Wisdom of the Mountains

In this seminar recording, Alan Watts introduces Vajrayana, also called Tantrayana or Mantrayana, the branch of Mahayana Buddhism that spread from ninth century North India into Tibet, China, Japan, and Mongolia. He frames the whole tradition around the idea of upaya, or skillful means, the teacher's use of surprise to produce a flash of enlightenment the student cannot arrange for himself, and connects this to the Japanese distinction between jiriki, liberation by one's own effort, and tariki, liberation by a power that is not the ego, drawing a close parallel to the Christian dispute between Pelagius and Augustine over works and grace. Watts then works through the mantra, especially Om and Om Mani Padme Hung, describing chant as a way of digging into sound to feel existence flickering on and off, and moves on to Tantra itself, tracing it to the Hindu fifth Veda and its left hand path of liberation through the very things ordinary discipline forbids, illustrated by the story of Brahma favoring the one who hates him because hatred keeps attention fixed. He describes the dense, endlessly detailed visionary quality of Tibetan Buddhist painting, comparing it to a psychedelic state in which every jewel in a net reflects every other jewel, and uses it to explain the difference between the gross or formal body and the subtle body, the felt shape of one's own sensation. The talk closes with an extended reading from Saraha's Treasury of Songs, a foundational tantric text that mocks both Brahminical ritualism and monastic asceticism as failing to reach the innate nature that mantras, austerities, and pilgrimage cannot produce. Throughout, Watts treats the exploration of inner consciousness as a counterpart to scientific investigation of the outer world, and insists it is undertaken not as duty but as delight.
transcriptmachine-transcribed, unedited
Now, this seminar this weekend concerns a subject which is so alien from anything that we understand in the West
that it may stretch your skulls a little.
I don't know.
But as Westerners face certain forms of Mahayana Buddhism from the outside,
they see what reminds them of total irrationality and superstition.
And this, in particular, applies to a form of Buddhism which has several names.
And they're all...
Well, it's really one form of Buddhism, but it's named differently.
And they are all sub-schools of Mahayana.
It's variously known as Vajrayana, Tantrayana, or Mantrayana.
You remember the word Yana means a course, basically, sometimes a vehicle.
And Buddhism is fundamentally likened to a vehicle or something like a raft which you use for crossing a river.
Or let's say you want to get in at a door and you have to knock and you need a brick to knock on the door with.
So you pick up the brick and bang on the door.
That's a Yana.
It's an instrument, an expedient, a means, a technique, a method.
And the Buddha's doctrine is called in Sanskrit the Dharma.
And Dharma has a whole multiplicity of meanings, but one of them is method.
Although it's usually translated law in English, this is not a good translation.
So the Yana, the whole idea of a Yana is related to the idea of Upaya, which I have previously explained to you.
U-P-A-Y-A, meaning skillful means, what we would call a pedagogical device or sort of trick.
Because Upaya in politics means cunning.
But in religion or philosophy, it means the skill of a teacher and getting something across to a student.
And so the whole essence of Upaya is really surprise.
Because everybody wants a surprise, but you can't surprise yourself because you know in advance what you're going to do.
When you have hiccups, then indeed you surprise yourself because you didn't intend to.
And Upaya and surprise is deeply connected with the whole inner meaning of Buddhism.
Life has to surprise itself.
Because if it doesn't, you don't know you're there.
Because you only know existence to the degree that there is a balance between knowing and not knowing.
See?
So there must be the surprise.
There must always be something in you, in other words, that is sort of spiritual hiccups.
That happens unbeknownst.
So an Upaya is a method of the teacher producing the surprise of enlightenment in the student.
And he uses a yana, that is to say a vehicle or a course.
Just like we say we give a course in philosophy or semantics or chemistry or something.
And so the course then is the Mahayana, the great course, which includes ever so many different Upayas or different ways.
The Hinayana, the little course, which has only a few ways.
Now, in the Hinayana, they are very tough-minded.
And they stick to the notion that all enlightenment depends on your own effort.
The Buddha is supposed to have said just before he died,
Be you lamps unto yourselves.
Be you a refuge unto yourselves.
Take to yourselves no other refuge.
And in Japanese classification of Buddhist schools, they have two that are respectively called Jiriki and Tariki.
And they classify all schools of Buddhism under these headings.
Ji means self.
Riki means power.
So there are ways of salvation, or better, more accurately, liberation, by your own power, Jiriki.
And then Tariki are the ways by the power of another.
That is to say, liberation through what Christians would call grace, rather than works.
And it's fascinating how the problem of faith and works, or grace and works, turns up in Buddhism just as it does in Christianity.
And it's really the same problem.
You see, in the history of Christianity, there was a huge argument around 400 A.D.
between a Welshman, or a Celt, by the name of Pelagius, and Augustine of Hippo.
And Pelagius was a kind of optimistic Britisher, who believed in muddling through, and playing the game, and putting your nose to the grindstone, and so on.
And he believed that one's own will and effort could obey the commandments of God, because he argued that God would not have given us any commandments unless we could have obeyed them.
But St. Augustine said that he missed the point entirely, that if he had read St. Paul properly, especially the Epistle to the Romans,
he would have found out that God did not give us commandments in order that we should obey them, but in order to prove that we couldn't.
That is to say, as St. Paul put it, to convict us of sin.
That the law, in other words, was a gimmick.
An upaya.
Nobody was ever expected to obey the law.
The Ten Commandments summarizing the law.
Especially, thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all your heart, with all your soul, and all your mind.
Nobody can do that at all.
And so even the greatest saints are always beating their breasts and confessing that they're abysmal sinners,
because they've realized that they can't live up to the commandments.
So therefore, St. Paul taught that the law, he said, is a pedagogue to lead us to Christ.
And you see, a pedagogue has the same meaning as upaya.
So what the law does is make you feel absolutely awful, because you can't obey it or do anything about it.
Now the Buddhists have come to an exactly similar conclusion in the course of time.
Because the Buddha was apparently, in his original teaching, tough-minded.
And said, listen boys, you better discipline yourselves, see?
And you get to work, and you cut out women, and drink, and possessions, and meditate, and control your minds.
Well, everybody tried this.
And of course they couldn't do it, a few people did.
Only, they dried up.
They found that it was a kind of a pyrrhic victory.
That what you gain by stopping your humanity, and stopping your emotions, isn't worth getting.
It's like cutting off your head to cure the headache.
So they realized that wasn't the way.
But that was why Buddha suggested it, so that they'd find out.
So then came in the new schools of Buddhism, which said, uh,
that you must be liberated by tariki.
And ta, as I said, means other power.
That is to say, the power of something in you, that is not your ego.
Just in the same way as your heart doesn't beat at the will of your ego.
So, uh, in psychoanalysis, for example, we would say that the unconscious has to, uh, be worked on.
And that it will be watered, and nourished, and so on.
Eventually, the unconscious will produce your integration.
This is Jungian language, not Freudian.
And, uh, you depend on that.
It's not you.
Uh, because, of course, integration means that you get the two aspects of yourself together,
and acknowledge them both as you.
The conscious and the unconscious, the power of the ego, and the power of the natural organism, of the psyche.
And, uh, so in every art one realizes there comes a point where your will is exhausted.
You've tried everything to make something work, and it won't work.
And then to achieve the perfection of the art.
Something has to happen of itself, which we variously call grace, inspiration, or tariki.
And the problem that everybody's always wanted to know is how to make that happen.
Now, you see, if we knew how to make it happen, it wouldn't be it.
Because it would be something we were doing.
And it would be, therefore, the old story of just as simply an ego effort.
And so we don't know how to make it happen.
But if you just settle for that and say, well, sorry, but, uh, there's nothing you can do about it.
Everybody's just going to go home.
And forget the whole thing and commit suicide.
The thing is, therefore, the state we call faith is the key.
And faith means that we know it will happen.
Only we've got to wait.
Only don't wait too hard.
Because that will be ego effort again and will stop it happening.
So, the thing is to learn to wait soft.
That is to say, in a state of openness.
Well, now, how do you do that?
There are all sorts of upayas, you see, means that help one to do this.
And one of them is this thing that I've been referring to as the Vajrayana.
That means the diamond vehicle.
The tantrayana.
That means the web vehicle.
And the mantrayana, which means the sound vehicle.
Sound in the sense of, uh, incantation.
I may as well begin with mantrayana aspect of it.
Because this is the most perplexing to us, from our point of view.
And doesn't make any sense.
That you know there is an age-old belief in spells.
And that certain formulae, said in the right way, will produce results.
All of this descends philosophically, so far as Asia is concerned.
From the Hindu, uh, Upanishadic idea.
That the world is the creation of sound.
The Hindus say that in the beginning was Vak.
Which is exactly the same thing as saying in the beginning was the word.
As in the Gospel of St. John.
But that doesn't mean the orders.
Like, uh, give him the word.
The, the Vak means vibration.
And, uh, so the, the, the, the name that is fundamentally Vak.
Is the Sanskrit word Om.
Because when you say Om.
You begin at the back of your throat with O.
And you finish at your lips.
And so you take in the whole range of sound.
And so this word Om is called the Pranava.
And it is the holiest of all names.
And so you can chant Om, you know.
And really stir up things.
And so, uh, all, uh, Hindus and Buddhists alike.
Use this word Om.
And we'll use it to set going a meditative state.
This is very easy to do.
Because it's awfully easy to concentrate on sound.
It's much more difficult to keep your eyes still.
You flicker.
Because your eyes tend constantly to,
it's natural for the eyes to rove over things.
And you get, uh, have difficulty.
In stopping your eyes from scanning.
But sound is very easy to concentrate on.
And the, the whole point of a mantra.
Is it's a method of digging sound.
I hope you know what I mean by that.
Because I purposely used a very slangy popular word to dig.
That means get right down into.
So that you realize that the, the, the flow, the vibration of sound,
is a way in which you experience basic existence.
Being here.
And you can learn everything from it.
Because sound is not a constant.
It comes and it goes.
It's on and off.
You only hear it because it is vibrating.
And so herein is the lesson that life is on and off.
Black and white.
Life and death.
Inside and outside.
Knowing and not knowing.
They're all in the vibration.
But it's easy to explain that in words.
But to understand it.
In your bones.
To feel it.
You have to.
Learn how to listen to a sound.
So then they invented this way.
Of making chanting sounds.
Now there are various ways in which this is understood.
By people in Asia.
Incidentally I should say.
That this, uh, as a form of Buddhism.
What I'm calling, uh, Vagrayana.
The whole movement.
Uh, sprung up.
In about the 9th century AD.
And in its geographical distribution.
Is from North India.
Into Tibet.
China and Japan and Mongolia.
And it is highly characteristic of Tibetan Buddhism.
So then.
Let's say there are various ways of understanding it.
The word, the formulas used for mantra.
Are understood by the ignorant.
As being shortcuts.
Instead of saying the whole Sutra.
The whole Sutra is summed up in the formula.
Om Mani Padme Hung.
And you can say that.
That'll do.
You're a poor weak slob.
And out of infinite compassion.
The bodhisattvas have arranged to get you into Nirvana.
Instead of going through all the heroic efforts.
Of those saints and, uh, sages and meditation practices.
You can just say Om Mani Padme Hung.
And in fact you don't even need to say it.
You can have it printed on paper.
And enclosed in a silver box on the end of a stick.
And all you have to do is rotate the thing.
So the, the popular idea of this.
Is the shortcut.
The next idea of it.
Is the one I've been sort of talking about.
Which is that you concentrate on these formulae.
On these sounds.
Of course.
And there's a third interpretation.
Which is you might call the esoteric interpretation.
Which was originally, uh, as far as I know.
The first person to really bring this up was Vasu Pandhu.
Whom I told you about last week.
Who lived, oh, shortly before 400.
And he said the whole point of mantra.
Is that they don't mean anything at all.
And that the word Om is completely meaningless.
And that, uh, all these, uh, various different kinds of incantations.
Um, are totally senseless.
And the idea of repeating them.
Is to liberate yourself from the notion that the universe means anything.
All those forms of Buddhism which are associated with the Vajrayana.
Are what is called Tantric.
And Tantric, the word basically means.
Web structure.
Warp and woof.
Well now, uh, Tantra in Hindu context.
Is a discipline that is sometimes called the fifth Veda.
There are four Vedas.
Uh, which are basic holy scriptures of Hinduism.
The fifth Veda.
Is as it were.
The esoteric one.
Now, according to the four Vedas.
In order to be liberated.
You have to give up.
Physical life.
That is to say.
You must not eat meat.
Uh, you must not have sexual intercourse.
You must not take alcohol.
Uh, or any, uh, kind of.
Consciousness changing, uh, substance.
Uh, there are various other things.
I forget them all.
But in Tantra.
The whole idea is.
Liberation through.
The forbidden things.
That is to say.
Liberation in the world.
Belonging to the world.
Participating in the world.
And sometimes.
Uh, it is therefore.
Called the left hand path.
Once as a Hindu story you know.
That the Brahma was asked.
The question.
Who will gain to union with you first.
He who loves you or he who hates you.
And Brahma replied.
He who hates me.
Because he will think of me more often.
So.
You can other words.
Attain to liberation.
By one of two ways.
One is by complete altruism.
And the other is by total selfishness.
And the, the, the moral of the whole thing is.
That if you are completely and consistently selfish.
You will discover.
That yourself is the other.
That you don't really experience yourself at all.
Except in terms of others.
When you say I love myself.
What do you mean?
Mean you love being alive.
And when you push it.
You see.
This is the point.
To push it.
To an extreme.
So.
Uh.
The, the left hand path is a very dangerous way.
Of, of going about things.
Because nobody approves of it.
I was discussing this morning with my father.
Some time in the distant past.
We had witnessed a comedy.
Wherein.
The stage.
Was set.
Of a man asleep in bed.
In a highly Victorian bedroom.
With all kinds of fancy furniture.
And terrible stuff.
You know.
And the alarm clock goes up.
And he wakes up in a total rage.
He immediately picks up his shoe.
And smashes the alarm clock.
He then.
Gets out of bed in fury.
He rips the sheets to pieces.
Overturns the bed.
Finds a hammer somewhere.
And starts breaking up all the crockery.
The windows.
And still the place is a total demolition.
Finally.
There is left in one corner.
One of those enormous standard lamps.
You know.
With.
Blah.
All the sort of bugaws on it.
And he takes several runs at this.
And finally he picks it up.
And he flings it in the air.
And as it comes down.
It bounces.
It was made of rubber.
And this is the flip.
You see.
That.
And that's the surprise I was talking about.
In the beginning.
Satori.
Sudden awakening.
It bounced.
You know.
You thought you were going to crash.
And you bounced.
And you see.
This is.
This is the whole thing about Buddhism.
We all think we're going to crash.
And it must seem that way.
Because otherwise it won't be a surprise to bounce.
If.
In other words.
You press your selfishness.
And you.
Go into this whole question.
Of.
Um.
What do I really want.
Supposing I could have it.
Supposing I have all the money.
Anything I can think of.
What is it I'm after.
And you explore all the sensations you can imagine.
All the delights of pleasure.
All the ecstasies.
All the drunks.
All the orgasms.
All the.
Anything you can think of.
Go right through to the end of it.
What is it you're looking for.
I want to be flipped.
You know.
I want to be let out of myself.
Well.
When you're let out of yourself.
That's altruism.
He that would save his life shall lose it.
And he that loses his life.
Or looses his life shall find it.
You go one way or the other.
And all comes to the same thing.
All right.
So in the same way.
Take the path of.
Meditative discipline on concentration.
Where somebody is sitting there with a stick.
This is you attend.
See.
I'm the master.
You follow that way.
See what you want to get that.
Out of that.
Try and get rid of yourself.
That's one way of doing it.
And a certain kind of people.
Who ought to.
To take it that way.
They want to.
They.
They don't know they're here.
Unless they hurt.
And that's the right way for them.
We shouldn't condemn it.
It's just like.
There are certain kinds of plants.
That grow this way.
There are certain kinds of plants.
That go this way.
And so there are many types.
On the other hand.
There's the mantra.
Game.
Where.
People say.
Oh.
This is so simple to do.
You really don't have to chant it at all.
It's just the shortest formula.
And it's this.
This is kind of cut.
And then they get going.
Into this thing.
And they get fascinated.
Singing.
Om Mani Padme Hum.
So.
Something like that.
Or.
Like those.
Pure Land Buddhists in Japan.
Namo Amida Butts.
And eventually comes.
Namo Amida Butts.
and you really get with it and when you get with it you suddenly realize it's doing you
now what's the difference between you and it self and other self power other power
it's all one only you play it isn't because you have to do that
I say have to that's not quite the right word you do that in order to create the sensation of
existence which is called now you see it now you don't I want to draw your attention to the fact
that very vivid Tibetan painting has a curious way of creating a state of mind if you really start
looking at it that I can only call psychedelic it's I don't know anything else quite like it
as you get into the detail of it it's like this let's suppose that you look at some object
and instead of the thing becoming fuzzy and fading out it always gets more detailed more clear more
alive and you suddenly find out that what you thought was just a bunch of blur was 16 000 maggots
with bright eyes on them and that every eye was a deep jewel and you go down into these deep jewel-like
eyes and you find inside them that there are cross-legged buddhas with aureoles around them
and uh necklaces of uh human heads and then you start looking at those and by jove in every eye on
one of those human heads you look inside it and there's another buddha sitting there see and you go
on like that forever and ever and ever in myriad detail see but now that is a state of consciousness
which these artists are trying to represent it is the the the idea of the the dharma datu which i
explained in last seminar that is to say the net of jewels where every jewel reflects all the other
jewels and therefore naturally contains the reflection of all the other jewels in each other jewel that it
reflects you see the infinite interrelatedness or they call it mutual penetration of everything in
the universe and so this is an art form designed to get you into the mood to understand that by looking
at it it is absolute total fascination
But, what I was trying to describe to you about the nature of these art forms, where you look at the details, and then you suddenly discover that behind the details, there are millions more details, and you never fuzz out.
You find, in other words, that the possibility to see down into something goes on forever and ever. Now then, that is the visual equivalent of hearing when you work with mantras, with these formal chants, to get to hear sound in such a way that, just as you could say that a visual field is rich in detail, like these paintings are.
Like a piece of Hindu beautiful silk weaving, which is rich with gold and flowers, and you see detail in that. Now, you can hear sound in the same way, and that's what Hindu music is playing with.
And so, when you get down into that, you see, you are, what I would call, truly listening in to the universe.
Because, eventually, if you listen to sound that way, or you look at form that way, you discover its secrets.
This is just another way of investigation of life, comparable to our scientific investigation, with microscopes and chemical analysis, and this, that, and the other.
But it's a different road. Scientific investigation does what we call looking out into matter, into the physical world.
This is going in the opposite direction, but it's all the same thing, it's the same continuum, but it's going into the nature of your feeling of it, that is to say, into the center of awareness, into the self.
And what these, all these drawings are, from various points of view, is they're drawings of your own interior world, looked at in this way, under the influence of the traditions of a, indeed, a particular culture, which is not our culture,
and, which, therefore, which, therefore strikes us as a little strange.
But whenever you look at a work of art, and you feel, gee, isn't that weird?
It's not the way people look.
You know, for people's first impression of Chinese art, say, they perhaps don't meet Tibetans so easily, is that it's, um,
well, everything's got curls on it, it wiggles, it's, uh, very strange.
And that, the, the reason for that, is that they are showing you a vision of the universe, which you haven't looked at, and so it looks odd to you.
And what you mean by odd, is, well, it curls where it shouldn't, or, uh, I don't see things that way, I don't see them with that extra flip on them.
No, indeed, you don't, because the way you see things is what you call ordinary, and what you're used to.
And, as you know, we, when we see things, we ignore.
We screen out certain aspects of things, which we don't notice.
And, therefore, by studying other people's art forms, we are taught to see things that we wouldn't ordinarily notice.
So, that when you become used to Chinese or Tibetan painting, you say, why, of course, that's the way the world is, also.
So, the feeling of the strange, of the, uh, we say, we use the word exotic, and that means looking, a thing looks exotic,
when you look at it from somebody else's point of view, and eventually you get used to it.
And so, if you move into a state of consciousness, such as I've been trying to describe,
that is not the usual kind of state of consciousness, you say, it's kind of weird, isn't it?
And if you aren't prepared for that, you might be afraid of it, and say, am I going mad?
Am I going out of my mind?
Yes, you are.
You're going out of your set, ordinary set of mind, but you're going into just another aspect of mind.
And, at first, it always feels weird.
That's why people have difficulty in meditation.
When they really start moving, they say, well, I'm going to go out of my mind if I think about that.
You know, all those famous stories about people who invented computers and went mad,
or who thought about the nature of thought, and absolutely were never heard from again.
There's a certain fear, in other words, of the loss of one's own ego,
of the sort of regular world, where conventions go on,
where the familiar gestures are made,
so that you feel at home,
and you get into other dimensions of awareness,
where the gestures are different.
The nerves are doing something else.
Or, in Eden, you don't know whether they're even nerves anymore.
They may be, um,
Adi Buddhas, and, uh,
all these charming girls,
who you see in these things,
and you don't know who they are.
Some kind of weird Tibetan fantasy.
You say, uh-oh.
This will get cultural shock.
Stay away from that.
But this isn't cultural shock, uh,
with respect to some other people.
It's cultural shock with respect to your own inner life.
In other words, that we all have in us levels of vibration,
which we are not used to,
not familiar with,
and therefore are scared of.
So this particular kind of Buddhism,
Vagrayana,
is a rather adventurous,
not to say dangerous,
exploration,
of man's inner consciousness,
depicting it
in an elaborate symbolism,
which, although to a Westerner
used to Christian symbolism,
looks as if it were
a drawing of some heaven somewhere,
of potentate seated on thrones
and receiving homage
and all that
political bit.
All these are quite definitely,
I'm not making this up,
all these are quite definitely
to be understood
as exteriorizations
of your own being.
In other words,
let us suppose
that we looked on a microscope slide
at the cross-section of a spinal column
or of, uh,
an area of the brain.
This would show us certain designs,
certain patterns,
and they would be,
uh,
rather central to you.
Now,
these are equivalent to those,
but they are moving
in a different direction,
and you have to understand now
the difference
between what is called
the material body
and the subtle body.
The rupa,
actually that means
the formal body,
as I explained
last, uh,
second seminar.
Uh,
the word rupa in Sanskrit,
which apply,
is applied to the material world,
means the world of form,
the world seen
in a certain form,
a form to which
we are accustomed.
So,
you have a formal body,
which is you
as you
appear
to any other
objective observer.
Then you have a subtle body,
which is
the way you are
as you feel
to yourself.
In other words,
supposing you've been on a drunk,
and you wake up
with a headache,
and it feels
that your head
is so big,
well,
that's the shape
of your subtle body.
Spiegelberg
used to show
a wonderful cartoon
of Corky
in the comics,
looking at a plane
going over,
which was
doing some stunts,
and it made his neck
grow longer
and longer
until it all
got tied in knots
while watching the plane.
That was the shape
of Corky's subtle body,
which is called
his
linga sharira
in Sanskrit,
as opposed to
stula
sharira,
which is your
gross body.
That means
more dense.
Now,
so when you get
the drawing
of the
microscope slide,
say,
a cross-section
of the spine
or something
that is quite
fundamental
to the structure
of nervous system,
you've got
a design
of the
gross body.
But when you
start looking
into the other
direction
of things,
which is how
you feel,
and you really
go into feeling
to what
sound is,
to what
touch is,
to what
emotion is,
and you trace
the senses back
along their channels
till you get
to the
mano vijnana,
which is the
central sense
behind each
separate sense.
and you find
that it isn't
just kind
of a
goo,
it's a,
it's an
incredibly
detailed
experience.
And then you
draw pictures
like this
to represent
what you
found.
We would
draw them
in a different
way
if we
genuinely
made this
inquiry
ourselves
because we
have different
traditions
and we
would find
ourselves,
goodness only
knows what
we'd be
drawing,
but we
would make,
we would
be making
things like
the stained
glass windows
in Chartres
Cathedral,
you see,
and
crucifixes,
because
when you
investigate
sensation,
you go down
into it,
and you feel
it getting
more and
more intense,
more and
more intense,
more,
you see,
right down
as how
much can
you stand?
Well,
there's
Jesus on
the cross,
cover it
with jewels,
make it
gorgeous.
So all
these things
you see
are
investigations
of the
basic sensation
of being
alive,
and people
are curious
about that.
You know,
where are
we?
What's
it all
about?
Well,
the only way
is to look
and see.
So if
you want
to find
out what
you mean
by meaning,
by asking
a question,
by being
conscious,
by being
here,
well,
you have
to meditate.
And meditation
is not
meditating
on something
like thinking
it out
in an
intellectual
way.
It is
looking
more closely
at what
you're asking
the question
about.
So you
could do
that externally
with a
microscope,
with chemical
analysis,
and so on.
That way
is valid.
But it
has to be
balanced
by the
internal
way,
going down
into your
own
sensations
and your
own
consciousness.
And the
point that
I'm going
to make
again in
another
way that
I made
this morning
is that
this isn't
something
you're
supposed
to do.
That is
to say,
isn't
a chore,
it isn't
your solemn
duty,
unless you
want to
come on,
that's the
sort of
person you
ought to
be.
This is
a delight.
Get into
that,
out of
total
fascination
and joy
and love
of whatever
it is that
you are
and everybody
else is.
So that
this is a
different
spirit
of religion
than that
to which
we are
normally
accustomed.
Instead
of saying,
which I
suppose
is an
attitude
characteristic
of what
you might
call a
patriot
that's
distinct
from a
matriarch
culture,
go and
read your
Bible.
Get down
on your
knees and
repent,
you see.
Ooh.
We feel
pretty
spooked
by that
attitude.
This one
says instead,
I've got
something to
show you.
Look in
here.
You all
know what
all this
is about?
You watch.
Take a
look.
You look
in there
and you
say,
ooh,
no.
It can't
really be
like that.
You look
at this
other guy
who was
the guru,
you see.
He says,
it's all
right,
don't be
afraid.
Ooh.
That's
not
possible.
Yeah,
you know.
And this
is the
attitude.
And I
don't know
how to
suggest it
except by
this sort
of drama
of the
two
different
approaches.
So,
this then
is the,
as near as
I can
get to
describing
it,
the inner
meaning
of Tantra,
of an
attitude
which is
common to
both
Hinduism
and
Buddhism.
They say
Tantra
it means
not only
the web,
the warp
and the
woof,
where you
can't have
yes without
no.
You can't
have this
direction
without having
this,
that direction
because this
direction,
to have it
there,
needs this
other one
to hang
on to.
But he
says,
look here,
I've got to
have something
to hang
on to
too,
so we
hang
on to
each
other
and
so there
we
Tantra
means the
comprehension
of the
unity of
opposites,
of the
good and
the bad,
of life
and death,
of love
and hate,
of all
extremes
in the
whole
spectrum
of our
emotions,
our
sensations,
everything.
In a sense
this is not
something for
children,
because you
have to
be reliable
to get
into this
because otherwise
you go berserk,
pay any
respect to
any rules
or anything
if you
didn't have
a mature
attitude
before getting
mixed up
in this
because you
suddenly see
anything
and everything
goes,
there is
no way
of
being wrong
because you
are it
whatever there
is forever
and ever
and that's
so,
you can
die,
fantastic,
forget everything
altogether,
blow right
out,
come back
because the
light is the
other side
of the
darkness,
be all
new again
but it's
all you
just as it
was before
because you
do the
same patterns
same kind
of stars
same kind
of physical
properties
the same
dance
blot it
out
it starts
again
just like
the physical
forces in
things you
see
repeat
their
fundamental
laws and
patterns
it's
exactly the
same
with the
inner world
I'm talking
about
investigating
the outer
world
investigating
the inner
world
it's
all one
and
that's
you
so
Buddhist
enlightenment
is simply
to know
that secret
and that's
what it means
really
finally
to grow
up
you see
again
just as I
said
that
we find
in our
own
preachers
and religious
people
an attitude
of
against
lifeness
and we
get a
funny
feeling
about
that
they're
full of
reprimands
and they're
full of
there's
a trap
you see
and they
have
the
young
people's
fellowship
as I
explained
to suck
you
into
this
trap
it's
exactly
the
same
thing
exists
here
in
particular
I
think
one
of
the
basic
tantric
texts
is
called
Saraha
the treasury
of songs
by
Professor
was
a
tantric
teacher
living
probably
in the
area
of
Bengal
about
AD
he
is making
a critique
of both
the Hindu
and Buddhist
orthodoxy
so he
says
the
Brahmins
who do
not
know
the
truth
recite
the
four
Vedas
in
vain
with
earth
and
they
make
preparations
and
seated
at
home
they
kindle
fire
and
from
the
senseless
offerings
that
they
make
they
burn
their
eyes
with
the
pungent
smoke
in
lordly
garb
with
one
staff
or
three
they
think
themselves
wise
with
their
brahmanical
law
vainly
is the
world
enslaved
by
and
on
their
heads
they
wear
matted
hair
seated
within
the
house
they
kindle
lamps
seated
in
a
corner
they
tinkle
bells
they
adopt
a
posture
and
fix
their
eyes
whispering
in
ears
and
deceiving
folk
teaching
widows
and
bald
headed
nuns
and
such
like
initiating
them
as
they
take
their
fee
the
giant
monks
mock
the
way
with
their
appearance
with
their
long
nails
and
their
filthy
clothes
or
else
naked
and
with
disheveled
hair
enslaving
themselves
with
their
doctrine
of
liberation
if
by
nakedness
one
is
released
then
dogs
and
jackals
must
be
so
if
from
absence
of
hair
there
comes
perfection
then
the
hips
of
maidens
must
be
so
if
from
having
a
tail
there
comes
release
then
for
the
peacock
and
yak
it
must
be
so
if
wisdom
consists
in
eating
just
what
one
finds
then
for
elephant
and
horse
it
must
be
so
for
these
giant
monks
there
is
no
release
Saraha
says
deprived
of
that's
not
the
same
as
old
school
Thai
it
means
the
old
school
of
Theravada
Buddhism
with
the
teaching
of
the
old
school
who
renounced
the
world
to
be
monks
some
are
seen
sitting
and
reading
the
scriptures
some
wither
away
in
their
concentration
on
thought
others
have
recourse
to
the
Mahayana
this
is
the
doctrine
which
expounds
the
original
text
they
say
others
just
meditate
on
mandala
circles
others
strive
to
define
the
fourth
stage
of
bliss
with
such
investigating
they
fall
from
the
way
some
would
envisage
it
as
space
others
endow
it
with
the
nature
of
voidness
and
thus
they
are
generally
in
disagreement
whoever
deprived
of
the
innate
that's
what
you
really
are
seeks
nirvana
can
in no
wise
acquire
the
absolute
truth
whoever
is
intent
on
anything
else
how
may
he
release
will
one
gain
release
abiding
in
meditation
what's
the
use
of
lamps
what's
the
use
of
offerings
what's
to be
done
by
reliance
on
mantras
what's
the
use
of
austerities
what's
the
use
of
going
on
pilgrimage
is
release
achieved
by

alan watts uses a childhood egg and spoon race, indras net, and the image of a juggling shiva to explore the terror and the glory of discovering that each of us is, in a hidden way

two incomplete surviving fragments from alan watts's world as play seminar, one on i ching hexagram divination and one on ingroup and outgroup game theory.


