Is that

Field of human

Endeavor

Which studies

Phenomenon

So crude

That they are

Time invariant

You know

The

Hydrogen atom

Cleaves

From the oxygen atom

The same way

Every time

But

Love affairs

Don't come apart

The same way

Every time

Bankruptcies

Don't occur

The same way

Every time

These are

Complex

Compound

Phenomena

That are then

Influenced

Temporal variables

And the variables

Embedded

In the environment

Around them

Now the problem is

These are the things

We're interested in

Love affairs

Bankruptcies

And the establishment

Of empires

Very few people

Have a passionate interest

In the dynamics

Of the water molecule

Except that those

That equipment over there

Was produced by those

Notions

These noble computers

The software that you're running

Oh, now I know

I have you on the run

Because this is a

But it makes pretty things

Argument

I'm just saying

I'm not commenting

On the value of it

Or not

Each person

Has to assess that

From the software

Well, see, I think

Science is a great

Enterprise

And noble

But not

The arbiter of truth

There are no arbiters

Of truth

The truth of the tarot

The truth of quantum physics

These are truths

In the supermarket of truth

But there's no

There's no

Top

End

To that process

There may not even be

One truth

In a given situation

If you're flipping coins

Probability theory

Is probably

A good guide

You wouldn't want to run

Your love affair

On probability theory

So you have to choose

The domain

You have to recognize

The applicable models

The applicable tools

For whatever domain

You're looking at

You're not allowed to do that

In this culture

The size of the overarching truth

Or

Well, you're allowed

To be a heretic

You just don't get paid well

That's the price

You pay for that

Still, yeah

Kind of tying this into

What you were talking about

Last night

About how

Messed up everything is

Since

Our ancestors got away

From the mushroom celebrations

And all that

It seems like

You were saying

That

We are tied into time

And we're being pulled towards

A certain something

Like

This dimension being destroyed

Or

We're not really being able to live

And I'm wondering

Is that

It seemed like

You looked at that

As bad

And then

On a different perspective

It's good

Because we're discovering

That we're being pulled

Towards something

That's maybe

Bigger

And more wonderful

How does that tie in?

Are you saying

That this is bad

What we're discovering

So we need to hang on

To our past

Or do you think

No, no

No, I don't think

It's bad

I think

I'm entirely

In support

Of whatever the universe

Is in the process

Of trying to do here

I think

That

I think that

History is ending

And that it was

A temporary

Perturbation

Of the system

And that we can

Anchor ourselves

Through this

Chaostrophy

Or whatever it is

By going back

To archaic models

But I

I think that

And you know

This is what

We'll talk

about tomorrow when we get the computer because I don't merely talk about it even though I've been flailing the

Mathematicians ultimately I too come to rest with a fishy formula

I think that the universe is some kind I think that there's something that has been overlooked by science

Called and I'll name it. It's called novelty

The universe is a novelty conserving engine of some sort from the very first

nanoseconds after the Big Bang

novelty has been

conserving itself and

Building newer and deeper levels of novelty on novelty already achieved so that

You know in the first few I mean you have the Big Bang then you have this era

Called the pre-physical era

It's brief. It lasts the amount of time it takes light to cross a distance

equivalent to the diameter of the proton electron

Something being dinky for sure. That's called the era before physics

Then physics begins one jiffy after that and and the original universe

was so hot that there would that it was a plasma of free electrons

So since it was a plasma there was nothing that you could call atomic physics because that the ambient temperature was so high

That electrons could not settle down into stable orbitals around nuclei as the temperature of the universe fell

Atomic systems crystallized out of that plasmic environment well, then

Further cooling of the universe leads to more complex

kinds of bonds and

The cooking out of complex elements from stars the original universe was made entirely of hydrogen this hydrogen

Aggregated into masses so

Dan so large that at their centers there was actually and if you think I'm not nervous doing this in front of you you're crazy

These aggregates of hydrogen

At the center it was so massive in temperature and pressure that fusion could actually begin and

And fusion cooked out heavier elements iron sulfur and eventually carbon well when you get four valent carbon

This throws open the doorway to tremendous new novelty you get now for the first time not atomic systems

But molecular systems these molecular systems lead into proto biological systems

proto biological systems lead into

Prokaryotes then eukaryotes then true higher

Multicellular animals then mammals then human beings then electronic culture then the big surprise now the thing to notice about all this is that

novelty keeps building on

Novelty already achieved it crosses biological lines

Atomic lines molecular line it is a law of the universe

universe I'm proposing that novelty is

Conserved and so then what we represent is

the kind of ultimate nexus of

novelty and I believe that you know we are being wound tighter and tighter and tighter into a confrontation with

the equivalent of a the singularity at the center of a black hole, but it isn't a

Gravitational singularity that I'm talking about it's a novelty

Singularity and so you know the universe is

Growing toward some kind of ultimate state of boundaryless

Hyperconnectivity and when that is achieved

The process will be cease to be

Describable in the locus of ordinary space time and energy

and energy now science has no notion of this concept of

Novelty in the East there is such a concept it's called Tao and

Tao builds things up and pulls them down according to its own mysterious laws

Tomorrow I will argue when we get the computer that its laws are not in fact entirely mysterious

and that we can discover

the nature of

the novelty

constant and

Instead of treating space-time as an absolutely featureless plane

We can take that zero value which is how that shows up in the Newtonian mechanics and

substitute instead of a

fractal dimension number which will be some kind of decimal fraction between one and two and

Then this will allow us to do things previously

Inconceivable like predict the future and stuff like that

See one thing I guess I should say since we've sort of drifted into this fairly rappy place is

the idea that

the universe is

The universe is growing toward itself

It's not moving outward from its origin. It's moving toward its completion and this is called teleology

It's very unwelcome in most scientific modeling

But that's a legacy from the 19th century where they were so concerned to get God out of the picture

But they wanted everything to happen through one random process

Colliding with another random process and flipping out

Mule deer elephants and redwood trees

But in principle we don't have to believe in God to believe in an attractor at the end of the process

We see many kinds of attractors in in the natural world one way that I think of the psychedelic experience is

You know you've heard me talk about hyperspace super space this kind of thing

It really does seem to me that

that reality is some kind of a very complex geometric object of some sort and you know how

they teach you in trigonometry that all possible ellipses can be obtained by sectioning a cone and

that if you take the infinite set of ellipses and

Reconstruct them you can reconstruct the cone

Well the way I think of psychedelics and psychedelic tripping is you are

sectioning a hyperdimensional object and what you're coming back with is a lower dimensional map of this higher dimensional object

Well everybody has a different map in the same way that there are an infinite number of elliptical sections of a cone

but they're all generated by the same object and if it's a mystery to you how a

simple finite object like a cone can generate an infinite number of

elliptical sections

Then it's going to be hard for you to understand how everybody can have a different

Psychedelic trip and yet be actually dealing with the same

Reality in hyperspace

Yeah

And I'm not trying to trick you up the semantics or anything like that, but would it also be moving towards its own closure, if that's what I mean?

You mean is completion closure?

Yes

Well, what does closure mean to you?

Well, I would relate the event to where we were talking before about

Closure not really existing

Well, maybe what we should say is there's there's only one closure and all others are

Our false closure closure isn't really the word I would use I I steal

Shamelessly from Alfred North Whitehead and probably others as well, but I'm willing to cop to that

He has this notion called

Concrescence

Which I think is a great idea. He says everything grows toward a nexus of concrescence

So complexification is at the service of concrescence

We can see how this planet is is caught in a concrescent

process a hundred years ago

You know it took three months to go around the world now it takes a third of a second a hundred years ago a newspaper

Carried local news now local news means the news of this planet

We can telephone Prague or Shanghai by just going outside to the phone booth

We are being knitted more and more tightly together now most people think this is a human world

Phenomenon and it will stop at some point with everybody connected to everybody else

I guess I don't think it is a process of the human world

I think we're embedded in a collapse of physical law

This is a fairly

Pathological notion from the point of view of most scientists because they believe that the universe will exist for you know

Millennia or millions of years into the future, but I think our presence on this planet indicates that we're deep into act three of the cosmic drama

Yeah

I

Yes, I mean in a way the problem is not the you know the problem is not the end of the universe

But why it existed in the first place what happened to flaw the original nothingness?

To contort itself into this fantastic cascade of interconnected complexity

It's very very tricky this stuff. I mean

You know there well without dragging that in it's tricky enough, so let's leave it at that. Yes

Yeah, the philosophy and the crop science is pretty interesting. I really came here to learn more about using that

Oh, I'll ask a question seize the tiller

Everything you describe you take the full dose all the time is that you have the best way to do your thing

I mean sometimes I take them

for them and start and then three more later. Oh, I see what you're asking. Should you boost it?

I

I don't like doing that simply because I like to get I think the the real action is in the flash and

the flash comes by getting as much of the material to the synapses in as coherent a wave front as

possible so I tend not to do that

But to take an initial large dose of course if you take an initial dose, and it doesn't do anything then you could follow it up

Pardon?

You mean just to discuss it generally?

Do you all know what ebogaine is?

It's a it's a psychedelic it's an interesting one one of the things interesting about it is how little people are aware of its existence

It comes it's the root scrapings of an African

small tree or bush called tabernacea iboga and

Interestingly enough, it's it's a true aphrodisiac

Perhaps the only real aphrodisiac in the world because what are called aphrodisiac are usually either just

stimulants or things which cause genital itching

But ebogaine actually seems to be a works on the psychology of sexual drive in some way

It's a powerful halicinogen

One of the puzzling things about ebogaine is that we can't confirm its use by human beings before

1850 and

You know the portuguese were in to the areas of africa where this is happening

They've been in there since the 1430s

so it probably is a new a new

pattern of drug use

That has arisen and it's a major force among the fang people of Zaire and Gabon

holding back

Christianity and mission culture and

It's a visionary halicinogen without doubt

I-b-o-g-a-i-n-e

Probably in the future eventually society will get around to exploiting

This particular one just like it does everything else

The drug is ebogaine the plant it comes from is Tabernansa eboga

Yeah

Well that's what ayahuasca is

You see the DMT is then not destroyed in in your intestine and so you have a slow-release DMT trip by doing that

In theory and probably in fact that would be a tremendously successful way to get very loaded the problem is it might be a too successful way

You want to be very careful with these mao inhibitors

There there are mao inhibitors that drug companies have produced where a single dose

Inhibits all the mao in your body for up to a month

This would be murder if you got around some DMT on that

The nice thing about harming is that it's fully reversible in four to six hours

So it's a it's a gentle mao inhibitor

But yes, this is the strategy

This is why you could conceivably take the seeds of a plant like pergammon harmola which grows around here more or less

and contains harming and combine it with a plant like desmantha selenoensis which contains DMT

and come up with a North American

Pseudo ayahuasca of some sort

People are doing this

But you know if you think if you think it takes courage to just do these

These compounds naturally

Imagine the kind of courage it takes to diddle with recipes

And to do your own bio assay

Which you must do because the cook must taste the soup

Terence, what was the first one?

Not the difference, but the bad one

Pegammon harmola

P-E-G-A-M-U-M

Pegammon harmola

In the Zygophilaceae

Yeah

I was talking to you two of these nations at the time

I was wondering if you and Dennis ever tried the experiment again

If not why not and then I didn't even do that

Well we never tried the experiment again because Dennis felt that he'd really made the maximum contribution

To the effort

There are many experiments though which could be tried which would put no human being in danger

For you know for instance you could use square wave generators which are acoustical generators to try and drive these drug molecules into DNA in vitro in a test tube

You know you would what you would do is you would simply put the denatured DNA into solution

Put some DMT into the solution

Shake it furiously

Ultra centrifuge the mix to get the loose DMT out

And then weigh the DNA and see if its weight had increased by a number which was magically divisible by the molecular weight of the DMT molecule

These kinds of studies have been done and show that DNA DMT does intercalate and locate itself into DNA

So yeah there are a lot of different things like that that could be done that wouldn't put anyone at risk

So Dennis really felt that he was at risk in a very serious way

Well he doesn't remember it very clearly

He his impression was that it lasted about five days

It actually lasted three weeks

So the real stuff that would have alarmed him

He fortunately was too out of it to see or remember

But I was there throughout the whole thing and saw it

And I think it would be nice to understand the parameters of the effect a little more clearly

Before we charge off and try that particular trick again, yeah

Well, this is what's being referred to is the

In True Hallucinations, which is a tape set which will be published as a book next year

It describes an expedition to the Amazon in 1971

Which was really where we got the whammy

I mean it's still I'm still running on what happened from you know the 28th of February 1971 to the 21st of March

The rest of my life is pretty much throw away

But what he I don't know it was weirder than flying saucer abduction

Because that now there's a whole form for it

It was hard to say something was waiting for us down in the Amazon

And as soon as we started taking these mushrooms

It began making suggestions about how you could use the mushroom and your voice

And certain other materials present at hand in that environment

To essentially, well there aren't even words to say what it was

Condense the soul into three-dimensional space

Or create the philosopher's stone inside your body and then give birth to it

Or in other words some radical transformation of the ontology of being human

Was held out as a possibility

And it all came down to an experiment that he wanted to perform

That seemed to me so unlikely to have any effect whatsoever

That I felt it was perfectly alright to let this experiment go forward

Because I would have bet dollars to donuts that nothing would happen

Instead all hell broke loose at the conclusion of this experiment

And you know he claimed at the time

That what he had done was bonded into my DNA

Enough psilocybin in a superconducting kind of bond

Which if you know how superconductivity works

A superconductive bond is very hard to disrupt

It's not like an ordinary chemical bond

And he felt that you could do what he called bell the cat

That you could actually hang a transceiver around the neck of the logos itself

And from then on it would talk to you constantly in the confines of your own mind

And it just seemed so wildly improbable to me that it went forward

But in fact at the conclusion of the experiment

Something changed in me

And I essentially became who I now appear to be

But before that I wasn't

I was sort of a wastrel and undirected person of some sort

And then tomorrow you will see when we get the computer

What the bottom line of this is

Because what was eventually revealed was a kind of mathematical mandala

Of space and time that rested for its veracity

On the fact that it allowed that it made prediction of the future possible

And tomorrow afternoon I will display this thing for you

And you can judge for yourself

Whether this is the product of a pathological incident

Or in fact an intellectual leap comparable to Newton's laws of motion

Or something like that

I think in principle all this is possible

I think transforming part of what human history's conclusion will be

Is what I call turning the human body inside out

We want the soul to become visible

We want the body to become an idea freely commanded in the imagination

And then at that point as James Joyce said

Man will be dirigible

That was as close as he could get in 1939 to saying

You'll turn into a flying saucer

You know, he knew it was an airship

He knew it was oblate

But he thought it was a dirigible

Anyway, enough about La Cerrera

Maybe we'll get into that tomorrow

Yeah

I've said a matter of clarification about the ayahuasca

Uh-huh

You said that it hits the DMT

Gains the harminas

Yes

The vine?

No

Good point

The vine contains the harmin

Another plant contains the DMT

This makes ayahuasca unique among these shamanic tools

Because you see all the rest of them

Peyote

Mushrooms

San Pedro

Ibogaine

Morning Glories

And whatever else

Cannabis

Are simply plants

Which you ingest

Ayahuasca is a drug

A product

Something made by pharmacologists

I mean pharmacologists who wear penis sheaves

But pharmacologists nevertheless

You see

So suddenly

The human dimension enters into it

Not all ayahuasca is alike

Ayahuasca depends on the personality of the person who made it

So it's not about a relationship between you and a plant

When you take ayahuasca between you and the plants

There stands a human being

And you know if you're headed down there to seriously get into this

Don't

Don't give up in a hurry

You will drink a lot of swill

Before you find someone who is conscientious enough

Honest enough

And cares about you enough

To not short change you

In some way

How do you speak of telepathine?

Telepathine, yes

Ayahuasca was discovered by Richard Spruce

In 1853

And then in the early years of the 20th century

The German ethnographer

Theodore Koch-Grundberg

Brought a lot of it back to Berlin

And Lewis Lewin and his group

Characterized an alkaloid

Which they named telepathine

But it was not realized then

Until I think 1957

By the chemists Hochstein and Paradis

That harmine

Or that telepathine

Was exactly the same compound

As an earlier compound

Isolated from the Syrian roux

Named harmine

And since the rules of chemical nomenclature

Are that the first compound

The first name takes precedent

Telepathine had to be dropped

And harmine substituted

But it tells you

How convinced

These early ethnographers were

That this stuff was

You know

Exciting paranormal mental abilities

Were they taking the PMT

Or were they taking it by someone?

The harmoline?

Yes

Oh, well

No, no

See, what happened was

That what

What Koch-Grundberg

Took back to Berlin

Was the liana

The vine

Banisteriopsis copy

The

The other

Active ingredient

In ayahuasca

Was not

Isolated

Chemically

Until 1956

But the guys

Who took the vine back

Before playing with the vine

The vine

Doesn't contain DMT

But the harmine

And harmoline itself

Are both

Well

Yes

Has an effect

At high doses

It can cause

Hallucination

By itself

The plant

Which contains

The DMT

Normally

There are a couple

Of possible substitutes

But normally

What's used

In the Amazon

Is Socotria viridis

And this is a little

Coffee-like plant

That contains DMT

In the roots

One of the great mysteries

Of ayahuasca

Is how

Out of

475,000 species of plants

In the Amazon

These people figured out

That you pound the vine

And combine it

With the leaves

And then go through

This elaborate boiling

And concentrating

And then you get

This fantastic visionary beverage

If you ask them

How they figured it out

They say

The plants told us

Which is so far

The best answer

Anybody has come up with

In 1962

Melvin Bristol

Who was

A graduate student

Of Richard Evans Schulte's

At Harvard

Was studying ayahuasca

Among the Subundoy Indians

And he took ayahuasca

And during the trip

A plant was revealed

To him

And he was told

That it would be

Alkaloid positive

And it was

Alkaloid positive

And it was

Alkaloid positive

Well this is now

Anecdotally

Embedded

In the literature

Was it dumb luck?

Was it synchronicity?

Or was it

That plants

Tell you about

Other plants

The way ayahuasca

Is used

By research

Pharmacologists

In these Amazon tribes

Is they brew

A standard brew

And then

If they have a plant

That they

For some reason

Suspect

Might have

Some medical usage

They will put

A little bit

Of that plant

Into the ayahuasca

And then

The ayahuasca

Will give them

A readout

On it

And explain

What it is

I had one

Of the longest evenings

I've ever put in

Where I took

Half a dose

Of ayahuasca

And half a dose

Of mushrooms

And it was

Absolutely

God awful

It was

Different

Than any bad trip

I've ever had

It didn't seem

To be about

My personality

It seemed to be

About core

Processes

There was a little

Pacman thing

And I could see it

Moving through

My memory

Just chew chew

Chew chew chew

Chew

And I didn't know

You know that horrifying

Scene in 2001

Where the guy is

Outside the spaceship

And he says

Open the pod doors

Hal

Open the pod doors

Hal

Well that's how I felt

I felt

I could almost see

The molecular machinery

Had jammed

And I said

Oh my god

It's not going

To de-animate

Or de-alkylate

It's somehow caught

In some kind

Of a loop

And I sweated bullets

For an hour

And a half

With it

It was really horrible

And then it finally

Released

And let me go

But as I sat

In that chair

I said you know

If I can't pull out

Of this place

Then there's a room

In a back ward

Somewhere

And they will just

Sit me there

And look in on me

Every twelve

Or fourteen hours

And that'll be

My story

Yeah

You said earlier

You were surprised

That you had

No competitors

Right

And you understand

That we have

A political climate

That's not congenial

They're exploring

True

So why are you surprised

Because I don't feel

Particularly courageous

I don't feel

That this is unusual

What we're doing here

Am I crazy?

Could be

It seems to me

Perfect

It would seem to me

Knowing what

I know which is no more than a thousand other people know I couldn't live with myself if I didn't talk about these things because our

problem is we're disempowered unhappy and

Disconnected from ourselves and each other

Here's the solution

How can you it's a political obligation or it's a moral obligation to try and at least inform people

They don't have to take it, but they should at least have the facts of the matter in front of them as they as they live their lives

So I just do it because I couldn't do it any other way, and I'm puzzled that nobody else feels

This imperative because the people I talked to

You know a thousand people have told me psychedelics were the most important thing that ever happened to them

But not one of those thousand people ever said and I've scheduled a speaking tour to do the same thing that you're doing

So I don't know

Wow

Well either I'm crazy or they are I don't know see I think that

that the that is you know how

If you confront certain well butterflies or deer there are certain kinds of animals that if you move slowly enough

They can't tell you're there

Because they're set up for edge detection and if you move slowly enough they don't register the edge

Transiting so you can actually walk right up to them and grab them if you know how to do it lizards are like this cats

So so so I think that by moving with stealth

Rather than going to harvard or berkeley and inviting the freshman class to pour into the street and smash bank windows

That we can actually slip this thing along I think that eventually

Such desperation is going to strike straight

Institutions that they will come to us and ask

They're going to try everything when the going gets rough and when they finally decide to drop all their pretension

We'll be perfectly willing to have a dialogue

I'm sorry to hear that people felt that paranoid about it. I don't think the political climate

Is that repressive? I think people are doing the work of the man for the man by being that paranoid

Well counter pressures his book was banned in florida, but for crying out loud look at the russians

They were able to toss out the communist party. Well now that's a pretty scary thing to go up against

We don't have anything comparable to that

In terms of its depth of penetration into our lives and yet they were able to do that

I think you know, there's more to life than hiding out

You've got to make the grand gesture at a certain point and then let the chips fall where they may

Brave words oh boy

I agree, but do you have something for your audiences and organization or something that they can support in raising consciousness and changing legislation?

Basically, I think people should see these kinds of meetings as a tremendous opportunity to form local

Alliances the last thing on earth we want here is the Terence McKenna cult that would just be the stupidest

Resolution of the whole thing the whole message is you don't need me or Tim or anybody else

Just you know take a little metaphysical responsibility

Upon yourself realize you are the microcosm of the macrocosm and then get with like-minded people and proceed

I mean this is how political revolutions are made is by people just ignoring as

Irrelevant outmoded social forms and structures and insisting on their own

authenticity

Oh

It might help

People I mean, how would it help?

Strength in numbers well, I think people should support psychedelic communities

archival projects

Legalization moves

Yes

But mainly I think what we all need to do is get more loaded

You know

Deeper trips higher doses you see it's not that we want to convert the entire planet to taking mushrooms

It's that we just want to be left alone to do what we want to do the mushroom if it's as great as I say it is

Then it doesn't need a mob

Clearing the way for it. It's perfectly able to advance its own agenda

The thing is just not to yield to fear because it as I said if you yield to fear you do the man's work

For the man and that makes you the man so what you have to do is just say well, you know, this is what we do and

Eventually it will change. I mean gay people is a good example. I mean that in our own lifetimes

We've seen this go from you know an unspeakable crime against nature

Which decent people took care to not even be informed of?

to you know a political subculture with its own agenda and its own

press and its own

political clout well

We are not as under the thumb as gay people were say in the early 50s or something if they can do it

We can do it if black people can go from slavery to a legitimate claim on full social

Integration into the body politic then we can do it too, but not if we know in American nobody gets nothing unless they demand it

So as long as we bow our heads and hide our stash and they're looking over our shoulder

Well, then they've got us on the run, but we just have to say look

This is it. This is who I am if this doesn't jive with your political agenda

Adjust your political agenda because this is who we are

Well now let's knock off and regroup for tomorrow on that point. Thanks very much

Well before we get into this morning's

rigid agenda

Where were we yesterday and is there I recall there were hands up do the people who belong to those hands still have the concerns

that went with them

Talk about forming local alliances and psychedelic communities

Well, I think you know

As I said this is your affinity group. You can't recognize

Psychedelic people walking around on the street because our victory in the area of fashion has been so total that now even creeps

Look like

Freaks, so

Yeah, I've been in a number of places where people

Organized I don't know what you would call them discussion groups affinity groups in the wake of it

It's something you sort of have to self-organize

Maybe in the period after the close this afternoon the people who are into that should be exchange names and and get something going

I mean obviously it's a delicate thing, but on the other hand

Mm-hmm

For me well a lot of people feel more secure

Doing journeys if they have

Some kind of ground control and in the most casual form that can just be your best friend who doesn't do it

But you do or if you're

suspect that fairly deep and

Charged issues are going to rise arise out of it why you want it to be someone with some

psychotherapeutic experience

But on the other hand, you know

You're in such a vulnerable state in that dimension that you really want to choose

Use the facilitator carefully I mean and have some kind of set of agreements worked out

Before I mean the psychedelic trip doesn't always take the direction

You want it to I mean you want you write down before you take it that you want to deal with some

Episode of childhood trauma or abandonment

Abandonment then you get loaded and it seems so preposterous that you know, you can hardly contemplate the notion without laughing aloud and the

Facilitator has this is keeps trying to bring you back say well. You're not doing the work

We're we're here to do the work. Well, then you say well

You know having a knockdown drag out fight while somebody's loaded isn't exactly the way to go either

you sort of have to feel into that issue as I said yesterday I I

Can't get where I want to go in the presence of somebody else because they hold me to the surface if I were to have my idea of the perfect

facilitator

situation is that they're two rooms away and you have something equivalent of a beeper and

Then you know you can beat them and they'll come in and pat you on the

Head and tell you that it's all right if you need that, but otherwise they stay completely out of it

It's really nice to follow your own

Thought you know, and I think we're we we change in the presence of another person

you know we create a persona and

It takes a lot of energy to maintain the persona and in that situation. There's no reason so why do it?

Yeah

Well, not exactly I mean people always say can you do it on the natch and I sort of feel like if I could do it on the natch

I'd be alarmed enough to check myself in for some serious mental health care

It's too radical. You don't want to be able to do that on the natch

It's a wonderful control on it to know that it won't happen unless you take the stuff

You know because it's not a mood shift or a subtle

Refocusing from foreground to background. It's an absolutely ontology peeling breakthrough

In principle I

Agree with that and I'm fascinated to try anything anybody has in mind, but

you have to be very

Demanding and I think too many people are not demanding at all

I mean you sit people down in a room and tell them we're going to

repeat om ah hum

500 times and at the end of it they come to you with tears of joy in their eyes and tell you it was the most profound thing that's ever happened to them

I don't understand where those people could be coming from you know, I mean, it's um

I can sit down and like think about being stoned on DMT and

And and I can get I can give myself the butterflies with that exercise, but but not much else

That's as far as I get you know

Persistently these various traditions claim that they can deliver the goods

But when you look at the art, which is the paper trail that they leave it doesn't look like what I'm talking about

You know, I mean I went through I

Once for a while I was a professional art buyer for Tibetan art

Tonkas and that kind of thing and I interiorized all of that iconography and the but it isn't very much like

what we're seeing and

You know, there are a number of highly idiosyncratic artists scattered through the history of art

Gustav Moreau

James Ensor we mentioned Hieronymus Bosch

Well, Mati Klarlein, but I'm trying to think of older ones

But but not these seem to be unique visions, but not exactly the vision

that

Seems to come out of this stuff part of what's so interesting to me is how alien it is

How if art is the if the artist is supposed to be the antenna of society

Anticipating the visions, which will later become the paradigms

Then they're not doing the job very well in this psychedelic

domain

Yeah, or you want it. Did you have a follow-up?

No way, but take a lot of distance and if you do get to that level

It's kind of like you sculpted your present moment

You're at that level, you can stay there

Whereas I don't know I see a way sometimes as you're going in and come back

You're going in and come back, you're going in and come back, you're going back to where you started

Well, but this is where the action is

You know it has to it has to make sense in the world now. I don't want to suggest

I mean, I think like in the case of psilocybin, I have no doubt

whatsoever

That if you take five grams of psilocybin

every four days

For let's say 40 days

Then you will have nothing whatsoever to say to the rest of us

You know if what you see the thing is in the spiritual quest all these methods

yoga and mantra and then you know all the

New versions of this the whole the whole stance of the spiritual quester is

Accelerator to the floor all the time

When you switch over to this method, it's the brake pads that are going to get the workout

We don't we psychedelic people do not strenuously exert ourselves to attain peculiar states of mind

We strenuously exert ourselves to keep the states of mind from becoming too peculiar

Why?

Because it can become

so peculiar

that

That I don't know what

Yes, that's it. It can become so peculiar that it is unspeakable, and if it's unspeakable

It's just dropped out of the social contract, you know

So really the reason to maintain it is so that you can get back into the sociological state and communicate

But what I'm thinking is that I'm sure that there are people who have pursued it to the point that they just walked out of existence and didn't come back

Yes, well, that's what I wanted to say if you want to be the guy on cold mountain

who is

Covered with hair who the village people

Occasionally see when the mist clears when he descends to the lower levels to cut wood you can become that Taoist immortal

You know what I like to say about

Psychedelics is once you get to this it's no longer about seeking the answer

It's now a tougher go now you have to face the answer and it's so easy to seek

You know this Rishi that Roshi that Geshe that guru and all the wonderful people and the

Gossip and hijinks around the ashram and all that malarkey, but once you get to this and it's just you and it

you know, it's

It's a whole different ballgame

Well, just keeps we're talking there are two things the

experience and the

Wisdom and maturity that comes from the experience you don't have to keep dosing to do that

But to attain maintain and work out the implications of that

But you have to keep dosing to keep encountering the unspeakable thing that is the source of all that

maturation and and so forth my gosh everybody's agitated here. Yeah

I wondered if in your experience in the Amazon or otherwise with shamanic culture

if you found that they were able to

To do this without the drugs or whether they were even interested

No, largely not

In the Amazon, I mean I discussed this with people and they

They they said no, you know you must the plant is the teacher I

Mentioned or maybe I didn't but there's an interesting book called hauma and harmaline by flattery and schwartz

And it discusses the real ambiance of the religious attitudes of early

Zoroastrianism and they believed in what they called the menang

Long existence and we're talking you know twenty two thousand B.C. Here and

they

Believe there was no possible way of accessing the spiritual dimension except drugs

That was the entire way to do it and I think it's a it's a kind of pharmacological and energy barrier

It's good that these things are isolated from ordinary

Experience by the formality of having to take

The compound if they weren't it would be flooding in upon us all the time and we would have a hard time indeed

Yeah, well

You speak about people

Psychedelics repeatedly and gaining experience from that and then there are these other people like for example mistakes and that can do

And so forth who practice meditations

I

Read somewhere recently that one of the people in the Amazon I watched it is recommended they

they

They

There is an initial effects come on today by the practice mind and control

And what I haven't seen very much is the combination of like you know mental practices

So as to

And the combination of that plus taking into the like psychedelics or suicides

And you talked a little bit about this, about what we do in preparation for the experiment.

But what is this?

This concludes Tape 4. Our program continues with Tape 5.

News with Tape 5.

Why is there no talk of the combining of the techniques with psychedelic?

Well, I don't know exactly. I mean, I would certainly agree.

See, I think that all religion is based on the experience of ecstasy.

And a religion like Hinduism represents, to my mind, an extreme case.

The roots of Hinduism are in the Soma rite.

For 3,000 years, this is what Hindu religiosity was about.

It was an intoxicant.

And without the intoxicant, there was no connection to the mystery.

Well, then, for some reason, it became tremendously hierarchically structured.

And constipated.

And dogmatic.

And, well, certainly dominator, if not outright fascism.

And so, I think all these religions have their roots in this irrational experience.

But they constantly want to turn it into a real estate operation.

And they do.

And so, but in answer to your question, all these techniques work with psychedelics.

You know, mantra, yantra, magical invocation, raising the Kundalini.

All of these things which seem so totally obscure from this level of consciousness.

It just becomes an, of course, of course it works.

So, it seems to me the lost ingredient is the psychedelic.

I mean, you know, if you go to India and you have any illusions about sadhus.

I mean, sadhus are hash heads with a line of patter.

That's all.

I mean, the main concern in any community of sadhus is how many chillums can you make and smoke before you fall asleep.

And I've never seen a yoga text that came clean about this.

And said, you know, this is basically a how to use cannabis technique.

So, it's good to go to the actual place and see how it's being handled.

What's going on in the Amazon is the shamans cure.

They chant.

They provide an exemplar for their society.

But when you get seriously loaded with them and talk to them, their attitude is more like scientists.

They will agree that they can cure and find lost objects and predict the weather and all that.

But they don't understand how this works.

They're very eager to admit that it's all a big mystery.

And that beyond the cheerful set of shamanic techniques that they, the Witoto, the Warani, whoever they are,

beyond the cheerful power of the conjuration of these techniques lies the absolute unknown.

And they're aware of that.

There's no closure in shamanism.

So it sort of keeps you humble.

Yeah.

The subject of, you know, from Friday night on into today, the subject of naturally altered

states, without chemicals that keep coming up.

And I've come to the understanding that your question is for vision.

Right.

And not for feeling.

And one of the most interesting things about psychedelic experience to me and my drug of

preference so far as LSD is the feeling part of the experience.

And it seems to tap me into a psychic level of information that's not available to me normally.

My question is, what do you think about the phenomenon that I experienced?

And I don't know whether it's because of my programming or because I'm a good receptor of a contact high,

where when you're around people who are tripping, you don't get the depth of their experience,

but you definitely feel like you're in an altered state.

Oh, I think contact highs are very real.

Not only contact highs, but there are also contact lows, which are very noticeable.

You know, there's a phenomenon called allophrenia.

Do you know what allophrenia is?

Allophrenia is when your friend is put in the hospital for schizophrenia and you go to visit him

and you become, you begin acting so peculiar that they don't let you out.

This is a common phenomenon.

Misbehavior by people who have come to visit people who have been hospitalized for schizophrenia or psychosis.

The best theory is that it's pheromonal.

You know, there's one theory of what schizophrenia is, that schizophrenia is a pheromonal disorder.

And you, what happens is your pheromone system goes haywire.

So then you don't smell right.

So then the people around you begin frowning at you, avoiding you, turning their back on you when you approach.

Then you begin thinking, there's something wrong with me. I'm weird.

Then you secrete more of this weird pheromone and people get more.

And a dissonance begins to happen until finally you have to be plucked out of the situation.

There are psychiatrists who swear that they can diagnose schizophrenia by a sniff test.

You know, they just walk over and take a hit off the side of your neck and then say, you know, lock this one up, put this one on.

Yeah.

I assume that you've seen Huichol art.

I'm wondering whether or not you see in any of that anything close to what schizophrenia is.

And I realize this from a different point, but...

Now the problem is one of...

The question is, is there in Huichol art a trace of this psychedelic dimension?

I guess there's a trace.

The problem is twofold.

The problem is one of material.

That with wood and beads and pitch, it's very hard to get the...

to contort that into the object scene.

And then the other thing is conceptually.

You know, that it's very hard to grab and hold these very weird images.

The other thing is that's happening in most traditional societies is that you operate within a canon.

You know, if you're a Huichol, you have a very limited vocabulary of expression within the iconography of Huichol art.

If you're a Tibetan Tonka painter, similarly, it's all laid out for you.

The walls of tradition are very high.

The channel is very narrow.

That's why it's so interesting when an artist can transcend the momentum of their cultural position and really produce something unique.

I don't see...

I mean, I think, you know, the reason I like talking to artists is because all the art of the past 20,000 years is like a teacup dipped into the ocean.

And yet any one of us, not particularly self-defined as artists, most of us, can access the ocean, can swim in the ocean.

And so you say, you know, we all can touch the same source that these great artists must have touched.

Their skill was that they were able to bring out a thimble full of this material and the rest of us can only look at it in wonder and then it passes by.

Yeah.

Yesterday I made a reference to when I was into the extraterrestrial reference to psychedelic use.

I was wondering if you don't hold that position anymore.

No, I'm not sure exactly.

I mean, the funny thing about the extraterrestrial position is that it depends on how long it's been since you've taken mushrooms, how creditable it seems.

If it's recent, it seems the only possible explanation.

If you wait a few months, then skepticism and reason begins to level the landscape and you say, well, no, it couldn't possibly really be that.

But I think, you know, no, I think that we hardly have an inkling as to the real nature of the world and the real history of life on this planet.

And, you know, we don't know how narrowly channeled the manifestation of organic intelligence is.

Does it always have to be in a body? Does it always have to be in a body that stands upright with binocular vision?

I think the real task with dealing with extraterrestrials is to know when you've got one.

It's completely silly to search the galaxy with radio telescopes for a radio civilization.

I mean, to my mind, that is as chuckle-headed as deciding you're going to search the galaxy for a decent Italian restaurant.

I mean, it doesn't work like that.

So, you know, if you think about the mushroom, try to think about it objectively, it looks to me very much like a good candidate for an extraterrestrial.

First of all, you know, DNA has been known to us only since 1950, less than a century, and we're already involved in this thing called the Human Genome Project.

Well, what that means is we are taking control of the scripts that write human beings.

It seems to me anything we would recognize as intelligence would pass through a phase of self-analysis where it would realize that it was made out of DNA and would then sequence itself.

We're about to do this ourselves.

Well, that means that most extraterrestrials will be the product of their own reflexive design process.

In other words, an extraterrestrial that can cross the gulf between the stars must surely then be able to control its own form.

Well then, if you look at the mushroom, it's a curious combination of artifact and entity.

It looks sort of manufactured.

There's very little fat on that system.

I mean, first of all, fungi are primary decomposers.

This means that they are at the very bottom of the food chain.

This makes the kind of vegetarianism espoused by Buddhists look like an orgy of slaughter.

You know?

Because if you're at the very bottom of the food chain, that is the only place that is absolutely karma-free.

So there's the mushroom in the occupying the karma-free position in the food chain.

Well then, it's...

You know, we've been reading about these huge mycelial clones spread under acres of soil in Michigan and Wyoming.

Well those things, what that is, is that's a cobweb-like network.

And in the case of a psilocybin species, filled with neurotransmitter-like compounds.

Can you imagine how many synaptic clamps there must be in a 1500-acre mushroom clone?

If brain size is any relationship to intelligence, then hang on, Hannah.

Because it means that this thing, spread through the forests of the Midwest, has, you know, a brain approximate in weight to a couple of dozen grey whales.

The other thing is, then, the spore looks perfectly designed to sustain itself in outer space.

If you want to store spores for longevity, you create conditions as close to the conditions in outer space as you possibly can.

High vacuum, very low temperature.

The casing of a spore is one of the most electron-dense organic materials in nature.

So electron-dense that it approximates a metal.

Well, global currents can form on the quasi-metallic surface of an airborne spore.

And they act as a further repellent for hard radiation.

So, and, you know, percolating through the galaxy at an ordinary rate, typical of stellar material,

a mushroom species could percolate from one side of the galaxy to the other in under 400,000 years.

Well, that's lightning speed compared to the size and age of the universe.

If we were to gain the power to design ourselves, I think after a whole bunch of, you know, Madonna and Robert Redford clones,

we would probably move on to becoming something very much like a mushroom.

It's, you know, mild, it's non-invasive, it's at the bottom of the food chain, it's virtually immortal, it's laden with neurotransmitters,

and it's living in the imagination.

And this, you know, brings me to a favorite subject of mine.

This is where we have to go.

We have to enter into the Blakean divine imagination.

That's where our future lies.

At this point, our relationship to this planet as infant to child is a relationship of impending toxemia.

We have to be parted from the mother to save the mother and to save us.

And there are not that many possibilities.

Where are we going to go?

The political geniuses who run this planet have made migration to the stars virtually impossible.

I mean, don't kid yourself.

It isn't only a matter of announcing a program.

Our short, stubby fingers couldn't assemble something like a Saturn V moon rocket.

That was made by a generation of people now deceased.

Americans in this era are, you know, rather dull-witted people who have a good deal of trouble even running a third world economy.

So we're not going to the stars.

You can forget that.

So then where are we going?

Well, nanotech, is that a possibility?

Could, can we download everybody into a super-cooled cube of gold deterbium alloy buried 500 feet deep in the center of Copernicus?

And then we'll go there and leave the earth and dance forever in the hallways of the astral imagination.

That's one possibility.

Another possibility is, is there a way to diffuse consciousness into the environment?

Can we become dolphins, caterpillars, grey whales and mosquitoes and just sort of defocus ourselves?

I mean, all of these are, of course, wildly radical notions.

But on the other hand, we're headed straight toward a brick wall at about 5,000 miles an hour.

We have to figure out something pretty astonishing in a hurry.

Yeah.

Yes.

Another thing about the functional design in the country.

You'll notice that it's shaped nice before re-entry into the atmosphere.

The heat shield.

Yes.

Precisely.

Yeah.

Can you kind of jump start an evolution from your conception of creation?

That's a funny question.

I don't know because it's so hard to tease apart genetics and environment.

I mean, they certainly have had a jump start on evolution by virtue of hanging out in the space that our lives have created.

You know, I think children need lots of attention, lots of nurturing, physical and spiritual.

I guess I would say so.

Certainly they haven't been programmed with the fear and misunderstanding that is in the society.

We just got through anti-dope week at our school, which is an incredibly painful experience at this particular school,

because I don't think there's a person associated with it who believes it for a moment.

But it's like we all have to study fascism because we live in a fascist state.

A teacher made a statement that LSD caused brain damage and my son dared to challenge this.

And the guy said, well, who told you it doesn't cause brain damage?

My daddy.

No, not my daddy.

He said, well, Albert Hoffman told me it doesn't cause brain damage.

End of discussion.

Yeah.

I know that children are very interconnected with their parents, so when you're doing substances, do you feel like the presence of your child sometimes going on your psychotropic experiences?

Because I've had that before, especially when they were really young.

Yes.

Well, when children are very young, you know, all kinds of psychic phenomenon happen.

And, you know, I think mothers, nursing mothers, and their relationship to their children is intensely telepathic.

I remember when my daughter was not very old.

She must have been like about three and a half.

And I had a dream, and it was a very unusual dream for me, and very highly realized.

And I dreamed of an orrery.

Do you know what an orrery is?

It's a model of the solar system made of gears.

And you crank it, and there's the sun in the center, and the planets go around it.

But this was a huge orrery.

I dreamed I walked down a hall, and I opened a door, and I walked into this room, and there was this orrery.

And these planets were circling around the sun inside this room.

And then, and I was awakened by my daughter crying.

And I went downstairs, and she said, there were planets circling around inside my bedroom.

And, you know, that's a very specific and rare image for an adult or a child to have.

So, yes, I think that our chuckle-headedness is the main barrier to our encountering all kinds of special abilities that move around us all the time.

We are truly the prisoners of our limited conceptions.

Yeah?

Well, sort of cycling with what you were saying, and also back to some of the questions about why you don't want to take it every day for 40 days in a row.

And it's more on a psychological level that what causes—I've worked with someone who has done drug therapies in Mexico, and also I have a little story about Jung.

And many of the people who have gotten into a situation of psychosis are people who have used drugs, and the general principle behind that is that people have experienced something that they cannot integrate back into their psyche or whatever,

even if it's the ability to say, well, that was then, and this is now, and therefore you get psychosis.

So, not to say these things to alarm people, but just for respect that there has to be this ability to come back and not be far out there.

And there are a lot of different parameters to this.

One is your own ego strength.

Another one is the society you live in.

If you're a shaman and you can say these things and have them be accepted, then you're fine.

And it doesn't have to be drugs.

Jung used to, when he was older, he used to sit in a chair and just go inside.

And when he came back, he would have this litany of things that he would say so that he could come back and function.

He would say, you know, I'm Carl Gustav Jung, my wife is so-and-so, my children, I have this many children, this many grandchildren.

I hate you.

Yeah.

He would just do all this.

Uh-huh.

The reconnect affirmation.

Yeah, re-entry.

Yeah, well, I think that's not a bad idea.

Yeah.

Can I just follow up on that?

I wanted to ask you, how do you see the role of rituals, specifically in your relationship to what students are playing in the traditional society?

Well, I don't have a very popular position on ritual, and I blame it on the mushroom, because I just quote the mushroom.

And the mushroom, I said, what about ritual?

And it said, that's fine if you don't know what you're doing.

And I think that, you know, it's really not an anti-ritualist position, because that is what ritual is.

That's what you do if you don't know what you're doing.

None of us.

But, you know, the purpose, you can tell when ritual works, because it makes itself obsolete.

That's the, it's, it's, yeah.

I think there's things that we do, and I think, I think, I think as we, as we continue to explore these things, we find all the choice.

There's certain things that, yeah.

I do this particular thing in your head.

We can do it in a certain ways that we can do it.

And it has changed.

It doesn't stay the same.

They are, in a way, to be able to find a ritual.

Well, you know, even in the most ritualistic context, there's always a footnote made for the crazy wisdom.

I mean, every great teacher has said that what he's saying is malarkey.

A teacher who doesn't tell you that what he or she is saying is malarkey is not to be taken seriously.

So, you know, it's the, if you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him style of thinking.

Or, I was just reading this guru who's coming on strong, is his name, Poojaji?

Poojaji?

Dobbs.

No, no, not Dobbs.

But anyway, somebody, this guy said, don't, don't do practice.

Don't do practice.

Practice is only distraction.

He said, we have to keep thinking up.

He said, you know, running an ashram isn't easy.

These students, they expect so much of us.

We have to continually keep inventing stuff to keep them happy and send them off on these crazy quests and, you know, endless fasts

and all this stuff because they want that.

But, you know, the guru is pretty much content to kick back with the latest Rolling Stone.

Yeah.

Remember, it serves me correctly.

Right.

Could you comment on that?

I'd like to know a little bit about it.

Well, are you all familiar with Rupert Sheldrake's work?

Sheldrake is a British biologist who's written a number of books.

His first book was called A New Science of Life and it was catapulted to fame by virtue of a review in nature

which said that it should be burned.

And then he wrote a book called The Presence of the Past.

Sheldrake has an extraordinarily simple, interesting, revolutionary idea that just drives scientists straight up a tree.

His idea is that once something happens, it's easier for it to happen the next time.

Yes, simple.

But it takes then forms which drive people crazy because he asserts based on that, that if you teach rats to run a new kind of maze in Australia,

then rats in Massachusetts should be able to run this maze faster than if the rats in Australia hadn't learned it.

Because once something has occurred, then it has a momentum in time.

He calls this the theory of formative causation or morphogenesis.

And it explains a lot of things which are otherwise very difficult for biology to explain.

But it raises also a bunch of issues that are pretty tricky.

And so Rupert and I have been close friends for years and even longer, I've been tight with a mathematician in Santa Cruz named Ralph Abraham,

who's a chaos dynamicist.

And Ralph and Rupert and I did a book together called Trilogues at the Edge of the West,

which will be out at the end of the summer from Bear.

And we'll all get together at Esalen the end of August and do a bunch more of these public three-way dialogues,

which are pretty spirited because we are very different people from each other,

but all psychedelic and all interested in paradigm recasting.

So that's what it's about.

And it'll be out in mid-summer.

End of August for that Esalen thing.

Anybody else?

Yeah.

What do you think?

The plants and places you've gone.

Uh-huh.

And how do people that live there experience them?

And you're thinking that feminism is a necessary thing for a successful future because the archaic world was so dominated by, well that's a bad choice of words isn't it?

Was so characterized by an awareness of the feminine and the boundary dissolving and the organic.

The whole problem with the world is that we cannot feel the consequences of what we are doing.

You know, I mean recently we had paraded in front of us the figure of Jeffrey Dahmer as who you don't want to be like.

And yet Jeffrey Dahmer to me was an absolute paradigm of global civilization.

Because his problem was that he couldn't feel the consequences of his actions.

And this is what we are doing.

I mean, we are lacerating ourselves by cutting down the rainforest and poisoning the oceans.

This is not some airy, fairy, save the redwoods kind of mentality that protests against this.

This is our own atmosphere, our own environment that we're destroying.

It's a slow suicide, not so slow at the rate that we're carrying it out.

Well, somehow we have to reactivate the maternal, nurturing, caring circuitry that kept the tendencies that have evolved in this fatal direction at bay for a long, long time.

And, you know, you can call it ego, you can call it male dominance, you can call it the phonetic alphabet.

Whatever it is, it has to be stopped because the planet is imperiled by it.

And I, my analysis of it is that the only way to do it is to dissolve the boundaries that culture and language and tradition have allowed us to create.

And they are largely boundaries that suppress women, not because men hate women, but because men hate the feminine.

And they want to control and hold it back.

It's threatening.

It's devouring.

I mean, the fact that the French refer to orgasm as the little death tells you, you know, what a weird kind of ambivalence haunts our relationship to anything which dissolves us out of the knot that we have tied ourselves into.

So, I, you know, I'm a kind of non-feminist feminist.

I mean, I think most feminists are feminists because they think women have gotten a raw deal.

I'm a feminist because I think mankind is headed for suicide if we don't return to a more intense expression of the feminine.

So, it's not a political agenda for me to liberate an oppressed group of people.

It's a collectivist agenda necessary to save everybody and everything on the planet.

Yeah.

One of the things that's implicit in your general work is that there exists allies, allies in the form of the planet.

And when we look at the drought from partnership to dominator society, in my mind, one of the things that would become implicit with your thesis would be that there are not only allies, but there are malevolent entities out there and the dominator force becomes so powerful.

And then when I get into that line of thought, I get into this whole demi-urge, clash of the titans kind of notion.

And sometimes the allies notion is very attractive, but in my mind, it always implies there's malevolent forces out there just as there are benevolent ones.

Well, no, I mean, there are malevolent and benevolent forces in there and out there.

But I don't see the world really as a struggle between good and evil in some kind of Manichean situation.

It seems to me that we confer value.

That, you know, nature is neither good nor evil, and that must then include all these allies.

It's just that we confer judgment.

This is because when you begin to get down toward the bottom line, we don't know what the bottom line is.

For instance, we're headed toward a great historical bifurcation where we're going to have to make some really hard choices.

And most of the time in the so-called New Age, they try to fuzz all the distinctions and make you think you're never going to be slammed to the wall and have to make a choice.

But the choice that's coming up for us is fundamental.

It is, are we to become the caregivers, the nurturers, and the gardeners of the earth?

Or is the earth, you know, I put it this way to somebody the other night.

The question was, is the earth our mother, therefore to be cared for into her old age, nurtured, revered, and loved?

Or is the earth our placenta, therefore to be examined for signs of toxin and then buried under the apple tree?

In other words, what is the true nature of human beings?

Are we to be integrated into nature and to celebrate it?

Or is nature a demonic and titanic force that is imprisoning spirit and holding it back from its full unfolding in worlds of alien light and higher dimension?

So far from here that it's a miracle that even rumor reached us of the possibility of salvation.

This is a tough choice because one path leads to radical renunciation of technology, radical pairing of population,

and an attempt to come to terms with this small liquid planet on which we find ourselves.

And the other direction says, you know, forget it.

It's the husk of a seed.

And it is utterly meaningless in the cosmic drama.

And the real destiny lies out there, halfway to the Nebul Gnubi or Zeta Reticuli or some other exotic port of...

I don't see how you can have that both ways.

But the star does have a lifetime.

Yes, and most stars have lives shorter than the amount of time that biology has been on this planet.

We are fortunate enough to be around a very slow-burning stable star.

There are a lot of mysteries...

I haven't forgotten your second question, Raven.

There are a lot of mysteries in our cosmic neighborhood that we rarely hear addressed.

For example, I mean just as an example,

if our destiny lies out in the great universe,

it's a hell of a technological barrier to cross to the stars.

I mean it may be insurmountable.

However, isn't it interesting that the most Earth-like star within 70 light-years is the nearest star?

Not technically the nearest star, which is a glowing red clinker called Alpha Centauri.

Right?

But Beta Centauri is 1.1 solar masses.

1.1 solar masses.

No star within 70 light-years is as Earth-like, I mean as Sun-like as that star.

From the point of view of the galaxy, Beta Centauri and our Sun almost look like lightly bounded binaries.

If this is an accident, it's a tremendously fortuitous accident for us because it may well mean that there is an Earth-like planet

at an incredibly short distance away from us in terms of the cosmic neighborhood.

In fact, probably within the next ten years, telescopes of sufficient resolving power will be created

that if there is a water-heavy, oxygen-rich world out there, it's going to show up.

Well then that is going to become a tremendous attractor in the historical matrix

because it will be hailed as the answer.

I mean can you imagine?

Because there will then be two possibilities.

That there is intelligence next door, not likely, or that there is, but likely, how do you assess it?

How many water-heavy, oxygen-rich planets have we examined, for crying out loud?

And the other possibility is that it's empty real estate.

In either case, it will excite keen interest throughout society.

So, you know, that's a little oddness in our cosmic neighborhood that is rarely mentioned or taken account of.

Yeah?

Yes, although I leave that to the Jeremiah Sitchens of the world to work out the details.

There is, after all, a fossil record that is pretty clear in spite of the ravings and rantings of these Christers.

The fossil record is pretty clear that we emerged out of the proto-hominids,

who emerged out of the pungid radiation that emerged out of and so forth and so on.

I don't, I think that, but there may be mysteries.

I mean, one question that I'm surprised nobody ever seems to ask in these weekends,

when I tell the cheerful story of the descent from the...

from the tree.

Right?

Exactly.

Right?

Right.

the ape encounter with the mushrooms and so forth and so on, is nobody ever asks,

well, but who put the mushrooms in the path of these binocular, bipedal, evolving primates?

I mean, is this just the story of nature's happiest accident?

Or did someone say, you know, tweak the planet, start the retraction of the rainforests,

seed the spores into the grasslands, and watch what happens?

Because then we come down out of the trees, brainless as a wombat,

and begin testing food sources, and lo and behold, here are these things which are obviously designed to be seen.

I mean, mushrooms are a form of display. They're designed to be seen.

They demand to be eaten. And the consequences of that, you know, are to lead a species to the brink of star flight.

Well, is that just a coincidence? Or is there a mind behind all of this?

See, I think that mind, the problem I have with all the extraterrestrial scenarios, and all the channeling, and all the abducting, and all the stuff that goes on,

is it's all too B-movie. It's all too simple, too straightforward.

That's what troubles me about the Sitchin scenario, is that it's perfectly understandable to us.

If it's understandable to us, you can bet your booties it's the wrong answer.

I mean, it's going to be weirder than that. It's not about mineral extraction or even diplomatic goodwill.

I had a professor years ago, his cosmology went like this.

You know how there are bacteria which you can introduce into gold slurry in low-grade gold ore,

and the bacteria will concentrate the gold, and then you just wash the gold out of the bacteria,

and it's a mining technique that's very efficient for poor-yielding gold ore.

So this guy's idea was that someday, UFOs would appear over every major city on Earth,

and they would just load up all the plutonium and fissionable material, and take it away, and say,

thank you very much. This mining operation is now concluded.

You people can go back to hurling shit at each other in the treetops, as far as we're concerned.

We have real application for this fissionable material.

You people were going to use it to blow each other up. What a bunch of dummies!

And farewell and good luck! So that's one possibility.

Can I ask what you think?

Yes, then I insist on getting to these plants.

You mentioned a book called Something in Harmony by Fletcher.

By Fletcher?

No, Haoma, H-A-O-M-A, Haoma and Harmony by...

No, by Flattery and Schwartz.

And it's published by the University of California Press,

Near Eastern Studies Division, publication number 23.

Yeah, isn't that a grabber?

Well, what I thought we should talk about this morning, since we seem to range wide and free,

is the practicum of all this.

Which is, you know, how many of these vision plants are there, and where are they,

and how do you obtain them, and how do you use them once you obtain them?

So, I thought, how many of you have ever seen...

Can you all... Here, let me get with it.

This is a poster, which I don't even know if it's still available.

It may be out of print. It is still available.

And it's a very good ethnobotanical course in hallucinogens on one sheet of paper.

What it's divided into, basically, is this is the old world, and this is the new.

Immediately, you notice that there are a lot more hallucinogens in the new world than the old.

This is one of the great puzzles of evolutionary botany,

because nobody can offer a reasonable explanation as to why

there should be nearly three times as many hallucinogenic plants in the new world as in the old.

I mean, other than that's where the flying saucers planted them,

nobody has come up with a good explanation.

Major hallucinogenic plant complexes that I've had experience with and can address are...

Well, let's do a little quick geographical tour.

First of all, North America, for reasons not well understood, is quite poor in native hallucinogens.

There are no major North American hallucinogens.

Peiote is, well, yes, it's North American.

The funny thing about peiote, I mean, you can feed me questions as long as we stick to the subject.

The thing about peiote is, you know, we have this tremendous respect for it.

We imagine that it's tremendously ancient, and it apparently isn't.

There is no archaeological evidence of peiote use any earlier than 500 years ago.

It's almost a phenomenon of the conquest.

What you find in the old graves, in the peiote cultural area,

are the seeds of sephora secundifolia, which is an ordeal poison.

Strychnine.

And often, often drug, human plant symbiotic relationships evolve over time.

It may be that the use of hallucinogens is still in fairly dynamic evolution all over the planet.

Peyote is a major hallucinogen, should have been used for the past 50,000 years.

If it has only been used for the past 500 years, that's pretty peculiar, all right.

And yet, that appears to be the evidence.

Ibogaine, not only a visionary hallucinogen, but an aphrodisiac as well,

no evidence of any use before 1850.

And yet, in an area where the Portuguese had been trading for the past 500 years

and writing cultural descriptions and interviewing the people,

I mean, if it was there, it would have been mentioned.

So, this is a puzzle.

You know, ayahuasca use, we assume, is millennia old.

But on the other hand, archaeology is a real miserable proposition in the Amazon

because the climate is so degradative, so we can't really know.

But aside from peyote and whatever its history, North America seems to have only minor hallucinogens

that have been utilized shamanically.

A puzzle, another puzzle about culture and attitudes is, as you all know, the Northwest Coast Indians,

the Kwakutal, Shimsham, and Tlingit language groups, have an extraordinarily evolved shamanism.

And were the people who developed that X-ray vision style of art?

Well, their cultural area has the densest number of psilocybin mushrooms of any place in the world.

No cultural evidence of psilocybin use.

No evidence that these people even knew these things were there.

I mean, I know this challenges the tradition of the all-knowing Aboriginal.

But, you know, that this is what the data seems to imply.

Now, in Southern California, and across portions of the Southwest,

there have been Datura religions, which are very old, apparently.

The so-called Tulaach religion.

I don't recommend Datura.

I don't know what astrological sign you have to be to make your peace with that stuff.

But I find it really peculiar and menacing.

It's about magic, which is about power and control and usually sexuality in some invasive and dominator application.

I've taken Datura a number of times.

And it's been interesting, but it feels watery and dark and dangerous to me.

There was a period when I lived in Nepal when I became aware that these sadhus,

not content with their superior meditation techniques and their endless smoking of hashish,

were also availing themselves of the seeds of Datura metal,

which is conspecific to what we call Jimson weed in this country.

And so I thought, well, I should take this too and find out what it's about.

Well, it was a very odd trip.

It was, I sat in my room in Bodanath and I would sit and say,

Hmm, nothing is happening, nothing is happening.

Well, you can only think that so many times.

Then my mind would drift into a kind of twilight state.

And then these wraith-like entities, I mean, they were like Victorian ghosts.

You know, they were like women in shredded damask gowns or something,

would fly into my window carrying newspaper sheets in their outstretched arms.

And they would let these sheets of newspaper flutter down onto my lap

and I would like begin to read.

And I would begin, and I would be so astonished by what I was reading that it would jerk me out of it.

And I would say, What's happening?

Nothing's happening. Nothing's happening.

Nothing's happening.

And then my attention would drift and this would happen again.

Well, then after about a half an hour of that, as the stuff began to build up,

I began to, like I would undergo these very brief periods of unconsciousness.

And when I came out of them, I would discover that my leg had been thrown up around behind my head

and my arm shot through.

And I was like all knotted up.

And then I would very carefully unfold myself and lay back down.

And I remember thinking, I'm certainly glad there's nobody else here.

Because this is the kind of thing just designed to drive a sitter into a connection fit of alarm.

And, you know, about six times over the next hour and a half, I went into these convulsive spasms.

And, you know, then on another night, these English people shared a suite of rooms off of mine.

And I had to get to the bathroom.

I had to go through this one guy's room.

So, this one night, I hadn't taken de Tura.

But this fellow had taken de Tura.

And at one point, I had to go to the John's.

So, I debated for a long time about how this was going to disturb his trip.

And maybe I should piss out the window.

But no, that didn't seem, although in India, it's perfectly all right.

And so, finally, I decided I would just walk through the room.

So, then as I was tiptoeing through the room, I saw that he was actually having sex with this girl that we knew from Kathmandu.

And it had a slight emotional tinge for me because I had actually had my eye on her,

although I had never said anything about it to anybody.

So, then, the next morning, I mentioned this.

And he said that, yes, it had been his impression as well, but that, in fact, she wasn't there.

And so, it was like, you know, I saw somebody else's hallucination.

And then what finally decided me that de Tura was too peculiar was I had another English friend who lived a couple of houses away.

And one day, I was in the market buying potatoes.

And this guy came along and we were just talking.

And in the course of this conversation, he was telling me how he'd been taking a lot of de Tura.

And in the course of this conversation, I became aware that he thought that I was visiting him in his apartment.

And I decided that's too fucked up, you know.

To not know whether you're entertaining someone in the confines of your apartment or buying vegetables in the market

means that you have become too disengaged from the modalities of the real.

And, of course, it creates tremendous drying and it's a deliriant is what the literature calls it.

It's a deliriant.

But these, you know, I think that people all over the world utilize plants for bizarre experiences.

Time and time again, I've run up against this.

There's one, you know, there's a very rare drug in South America called Ukuhei.

Ukuhei.

It's made by the Witoto and the Bora and the Muinani in this very circumscribed area.

And what fascinated us about it was that it was an orally active DMT drug.

And we couldn't, as pharmacologists, understand how an orally active DMT drug was possible.

Because the DMT should be destroyed in your gut.

So we wanted to get a sample of this stuff.

And it's made from the resin of varola trees.

The inner bark of the varola sheds of red resin.

And we eventually, in 1981, my brother and I and Wade Davis, the guy who wrote The Serpent and the Rainbow,

we all launched an expedition up the Rio Yaguas Yasu.

And where there was this stuff.

And we would do what we called bioassays, which means somebody has to test this stuff.

Because we would get samples from these shamans.

And we would draw straws for who got to do the bioassay.

Well, taking this Ukuhei was appalling.

I mean, your heart rate goes up to about three times normal.

You shed water by the gallon.

Your blood pressure shoots up.

I mean, it felt like a pre-coronary to me.

And then we come down and say to this shaman, you know,

Lorenzio, what's the story?

And he said, yeah, it takes getting used to, doesn't it?

And so then I, and then when you look at it,

when you look at this Ukuhei chemically,

you see, well, yes, there's DMT in there.

And there's 5-MAO DMT in there.

But then when you do the gas chromatogram,

you see that marching along behind those spots

are all these other spots of various tryptamine compounds,

some of which are cardio regulators,

some of which nobody knows what they do.

And so then you realize that it's a dirty drug.

There's too much junk in there.

What you want is something that has a very clean signature.

So Ukuhei didn't exactly seem the way to go.

I think that this is the real situation with Amanita muscaria,

probably the most discussed, uninteresting drug in the world

because so many people have tried to hang so much on it.

And you know, it's a horrible experience most of the time.

I mean...

Yeah, yeah.

And occasionally you'll meet someone who says,

well, you're just wrong.

It's wonderful.

I've taken it for years.

I love it.

And I, you know, don't know.

First of all, it's genetically variable.

It's geographically variable.

It's seasonally variable.

And it fluctuates at various times in its process of maturation.

So what must be going on with Amanita muscaria

is you have to learn how to take it in your area

from people who know where to collect it,

when to collect it,

how much to collect and how to prepare it.

But if you just go out and find one and chow down,

I guarantee you it'll turn you every way but loose.

And then it'll turn you loose.

So...

But have you done it by drinking urine?

No, that's what they always say.

They say, have you drunk your urine recently?

I got a letter last week.

No, I understand that it...

Do you all understand the basis of the question?

Why does urine come into it?

Because in Siberia they have discovered,

which is where this Amanita thing originates,

that the active principle is not destroyed inside your body,

that it is excreted in the urine.

And the true aficionados of this stuff believe that the so-called second pass

is better than the first pass.

And so you have to...

You know, they drink the urine.

One of the great hazards of Siberian shamanism

is stepping outside of the yurt on a snowy night to take a leak

and being pitched head first into the snow by frantic reindeer

who'll butt you out of the way to try to get to the yellow snow

because they're so completely hooked on Amanita

that nothing stands in their way of this stuff.

I thought you were going to say that it's your students.

Oh, your students pushing you out of them.

Well, I've never hung out with the Yakuts.

Maybe they are a pretty wild-eyed gang.

An example of how a very ancient folkway

can be incorporated into our culture

without us even realizing it

and is provided by discussing Amanita muscaria.

If you go to the Encyclopedia Britannica

and you look up Santa Claus

they'll tell you that it has to do with Saint Nicholas

and it got started in the 11th century

but when you look at the Santa Claus story

it's a perfect mythologian to analyze from this point of view

because look what's going on with Santa Claus.

First of all, Santa Claus's colors are red and white.

The colors of the Amanita muscaria for sure.

Santa Claus lives at the North Pole.

What does this mean?

It means that Santa Claus lives at the Axis Mundi

where Yggdrasil, the magic world ash of Welch mythology

has taken root.

Santa Claus flies.

This is what shamans do.

Santa Claus is the master of the reindeer.

The animal most associated with the Amanita muscaria.

Santa Claus is aided in his work by troops of elves.

And what is the work of Santa Claus?

To build toys for children.

Remember the DMT thing?

Saying, look at this!

Look at this!

Well, those were off-duty elves, clearly.

And so here are all the motifs.

And I believe that for children in our culture

that all the Christer stuff is not what Christmas is about.

Christmas is about standing in front of the tree on Christmas morning

with the gifts arrayed and the twinkling lights on.

Well, that tree is the tree that the Amanita muscaria forms its symbiotic relationship to.

It's always spruce or pine that it has a mycorrhizal relationship to.

So the number of motifs relating Santa Claus to a cult of Amanita muscaria,

there's almost nothing but relational motifs there.

And yet if you suggest this to people they just back away in horror, you know.

Well, these hallucinogenic plants seem clustered in the New World in two areas.

The first area is the Sierra Mazateca of Central Mexico and related areas.

And there you have a number of things overlapping.

You have a mushroom area of multiple species where,

unlike the Kwakutal, Shimsham, Tlingit language area,

in this Central Mexican area they absolutely did use and discover these mushrooms.

And we have these things called mushroom stones that go 2500 BC.

So the mushroom religion is truly archaic in Mexico.

In the same cultural area you have the morning glory seeds that come from Ipomia purpura and related hybrids.

Are you all familiar with these?

This is a psychedelic plant that you can grow yourself and take.

Don't buy the packages of seeds and take them because a benevolent government has made sure that they are soaked in horrendous poison so that you can't get loaded on them.

But you can grow a crop out of them that will be toxin free.

And this is a tremendous visionary intoxicant.

It takes a couple of hundred of these seeds.

But in that same area, strangely enough, there's another morning glory, Turbina coriombosa.

It used to be called Rivia coriombosa.

That as few as 13 seeds will flatten you.

Now, it's interesting, as long as we're talking about morning glory seeds,

to note that per unit volume, by weight, probably the strongest plant hallucinogen in the world is Hawaiian baby wood rose.

And yet there is no record of any culture ever utilizing that.

There are 13 species of Argyria.

It's called Hawaiian baby wood rose, but it has nothing to do with Hawaii.

It's native to India.

There are 13 species of Argyria scattered from southern India out to Fiji.

And all contain ergot-like, LSD-like compounds like Chinook Levine and so forth.

These, I got started on morning glory seeds because they were available.

But don't sell this stuff short, folks.

I mean, it'll give you a ride that you'll never forget.

And the baby wood rose, even more so, be very careful with the Hawaiian baby wood rose.

Because it contains cardio-active glycosides.

And, you know, if you, you know, maybe six seeds will do you.

Twelve seeds might well plant you.

And twelve seeds will fit on a tablespoon.

So this is nothing to start choking down in large amounts.

Yeah.

Yes.

And could be extracted in a fairly simple filtration system.

Yeah.

Good point.

Yeah.

Do you grind them up?

Well, they are dry.

They're little crescent-shaped dry things.

Yeah.

Grind them in a brawn grinder.

And applesauce is the favorite carrier for these disgusting things or milkshakes.

But it would be good to look into doing a little chemistry.

The emetic in the morning glories is estercoumarone.

Not the cardio-active glycoside in Argyria nervosa.

But in Ipomaea purpura, it's estercoumarone.

And you could devise a simple chemical system for removing that.

And I think LSD, you know, have you ever had what's called Woodrow's LSD?

Well, it's wonderful.

It's unlike LSD.

It's more like psilocybin because it is highly visionary.

And one of the things about these morning glories is, you know, I don't know whether we have to talk about Rupert's theory or what,

but it is just an archive of Mayan and Toltec imagery.

I mean, you take this stuff and you're there in the pyramidal complex on the day of Venus's heliacal rising when they do their thing.

I mean, it's pretty amazing.

Is the active ingredient like psilocybin?

It's a close relative. It's active, not in the microgram range, but in the milligram range.

And there are several active compounds.

You're right.

And I think Chinoclavine is psychoactive and Ergonovine.

All these occur there.

So do you grind those and swallow them all or make them infusion?

No, you grind them to a powder and then just take it, capsule them.

It's a lot of capsules.

It's like half a cup of this horrible whitish meal with a strange smell.

But yeah, basically about 200 seeds.

You may want to go higher, but start with that.

Yeah.

Okay.

Now, supposedly in the mass attack area, the merveocarbosis seeds are ground up and then they are like put into a cold water to make a cold water infusion.

And then the solids are refused so that there's only like a water soluble fraction in the water.

And then that is wrong.

Well, no.

But if what you're saying is true, that's where the glycoside would reside.

That's not my understanding actually.

Well, maybe the caption got mislabeled or something because the way they do it where I've seen it is they take the little seeds and they grind them on a matate to powder.

Then they put it in water, as you said, and then and they shake it and leave it and come back an hour later and shake it again and do that for a while.

And then the stuff precipitates to the bottom, the matter, and the liquid fraction is poured off and discarded and they take the solid matter and they let it dry in the sun until it's no longer runny.

But it's a kind of like the consistency of oatmeal or play dough or something like that.

And then they make a little tiny tortilla which they then toast on a metal griddle.

And so you get this thing which looks slightly smaller than a Ritz cracker and is a toasted morning glory seed wafer and you eat that and that is the thing which is active.

That's how I've seen it done.

Apparently not.

They toast it lightly.

They don't, it's not blackened.

It's just sort of golden.

No, it's the, it's one species of morning glory, Turbina, previously called Rivia coriumbosa.

The other one, the morning glory that you have to take a couple of hundred seeds for is used in that area as a halicinogen,

but it's also used to induce labor and has a whole role in midwifery and like that.

Okay, good.

Thank you.

No, that's the Hawaiian Woodrose and it has no history of human usage, so you're on your own

This is it's worth talking about maybe for a minute that you know there

Halicinogens are like hotel rooms

Some are occupied and some are not and it's always interesting

to fiddle with the unoccupied ones because if you're if you believe Sheldrake, then it's an empty field

You know one way of thinking of these things is when you take a plant it takes you

So when you take mushrooms for instance

what the trip is is

all the mushroom trips that anybody ever had and

you leave you know you make a tiny contribution to it's you leave a piece of your trip in the trip and

so the the trip is slowly evolving over time as

Those who take the plant each leaves a brick or an offering or a little

Architectural motif on this vast edifice. Well, then if you come that was why

You know a plant like Hawaiian Woodrose or to some degree stropharia cubensis because it is not the preferred mushroom among the Mexican

Traditionalists then it's unoccupied

You can make of it what you want. It can be sort of your

Vehicle and this is why you know a drug like ketamine

Which is a new drug a drug without a thousand years of input my impression of where you go on ketamine is it's like visiting a new office building

That nobody has rented offices yet. I mean all the water coolers work and there are these

recessional distances with fluorescent lighting

But you know there are no hurrying secretaries and crowded offices and chatter around the water fountains

It's just empty. It's empty because not enough people have left their initials on the walls. Yeah

What is the variety that's common mushroom that's common in the Yucatan and the Mayan?

Well, if you mean growing on manure, yeah, that's stropharia cubensis

See there are about 30 species of mushrooms that grow in

in that Mexican area and most of them are

are

What are called? Well not most some are ephemeral mushrooms meaning they're very small and they can be almost anywhere and

Then there are some larger ones too that can be almost anywhere

stropharia cubensis is the only one of the good ones that locates on cow dung

Now there are other mushrooms which grow on cow dung that contain psilocybin

But they also are more sickening there are species of paneolus and species of coprinus

if you collect a mushroom off dung and you want to know whether it's a

paneolus or a coprinus or a stropharia

Just keep it around for a few hours if it's a stropharia

it will just sort of be around. If it's a coprinus or a paneolus it will do what's called autodigest

it will turn into a slimy mess and

Can you tell from sporeprin?

No you can't tell from the sporeprin but you can tell from the macromorphology of it if you know mushrooms

They're easy to tell apart

I think I had sporeprin and I don't have much

Yeah well that's tricky you need somebody who really knows their stuff

It was more speculative but I think it would be worth trying

Yeah, yeah

Some are and some aren't

But it's the one that is the water-soluble but I don't think I'm not sure about that

I've read some more about synthesizing LSD and it's apparently hard to get to the starting points

I heard if you get a bunch more in the lower states it's still kind of lighter flutes

and I heard that gets you halfway there

Yeah, that sounds right

Pet ether is a good one. So is chloroform

Have any of you read The Road to Eleusis?

Oh yes

That's about the Eleusinian Mysteries and argues

It's by Wasson and Hoffman and Ruck

and argues that the mystery at Eleusis was a kind of ergotized beer

that they were gathering ergot off paspalum

and making an ergotized beer

and the only way they could have done that for 2,000 years

stoning thousands of people each September at this cult site

without the thing getting a reputation for being toxic or causing convulsions

is if they had some way that was very efficient

of separating the dangerous alkaloids from the hallucinogenic ones

so that may have been a water fractionation technique as well

or you know the whole theory may be wrong

and whatever was drunk at Eleusis may not have been ergotized beer

it could have been a mushroom of some sort

this is what Robert Graves thought that it was a mushroom

Is that put back in print yet?

The Road to Eleusis?

Probably not because Wasson is now dead

and the estate is kind of funny about that kind of thing

yeah

I have two questions

one of them

could you talk more about the emetic

and how to get rid of that?

The emetic is ester coumarone

if you're not a chemist

and used to dealing with high molecular weight solvents

then you should do some kind of a water

you know dissolve it in water

and then try to separate out the fractions

this would be

I mean I think

a lot of work needs to be done

I think in the underground

there are publications which have circulated

that are you know

the wizard's workbook for mushroom rec

or for morning glory reclamation

and stuff like this

it's a

you pay your dues with morning glories

but it's usually worth the price of admission

it's just nausea after all for crying out loud

yeah

the question had to do with what you were saying about

different hallucinogens in hotel rooms

I got the impression that the implication is that

somehow consciousness creates the reality

that's put you know that's out there

depending on whether how often consciousness has used

these different hallucinogens

is that

yeah I think so

I mean that we leave our fingerprints upon the drugs we take

and drugs that have been taken for thousands of years

have a lot of fingerprints on them

and you join up with that

you enter into the field

you know

one way of thinking

since somebody talked about Sheldrake earlier

one way of thinking about psychedelics

in trying to define what do they do

is that they are amplifiers of the morphogenetic field

that you know

that the past of objects

somehow becomes present

this would fit in with my notion

that when you take a psychedelic

you are rising into some kind of super space

that can be mathematically described

because having the past be co-present with the present

is a way of saying

that you have shift your dimensional relationship to the data field

and now it all appears to be one coherent thing

yeah

what is the plant that grows in the southwest that has Harmelina?

Pegaman Harmelina

the giant Syrian rue

its original range is from Morocco to Manchuria

but at some time in the 19th century

it was brought into this country as a range fodder for goats

I mean it's pretty rasty plant

it has small yellow flowers

and it's a kind of

it has succulent leaves

sort of water holding leaves

and it looks like a form of sage brush

and when you cut into it with a knife or a machete

it's brilliant yellow inside

and that brilliant yellow is the harming

pound it up with a sledge hammer

to separate the fibers

and do a hot water wash on it

and then you know do a second hot water wash

then get rid of the physical stuff

combine the two mother liquors

and drive it down to a reasonable volume

and it'll do the trick

yeah

you're probably familiar with a couple of different books

by Allegro and Pujaric

John Allegro and Andreja Pujaric

yeah

what's your assessment

do you think there's any value that there is in you

well

not to rain on anybody's parade

Andreja Pujaric is a very mercurial person

is that what we want to say

recall that he was the guy who pushed Uri Geller for a long time

and they were forever tromping into the Negev

and coming out with blank cassettes

that had held the wisdom of the galaxy

but the aliens erased them before they let them return

that could happen here

so that's Andreja Pujaric

he's been around for a long time

I mean you have to

these people are such eccentrics

I mean you have to just respect people's persistence and survival power

but I think you know his scholarship and his notion of the rules of evidence

is fairly divergent even from my fairly loose canon

so Allegro is a little different case

do you all know the book The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross

he managed to hypothesize one of the most radical theories ever to come down the pike

I don't know how true it is

but his theory is that Jesus was a mushroom

and you know this would not probably have cut too much mustard

except that the guy was a Dead Sea Scrolls scholar of world renown

had a scholars grasp of Aramaic and Akkadian

and was fully licensed to be one of the people who tell us

what the primary documents of Christianity really mean

the problem was when Allegro got a hold of them

he said well what they really mean is

that a sacramental mushroom was being grown in caves by Nabataeans down around Qumram

and they called it Jesus in order to befuddle the Roman authorities

and created the cheerful theory of the friendly carpenter

who tells us to render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's

and this was all a publicity stunt just to keep the Roman authorities guessing

and he has textual he claims he has textual support for this

the problem is you have to be an Aramaic philologist to follow the argument

I mean the argument is unbelievably tortured

there is a lot of question

there is a peculiar opaqueness about the early history of Christianity

I mean if we are to try and take it seriously and understand what happened there

then it must be that first of all if we believe Christ was a real person

then he must have been born in 6 BC

because there was a conunctio maxima of Jupiter and Saturn at that time

which is a good astrological event to hang the nativity on

which means then that the crucifixion would have occurred in 27

well why is it then that there are no mentions

no mention of Christ can be pushed back later than earlier than AD 69

what was going on between 27 and 69

the Gospels are not contemporaneous

and the mention in 69 is not even a sure thing

it's in Suetonius

and he says Jews have recently come to Rome

agitating in the name of their leader Crespus

and that's the reference

and you know it's puzzling

because take a figure as minor as Mani

Mani is the founder of Manicheanism

he was born in Seleucia Ctesiphon in the 700s

well God we have Mani's laundry bills

I mean we know how much he paid in taxes

the nickname he had for his dog

I mean we have a lot of data on Mani

and so why a figure like Christ

should be so peculiarly swathed in ambiguity

if it was a real person with these people eager to chronicle

it is a little hard to figure out

didn't Mani have a figure of religion

going in his own lifetime

to have a figure organization

of course Christ has had 12 guys

yeah I mean Mani got right with it

I mean he cultivated the court

he knew how to get his thing going

yeah

if any of you are interested in these kinds of questions

and like your data in novel form

read the Transmigration of Timothy Archer

by Philip K. Dick

which is a wonderful intellectual romp

through all of these issues

it's essentially the fictional telling of the story of James Pike

who you may remember was the Episcopal Bishop of San Francisco

and a great enthusiast for LSD

and he died in the Negev under very mysterious conditions

he parked his car

and with a roadside map

and a bottle of Coca-Cola

in 115 degree heat

started walking toward the Dead Sea

and dehydrated and died

and he was very close to John Allegro

you know I'm not given to conspiracy theory

but you must have been following this whole hassle

about the Dead Sea Scrolls

well a lot of people think

it's because what is written there

is incommensurate with Christianity

as it has existed for 1700 years

and nobody knows what to do with this stuff

I mean it's the equivalent of

what do you do with the doctrine of the resurrection

if somebody comes up with the mummy of Christ

well that's the kind of situation

that these Dead Sea Scrolls

may place Christian hermeneutics in

John Allegro's book

no, John Allegro died recently

sacred mushroom

oh no

the book by Philip K. Dick

is called

The Transmigration of Timothy Archer

yeah

are you aware of

Edmund Bordeaux Zeki's translations?

oh yes

he's another one

his really tweaking volume

was called

How the Great Pan Died

Right

and it was an expose

of Jesus Barabbas

versus this

suppose of Jesus

and so

yes

yes well

the Empire never died

which is Philip K. Dick's motto

the Gnostic temperament is alive and well

in fact there hasn't been a century

as friendly to Gnosticism

as the 20th

since the 4th

so

there you have it

I've heard a little bit of revelations

and it sounds like a description of

of

well this has been suggested

what you need to

you know

to put the

to put the Gospel of John

in

or I mean

yes

to put the Gospel of John in context

get

Charles' book

the Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha

of the New Testament

this concludes

Tape 5

our program continues

with Tape 6

and then you see

everything that the Church Fathers

tossed out

because you see

the

canon

the New Testament

is a group of accounts

that were able to survive the

sorting process

of the Council of Nicaea

and

there was a huge literature

which was just tossed out

as being too weird

I mean

read the Gospel of Philip

the Gospel of Thomas

had you all

have you all

looked at

the Nag Hammadi Library

the Nag

and you know what this is

the Nag Hammadi Library

is

42 texts

which were dug up

in Upper Egypt

in 1948

at a

Coptic Monastery

called

Chenabaschion

42 texts

that went

into the ground

A.D. 220

means

nobody has been able

to put a finger

on them

since A.D. 220

it's like a

fossil

of Christianity

in the third century

well my god

you can barely

map it on

to the cheerful

religion

that we inherit

as Christianity

I mean it is

an exotic

and complicated

situation

it's very well

worth reading

James

oh

any

I'm sure

the metaphysical bookstore

in Berkeley

I mean in Boulder

will sell you

James M. Robinson

is the editor

and it's called

the Nag Hammadi Library

42 texts

reflecting

early

Christianity

Gnosticism

and so forth

and so on

Hans Jonas

is a brilliant

his book

Gnosticism

the message

of the alien god

to infant Christianity

if that's not a title

to die for

huh

oh

the Apocrypha

and Pseudepigrapha

of the New Testament

by Charles

and that's a

that weighs in

at about 35 pounds

but

theological libraries

will have it

but it's in the

locked case

you don't want

seminarians mucking around

with this kind of stuff

that's right

the Arantia book

is a very spectacular

and early example

of channeling

before it was even named

and very interesting

of all the channeled material

the Arantia book

for pure grandiosity

puts everybody else

to shame

right

they talk about

seeding the planet

yeah well

these are persistent themes

you know

I mean all of Gnosticism

is

the perception

that we don't belong here

that we are creatures of another realm

beings of light

who because of some horrible cosmic mistake

have been trapped

in the world of matter

and the Gnostics take

the Pentatech

the first five books of Moses

and turn it into a nightmare story

and say that you know

the God of this world

which in Jewish tradition

is called Yahweh

who is the creator of the world

for the Gnostics

he is not the real God at all

he's the Demerge

he's a kind of mad God

who has entrapped the light

and the task of salvation

is to gather the light

and then release it back

to its hidden higher source

beyond the machinery of cosmic fate

well that's good

that it's sort of like

you know the Manduki Upanishad

it's my favorite Upanishad

because it's the shortest

it's only a page and a half long

which you know

others should have been

so similarly inspired to brevity

but it's the breath of Brahman

it traces

it's the description of one

exhalation inhalation cycle

cycle

yeah

I know people call it

and say

Yahweh

well you're not even supposed to say it

if you're orthodox

G-D

yeah

I'm fascinated by

the Rasa Farni

the installation of

Yahweh

the abbreviation of

Yahweh

in the same phrase

hallelujah

is supposed to be that

what is your understanding of that connection

does it find that first

well I don't know too much about Rastafarianism

it was founded by

Marcus Garvey

and had this notion of return to Africa

you know syncretism

is always with us

Gnosticism was characterized by syncretism

the whole late Hellenic religious efflorescence

was largely syncretic

and certainly that's what we have now

I mean

you know the new age

you go to these fairs

and the people who are talking to the Pleiades

have the booth next to the people who are talking to Zinebel Genubi

and both have world plans from the Sausserian All Fathers

and the two plans are different

and you just

you know

Gnosticism is alive and well

in the halls of academia

I mean

you've got guys like Marvin Minsky

and Hasmore

which you want to download

human brain

into a computer

to you know

kind of come pure information

so if that's not released from people matter

good information

I don't know what it is

No I agree

there are two sentiments loose in the world

and you're going to not get through this life

without taking sides

you know

do you believe that our destiny is in another dimension

made of light

on the other side of the universe

or do you believe that we should

you know

clean up the rainforests

and save the planet

you want to be very careful

with your political agenda

one of my

sub-interests

which sort of has a relationship to this

but it's oblique

is

Asteroidal impacts

I think

Asteroidal impacts

are one of the great

undiscussed

factors

in evolution

that

every

solid body

in the solar system

is heavily

cratered

with impacts

by infalling bodies

there's this thing

down in Arizona

that only happened

50,000 years ago

it was a piss-ant sized object

and everything

within 800 miles

of the impact point

died instantly

it dug a whole

half a mile

into the ground

it was a nothing burger

this thing which came down

65 million years ago

they now think

on the Yucatan

it killed

everything on the earth

larger than a chicken

died

you know

I mean you want to talk about

ecotastrophe

I mean we have never

you can't even conceive

of what it's like

when something like that

happens to a planet

they estimate that

at the velocity

this thing must have been

traveling

it was 5 miles

into the planet

in the first

second and a half

it raised a wall

of rocks

6,000 feet high

that moved outward

at Mach 7

I mean

yeah

and the planet

rang for a million years

you know

and it was

but if it hadn't been

for that

there would be

no flowering plants

no triumph

of the mammals

no Whitney Houston

no

sperm entering egg

well

but suppose

you know

there's all this

tumult in our psyche

about

the great change

that's supposed to happen

and where are we supposed

to put our political energies

and what are we supposed

to be doing

well it would be

pretty ironic

if we

you know

beat ourselves over the head

and save the rain forest

and all this malarkey

and then

this something

came down

and just turned

the whole thing

into hash

then people would say

my god

how could we have been

so stupid

we should have been

extracting

and sequestering

U-235

and plutonium

we should have been

building starships

the size of Montana

we should have been

sparing no effort

and what did we do

we replanted rainforests

and now look

the whole thing

so you have to

you know

good intentions

are not sufficient

you have to locate

where the threat

is coming from

and act accordingly

there are no points

for good intentions

in the game of evolution

so mind

and we have to decide

you know

what does life want

is it

that life

at its most basic level

senses

the finite

duration

of the stars life

and so

it wants

to use

this moment

of sunshine

to build

something

that could carry us

out into the

mainstream

of the galaxy

to the denser

star fields

or

you know

is that some kind

of titanic

Apollonian

male dominated

techno-fascist

materialist trip

and what we need

to do

is cultivate

gentleness

and attention

to the bugs

and the grasses

and the water

I don't

have an answer to that

I think it's a real dilemma

I think people who think

they do have answers

haven't

really

connected with

how ambiguous

the situation

really is

how can you do both

what says the mushroom

well

no

some people can do

well what the mushroom says

is it's it's a total

apocalyptarian

I mean it says

rouse your camels

pack your tents

we're moving out

this has been fine for a while

but ahead lie worlds

of unimaginable challenge

at great distance

but of course the

the mushroom sounds like

a techno-fascist

hortatory

male dominator

when it talks like that

you take ayahuasca

and it says

clean up the rivers

care for the children

replant the forest

well

but then you have to look

at the mushroom

possibly being the

universal traveler

that it is

it has that urge

it's got the wanderlust

so it's of course

it's going to be accomplished

that's right it has

nomadic ethics

so it pushes

nomadic solutions

where the ayahuasca

an enormous jungle plant

a flowering plant

a creature born out of

the last catastrophe

just like we are

has a different

uh

agenda

no

the demons are of many

kinds

some are made of ions

some of mind

the ones of DMT

you'll find

stutter often

and are blind

means you know

just because

somebody

uh

just because

somebody once said

of channeling

just because somebody's

dead doesn't mean

they're smart

so

it could be

you know

everybody has their own

uh

agenda

well why don't we break

yeah

question

last question

speaking of

physiological threats

are you aware of

Fred Miles

work

on the steady state

or something

oh yeah

mm-hmm

the panspermia theory

yeah

and

and again

they argue strongly

for high tech

even the age

might have come out

of court

detract

yeah

and again

they argue strongly

but it may actually have come out of space.

And Hoyle has an impressive array of statistics

that link planetary presence in near orbit to viral disease.

Yeah, well I think that the next revolution in biology

is so obvious that you can be totally radical

and completely confident you're on safe ground

and say the next great revolution in biology is the realization that space is not a barrier to life

and that technology is only one method for traversing between the stars.

If in fact planets are regularly pulverized by cosmic catastrophes

then they must be like bursting seed pods

and everything is subjected to a tremendous evolutionary hammering

but spores, viruses, stuff like that, particulate matter

it just drifts out between the stars

and then when it finds another suitable environment it breaks out.

We don't know what the constraints on life are.

You know the oceans of Europa could harbor life.

You know these hot vent, sulfur vent organisms that we find in the deep oceans here

they could survive in the oceans of Europa

if there were hot sulfur vents at the bottom of those oceans

those organisms wouldn't bat an eye.

You know ice covered?

Europa is covered with ice

but underneath the ice is water

and there are fractures

and you know the exotic chemistries

and pressures and temperatures of the Jovian environment

could produce life.

We don't know what the constraints are

if cometary environments are a better place for life to arise

than a warm pond on a newly condensed planet

then all bets are off as to what, you know

planetary surfaces may be unlikely places for life to get going.

It's hard to say.

Who's to say there are gaseous creatures on gaseous planets?

That's right.

We don't know.

You could have life at temperatures and pressures

where we couldn't exist for a microsecond

like at the bottom of the Jovian atmosphere

something like that.

No, there's more mystery than anything else.

Okay, the notion here is

I've always felt that the psychedelic experience should be good for something

in a very practical sense

and I always felt that there was something

that wanted, that you should be able to learn

that was very hard to bring out

and we talked a little bit yesterday

about this strange episode that happened in the Amazon

where instead of an ordinary trip

it was locked in for weeks and weeks

and then people differed as to whether it was a transformative incident

or a psychosis or what exactly it was

and but what happened was

or what I think wants to happen in every psychedelic experience

is that there is a totality symbol

you know, Jung tried to get his patients to make mandalas

because he said they were totality symbols

well eventually the totality symbol is more than a symbol

it actually becomes a true map of the totality

and what this boils down to is a kind of very strange revelation

about the nature of the I Ching

that takes very seriously the idea that the I Ching is a tool for studying time

but then takes the idea much further

it's hard to give this lecture

it's hard to listen to this lecture

because the learning curve is steep

and you just have to stick with it for a while

and then there will be pay dirt

but it's you have to bear with me

and I had to bear with the entity

which was revealing this stuff to me

because it took the form of a

are you all familiar with the idea of a koan?

this is something that your guru

a little saying or something that your guru gives you

that if you can figure it out

then you move on to the next stage

well, so the koan that I was presented with

had to do with the I Ching

which I was not that passionately fascinated by

I was just sort of mildly interested in it

like a lot of other freaks

and I was not at all mathematically inclined

I mean that I am the author of a theory of pure mathematics

is as astonishing to me as it is to anybody else I'm sure

basically as you know but let me review it

the I Ching is a Chinese system of divination

that uses 64 structures called hexagrams

and hexagrams are made of broken and unbroken lines

stacked one above another

and they are the sum set

sum total of the possible set of such structures is 64

and it's been remarked by a number of people

that the I Ching has peculiar structural affinities with the DNA

but nobody has ever really known what to make of that

well this dialogue with this mushroom entity

began by posing a very simple question

which is as you know most of you

the I Ching hexagrams occur in a sequence

which is called the King Wen sequence

which is very old

in fact portions of the King Wen sequence

are scratched on shoulder scapula

that are 3500 years old

it's possible to argue that the King Wen sequence of the I Ching

is the oldest abstract sequence in the world

the world the question is or what the koan was

was is the King Wen sequence a sequence

or is it simply a jumble of hexagrams that over time

has become traditionally sanctioned as the sequence

in other words if it's a sequence you should be able to write the rules

that generate that hex that sequence and no other

so let me dig into this here

the first hexagram

can you see this colored chalk we have two other choices

we have an orange and blue

here we'll do a visual test

oh

is this the stuff

ok

why is this so half acid as they say

so here's the first hexagram

it's called the creative

and it's made of six lines

this is no news to anybody I hope

here's the second hexagram

it's called the receptive

the yellow

ok let me do these this way and then I'll switch

so when I started looking at this question of the order in the I Ching

the first thing I saw it only took me about ten minutes

of just looking at it

and I noticed and I'm not the first person to have noticed this

that it isn't 64 hexagrams

it's 32 pairs of hexagrams

and the second member of each pair is formed by turning the first hexagrams

by turning the first member upside down

do you see

so that only took ten minutes

that was no problem

now

there are eight cases in the I Ching where inverting the first hexagram causes no change

because of the nature of its structure

you meet the first case here

obviously if you turn this thing upside down

it's still six unbroken lines

so in the eight cases where inverting a hexagram causes no change

a second rule is generated

the second rule is

if inverting the first hexagram causes no change

then all lines change

very straightforward right

but now

the problem

the koan has changed

and the question is what are the ordering what rules order the 32 pairs

and this was much trickier

much trickier

and

after a while the prompting voice said

look at the first order of difference

this is just a fancy way of saying

count how many lines change as you go from one hexagram to another

if you go from this hexagram to this hexagram how many lines change

six

so the first order of difference is six between these two hexagrams

similarly we can go from two to three

and there will be another first order of difference

now logic should tell you that the values of the first order of difference

are going to be whole numbers one through six right

what I did was I went through the I Ching and actually checked on these

and I discovered it again immediately what jumped out at me was there were no fives

so we wrote computer programs to randomly arrange hexagrams and check for fives

and we discovered fives are as common as any other number

the exclusion of fives in the King Wen sequence was a human decision

someone didn't want fives to show up in the first order of difference

ok

so then I

looked at these values and what I discovered was

when you inside the pairs

when you invert one to get the other

the first order of difference is always an even number

so within the pairs you have no freedom

it's going to be an even number

between the pairs

you can arrange them so that you get odd numbers or even numbers

and what I discovered was between the pairs

half are odd and half are even

again human agency did this

we wrote computer programs to randomly throw hexagram sequences and test

for this quality and we found that only one in every 7,500 times

could you expect to get a sequence which would be 25% odd 75% even

which is what this enforces

so I was very excited by this because I said wow there's all this hidden stuff

in the I Ching that I've never

why is this thing inching up on me

this thing?

ok

so I thought how weird that all this structure is in there

and I'd read all of Wilhelm's commentaries and

Lama Govinda and these people

and it didn't seem that they had noticed this kind of stuff

so I was very excited I thought that I was really on to something

and I made a graph of the first order of difference

and it looks something like this

of course it has 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 on this axis

blue

and 1, 2, 3, 4 to 64 this way

because there are 64 hexagrams

and then I drew the first order of difference

now notice remember this was 6

so up here we put a point

and the next one is something else

and then we connect the points

and what you get is the structure

which looks like this roughly

in other words it looks stochastic

it looks random

it doesn't look like you're on the track of any kind of order here

except that I noticed a really funny thing about this

what I noticed was that this section

and this section are mirror images of each other

so imagine for a moment that you have a copy of this right here

what you're then able to do is rotate the copy 180 degrees within the plane

and you'll discover that it fits perfectly in here

it dovetails at the beginning and at the end

but nowhere in between

this is again a product of human decision

someone made it so that it would do this

and the question is why

why would anyone want to do that

and when it works you have hexagram 1

across from hexagram 63

and hexagram 2 across from 62

in other words these always sum to 64

when it's in the right position

so I just thought that I was uncovering some kind of

like

you know the equivalent of Chinese Kabbalism

some kind of lost intellectual system

and

but the voice said to me

it said this is a picture of time

and I couldn't understand what exactly was meant by that

it seemed to me a fairly esoteric thing to assert

that it was a picture of time

now remember there are 64 hexagrams in the I Ching

and they have six lines each

six times 64 is 384

when it told me that this was a picture of time

I began to entertain the idea that this was somehow could be used as a calendar

so then I said well what it is is it's the whole I Ching running one way

and the whole I Ching running backwards the other way

combined into this peculiar structure

which has 384 data points in it

which are the lines or so called Yao of the I Ching

now 384 is 19 days longer than the solar year length

so if you had a calendar of 384 days it would precess against the equinoxes 19 days every year

so it doesn't seem a good candidate for a calendar if you're trying to keep solar dynamics central

but I discovered something weird about this number 384 days

now think of it as days

and that is that peculiar things happen when you multiply this number by numbers that are inherent to the structure of the I Ching

when you multiply this number by 64 you get a day number which when you break it down into years is 67 years 104.25 days

now what's interesting about that number is that it is six sunspot cycles of 11 plus years

there's also a major sunspot cycle of 33 years

so it meant each line in a super hexagram made by multiplying this number

will be associated with one sunspot cycle

and the trigrams inside the hexagram will be associated with the major sunspot cycle

well when you take 67 years 104.25 days

again by 64 you get 4306 years plus some days

this number is very close to twice the amount of time that it takes for a zodiacal era

such as the age of Pisces or the age of Aquarius

they last roughly this long

well if you take this number by 6 not 64 but 6 which is a legitimate number because it's built into the I Ching

you get 25,000 years roughly

this is the procession of the great year or the equinoctial year as it's called

so I thought wow this is really far out

it's some kind of multi-leveled resonance calendar

oh and I forgot to say about 384 days

this was central excuse me

that this is 13 lunations

a lunation is 25 is 29 point something days

and when you multiply that number by 13 you get 383.89

so I said aha what this thing is is it keeps track of the moon on this level

it keeps track of the sunspots on this level

and it keeps track of the great year of the zodiac on this level

all naked eye astronomical phenomenon

not hypothesizing any advanced technology

but hypothesizing an advanced intellectual point of view

well so I thought I was finished

and that somehow it wanted to tell me about a Neolithic calendar in ancient China for some reason

but there was more

Popeye had spinach

I have this

the prompting voice said

this structure which you have created

and by the way some of you who are scholars of the I Ching

remember in the second half of the Wilhelm Bains translation

there are a whole bunch of very ancient sayings

that nobody knows what they're talking about

they're so esoteric

and the most mysterious of these sayings

is the saying which says

the forward running numbers refer to the future

the backward running numbers refer to the past

well in the I Ching there are no forward or backward running numbers

unless you do something like this

and then look what you get

1, 2, 3, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59

you get forward and backward running numbers

so I said wow

you know we're digging this thing out

the I Ching is not an oracle

as it's been done at country fairs

for three millennia

the I Ching as we possess it

is a piece of broken machinery

it's as though you had you know

the main gear out of a machine

and you're trying by archaeological reconstruction

to rebuild that machine

so I was sort of stuck at this point

and the prompting voice turned on

and said this structure which you've made

which is the entire I Ching

running forward and backward against itself

which would place it then at the top

of a hierarchy

should be placed at the bottom

of a hierarchy

treat this thing as a single line

it said

and I was calling this at that point

the simple wave

it said treat the simple wave

as a line in a hexagram

well when you do that

bear with me folks

remember I said the learning curve

was steep

however it's not long

oh yeah

what color

yellow

let me see

okay

well so if we treat this module

as the bottom of a hierarchy

then we want to treat it

treat it like a line

so what do you do with lines in I Ching land

you stack six of them on top of each other

so I'm going to symbolize this thing

with an S

okay

so here's what I did

I took one of them

and another one

and I said

did I do good

and it said sort of

but a hexagram is more than six lines isn't it

and I said well what more is it than six lines

and said well it's two trigrams

said oh okay

so then I went like this

do you see how I superimposed the thing over the six

two larger ones which were superimposed over three

so then I said

it's alright

it said yes except you forgot one thing

a hexagram has an identity as a whole

as a hexagram

said okay

good

it said yes good

what are you going to do with it

and I'll show this to you

just so you can get

the idea

I don't know how visible this will be

this is what

you get if you do that

and what it looks like

is exactly what it looks like

which is a hodgepodge

of crazy lines running everywhere

on three levels

and the

the thing said to me

it said this is a map of time

and I

when I made the mistake

of saying to my friends and acquaintances

this is a map of time

and they said

you know we're very concerned

apparently

you didn't get better

even though you claimed you got better

and now you know you run around

showing this thing to people

and notice it

everything is in closure up here

and then everything attains closure

down here

and then there are sub closures

six on one level

two on another

and the final one on this one

and finally my friend

Ralph Abraham

took pity on me

and he said the problem with this thing

is that it's an occult dogma

nobody can understand this thing

except you

you are necessary for its interpretation

and I said

so what am I

what do I do

and he said you must learn

how to change this

into a more orthodox mathematical object

that

mathematicians can then discuss with you

and I was completely stuck

and I sat with it

for two years

because it just seemed

I'm not a mathematician

I had no clue

as to how to do that

and finally one afternoon

the pot was good enough

or the stars moved into position

or something

and in a single instant

I saw how to carry out

the mathematical reduction

of this wave

and I did it

on this

well if you look at it closely

you'll see that

because they are at different scales

it isn't that

one side is exactly like

the other side

there are dissimilarities

so I finally figured out

how to

mathematize

and conserve

all the qualities of that wave

and I put it into

an ordinary Cartesian object

which I doubt you can see

but you don't really have to see it anyway

all this is

see what that is

it's just a one level

it's an ordinary graph of some sort

huh

it's the sum of certain qualities

there was skew

parallelism

angle of approach

crossover

there were about five things

that I felt were important

and I figured out how to

mathematize them all

so that this

which is an ordinary Cartesian graph

is in fact

a topological equivalent

of my occult diagram

and

yeah

right

uh huh

so then

uh

and then I started saying to people

this is a map of time

and they said

is it

haha

well where are we

haha

and I said

well

um

we

uh

hmm

in order to know where we are

we would have to know where the end point is

if you have a wave you have a wavelength

so we have to find the end point

so then I began

collecting historical data

and

fitting

curves

to it

trying to define the end point

now remember yesterday

at the close of the day or in the afternoon

we got off on what appeared to some people to be

a tangent about

novelty and science

and time

and whether

it was

uh

whether

it should be viewed as a flat plane

or a fractal

or something like that

well

what the thing was telling me was

that novelty

is

uh

something which can be charted in time

and that these waves

were actually pictures

of

uh

of

um

the ebb and flow of novelty

that this wasn't charting stock prices

or population rise

or

average temperatures

it was charting

the ebb and flow of novelty

through time

and that

como

novelty

is

uh

how about density of connection

as opposed

you know if complexity can be

quantified then you say

complexity ebbs and flows

i mean if we had a device

which measured complexity

and we measured this point right here

as opposed to this point an inch behind my finger

i'm hoping it would tell us that an inch behind my finger is a more complex environment than this point right here

so space and time

is

then

seen to be

a medium

with

uh

density

uh

densification of complexity

embedded in it like raisins

or something

yeah

where are the under-established origin things

well

until you scale it against time

you don't have to

i mean i think

you did scale it on this graph

i don't have to

well i think what you're

i think if i understand your question right

remember how i said that over here it was at closure

it goes like this

and that's both lines

they're running

that's both sides of the graph

they're perfectly superimposed over each other

At this point they cease to be superimposed

One goes that way and one goes that way and then you start getting this kind of stuff

And then when you come down to the end they fall into closure again

Yes, it's a thing of fate exactly you got it, okay

Well to this point we haven't discussed this thing scaled against calendrical time

We're just trying to look at it as a mathematical object

then what I realized was

If these are part if this thing has 384 points in it and this has

six

Then the what the thing was telling me was you have to map the you have to map the wave back over itself

So you take all 384 points and you cram them into this space

wandering up this hill

Then you go to this space and you cram all 384 points in here and you create a fractal infinite regress

Do you understand?

Say you understand

You will understand

Okay, so then that was the time that was the time map it was saying novelty can be described

By an infinite fractal regress that is contained in the I Ching

Now the main objection that I was meeting from people who wanted to lock me up was they were saying now let's get this straight

You want to revise you want to revise modern physics based on a pattern which you found in an ancient Chinese book of divination is that correct and I could feel the force of that criticism because that's how I think

You know where somebody from some nut piece of data then wants to build castles in the air

And so I created a metaphor which is satisfying to me

I hope it's satisfying to somebody else

Trying to explain why we should seek a law of physics inside the structure of the I Ching

And here's the metaphor

Think of sand dunes

Picture them in your mind

Since this is the new age you may even close your eyes if it helps

Picture sand dunes

Now notice that sand dunes look like wind

Sand dunes look like wind

And sand dunes are made by wind

So now let's analyze the situation

Let's think of wind as input

And let's think of sand grains as bits inside a computer

So when the wind blows the program runs and the bits rearrange themselves

And they arrange themselves into a lower dimensional slice of wind

Essentially wind which is a pressure variant phenomenon variable in time

turns into a pictorial phenomenon variant across the pictorial surface

Do you see how that works?

Well, now, sand dunes created by wind

Deposited by wind bear the impression of wind

Lines of foam and beach detritus

Deposited by the incoming tide

Bear the form of waves

So what it was telling me was

It was telling me that

Things formed in time

Bear the impression of the forces which created them

And I said well then what is the equivalent of sand dunes

Or waves of beach detritus in the real world

And it said human beings

Genes

Not grains of sand

Genes are moved by time

And we as hyperdimensional objects

We human beings and other animals

We bear the impression of the forces that created us

And if novelty truly does ebb and flow

The way wind speed ebbs and flows over a landscape

Then the creatures that have arisen in time

And the creatures that have arisen in time

Will bear the imprint of this ebb and flow

And I believe that what was going on

With the people who created the I Ching

Was that they were practicing some kind of yoga

Or some kind of psychedelic plus yoga thing

And they were stilling their macro physical functions

And they were descending deep into organism

And there they were seeing the ebb and flow of variables

Of some sort

And they watched

Who knows how long?

Centuries maybe

And they said you know

In the organism there is the ebb and flow of variables

And then they asked questions like

How many variables are there?

Are there an infinite number?

And they began to create notation systems

For these variables

And finally they came to the conclusion

No, there are not an infinite number

There are 64 of these temporal variables

And think of them as elements

In the same way that the entire world

Of physical manifestation

Can be created out of 104 physical elements

The entire world of temporal manifestation

Can be created out of 64 elements

And so the way I think of reality

Having survived this experience

Is you have hexagrams moving on many levels

Let's say you have a hexagram

Which rules this 10,000 year period

For 10,000 years this hexagram will rule

And then on the next level

The hexagrams are changing every 100 years

And then on the next level every 10 minutes

And on the next level every 15 seconds

Well what any point in the matrix called now

Is is the perspective you have

When you look through the moving film

Of these temporal elements moving on many many levels

You see

They create a unique juxtaposition

With each other in every single moment

And that is what the unique felt presence

Of immediate reality is all about

Well I by this time

Yeah question

No

So you are saying that

That becomes a membrane

Of a huge

The wide membrane

Between the two realities

What?

That position

Where they all come together

Like that's the place

Where you can access both

See I look at that

And always look at the symbol

The teaching symbol

As the guiding symbol

Of this plane of reality

Found by God

So you are talking about

The exact membrane

That is between

Time and yon time

Is that true?

Yeah pretty much

I mean you know

Plato said

Time is the moving image of eternity

It's a wave front

And it's an interference pattern

Yes it's a

It's a

Kind of hologram

And a set of resonances

And interference patterns

That are created

When these waves

Moving at many levels

Of expression

Superimpose

And collide

With each other

And through

The use of small computers

We can explore

Various places

In the wave

And we can position it

Against time

Because what it's saying

Is that novelty

Comes and goes

You know

Yesterday was wonderful

Tomorrow could be dog shit

Same for last year

And next year

Time

Undergoes changes

On many scales

I mean

From moment to moment

If you watch your mind

You're

You're going up

You're going down

And then on the daily scale

Up

Down

Yearly scale

And then on all scales

There is ebb and flow

Of novelty

And all these scales

Can be mathematically

Collapsed into one wave

And then with the computer

You can

Not only predict the future

Which is fairly trivial

Because who can gainsay it

But you can also predict the past

Which is very tricky

Because most people have a good deal more information

About the past

Than they do about the future

Yeah

Is there an infinite level

One year you may have

A larger scale

Going up

But

That's right

Well no

You've got the whole concept correct

Except you don't need an infinite number

Because

Look what happens

If you start with 384 days

And you start multiplying upward

By 64

Remember I said the first one was 67 years

Well you only have to carry out about 6 of these

Till you have 72 billion years

More time than is necessary

For the universe to have birthed itself

And reached its present state

Similarly

If you start dividing

You only have to divide 11 times

To reach the realm of Planck's constant

6.55 times 10 to the minus 23rd erg seconds

In technical parlance known as a jiffy

Beyond the jiffy

There is no need to continue the divisions

Because the jiffy defines the grain of the canvas

On which reality is projected

So what we have are

You know

A cosmology of roughly 22 levels

At the highest level it's 72 billion years

At the lowest level

It's in the realm of Planck's constant

And we are somewhere suspended in between

And these things are coming and going

On every level

Yeah

Well the way that you

Arrogate these conclusions

Doesn't

I don't follow it all

To say the least

However

It seems to me

That you'd be able to

Use this model

Do you see some difference in the waveforms

Around the time of

Shadow Hyatt

Compared to the Third Reich

Absolutely

Do you see differences like that?

Yes

I'm hurrying us toward the more fun part of this

And I think that

We'll do it now

What we're going to do now

Is look at the wave

Placed against history

With my end date

December 22nd, 2012

Although

The machine will accept any end date

And the idea that you should be

Asking yourself

Is

You know

This clown claims

That this thing

Describes the ebb and flow of novelty

But does it in fact

Fit

My intuition

Of the ebb and flow of novelty

Now

Here's the good news

The next part of the lecture

Does not depend on anything

That's been said in the first part

You don't have to understand

Anything I've said in the last half hour

To appreciate the neatness

Of the next level

Lucky for us

Eh?

Is there any way to answer that?

Hmm

That's fine I think

So now

Because you know

Some people aren't interested in this

You tell them you can predict the future

And they say

Well predict it

And then you predict it correctly

And then they say

Great

It never enters their mind

To ask the question

How did you predict it?

Which is what I

Out of

Out of obligation

To intellectual fairness

Feel that I should expose you to

Now

Let's look at

The wave

F

Now

Let me explain

The rules of the game

Here

There are

Six billion years

Currently

On screen

Today

Is over here

At 98.8%

This is the last

Six billion years

And

And let me explain to you

How you interpret the wave

And if you want to take a moment

And rearrange yourselves

The rest of it

Is going to be fairly close focus

On this thing

So

Don't be shy

And don't make yourself uncomfortable

How did the history

Ah

The end date

Ah

It

I got it

By fitting historical data

To the wave

And seeing

I had certain intuitions

I mean

For instance

I said

Well if I have a wave

Which describes historical novelty

By God

It better do well

On the Italian Renaissance

It should do well

On the 20th century

And it should do well

On the golden age of Greece

If a theory of novelty

Incorrectly predicts

Those episodes

It's a pretty worthless

Theory of novelty

Once I had chosen

An end date

And I chose

December 22nd

I got a lot of support

For that

By realizing

That the Mayan calendar

Chose the same end date

Now the only thing

I had in common

With the ancient Maya

Is that we both

Take psychedelic mushrooms

Now is it conceivable

That there is a message

In the mushroom

As specific

As no matter where

In space and time

You are

And you take these mushrooms

It says

December 22nd

2012 AD

It appears so

Because the Mayans

Their civilization

Rose and fell

At a very uninteresting part

Of their own

Calendrical machinery

They predicted

The end of the world

A thousand years

After their own eclipse

And they predicted

The birth of their

Calendary

They set the birth

Of their calendar

A thousand years

Preceding the emergence

Of their civilization

Yeah

So

Now this year

Is this

What the Mayan

Has as a

Completion

Of a large cycle

Or is this

What they are

Believing is

The completion

Of all

Their cycles

It depends

On who you talk

To

The Mayan calendar

Is built up

Of nested cycles

Some

20 years

In length

Some 240

And there are

13 Baktuns

Which I think

A Baktun

Is 396 years

In duration

And most Mayanists

Believe

That

A set

Of 13 Baktuns

Is the complete

Calendrical set

There's a minority

Of Mayanists

Who want to argue

That there are

Greater cycles

Than that

In any case

Baktun 13

Will come to an end

December 22nd

So

You know

It was good enough

For me

Now

Could you say

Just a little bit more

About the property

Of novelty

Is it synonymous

With complexity

Well

You know

If

Since this is a

Push-pull theory

And we have

Novelty versus

Something

The opposite

Of novelty

Is habit

Rupert

Insisted on that

I was calling it

Entropy

And

Conservatism

And

Recidivism

And he said

No, no

It's a war

Between habit

And novelty

Habit means

A reversion

To a traditional

And already established

Pattern

Novelty means

A breaking out

Into a previous

Domain

Untested domain

Of new

Connections

And

And new

Possibilities

As in

You mean

As in

Yes

The unexpected

Is built

Into it

Because when you

Come around

Some of these curves

There are unexpected

Things going on

What about the chaos

Order

Sounds like that

Yeah, well you could think

Of it that way

I haven't completely

Resolved

How novelty

Should be

Defined

Because if you know

Anything about information

Theory

You know that they've had

A hell of a time

Getting a definition

Of complexity

Together over there

They also are interested

In mathematical

Definitions of complexity

But they haven't

Made too much progress

This concludes

Tape 6

Our program

Continues

With Tape 7

Our program

Continues

With Tape 7

Let me

Explain to you

How to read

The graph

Because it's

The exact opposite

Psychologically

Of a

Stock market graph

I think

When you look

At a stock market

Most of us

Want it to go up

Not down

In this game

We want it

To go down

The

Higher

Novelty

Occur as you

Approach 0

So

This is the most

Novel point

On the screen

This is the most

Habit

Impacted

Moment

On the screen

And what you see

Is habit and novelty

Are at war

With each other

Now

Here's how

I interpret

This particular screen

And it

Is a basis

For interpreting

All the rest

This is a turning point

After a long period

Of habit

Consolidation

And recidivism

Whatever that means

At 4.7 billion years ago

Something very novel

Happened

Along this descent

I maintain

That it's actually

The stabilization

Of the surface

Of the earth

Itself

That what we're seeing

Here

Is the earth

Changing into

A stable planetary body

And then

The earliest forms

Of life

The proto-life

Appears

Right here

And

Undergoes

A series

Then

Of fluctuations

Then

There is

Some kind of

A problem

Some impediment

To

What would otherwise

Be the rather

Straight shot

Toward novelty

By this

Spike

Here

Well

Evolutionary biologists

Say

That in the early

History of the earth

There was a crisis

Having to do

With the production

Of oxygen

As a waste gas

Life arose

In a non-reducing

Atmosphere

The first

Pollution crisis

In the history

Complex membranes

And mechanisms

For dealing

With this

And that's

What happened

Along here

And

Once that

Was achieved

Then

The pace

Of novelty

Quickened

And the descent

Continued

And we

Our entire

Civilization

In fact

You know

The last

Billion years

As a matter of fact

Is lost

Down here

In this stochastic

Fluctuation

Near the zero point

Of course

Relative

To these places

In the wave

We're so near

The maximum

Of novelty

That it's practically

Punching in

Through the walls

And in fact

Human civilization

Correctly mirrors

That

I mean

Where you would expect

To find a civilization

On this graph

Is somewhere

Down in here

Well now

If everything

Is working right

Are you at the 98.8%?

Ninety

That's

Yeah

98.8%

The target

Date of today

The target

Date of today

Now

What I'm going to do

Is

There's a zoom

Function here

And we're going to start

Flying toward the present

And every time a screen

Changes

We're going to see

Half as much time

On the screen

We have six billion years up

We'll go to three

Then one and a half

Then point seven five

And so forth

This seems to be

An excellent computer

With a fast chip

So

Let me see

The right hand

Yeah

And we're going to

And we're going to get

Greater and greater detail

And

Your attitude toward this

Should be

I'm asserting

That this is true

You have a notion

Of where the high points

In evolutionary

And human history

Have occurred

You should be asking yourself

Whether this fits

Your intuition

Now obviously

It's pretty vague stuff

When we're looking

At six billion years

But on the other hand

We can take this thing

Down to three days

If necessary

And

We know

Where the great changes

Have come

In the last thousand years

It's not that ambiguous

So let's

Test the zoom function

Zoom

It asks me

Yes

I reply

Seek minimum

It asks me

No

I reply

Approach factor

It asks me

And I'm going to tell it

Two

In order to have

The screen each time

It would accept

Any number

But two

Seems rational

For demonstration purposes

No

It's going to slice

The time

It's going to slice it

Each time

And rescale

I'm just coming up

With minute and hour and day

So is the origin of time here

Also like the origin of the universe

You would presume so

So the big bang

Would kind of

The big bang would be

No

The big bang would be

Very high

Because

There's no life

There's no atomic systems

No

There's no molecules

It's a very low complexity

Situation

At the birth of the universe

That's not the graph

Yeah

No

Yes

That's right

Here

Up here

Okay

Now before I do this

Let me locate escape

Okay

This is such a pleasure

To do it

With fast machines

Okay

There's three billion

See how detail

Is coming up

As time is lost

And if anybody wants me to stop it

At any point

I will

Just read off what it is

Stop it here

Here's 750 million years

This is virtually the entire history

Of life on earth

And in fact

Of higher life

I'm sorry

You know

Organisms

Not

Multicellular life

This is the history

Of multicellular life

And what you see

Is there was a steep descent

Into novelty

Until about

300 million years ago

And then there

Are a series of oscillations

Close to zero

Until

About 65 million years ago

And then there's a sudden plunge

Deeper

Into novelty

Immediately preceding

The concrescence

Which occurs

At dawn

Greenwich mean time

December 22nd

One thing about

This theory

It's not vague

And notice

That it doesn't hedge

On predictions

Either

It fills

Every screen

Full of predictions

Two

Approach factor

Yeah

Okay

We've got

750 million years

On the screen

375 million years

On the screen

Now I want to talk

About this

For a minute

Now this

Is a screen

Full of dramatic predictions

These are

Tremendously

Punctuated

And temporally

Defined

Plunges

Into novelty

And

We don't have

Tremendous

Paleontological

Records

For what's going on

275 million years ago

But from

Studying

These low points

And

Talking to

Geochronologists

About them

I've decided

That

These are

Planetesimal

Impacts

On the earth

Now you know

That the last one

Was 65 million years ago

That's this one

Right there

But there were others

There was one

This one

220 million years ago

Can you define

Oh

Asteroid strikes

On the earth

Oh

Well there was

A little tiny one

In Arizona

Those happen

All the time

In cosmic terms

Every

Hundred thousand years

Or so

But this thing

That happened 65 million years ago

Was a planet shatterer

And

They're rare

Okay

So

So I'm suggesting

That these

Are asteroid impacts

Which then

Evolution

Has to restart

Reclaim its territory

And then

There is something else

Happening

That could not all be

Asteroid impact

They could be

You know

Enormous episodes

Of volcanism

On the earth

Such as the Deccan traps

In India

Or something like that

Now let's start

The thing again

And that was how many

What we're looking at now

Seek minimum

No

Approach factor

Two

Go for it

That's 187 million years

There's the impact

65 million years ago

Now let's look at this

This is the last 93 million years

Ah yes

It looks like the thing

We started out with

Somebody's paying attention

Right on

Yes

See what happens is

A fractal is a nested data set

And every time you pass through

A whole number

The pattern repeats

This sets up a very interesting

Um

Set of circumstances

Inside the wave

Which is that

We can talk about

Temporal resonance

We can talk about

How the Third Reich

Is a resonance

Of ancient Egypt

We can talk about

Saddam Hussein

As a resonance

Of Muhammad

Because

When we look at the way

These things are lined up

Historically

We see that

Directly above

Saddam Hussein

And in a

Relationship of

Parallelism

Is the career

Of the Prophet

And so

What is being suggested here

Is that

Every day

Every moment

Is in fact

An interference pattern

Created by

Other times

And places

This is not

This is a fairly challenging

And peculiar idea

Not

Something the linear

Western mind

Would have ever come up with

So for instance

If you should find yourself

Having lunch

In a place called

Hadrian's Hamburger Stand

This has something

To do

With the Emperor Hadrian

And his four year military campaign

In Scotland

Is a direct causal influence

On your being

At Hadrian's Hamburger Stand

For lunch

I like to say

Rome falls

Nine times an hour

And you have to be

Perceptive

You have to be paying attention

To the ebb and flow

Of your own inner thoughts

But if you are

You feel

The fall of Rome

You also feel

The age of exploration

Of the birth of Buddha

The fall of Carthage

It all happens

Nine times an hour

It also happens

Twice a day

And once a year

Yeah

Sometimes

Yeah

It is very similar

That's right

With astrologers

Where the

scientific positions

were

Yeah

There's

We've never tried

To do it

Scientifically

You know

Where you would actually

Keep track

But

Major

Astrological

Conjunctions

Are often

Interacted

In major

Ingressions

Into novelty

Terence

Interestingly

Have you

Or anyone

Else

That's

Aware of this

Ever tried to

Convolve

With the

Einstein

Spiel equation

No

Because

I'm not smart

Enough

To do that

And what it would

Produce

Would be

Fascinating

I think God

Has chosen you

For this work

Your father

About Saddam Hussein

Just makes me ask

What are the

historical

Hennesses

Oh, well Ronald Reagan, his historical antecedents were the last six Roman emperors before the

fall of Rome in 475. And Bush's antecedent is... No, I think Bush gets to be Justinian.

You remember somebody said history always occurs twice, first as tragedy, then as farce. That person had a good intuitive...

So now, let's go into this a little more. How much time do we have? Oh, 93 million years. Okay, so here's the...

Here's the asteroid impact and dead on, I mean 65 million years is right there to the degree that we can date these two events.

It's a winner. It's a bullseye. And you know, it was a huge setback for organic life.

As I said this morning, nothing larger than a chicken survived it. The mammals began their radiation.

And these are, you know, just different vicissitudes. I'm not sure what to make of this spike here,

but I haven't really spent a lot of time on that period from 40 to 36 million years ago.

Somebody else may have a notion as to what this represents.

Which it was. Evolutionary biologists say, you know, that forms quickly reoccupied all the niches.

And remember, if this hadn't happened, we wouldn't be the planetary rulers that we are.

We'd still be little furry creatures trying to steal eggs out of the nests of the saurian masters who ruled the planet.

Why? Because all the dinosaurs were killed in this impact.

And that allowed these little egg-stealing rodent-like furry creatures to undergo an explosive evolutionary radiation

leading directly to our own vast superiority over the rest of nature.

Yeah? Yeah? No? Yeah?

Oh, that's a whole different scale. You see, the dinosaurs died off 65 million years ago.

The ice ages are a phenomenon of the last 5 million years.

And we'll see the ice ages, but not there. Right now, those ice ages are down in here.

Somewhere lost in the detail. Let's go back to our Zoom.

We'll get there, won't we? Oh yeah, we'll get there.

I'm waiting for you to get to my writing slot.

Don't worry. No, we don't want to seek the minimum. The approach factor should be 2.

Okay, 93 million years on the screen. 46 million years on the screen.

23 million, 11 million, 5 million. 5 million years on the screen.

Now, here are your ice ages. Here they are. You see, when the ice is in place, species are bottled up and gene transfer is impeded.

This constitutes a non-novel situation. Then when the ice melts, these gene pools re-encounter each other and you get proliferation of form.

We're getting excellent agreement here. This is the melting of the last glacier. Maybe.

The last glacier was about 13,000 years ago. Yeah, I think it's actually over here. Still lost in detail.

But these are, you know how evolution is described as punctuated. How it isn't that evolution proceeds smoothly,

but there will be a climaxed stasis and then suddenly many new species.

Well, these are the punctuated evolution. This is actually a picture of punctuated evolution.

And the high numbers of species are down in these troughs and the low numbers of species are on these ascents,

close to the changeover points. So, again, the paleontological data isn't that clear.

But at this scale of resolution, we're getting good agreement between data and theory.

Are these different nests identical in both amplitude and phase? Do you know, Prince?

I mean, maybe it does. In other words, can you take the section that you're looking at,

superimpose it over this other nest and you can have it overlay identically or the phase shifts?

Well, they are topologically equivalent, but not numerically equivalent.

Right, amplitude is going to be different. The whole wave is actually regenerated.

That's right. It's a damped oscillation is really what we're seeing.

I just wondered if there's any other phase shifts because that's one of the things that an FFT could...

I mean, this is an ideal wave for an FFT and it's relatively easy to do.

Yeah, well, I hope you'll be on it by Monday afternoon.

Okay, let me restart the zoom. No, I'm restarting the zoom. Zoom, yeah.

I have a question. Okay.

About magnetic k?

Yes, these could very well be magnetic reversals.

Yeah, they very well could be magnetic reversals.

And...

Well, what we're looking at is I'm suggesting they're ice ages.

It was suggested that they're geomagnetic reversals.

Geomagnetic reversals and ice ages may even have links to each other.

Do we see anything there that might indicate the increase of the human construct range?

Well, we see that over here a steep descent into novelty going deeper than we've ever gone before.

And that would probably indicate that an animal or an organ has appeared of a density of complexity greater than anything which preceded it.

So I would say yes.

How low is that?

Well, let me start the zoom and we'll get over in here on a big scale and then you can see.

Okay, we're going to go from five million down to two million.

Now let's discuss this.

Because this is the domain in which we evolved.

Our story is on screen at this point.

It's said that a hundred thousand years ago at the Colossus Cave river mouth in South Africa there were homo sapiens indistinguishable from the people sitting in this room.

The oldest homo sapiens skeletons are from there.

That's clear over here.

This is the panjida radiation, meaning the proliferation of these primate forms.

And that's about 900 million years ago.

This is the whole period in which the primates were breaking away from the rest of nature.

And this is I think probably where the mushrooms begin to come into the picture.

And see how the whole system is propelled into lower levels of novelty than anything which preceded it.

Higher levels of novelty.

When the wave moves down, novelty is increasing.

Zoom.

Yes.

Minimum.

That's one way of saying it.

Or increased density of connection.

Or it means something happening which has never happened before which allows novelty to build upon itself.

We talked about this a little bit yesterday about how the early universe was very simple and then came ordinary chemistry and then organic chemistry and then life and then complex life and then higher animals and then primitive human beings and then language and culture and then computers and particle accelerators.

And all of this representing steeper and steeper descents into novelty headed toward a confrontation with novelty at infinite density.

Not millennia or millennia in the future, but twenty years from now.

It's not only that something's being created that was never created before, but it's being stored or incarnate in the entire system.

Conserved is the word I use.

But yes, that's right.

And how does this relate to the fact that the last twenty years cycle of the mind calendar ended in June 28th and that we're entering the supposedly last twenty years of the calendar?

Am I correct?

That's right.

Well, when we get to the present, you'll be able to see, you know, the past few months, the next few months, the next few years.

We approach it this way because I want to convince you that there's something sort of woo-woo about this thing.

It does seem to have an uncanny predictive ability.

Now, the most commonly met objection to this, and it may be forming in your mind, is that this guy just doesn't understand patterns and that every pattern can be used to describe a different pattern.

But I resist this because notice that this whole set of correlations is dependent upon this zero date which we inputted.

If we shift the zero date, then all the other predictions would be thrown off.

Well, now, naturally, if we shift the zero date fifty years, it's not going to have a hell of an effect on an event 175 million years ago.

But if we move the date fifty years and we look at 1492, you know, it's all screwed up.

You have to be right on the money when you get into the historical data field because the historical data field can vary over a 24-hour period.

I mean, John F. Kennedy dead, John F. Kennedy alive, the difference is ten minutes.

So it can be very, it can be very highly quantified, specific, yeah.

Okay, enter.

That's two million, roughly three million years on the screen.

One and a half million years on the screen.

Seven hundred thousand.

Let's look at this for a minute.

This is the last million years.

And the last hundred thousand years are right there.

This is the emergence of modern human types.

And it sets off the last cascade, at least at this scale.

So all of this is evolutionary advance and climatological flux and so forth.

And then from the time the modern human type emerges, it's a straight shot down in there.

Now, obviously we all know more about time as we get closer to the present.

This is 366,000 years.

It's a hundred thousand years up there.

There's the last two hundred thousand years.

There's the last hundred thousand years.

This is the environment in which we were shaped.

These are very, these are climatological fluctuations here.

The last, this is the last glaciation.

Oh, I forgot.

It's shipped to the computer.

Sorry.

Is it dying or is it having a good time?

It's an, it's a, it's a, I forgot it does that.

Anyway, it's a very happy computer.

What are you doing this evening?

You can't, when Harry met Sally, remember that orgasm in the restaurant?

Remember the orgasm in the restaurant when Harry met Sally?

Vaguely.

Okay.

This is the last 91,000 years.

The glaciers melt here.

The glacial melt begins around 19,000 years ago.

And as you see, it's just a straight fall from there to the moon flight and to H. Ross Perot and to all the rest of it.

And these are, again, episodes probably of glaciation or flux in the incidents of incoming cosmic radiation.

It's hard to say what it is.

Have you spoken about it in the last three or four days only?

Oh, yeah.

We can go down.

We can take it down to very small.

I mean, understand that the program does many wonderful things which we're not doing.

I'm just doing a simple demo, but obviously all this stuff has got to be about something.

Now we're getting into the area where people have real data.

That's 45,000 years.

22,000 years on the screen.

Let's look at this for a minute.

This is worth talking about.

Now we, now the pressure begins to come on.

It's all very well to predict interglacials that may or may not have occurred.

Predicting assassinations of dynastic families is a little trickier.

Here's the glacial melt begins.

And species, this is the descent, this is where the mushroom paradise existed in its fullest expression.

From about 17,000 years ago to about 10,000 years ago.

Well, now what is this sudden interruption of the descent into novelty here?

I maintain based on the archeological record that it's what is called the Tanged Point Technocomplex.

Do you all know what that is?

Does anybody know what it is?

Tanged Point Technocomplex means that before this point, when an arrowhead is found, you find one.

It means it was lost by somebody who was hunting.

Around 10,000 B.C. you begin to find large numbers of arrowheads all in one place

without chipping fragments.

This was not an arrowhead factory.

This was the site of a battle between human populations.

War is invented here because agriculture is invented here.

You're looking at the end of the partnership paradise.

The era of orgy gives way to the era of anxious monogamy, warfare, agriculture,

you know, ego-hood is born.

Now, somebody asked about, who asked about chatalhyayuk?

Somebody.

Chatalhyayuk, bottom of this stab here.

The fire that burned through chatal level 5A occurred in 6500 B.C.

We know this from charcoal dating.

It's right there.

It's on the money.

See, somehow this whole Tang Point techno-complex bummer was overcome.

And there was a steep descent into novelty.

And chatalhyayuk was the product of that.

But then it was destroyed and there was a rebound into chuckle-headedness for a while.

And then right down here in the bottom of this thing is where the Great Pyramid is sitting.

You know, the Great Pyramid was finished in September of 2970 B.C.

Why this should be so controversial, I do not understand.

Because there are grains of charcoal between the unmoved stones.

That charcoal has not been anywhere since the day that stone was set in place.

And it's 2790 B.C.

These people who want to push it back and say it's 10,000 years old.

Well, the obligation to prove is on them because the carbon radiological data argues.

You see, there's some tendency in the New Age, which I don't understand very well,

that wants to make everything older than it is.

You know, the pyramids are 50,000 years old.

Atlantis rose and fell 100,000 years ago.

The miracle is how new everything is.

The pyramids were built day before yesterday.

Charlemagne was king of France early this morning.

It's all very, very recent.

I mean, the emergence of mind out of non-mind is an event practically on top of us.

Now let's start it up and we'll get really down to the...

Well, yes, in a sense, because you see what happens is when you...

It's a built-in mathematical property of this wave that when you get to the end of a big wave,

there's... when you get to the end on any scale, there's a sudden drop to the next scale.

And then it goes along to the end and then there's a sudden drop.

So if what we're saying is that a universe is made like...

A universe that actually had this structure that I outlined for you of 26 levels where each level was 164th smaller than the level which preceded it...

A universe built on that kind of architectonics would only be halfway through its life an hour and 35 minutes before the end.

Do you see how that would work?

That in the last hour and 35 minutes, it's going to go through as much development as it went through in the previous 72 billion years.

So yes, time is accelerating, accelerating into...

You know, we've gone from barely moving to approaching a staggering speed.

And I maintain, you know, that in 2012, the last six days preceding the approach to concrescence will be the jackpot.

I mean, the laws of physics will break down.

Everything will be in a state of visible, motile transformation.

This isn't happening in the human world.

It isn't happening in our minds.

It's a crisis in the structure of physical law itself.

And that's why people...

That's why this theory will be hard to disprove or prove until so close to the end date

that you'll barely have time to make a telephone call to say whether it's true or not

before, if it is true, your telephone call becomes totally irrelevant, you know.

What you're essentially saying is the fabric based on itself as being contorted, twisted, and involved...

Yeah, that's right.

You won't use that particular...

No, that's right.

And if that seems unlikely to you, let's always...

Let's never forget what the Orthodox guys are peddling.

They're peddling the Big Bang Theory, which says the universe sprang from nothing in a single instance.

I would prefer what I call the big surprise cosmology.

Because it seems to me if you have to have a singularity, the least likely place to find a singularity would be in a featureless high vacuum.

If you want to find a singularity, look in a corner of the universe where there are planets, stars, elements, organisms, alphabets, civilizations, minds.

In other words, look in a complex domain if you want to find a singularity.

That's where you might have some chance of finding it.

But finding it in an unflawed nothingness is a strange place to look, even.

One of the arguments maybe being proposed by those on the fringe is that, in fact, it's a very complex universe that's been pushed through a membrane into the singularity, which then creates another entire...

Well, one possibility is that it's a wrap-around, that we're just not whistling Dixie when we talk about the archaic revival.

What history is, is a finger reaching for the reset button, and when you finally touch it, you find yourself at the moment of the Big Bang.

You know, you've actually sent it screaming back to the first moment.

So this is an exercise in holographics, in a sense.

That final six days is a very pertinent, potent holographic description of the whole baby.

That's right.

And every cycle is a holographic description of the cycles that preceded it.

That we've just seen.

Right.

So in 1945, when the bomb flickers into existence over Hiroshima, this is the resonance of the Big Bang.

It's being caused by the Big Bang.

And the entire life of the universe is then somehow reenacted in the remaining 67 years.

In the same way, remember, there was a 4,306-year cycle.

We are reenacting that cycle in the present 67-year cycle.

We have reached AD 700 right now.

I mean, if you wonder why things are so benighted, it's because we're in the heart of the dark ages.

You wonder why you can't understand the nature of the collapse of the state vector.

Well, it's because you have an AD 700 intellectual machine looking at it.

My God, the calculus hasn't been invented.

Algebra hasn't been invented.

The new world hasn't been discovered.

These things will all happen ahead of us.

Right now, we are in the heart of the dark ages.

By the late 90s, we'll be closing distance with the Renaissance.

Clearly, we have to put up with a bunch of Christ or fundamentalism, epidemic diseases,

and general not-headedness until we get to that point.

But then, after the turn of the century, we can expect the equivalent of the Renaissance, the Industrial Reformation, the rise of Napoleon, the Civil War, Adolf Hitler.

It'll just be coming quick, quick, quick, quick, and finally, you know, it just pulls you in, and everything happens at once.

One way of thinking of this is that the entire rest of the future history of the universe is being compressed into the next 20 years.

But in other words, the heat death of the universe is 20 years away, essentially, is what is being suggested, because time is beginning to accelerate at such a rate that this compression factor is enormous.

Okay, now, let me see, what have we got? We've got 22,000 years on the screen, and we talked about it, so let me shift here.

Oh, no, zoom, yes. Is that minimum? No.

Yes, I think, you know, Jeremy Rifkin wrote a book. Anybody read it? What was it called? Nobody read it. It was called...

Anyway, the premise of the book was that time is accelerating, but he thought of it as social time, cultural time.

I don't. I think it's embedded in the fabric of space-time itself.

Yes, I think in a few... You see, you can only react to crises that you understand.

So if I tell you the ozone hole is disappearing, you're alarmed.

If I tell you an asteroid is going to strike the Earth, you're alarmed.

But if I tell you that the Earth is about to collide with a hyper-dimensional knot in the nexus of space-time...

You know? But that's what's happening. Ahead of us is an enormous speed bump.

We are colliding... We're about to collide with something that we can barely cognize.

So it's hard to know what to think about it. Yeah?

This may be a little la-la and a bit simplistic, but consider this...

You know, we all have experience of this sort of shifting of time and just the experience of one lifetime.

You know, as a two- or three-year-old, the moment as we experienced it seemed to last a longer period of time.

I mean, my God, summer has lasted forever and whatnot. We don't have that.

And it's sort of... Well, that's what happens over the course of a lifetime.

What happens if consciousness shifts out to infinity?

What happens to the moment then? It becomes vanishingly small, or in terms of the frequency...

It stops. It stops. Yeah, well see...

Before it stops, it's speeding up. In other words, the span is becoming shorter and shorter.

Say if you take a second, the seconds will become shorter.

That means, in effect, that the whole process is speeding up until it collapses.

Yes, it's possible that dying takes forever.

Right. You see.

That's what...

And so, you know, you start to die, and then you die, and die, and then you realize you're going to die forever,

and never approach it, because the seconds become stretched into millions of years.

It's something like that. It's about...

And I think psychedelics are about the fabric of time.

When you strip away the hallucinations, and the personal reference, and the craziness,

the bare bones of it are...

It's about time. It illuminates what time is.

Yeah.

Something I have to add to is that you're moving to Highlander,

and they have a term called the quickening.

And I've noticed a lot of people in ecstasy circles on x,

feel this sense of quickening time, of something approaching,

when time is quickening towards that end point.

And people seem, more or less, on ecstasy to be a lot more epicent and eugenic towards that.

Yeah. I mean, see, part of the problem with perceiving what's going on

is that we're like mayflies or something.

I mean, we live so briefly that to us it looks like the world is standing still.

But, in fact, staggering amounts of change are going on.

I mean, the automobile is a hundred years old, for crying out loud.

We can't conceive of a reality without the automobile.

So, and just in my lifetime, you know, I've seen immense change.

So, and this is going to accelerate eventually to the point

where I believe they'll hold conferences on the acceleration of time,

and people will, boards will be appointed to try and figure out

if anything can be done about it, and stuff like that.

I know you have a distaste for quantum physics,

but there was a conference, apparently, last spring in Spain.

Actually, it was a conference of astrophysics, I believe,

because I heard some of the reports on it.

And a serious topic of discussion was the fact that,

trying to attempt to answer the question, does time exist?

I mean, this was being serious on the agenda at some astrophysics conference.

Yeah, time is the great misunderstood or un-understood quantity in our lives, for sure.

Terence?

Yep?

You refer to those Orthodox guys and their Big Bang theory.

Right.

So you reject the Big Bang theory.

I don't necessarily reject it.

I just think they shouldn't sneer at me when their theory is so cockamamie.

I mean, in other words, I haven't proposed anything weirder than the Big Bang.

Saying that a universe can condense itself faster and faster down into a super-novel object,

sounds to me like a considerably more conservative statement

than to say that a universe can spring from nothing for no reason in a single instant.

They've cornered the market on the unlikely approach to cosmology.

If you have any book to read.

Thank you.

Do they refer to as an alternative to that?

To their theory? No, but I'm going to write one.

There's actually been a serious debate on the whole topic.

I mean, there was a book recently published in the last year.

Did the Big Bang happen? It was written by another cosmologist.

Well, the Big Bang looked like it was in real trouble as recently as six months ago,

but the new data from this, is it OGOS-3 or one of these satellites,

they finally actually found irregularities in the microwave background.

And until they found some irregularities, they were in a real mess

because they couldn't figure out how you get from the super smooth initial conditions

to the clumpy present situation.

Now this new data appears to have pulled their chestnuts out of the fire.

But I think the Big Bang may be in need of serious revision.

I mean, you have the inflationary, the super-inflationary cosmology

as an attempt to fix some of those problems.

But it gets, you know, there are problems, yeah.

Well, of course, if it's true that this derivation of the change of the fly,

then you would expect small fluctuations in the background radiation

because of the practical nature of what it talks about.

That's right.

What did he say exactly?

I can't remember the exact quote, but he, in fact, said that events would be speeded up in the time of events.

Yeah, that's absolutely right.

If we get a little deeper into this, we can even discuss maybe why he would have said such a thing

because I think we can illuminate it.

Here, let's do a little more.

We've got 22,000 years on the screen, 11,000 years on the screen, 5,000 and some.

This is, in a way, my favorite screen because this book I want to write I'm going to call History's Fractal Mountain.

And there it is, folks. History's Fractal Mountain.

Chatalyayuk is over here in the bottom of this.

Along this descending gradient here, like pearls on a string, you get the great ancient civilizations.

Ur, Chaldea, Babylon, and Egypt.

And this actually, the graph actually confirms the intuition of the theosophical mentality

that Egypt did achieve some level of advance that was not surpassed until late Roman times.

That there was a tremendous breakthrough on the part of these civilizations.

This negative habitual or recidivist upward curve is studded with a whole bunch of warlike male dominator civilizations.

The Hittites, the Mitanni, the Assyrians, and up here at the top, Mycenaean pirates overwhelm the last outpost of the goddess culture on Minoan Crete.

This is Homer, right there. Homer sings his song.

And if that, that to me fits, because I had a professor who once said to me, you want to know where it went wrong?

I'll tell you where it went wrong.

When these Greeks pulled their boats up on the shore and stopped being fishermen and started talking philosophy, the shit hit the fan.

And that's precisely what happened. There it is. You see this steep, steep descent into novelty.

And then, after the fall of Rome, oscillation around the mean where it's sort of up, it's sort of down.

But there's no real progress until the Industrial Reformation. I mean, in the Industrial Revolution of the 1740s.

Well, that makes sense, because any kind of attempt at descend into novelty or ascend into novelty would have been suppressed by an emerging church at the time.

That's right. Well, of course, this isn't Eurocentric. It's global.

Oh, you mean where is the birth of Christ?

Roughly, it's right here. There's a little kind of a choke and then a very steep fall right afterwards.

That's the birth of Christianity, of the Roman Empire versus the Republic, and so forth.

Because I read the tapes here. I mean, these are all the BC numbers, 36 BC.

Yeah.

But you're right about in there, then.

Yeah, it's sort of...

Straight up at that minimum.

Yeah, right about there.

Well, let's see, and we may get it on the next pass.

The thing that novelty has now gone to...

...and it around the human civilization.

Yeah.

Yeah, it's bad, it's mutual.

You mean as opposed to general speech or whatever?

Yeah.

Well, it wasn't... at first it was physical.

It was that... it was that atomic physics gave way to chemistry, which gave way to molecular biology,

which gave way to life.

It keeps moving, it keeps being active at the front of the wave, but it leaves a residuum behind it of these previously created structures.

Right now, the wave is clearly lodged in our species, while everything else is under the aegis of Darwinian mechanics.

We're apparently under the aegis of cultural mechanics.

Well, absolutely.

It depends on the intensity of the prominent feature.

You know, if a meteor came in, in the middle of some of this, it would obliterate what you're seeing there, and another feature would stand out in the way of it.

Yeah, that's right.

It's not really being dominant or dictated by human life, but it just so happens that it's more...

It seems like the thing that you're measuring change.

Well...

It seems like the quantity being measured changed here.

How so?

It seems like the first we are cosmological, now we're in traffic.

I mean, I'm really...

This is very speculative stuff.

It keeps condensing toward...

It keeps...

It builds on complexity.

Wherever there is complexity, you will get more complexity.

It doesn't build on simplicity.

It builds on the last, most complex achievement, see.

So, intelligence rests on animal organization, which rests on cellular biology, which rests on molecular biology, which rests on physio...

I found one.

You got it.

Okay.

Uh...

Two.

That could be clarified by a transform of the way.

Now, pretty soon we're...

Now, there is the descent.

Here, let's stop and look.

Uh...

The...

Crucifixion is right there.

And, it's interesting.

You know, Christ was an absolute contemporary of Caesar Augustus.

So, you get this great religious reformer, at the same time that you get the great reformer of Roman polity.

So, two of the most important personalities who ever lived are alive at that point.

That, strangely enough, does not win the prize.

See this deep little chip here?

If we were to blow that up and look at the bottom of that trough, there was a moment when you could have had a dinner party.

When Lao Tzu, Confucius, Mencius, Pythagoras, and Ezekiel could have all gotten drunk together.

Uh...

Had they been able to find each other.

Right back there in the...

Immediately preceding the Greek Renaissance.

Now, the fall of Rome is in 475, right there.

And, you see how the time after the fall of Rome is all of a certain general character clear up to 1700.

And, then, certain technologies and mathematical techniques propel to an even deeper level of novelty.

Now, the next screen is the one that I think is probably where we either win or lose you.

Look at the overall shape of that wave.

It's clear that there's an overlying principle at work here.

I mean, the birth and death of Christ is practically noise on that curve.

Uh...

I mean...

There's a deep, strong move into novelty and those superpositions of those events are relatively...

That's true.

He was arguing that maybe Christ was a...

What?

Well, it just points out that it's not being driven by what we would perceive as...

No, it's not being driven by these great personalities.

They are being driven by it.

I'm sure that if you could have stepped into Christ's mind while he was undergoing the passion...

The main question he was asking himself was...

What is going on?

You know, why do I say what I do?

Why do I do what I do?

I don't seem to be my own person.

You know, I seem to be a puppet of some cosmic force.

Because he was a puppet of some cosmic force.

You see, the transcendental object at the end of time...

Is like one of those reflecto balls that hang in discos, you know?

And as it turns and spins...

It sends off distorted reflections of itself which ricochet into the past.

And if you are correctly situated...

It will turn you into a Christ.

Or a Buddha.

Or a Lao Tzu.

If you are not quite correctly situated...

It turns you into a modern Blavatsky.

A Meister Echo.

In other words, second stringers.

If it's...

You know, if you just get a little of it...

Well, then you're a person with strange insights and great personal charisma.

And the people around you love you.

We all are very close to this thing.

Every night when you dream...

You come into the presence of the transcendental object at the end of time.

We are all distorted reflections of the last thing.

And as we get closer and closer to the eschaton, the last thing...

The distortion begins to leave.

And you say, my God, it's like watching a photograph from an SX-70 develop.

First it's just Merck and then you say...

And then you say, oh, there's a person there and it's getting clearer and clearer.

You know, we are actually being pulled into the attractor...

The veils are being parted.

The truth is becoming more and more and more eminent.

And in the final confrontation with it...

You know, it's the apotheosis.

It's the apocalypse, the apotheosis, the apocatastasis.

A whole bunch of Greek words beginning with A.

No.

Well, that would mean the things we're going to really carry about is Christmas.

Okay.

Did you enter a time span in there too?

Well, no, it picked up the time span that we had.

See, it just accepted the correction.

Thank you very much.

Good thinking.

Now, is it all right?

Yes.

Okay.

Now, this is the screen upon which the theory will stand or fall.

Because this is the screen that is filled with the history that we know.

We're not talking fossil records or chatalyayuk or any of that.

We're talking very precise dates.

It's saying that there was a very steep descent into novelty around 948 A.D.

What is this?

What is it set to again?

1400 years.

And this first steep descent into novelty is the intellectual flowering of Islam within the confines of the Umayyid and Abbasid caliphate and the invention of algebra.

An intellectual tool that sets the stage for modern science.

Essentially, this is the birth of modern science.

And you see how steep, sudden and precipitous it was.

Okay.

Then you go over to this next one.

And let me try something here since this is such a fast machine.

See, I'm moving the little pointer and it's telling me exactly what I'm pointing at.

I haven't done this for you before.

But this is very good for checking these things.

Oh, to know exactly the date.

To know exactly.

Yes, we're pointing at the exact date.

And I want to get it over here to the bottom of this sucker.

1121, the first crusade, the collapse of fortress Europe.

This is the beginning of the globalization of the European mind.

We're dead on here.

Okay.

Now the next steep descent into novelty is this one, obviously.

Let's go over there and see what it is.

There it is.

1430.

Oh, no.

1358.

I'm sorry.

Just a minute here.

Let me get my ducks in a row.

Okay.

Do we all agree it's pointing at the bottom of the thing?

Yes.

It's at the end of the novel, not the beginning of the novel.

No, that's the densest point of the novelty.

And it's 1354.

What happened in 1354?

That's right.

One third of the population of Europe dies in an 18 month period beginning in late 1354.

The greatest demographic collapse that Europe has ever experienced.

It's an absolute hit, dead on.

Now let's go over here to this.

Now notice though that the recovery is quick.

There's a steep descent into novelty and an almost immediate reversion back up to the same level of habit.

Exactly.

Business as usual.

But this next one is different.

It's a steep descent into novelty.

And then it really stays down for a long time and explores this.

So let's go over to the turning point, which is up at the top.

Karen, do you cross-reference this with Indian culture and Chinese culture?

It's global.

It's global, but having said that, you have to notice that the world is now dominated by European values and culture.

So while we can chart the ebb and flow of the Han Dynasty, at this point European culture is moving to the fore

because European culture is beginning to put its imprint on all of world history.

This concludes tape seven.

Our program continues with tape eight.

Continues with tape eight.

But you also can't forget this is a superposition of many factors.

That's right.

This is a picture of a resonance pattern, an interference pattern of many times and places.

Now up here at the top of this thing, at the very top, it's 1455.

What happened in 1455?

Does anyone know?

Columbus was born.

What?

Columbus was born?

Thanks for playing.

In 1455, Constantinople fell to the Ottoman Turk, making European access to the Far East impossible.

Therefore, the age of exploration begins and you get Vasco da Gama and all those people.

This was a tremendously shattering event for European civilization to lose Constantinople to the Ottoman Turk.

Now let's go over to, or wait, back, I mean, to this place.

This is another very seminal event which combined with this Constantinople loss sets the stage for this descent into novelty.

Even though it's way up here in habit, there's a little chip out as there's a novel invention of some sort that happened in 1540.

1440, I'm sorry.

The invention is the invention of printing in Mainz in 1440.

That did it, friends, as far as most people are concerned.

Enlarge it one set now?

Good idea.

One more.

Yeah, let's do one zoom.

I think I have to move it over clear all the way before we do that zoom or there'll be some kind of a screw-up.

Yeah, we'll focus on that one.

Right.

Let me...

Well, I'm glad you like it because it's my best trick.

Not that.

You only have one for Macintosh.

I do, I do.

Oh, you do?

You do?

It's just we haven't written the manual yet.

Oh.

How much are we going to do?

Do you know?

Oh, hard to say.

Oh, you're bad, yeah.

Okay, now it's pointing at today.

Now let's do our zoom.

Approach factor two.

Strange that it didn't ask for the seek minimum, isn't it?

Okay.

Now we're seeing the same thing again.

We're just seeing it in higher detail.

But what I'll fudge by telling you that up here 1455, down here 1492.

Along this screaming descent into novelty are all the painters of the Quattrocento.

This is the Italian Renaissance, this descent into novelty.

And this is the era of exploration, 1492.

Good, huh?

Good, good.

The absolute thing is in 1485.

And all the painters of the Italian Renaissance are along this thing.

Now notice that in 1492, there isn't an instant rebound.

There's 1492.

But instead, because this lost half of the planet has been discovered, this sets off the age of discovery.

And habit is unable to reassert itself.

Because too much peculiar data is flowing in.

Too many new lands, peoples, materials, philosophies, alphabets, languages, sexual styles, cuisines.

And it's like they're overwhelmed.

However, after a while, they get their act together and manage to turn it into hell itself.

Right there.

Right.

Figurant.

What that is, what ends the era of discovery and optimism and psychedelic exotica is the Thirty Years' War.

The Thirty Years' War begins in 1619.

It ends in 1648.

It begins with Europe medieval.

It ends with Europe modern.

Parliaments have replaced popes and kings.

The whole name of the game has been changed.

Now, the Thirty Years' War lasts, as I said, until 1648.

Sorry.

1648.

At the bottom of this cut in here, which is in a situation of rising habit,

there nevertheless is a strong tendency toward novelty reaching a culmination in 1677.

Newton publishes the Principia.

The celestial mechanics are put on a firm basis.

The calculus has been invented.

The modern, the world of modern science is now completely in place.

Then, and, and what, aside from the Thirty Years' War, what Europe is exporting to the rest of the world,

on this hellish upswing, is slavery, the patron system, forced labor, brutal return to habitual methods of the past.

You may not know that slavery died with the fall of the Roman Empire.

If you owned a slave during the medieval period, you owned one slave.

It was a house slave.

And it proved, your ownership of this person proved that you were a person of immense wealth.

It would be like owning a beach bonanza today.

It's beyond owning a Rolls Royce.

And, but, the need for a drug, strangely enough, the drug being sugar, reversed this.

And in the 1440s, they began buying Africans and taking them to the Canary Islands to work sugar.

So, you know, the whole, the moral power of Western civilization could not stand in the way of the reestablishment of slavery and the sugar trade.

Now, up here at the top of this thing, there is a steep, there's a twist, a turn right there.

In 1739, this is the European Enlightenment.

The European Enlightenment was the great intellectual step that set the stage for secular civilization.

People like Voltaire.

People like this, this is a rule.

That's immediate.

That is a brutalist.

In 17ありがとう mood growth.

Yes.

We kind of know how those people care and out of that came two revolutions.

Well, the Inquisition would have been, I presume, a fairly un-novel thing since what it was was a power group torturing the helpless, which there's nothing new in that, for heaven' sake.

It went on for a long time in a note.

It was a Spanish phenomenon. It was confined geographically to a number to a very small number of places

right there

August 1st

The American Revolution takes place as a consequence of this steep descent into novelty at the beginning of the European

Enlightenment well as you know the American Revolution is generally thought to have had a happy

conclusion

the French Revolution

not so happy and

If you explode that area and look you can see that they're happening on different slopes of this thing then the restoration of Louis-Napoleon

In 1803 is there. This bump is the American Civil War and the Franco-Prussian War

which were the first modern wars and completely distorted the demographics of the United States and Europe and

now I want to

The Franco-Prussian War began in 18

I think and the Civil War was 1865

let's uh

I want to go over here to

I think you're right. I didn't feel right about saying that and that would

1848 was the year of revolution, but the Franco-Prussian War was at the same time as the American Civil War. You're right

Okay, there's today's date. Now let's do the approach

Approach factor

Okay, that's 357 years on the screen. You see the American and French Revolutions

The Franco-Prussian War and the American Civil War, the 20th century

Now let's look at the 20th century

And this is, remember how I said that the Great Pyramids were at the bottom of this trough

Uh, at a higher level and now we're seeing the same pattern again. What we get at the bottom of this trough here is, um

The Third Reich

And to show you how the resonances work

Think about the Third Reich in relationship to ancient Egypt

First of all, probably the word Fuhrer can be traced to the word Pharaoh

These, if this is the same concept of a master leader

In addition, the Third Reich and ancient Egypt

Shared an obsession with large-scale tasteless architecture

In addition, both civilizations had a real tendency to lean on the Jews

So, you see, you get this strange kind of microscope on a historical

I mean, most people, I think, would not associate ancient Egypt to the Third Reich

And yet, when you begin listing the similarities

You see, in a way, one is a reflection of the other

Okay, within the 20th century

This is somewhere like 1903

You know, Einstein was in 1905

The general theory, I think

Which came first, the general or the special?

Special came first in 1905

And the general came slightly later

Down here, in the bottom of this trough

Let me show you

Right there

Hitler becomes Chancellor of Germany

And then all of World War II

Is fought in the bottom of that trench

Here's 39

Here's August 39

That's June

That's September

So that's when it begins

And see how

Even though it's a novel situation

Because it's a war

It's a recursion to habit

So at the bottom of a trough of novelty

You get a little upward pimple of recursion to habit

Then

Let's look at

There it is

That's Hiroshima

Right there

And Nagasaki

Right there

The war ends

And

Novelty is left behind

And remember that the psychology of the post-war mind was

Everybody wanted things to just get back to normal

I mean, certainly the Europeans wanted things to get back to normal

Their whole scene had been bombed into the stone age

And in this country people just wanted to get their place in the suburbs

And marry the girl next door

And have a slew of kids

And buy a Chevrolet

And forget about, you know, thousand year millennial plans

And all the rest of it

And so this is the post-war, cold war era

And it lasts

Let's look

Oh, there's 1952

Here's

The launching of Sputnik is there

Sputnik is there

Three

Sputnik is there

And

Sputnik is there

Could

have a

No, no. October 1st, 1957. A day graven on my mind till they lower my box. The first

American satellite was launched right around there, Explorer 1. Give me the date. Okay,

there's the assassination of John Kennedy, as close as I can get it at this resolution.

If I go back one, I'm before it. So you see it's right at the bottom of that steep stab that takes place against this other thing.

What turned it around? You mean what's the turning point? I thought you'd never ask.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. And what is it?

Oh, I'm about to get it for you. There it is. August 1967. It's the summer of love.

Not only does this thing illuminate history, it also, you know, fulfills my deepest inner delusion.

So, and remember I said when we were looking at history's fractal mountain that this was Homer up here.

So, then you can see that the freak thing, the hippies were like the pre-Hellenic Greeks.

I mean, all those, you know, all that bra-lessness and loose-fitting clothes and tambourines and ecstatic,

Bacchanalian with a philosophical undertone. I mean, it was a Greek mentality that broke out in 1967.

Well, then here's the long descent into, you know, the dreary present moment.

And what can I show you here? Richard Nixon getting the axe. Yeah.

Now we're into the Reagan era down here. Yeah. Yeah, I'm going to cut it.

I'm just trying to get back to today. There it is. Okay. Cut it. Zoom. Yes. Approach Factor 2. Enter.

Well, it's going to be... There it is. That's the hippie thing and then the descent.

Now that's in the, that's the eight, the seventies and the eighties. That's the last 11 years.

I want to stop it here. Now, now, see how tight it has to be to work.

Remember that we've been looking at this thing from, we've descended from six billion years to 11 years.

We have predicted asteroid impacts, glaciations, speciations, the rise and fall of empires.

Now we're down to the short and curly, I would think. Let's take a look here at what we've got.

Who, I suppose, now we're all experts on this phase of things because we've all just lived through.

I don't see anyone here under 11. So we've just lived through all of this.

So let's take a look at what it is. Now let's see, when was George Bush elected president?

88. So it would have been November 88. That's October. That's November.

Now, what is the resonance to that moment? I don't think of it so much as, as Bush being elected as Reagan leaving office.

The resonance here is the fall of Rome. Rome falls right there.

Well then, see, we have a series of high and low points which we should be able to correlate to recent catastrophic or world-changing events.

So let's play the game.

What's happening down here, for the 30 days preceding that day, is a million people are camping out in Tiananmen Square.

At the very bottom of the trough is the night that they had the most people in the square.

And then it turns upward, as you can see, because the constipated fascist oligarchs in charge of that society were preparing to do murder.

And there's nothing novel or new about murder. It's the oldest game in the book.

So that went on there.

Then, remember the Romanian... No, no. Let's go over here.

The next steep descent into novelty is right there.

Right? That's too far. No, no, no. That's right.

Okay, right there. Who knows what happened very close to 11-11-89.

The Berlin Wall fell down. Germany is unified right there.

So, Tiananmen, Germany, then a bummer of some sort.

And what is that bummer?

It's the Romanian Revolution, which, as you'll recall, was handled in the messier style,

where you hurl, put people up against walls and machine gun them and so forth and so on.

There's a lot of convergence that was August 87.

August 87?

It was also sort of the building of the reaction of the Soviet Union to what Gorbachev was doing as well.

Along that line.

Well, then let's go over to here.

I want to see the harmonic convergence.

Oh, you want to see the harmonic convergence?

Give me the date.

887.

887?

In judging this, you have to ask yourself, was the harmonic...

It's actually 88.

It's the first anniversary.

It's the Iran-Iraq war ending right there.

Wait.

We'll go back to 87.

Don't you want to go back to 87?

Oh, yeah.

Yeah.

There's an anniversary every year.

Something interesting happens.

In the six month hour.

Well, maybe it's not.

Oh, okay.

August what?

17th, 18th, I think.

There is as close as we can get.

What it shows that is that a long descent into novelty that had previously been impeded,

but there isn't anything particularly special about that date,

but it does fall in the domain of going over this hump.

Over here, you'll recall the Gulf War and all that.

Here's how that looks.

Okay.

Now, look here.

August 3rd, 1990.

There's where Saddam Hussein invades Kuwait.

It's also where Mohammed is born, one level up.

I can get higher and lower resonances simply by touching I here.

We haven't done that, but it's possible.

Now, remember how after he invaded, then there was a lot of breast beating

and armies being moved into position and so forth.

That goes on until there.

Now, there, no, no.

There is where the 30-day ultimatum from the Security Council is issued.

The war begins, the air war, on the 17th of January, right there.

And the land war, well, you can see that there's a steep descent into novelty,

which then is slightly moderated and at the kink is where the war begins.

Now, the next steep descent into novelty...

So, lining people up and machine gunning happens during periods, returning to...

To habit. That's the usual habit.

And I write war happens during novelty.

Well, wars can have... War is a kind of ambiguous thing.

War is a habitual activity, but it does cause novelty, especially technological novelty.

So, you know, that's why it's nice that you can blow up these waves and see the variations within the theme.

Now, this point...

The coup in the Soviet Union.

That's it.

There it is, the coup in the Soviet Union, right at the bottom of this one.

And now, the next one is really intriguing to me, and I'll show you why.

There it is.

It's February 21st of this year, and it's the lowest point of novelty for this year.

Now, I was really puzzled by this, because I watched very carefully that week, and there didn't seem to be anything very novel going on.

My book did come out, you're right.

But I was modest enough not to place that in a context of world history.

Well, you know what happened, and this leads us to the slippery edge of prophecy.

There was an event which happened, not on the 21st of February, but on the 20th, which may be trivial and forgettable and absolutely not worth talking about,

or may be one of the most important events in the history of the 20th century.

Do you know what it was?

No, no.

Ross Perot goes on Larry King and offers a suggestion about his availability for the presidency.

Now, if the guy fades and becomes a nothing burger, it doesn't count.

But he does have the wave blowing at his back, that's for sure.

So that's basically it.

If you want to see, let's see.

No, well, let's look at the future.

Yeah.

Let me get the shmiggy somewhere roughly into the middle, and then we'll do it.

Do you really want to sell software?

I don't show people in the future.

Oh, no, no, because we can play with it.

Okay, now let's see if I can figure out how to do this.

Specify target date C.

Target date month.

Let's do today.

Today is the fifth month, the 31st day of 1992.

We don't want to add days.

Okay, we want to move that over to 50%.

Yes, that's where the cursor pops up.

Now let's choose the time span, E.

Let's do 10 years, plus months, 0, plus days, 0.

Now let's graph the wave, F, F.

So it's pointing at today.

What time span?

10 years.

The last five, the next five.

And what it shows is that we are actually, as if you didn't know,

exploring a very deep trough of novelty.

It will last until August of next year.

And then there will be some kind of return to habit with a vengeance.

Now the November election is...

Now wait a minute.

There's something wrong here.

Let me see.

No, I want to point at it today.

You can see what they are right there, right?

Yeah.

Okay, that's as close to today as we can get.

We're getting ready to go down into creative.

Yeah, we're definitely getting ready to go down into novelty.

How long is that space of that next little novelty space?

You mean clear to here?

Yeah, yeah.

Okay, well, it's all going to last until...

August 93.

The thing to keep your eye on is this, which is such a spectacular drop.

I mean, look how much weirdness we've been through, but it's taken us this much time to do it.

This sucker is going to do it in a three-month period in early 96.

You know, this is what we're doing.

FFTs could really be a value, because do you know what FFTs actually do?

I am a scientist.

They break down this waveform into a very large to infinite series of sine and cosine waves

at varying amplitudes and phases.

So if you could correlate a certain frequency of sine waves and phase shift with a phenomenon,

say, a medical phenomenon or a political phenomenon,

you could really serve in on the nature of the changes that are likely to take place.

Well, I hope you'll do this.

I think it should be done.

Here, I'll show you a function you haven't seen.

Instead of zooming in, we'll zoom out.

Oh, so you're going to go back to its last octave resonance?

Well, no.

I'll just, instead of 10 years on the screen, we'll see 20.

Oh, I see.

Now, it's still pointing, well, no, wait a minute.

Okay, there you see it.

Ah, the water.

Yeah, we're at this little peak.

Yeah, right.

Right.

And there's the whole thing.

So, that's the idea.

Now, the notion is that, remember how I kept talking about how a cone contains all possible ellipses and you section it?

What the psychedelic experience is, is a sectioning of eternity and you can build up a picture of the cone by sectioning eternity sufficiently that you get a map like this.

I mean, I'm convinced by this that time is fractal, that instead of treating time as a zero quantity as the Newtonian equations do or as a very gentle curvature as the Einstein equations do, that we have to sub in this fractal dimension.

And that this will make possible a science as more powerful relatively to present science as present science is through the power of the calculus to Greek science.

Time, about which we previously knew next to nothing except that it seemed to keep happening, can actually be described in the same way that energy and other factors in the universe can be described.

Now, the last thought I want to leave you with is I don't think anybody could make this up.

Certainly not me, a person with no training in mathematics, no interest in this kind of thing.

I was told this stuff.

And, you know, most, God forbid, channeling is of the horrible variety which tells you to, you know, eat brown rice and love your neighbor.

You don't need channels to tell you that.

You have channels in your own head which tell you that.

This is a mathematical equation.

I mean, it's embedded in a lot of rap.

But the real channel is an equation for the description of time which makes assertions, makes predictions, is willing to be held to mathematical analysis.

All the things scientists are always screaming that occultists never will provide them with their theories, this provides.

So I'm willing, since it's only one person, one person's life, I'm willing to preach this a little bit because I'm not, maybe I can't believe, see the choice here is pretty stark.

Either I'm nuts or I'm Newton.

There's no in between.

There is no in between.

Yeah, it's right.

I'm the greatest intellectual synthesizer in the history of man.

If I'm wrong, it's just horseshit.

So then the question is, which is it?

Now, what is the corollary?

Say you are the channel for the next step of our understanding of this reality in that sense.

What is your resonant corollary from this time?

You mean, who am I the resonance of?

Yeah.

A question I've never asked.

When did this stop?

When did you first publish?

I figured this out.

There were many.

It took a long time.

But from 1971 to 73 is when I figured it out.

Okay, so what was happening at that time?

Here.

Up here.

Let's see.

Let's go back.

Let's go there and see.

In 1973 you had your...

I really think this needs to go into...

The reason I said it is because basically it's a description of the fabric of space-time.

You know, if doing that shows things like supernova and whatnot that we can document...

Then you would have it.

Absolutely.

Then you would have it.

So you had...

Okay, let's see.

You had finished developing this before your life-changing experience in 1971?

No, the life-changing experience was in 1971.

Well, let's point it at this little dip here giving me the benefit of the doubt and say

that it was January, February, March, April 26, 73.

I'm sure that had you visited me in April 26, 73, you would have found me hunched over graph paper

and working furiously.

Now let's see what the resonance of that is.

I is the resonance call.

It asks higher or lower.

We answer higher.

That means earlier.

Higher.

Major or trigrammatic resonance.

Forget that.

Major is the answer.

Which point?

First, second, third, 99th?

I have no idea what that means.

Let's answer first.

526 BC.

Oh, it's the Greek Renaissance.

It's Plato, Pythagoras, Ezekiel, Confucius, Lao Tzu.

Hey, I think it's time to knock off.

You should quit when you're ahead, you know?

Yes.

It provides us with redundancy.

I'm thinking of calculus.

I'm thinking of atomic bombs.

They're usually developed in parallel, several sites on Earth.

Just an observation.

There's no parallelism here.

Well, in a sense there...

No, no.

Wait a minute.

In a sense there is.

This is a fractal.

It was invented or channeled by me before fractals became the absolute obsession of frontier mathematics.

Now everybody wants to talk about fractals.

And everybody says, you know, population growth, river mouths, everything can be modeled by fractals.

But nobody has said time can be modeled by a fractal.

So I think probably the rise of fractal mathematics is indicative of this.

The other thing is, this could never have been brought to the public without small personal computers.

I developed this, finished it in 75, and in 77 they began selling small computers.

So it's a weirdness.

It's a hallucination.

That's what it is.

My dream has always been to bring something here from there.

And apparently the only things which travel well from there to here are ideas.

And I'm not an artist, so I couldn't paint.

So this is a psychedelic idea.

I think there are millions of these kinds of ideas swimming in the psychedelic ocean.

Yeah?

The second thing that strikes me about this is what good doesn't do us, and if it's true, I don't want to know it.

I would like to hide from this if you're anywhere near correct.

Well, that's because we really haven't talked about the nature of the concrescence.

What is happening?

This all argues for an impossible conclusion.

That the world is going to disappear up its own wazoo at dawn, December 22, 2012.

Can we see it on the screen?

What?

It's 2012.

Oh, you want to see the last day?

The last day.

Right there.

The last week.

Well, here, let me...

The day after, sir.

The last day we're not here.

Yeah, I'll show you.

I'll show you the final thing.

We're running over here, but anybody who wants to leave has my blessing and my sympathy.

Well, we'll let you leave.

Okay, let's change the date of interest.

Where is the date of interest?

Well, they don't get date specific.

Why don't I see...

Oh, there it is.

See.

Target date.

Oh, let's look at January 1, 2012.

August 2010.

On a time span...

Oh, wait a minute.

Do you wish to add a number of days?

No.

We're rather fortuitous that we have 2012.

I mean, if we didn't have that calendar, there would be no place to index it.

That's right.

Time span.

Specify time span.

E.

Years.

2010.

No.

Twelve years.

Plus months.

Zip.

Plus days.

Zip.

F.

Okay, the pointer will be pointing at Jan 1, 2010.

But you see, there it is.

It runs down.

He don't go no more.

That's the end.

Now, I have created one way out that preserves the theory and a rational universe.

And it is simply this, that what happens on December 22, 2012, is that time travel is invented.

And because it is invented, it is no longer possible to portray historical data on a linear graph.

So that's all.

It's just, it was a thing about technology and eventually a technology was created which made the three-dimensional space-time matrix itself obsolete.

It's just a dimensional octave jump.

Yes, dimensional octave jump.

What is the transcendental object?

The transcendental object is the despair of description.

It cannot be known.

It can only be approximated.

It's the sacred heart of Jesus.

It's the flying saucer.

It's the philosopher's stone.

It's tantric union.

It's good LSD.

It's all of these things and more.

It cannot, it transcends language and understanding.

But the closer we get to it, the more it will be revealed.

And the reason the 20th century is so peculiar is because we're so close to the zero point.

We're so close to the transcendental object that, you know, take a hit.

There it is.

Close your eyes and daydream.

There it is.

Have an orgasm.

There it is.

It's trying to break through.

It's almost upon us.

We've been sailing toward this thing for 72 billion years.

And we are now 22 years from impact.

The walls are so steep.

The acceleration is so great.

We are there for all practical purposes.

And then what spiritual life and headdom and all that means is realize that we are there

so that anxiety drains from your life, body, and world view, and then you just ride the wave.

And when people talk of catastrophe, revelation, salvation, and destruction, you just smile a small smile knowing that it will be all that and more and more and more.

It's something, I think it's to reassure us.

You see, I think the world is going to get hip to the fact that we are actually caught in a whirlpool in time that is sucking us into another dimension.

Without something like time wave zero, a notion like that could get fairly alarming and spread a lot of panic.

With time wave zero, you just say, look, we have a map of what's going on.

We'll check off the milestones.

As long as the wave keeps working, nobody should freak out.

Just settle in, hang on, and we'll navigate through this.

So it's a vital piece of knowledge necessary to face the eschaton without panic.

Because these crazy religions want to tell you that you're going to be judged and damned and fired and roasted.

No, no, that's not it. They got the story wrong.

We're just being sucked into hyperspace.

And hyperspace is the human imagination, the human heart, the human soul.

It's the domain of our dreams.

Our imagination is a flickering image of what it will be.

But what it really will be is the despair of prose.

What it will really be can only be approached in silent darkness on five grams.

And then you can't tell anybody about it.

Thank you very much.

This concludes In Search of the Original Tree of Knowledge, a weekend workshop with Terence McKenna.

If you would like additional copies of this recording or a complete catalog of transformational audio tapes,

please call Sounds True, 1-800-333-9185, or write Sounds True, 735 Walnut Street, Boulder, Colorado, 80302.

files 3
originaloriginal file (mp3)mp3 22.05kHz stereo, 48 kb/s~205 MBget ->streamoriginal-tree-of-knowledge.oggopus 48kHz stereo, 143 kb/s~614 MBget ->transcriptfull transcript (machine)~410 KBget ->
more from Terence McKenna
<- cd ../